ARISTEO
ARISTEO
Aristeo C. Salapa
Professor/Facilitator
Master of Public Administration
University of Southeastern Philippines
College of Governance, Business and Economics
Department of Governance Studies
Obrero, Davao City
[email protected]
PHILIPPINES
Abstract:
Development planning via blended learning is a must for graduate students. A
combination of all the approaches of learning exemplifies the readiness of graduate students
to elevate knowledge to a higher ground. These are in a form and use of advanced
technology, traditional classroom lecture, and others.
Expanding therein students abilities not just within the four corners of the room where
simulation is best tested but by actual and practice on the ground prepares them for the real
work ahead.
The syllabus plays a vital role. A real planned course measures the output at the end
of the semester. This is clearly manifested in realization of the Universitys four-fold thrust of
instruction, research, extension and production. Threshing all these together, the learner and
the community reap such endeavor.
Graduate students best equipped both in theory and in practice via blended learning
are demonstrations of the Universitys edge for competitive advantage.
class graduates and relevant research and quality extension through quality education and
sustainable resource management.
The Issue and the Process
The four-fold thrust of the University namely: instruction, research, extension and
production are embedded in every curricular program of the University. The syllabus
prepared by professors should manifest all of these.
As a graduate program, with a five month scope of coverage, the challenge of
incorporating theory, practice and the thrust of the University became an arduous task not
withstanding other important concerns like security, financial resources and leg working.
For the first semester, classes at the University start during the month of June.
It is expected that professors must distribute syllabus at the beginning of class so as to fair
play the playing field; digest expectations both from teachers and students and anticipate
activities for the entire duration of the course. A careful envisioned planning from the
professor in charge is expected so that by the end of the semester, products and results are
delivered. Best techniques must be used in the delivery of such course.
Two of the courses offered in the Master of Public Administration program are
Management Planning and Control as well as Strategic Planning for Public Action. These
courses have a description of processes and techniques in administrative planning,
organizational analysis and control with simulation and actual planning.
Teaching planning, per se, whether strategic or development and the process involved
in it, is one major subject in the MPA program that calls for a blended technique so that
theory and application is achieved at a maximum level.
The use of blended teaching approach is appropriate for this course. Bersin (2004)
opined that blended learning is a combination of different training mediato create an
optimum training program for a specific audience traditional instructor led-training is
being supplemented with other electronic formats. The rationale for blended learning is that
it addresses the different learning styles and the multiple method of information delivery
reinforces the lesson. A major component of the blended learning design is the provision of
experiential learning - considered to be the most effective method of delivering instruction.
Further, the goal of a blended learning course is mastery of the subject which is
demonstrated by having the student successfully teach the material to another person. Thus, a
student of public administration employing the Cs compare, consequence and connect after
comprehending. Such desired output is best outlined by stil using the multi-disciplinary
approach of practical skills and theory.
It is through this avenue that this study demonstrates. The knowledge acquired via the
four corners of the university is applied for effective results.
Below is the process flow and conceptual framework of this study:
Blended Learning
Approach
Barangay
Profile
Secondary
Data
Analysis
Phase 2- Seminar
Workshop
o
o
o
o
SWOT
Problem Tree
Objective Tree
Vision, Mission,
Goals
Formulation
Activities
Barangay
Development
Plan of New
Bantayan
(2010-2012)
of
the Facilitators and
T
O
Phase 3- Writeshop
Results
Phase 1- Learning, Equipping and Leg Working
The months of June and July were allotted for Phase 1 of this endeavor.
Classes were held every Saturday of 3 hours.
officially enrolled students, classroom outlines were delivered via powerpoint presentations,
open forum and home assignments using all modes of communications such as emails, net
messenger plus tasking were employed. A Gantt chart was maintained to keep things on track
as well monitor progress. Updates were regularly done via texting; Saturday class served as
group meetings prior to the discussion of major topics in the class.
The major topics discussed during
Background review of RA7160- The Local Government Code of 1991 with some updates;
elements and process of planning- internal and external analysis, environmental scanning;
methods of doing such like survey, secondary data analysis; interview, SWOT and other
valuable tools necessary for planning. It was then followed with lecture simulation on SWOT
to problem tree to objective tree activity. A lecture with workshop was also initiated on how
to make a VISION, MISSION and outlining the GOALS. Anticipated activities were seen as
well. Clue guides were also given. Moreover, a secondary data analysis was also done on the
barangay. An ocular visit and initial field interview to the residents for a quick snap shot was
initiated. This was followed by the conduct of Stakeholder analysis.
On week days, students, amid their tight working schedules, took time to
appear in the chosen Barangay to present the proposal for Barangay Development Planning to
the Barangay Council. A resolution was obtained for their nod and acceptance. Other team
members took time to prepare for their budget and needed contribution for Phase 2. Indeed,
well prepared and carefully assigned tasks were distributed to all.
Also included in this two month preparation before embarking on Phase 2
were a series of capability building sessions like, how to give effective lecture, how to
maintain rapport with the participants, how to process activities, how to maintain decorum
and order, how to deal with elders, learn action songs and most importantly talking on the
vernacular in daily conversations.
A partnership with shared responsibility and certain amount of contributions
from both the students and the partner barangay was finalized.
Phase 2- The MPA students (Facilitators) in Practice and the Participants
The Location
The chosen barangay was Barangay New Bantayan at the Municipality of
Asuncion in the Province of Davao del Norte. The Municipality has 20 barangays. Of these,
only 1 barangay has an existing Barangay Development Plan. The entry to the Barangay by
the students of USeP as said by the Mayor is a welcome change to the people of New
Bantayan. Furthermore, the task, he added, is so noble.
The barangay has around 2800 residents. Main source of income is banana
farming. Its Internal revenue allotment (IRA), share from the LGU, is less than 1 million
pesos. Many of its barangay officials are newly elected. The barangay has a potential for
agricultural development as well as eco-tourism. In one of the meetings of the barangay
officials with the MPA students, they admitted that their annula plans and activities were
mostly copy and paste of the previous year. They need fresh ideas and guidance to view in
greater perspective what service in the barangay is all about and be informed of the varied
linkages that they can connect to.
The Seminar-Writeshop
On August 5, 6, 7 and 8, 2009, MPA students set forth at Barangay New
Bantayan. Thirty two (32) participants as identified in the Stakeholder analysis came with
vigor and enthusiasm. The program was followed religiously as scheduled.MPA students
assigned to topics came ready and prepared. It was grace under pressure. The seminarworkshop of 4 days employed a variety of approaches as mode of delivery. In summary, the
activities consisted of the following: Day 1- Registration, Expectations, SWOT; Day 2Problem Tree and Objective Tree, VISION and MISSION making; Day 3- GOALS and
activities; Day 4- Activity Planning for the next 3 years following this format- barangay
development thrust, objectives, programs/activities, strategies, indicators, expected output,
time frame, budget, source of fund, person/agency responsible; Day 4- Writeshop for the
Goals and Closing Ceremony. Hence, to wit:
Barangay Principles and Values: Kami matinud-anon, makanunayon, magkahiusa nga
magpadayon nga makab-ot ug matuman ang kalambuan sa among barangay; Kami nga mga
taga New-BantayaMagkahiusa, magsinabtanay, matinud-anon, madasigon, malungtaron ug
ligdung nga katawhan sa barangay;
Barangay Vision: Kami maningkamot nga adunay malungtaron, makanunayon ug
progresibong ekonomiya, maampingon sa kinaiyahan, ug magpuyo nga haruhay malinawon;
Barangay Mission: Ang Barangay New Bantayan magpadayong prodyuser ug
eksporter sa saging, pagsuporta sa maayong edukasyon, himsog nga panglawas, alternatibong
panginabuhian, dugang nga infrastraktura, pag-ikag sa eco-tourism, hinlo ug lunhaw nga
kinaiyahan, pagpanday ug mga balaod alang sa umaabot nga progresibong henerasyon nga
katawhan sa barangay;
Barangay Goals: 1. Magkahiusa ug disiplinado nga katawhan sa
Barangay;2.Makahatag og maayong panginabuhian sa mga lumulupyo sa Barangay;
3.Mapakunhod ang problema sa panglawas;4. Makahimo ug mga proyekto nga makatabang
sa lumulupyo sa Barangay; 5.Mapataas ang literacy rate; 6.Pinakamalinawon nga Barangay
sa Asuncion; 7.Pag-awhag sa mga lumulupyo sa pagpakabana sa kalihukan sa Barangay; 8.
Thereby, such framework works best for higher educational learning .To wit;
Theoretical Foundations
Planning Model
RA 7160
Practical Applications
o MPA
Students
Barangay
Blended Learning
Approach
References
Acosta, Rolando M, et al. 1991. Local Government Capability-Building Handbook. Konrad
Adenauer Foundation
A Manual on the Estate/Barangay-Level Productivity Systems Assessment and Planning
( PSAP) Methodology.Philippine Partnership for the Development of Human Resources in
Rural Areas
Annual Report 2004. University of Southeastern Philippines
Barangay Development Planning. 1997. Barangay Administration Training Program.
Module 2. Local Government Academy. Department of Interior and Local Governemnt.
Barangay Land Use Planning. LGU Facilitators Manual. Resource Management Component.
Upland Development Programme in Southern Mindanao
Barangay Profile. New Bantayan. Municipality of Asuncion. Province of Davao del Norte
Bersin, J. 2004. The Blended Learning Book: Best Practices, Proven Methodologies and
Lessons Learned. San Francisco: Pfeiffer
Civicus International. Strategic Planning.
Comprehensive Barangay Development Planning Manual. 2008. Mindanao Rural
Development Program
Five Year Participatory Land Use-Based Barangay Development Plan. 2006-2010. Barangay
Binancian. Municipality of Asuncion. Province of Davao del Norte
Husay Balangay. 2002. Local Government Academy. ISSN 1655-7328
Manual of Operations. The Philippine Minimum Basic Needs (MBN) Approach To Improved
Quality of Life
Prantilla Edmundo B.1998. University Manual I. University of Southeastern Philippines
Preston P. LE Breton and Dale A. Henning Planning Theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc. New Jersey
RA 7160. Local Government Code of 1991
Strategic Plan 2007-2021. University of Southeastern Philippines
School of Government and Management. Graduate School Code. University of Southeastern
Philippines
William R. King and David I. Strategic Planning and Policy. Cleveland; USA