This document discusses manufacturing and service technologies. It begins by describing different types of manufacturing organizations based on Woodward's classification of production. It then discusses computer-integrated manufacturing (CIM) and how it relates to traditional manufacturing technologies. Several tables compare the characteristics of mass production and CIM organizations. The document also differentiates between manufacturing and service technologies. Finally, it discusses the relationship between departmental technologies, organizational structure, and management characteristics.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
369 views18 pages
Manufacturing and Service Technologies
This document discusses manufacturing and service technologies. It begins by describing different types of manufacturing organizations based on Woodward's classification of production. It then discusses computer-integrated manufacturing (CIM) and how it relates to traditional manufacturing technologies. Several tables compare the characteristics of mass production and CIM organizations. The document also differentiates between manufacturing and service technologies. Finally, it discusses the relationship between departmental technologies, organizational structure, and management characteristics.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 18
Chapter Six
Manufacturing and Service
Technologies 1 6 - Transformation Process for a Manufacturing Company 6-2 ENVIRONMENT Organization Raw Material Inputs Product or Service Outputs Transformation Process Departments Materials Handling Milling Inspection Assembly Woodwards Classification Based on System of Production Group I Small-batch and unit production
Group II Large-batch and mass production
Group III Continuous process production 6-3 Computer-Integrated Manufacturing Computer-aided design (CAD)
Computer-aided manufacturing (CAM)
Integrated Information Network 6-4 Relationship of Computer-Integrated Manufacturing Technology to Traditional Technologies 6-5 NEW CHOICES Mass Production
Small batch
Flexible Manufacturing
Mass Customization
Continuous Process
BATCH SIZE Small Unlimited Customized Standardized P R O D U C T
F L E X I B I L I T Y
Comparison of Organizational Characteristics Associated with Mass Production and Computer Integrated Manufacturing Characteristic Mass Production CIM Structure: Span of Control Wide Narrow Hierarchical levels Many Few Tasks Routine, repetitive Adaptive, craft-like Specialization High Low Decision making Centralized Decentralized Overall Bureaucratic, mechanistic Self-regulating, organic 6-6 Comparison of Organizational Characteristics Associated with Mass Production and Computer Integrated Manufacturing Characteristic Mass Production CIM Human Resources: Interactions Stand alone Teamwork Training Narrow, one time Broad, frequent Expertise Manual, technical Cognitive, social Solve problems 6-7 Comparison of Organizational Characteristics Associated with Mass Production and Computer Integrated Manufacturing Characteristic Mass Production CIM Interorganizational: Customer Demand Stable Changing Suppliers Many, arms length Changing Few, close relations 6-8 Differences Between Manufacturing and Service Technologies 6-9 Manufacturing Technology 1. Tangible product 2. Products can be inventoried for later consumption 3. Capital asset intensive 4. Little direct customer interaction 5. Human element may be less important 6. Quality is directly measured 7. Longer response time is acceptable 8. Site of facility is moderately important
Service Technology 1. Intangible product 2. Production and consumption take place simultaneously 3. Labor and knowledge intensive 4. Customer interaction generally high 5. Human element very important 6. Quality is perceived and difficult to measure 7. Rapid response time is usually necessary 8. Site of facility is extremely important
Service: Airlines, Hotels,Consultants, Healthcare, Law firms Product and Service: Fast-food outlets, Cosmetics, Real estate, Stockbrokers, Retail stores Product: Soft drink companies, Steel companies, Auto manufacturers, Food processing plants Configuration and Characteristics of Service Organizations vs. Product Organizations Service Product Structure: Separate boundary roles Few Many Geographical dispersion Much Little Decision making Decentralized Centralized Formalization Lower Higher Human Resources: Employee skill level Higher Lower Skill emphasis Interpersonal Technical 6-10 Departmental Technologies CRAFT Low analyzability Low variety Examples: Performing arts Trades Fine goods manufacturing ROUTINE High analyzability Low variety Examples: Sales Clerical Drafting Auditing 6-11 Departmental Technologies ENGINEERING High analyzability High variety Examples: Legal Engineering Tax accounting General accounting NONROUTINE Low analyzability High variety Examples: Strategic planning Social science research Applied research 6-12 Relationship of Department Technology to Structural and Management Characteristics 6-13 Mechanistic Structure 1. High formalization 2. High centralization 3. Little training or experience 4. Wide span 5. Vertical, written communications
ROUTINE Mostly Mechanistic Structure 1. Moderate formalization 2. Moderate centralization 3. Formal training 4. Moderate span 5. Written and verbal communications
CRAFT Organic Structure 1. Low formalization 2. Low centralization 3. Training plus experience 4. Moderate to narrow span 5. Horizontal communications meetings
NONROUTINE Thompsons Classification of Interdependence and Management Implications 6-14
Form of Interdependence Demands on Horizontal Communications, Decision Making
Type of Coordination Required Priority for Locating Units Close Together Pooled (bank) Low communication Standardization, rules, procedures
Divisional Structure
Low Sequential (assembly line)
Medium communication Plans, schedules, feedback
Task Forces
Medium Reciprocal (hospital) High communication Mutual adjustment, cross-departmental meetings, teamwork
Horizontal Structure
High Client Client Client Primary Means to Achieve Coordination for Different Levels of Task Interdependence in a Manufacturing Firm 6-15 Reciprocal (new product development) Sequential (product manufacture) Pooled (product delivery) COORDINATION INTERDEPENDENCE High Low Horizontal structure, cross-functional teams
Rules Mutual Adjustment Planning Standardization Relationships Among Interdependence and Other Characteristics of Team Play Baseball Football Basketball Interdependence: Pooled Sequential Reciprocal Physical dispersion of players: High Medium Low
Coordination: Rules that govern the sport Game plan and position roles Mutual adjustment and shared responsibility
Key management job: Select players and develop their skills Prepare and execute game Influence flow of game 6-16 Source: Based on William Passmore, Carol E. Francis, and Jeffrey Halderman, Sociotechnical Systems: A North American Reflection On the Empirical Studies of the 70s, Human Relations 35 (1982): 1179-1204. Sociotechnical Systems Model 6-17 Design for Joint Optimization Work roles, tasks, workflow Goals and values Skills and abilities The Social System Individual and team behaviors
Organizational/team culture
Management practices
Leadership style
Degree of communication and openness
Individual needs and desires
The Technical System Type of production technology (small batch, mass production, CIM, etc.)
Level of interdependence (pooled, sequential, reciprocal)
Physical work setting
Complexity of production process (variety and analyzability)
Nature of raw materials
Time pressure
Technology Comparison 6-18 Workbook Activity
McDonalds
Burger King Family Restaurant Organization Goals Authority Structure Woodwards Technology Type Mechanistic vs. Organic Teamwork vs. Individual Interdependence Routine vs. Nonroutine tasks Task Specialization Task Standardization Technical vs. Social Expertise Centralized vs. Decentralized