0% found this document useful (0 votes)
104 views5 pages

Demise of The Digital

The document discusses changes to fire alarm system communications due to changes in the communications infrastructure. Specifically, it summarizes the demise of the Digital Alarm Communicator Transmitter (DACT) due to the replacement of copper telephone lines with fiber optic lines. It provides background on how DACTs used to connect to phone lines but that infrastructure is disappearing. The requirements and listed options for fire alarm communications in NFPA 72 have also been updated over time.

Uploaded by

Saber Hussaini
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
104 views5 pages

Demise of The Digital

The document discusses changes to fire alarm system communications due to changes in the communications infrastructure. Specifically, it summarizes the demise of the Digital Alarm Communicator Transmitter (DACT) due to the replacement of copper telephone lines with fiber optic lines. It provides background on how DACTs used to connect to phone lines but that infrastructure is disappearing. The requirements and listed options for fire alarm communications in NFPA 72 have also been updated over time.

Uploaded by

Saber Hussaini
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

DemiseoftheDigitalAlarmCommunicatorTransmitter(DACT)

Howchangestothecommunicationsinfrastructureareimpactingfirealarmsystems.
ArtBlack|FireProtectionEngineering

Jul1,2011

TheAmericancommunicationsinfrastructureischangingquickly.TherequirementsofNFPA
721forfirealarmsystemcommunicationsbetweenaprotectedpremisesfirealarmsystemandthe
supervisingstationhavekeptupwithtechnologyinsomewaysandhavebeenleftbehindinother
ways.Thisarticleexplainstodaysoptionsforfirealarmsystemcommunications.
ThePast
Priorto1993,firealarmcommunicationsrequirementswerefoundinNFPA71,Standardfor
CentralStationService.WiththecombinationofallNFPAsignalingstandardsintoonedocument,
theserequirementswererelocatedtoChapter4ofNFPA72.2TheorganizationoftheNationalFire
AlarmCodehaschangedsincethen,buttherequirementsstillcanbefoundintheSupervising
StationsChapter(currentlyChapter26).
Inthepast,whenadeveloperofacommunicationstechnologywantedtobringaproductto
market,thefollowingprocedurewasrequired:
a. Thenewtechnologywouldbebroughttothetechnicalcommittee,whereitwasevaluatedduringthe
currentcodedevelopmentcycle.
b. Ifthetechnicalcommitteefoundthetechnologyviable,thetechnologywasaddedtothestandard.
c. OncetheNFPAstandardwaspublished,themanufacturercouldgettheproductlistedandtakeitto
market.

Inthe1980s,whentechnologymovedatamoreleisurelypace,thisprocessworkedwell.Entering
the1990sandthe21stcentury,thetechnicalcommitteerealizedthatthistimehonoredprocesswas
tooslow.
Developmentof"OtherTechnologies"
In1999,anewsectionwasaddedtotheNationalFireAlarmCodetitledOtherTransmission
Technologies.3Thissectionwasdevelopedbythesupervisingstationstechnicalcommitteeafter
muchdiscussionandcommitteeworkandadecisionbythecommitteenottoaddanymorespecific
technologies.OtherTransmissionTechnologiesdetailsanumberofperformancebaseddesign
featuresthatanynewtransmissiontechnologymustmeettobelisted.Ifadeveloperfollowsthis
section,thentheproductcanbetakendirectlytothetestinglaboratoryandgettothemarketina
timelymanner.
TheWorldofTransmissionTechnologiesPriorto2010
WiththeadditionofOtherTransmissionTechnologiesin1999,the
lineupofpossibletechnologiesintheNationalFireAlarm
Codeincludedthefollowing:
a. Activemultiplex
b. Digitalalarmcommunicationssystems(DACS)
c. McCullohsystems

d. Twowayradiofrequencymultiplexsystems
e. Onewayprivateradioalarmsystems
f. Directlyconnectednoncodedsystems
g. Privatemicrowaveradiosystems
h. Othertransmissiontechnologies

Thislineupprovidedspecifictechnicalrequirementsforeachofthetechnologieslisted,virtually
unchangedsincetheywereinitiallyincludedinthestandard.
NFPA722010HousecleaningEfforts
In2010,theTechnicalCommitteereexaminedeachofthetransmissiontechnologiesinthe
standard,usingtheOtherTransmissionTechnologiessectionasalitmustesttodeterminewhether
thelegacymethodscouldbeeliminated.Afterthisexamination,thefollowinglegacymethodswere
eliminatedfromthe2010editionofthestandard:
ActiveMultiplex
Activemultiplexsystems(alsoknownasderivedlocalchannel
systems)weredevelopedbyWisconsinBellin1983withthe
collaborationofseverallocalfirealarmmonitoringcompaniesin
Wisconsin.Thesystemusedasingletelephoneline,withaunitthatsplitthebandwidthbetween
voiceandfirealarmdata.SimilartotodaysDSLunits,thiswasaleapforwardfortheera.Witha
singletelephoneline,onecouldhaveanalwaysonconnectiontothefirealarmcontrolpaneland
stillusethetelephonelinefornormalvoicecommunications.Eventually,thespecializedequipment
requiredforthissystembecameunavailable,andthismethodfellintodisuse.Sinceallrequirements
ofOtherTransmissiontechnologiesweremetwiththismethod,eliminationofthismethodwould
notdisallowanyderivedlocalchannelsystemsstillinuse.
McCulloh
McCullohsystemsareanevenoldertechnology,datingbacktothe
late19thcentury.Thesewerewindupwheelswithcamsthatwould
transmitasignal(originallyviatelegraph)toafirealarmdispatch
center.Aftertransmission,theMcCullohwheelwouldneedtobe
manuallyrewound,whichwasthebeginningofarequirementforarunnerserviceforcentral
stationservice.(Todaysrequirementforarunnertobedispatchedwhenequipmentneedstobe
resetbytheprimecontractor1continuesthishistoricalneed.)Sincedirectcopperconnectionswere
required,andthesignalsdidnottravelfar,subsidiarystationswererequired,andasmonitoring
becameregionalized,thisformoftransmissionlostfavor.Also,sinceMcCullohmeetstheminimum
requirementsoftheOtherTransmissionTechnologiessection,McCullohwaseliminatedinthe2010
editionoftheNationalFireAlarmandSignalingCode.
DirectlyConnectedNonCodedSystems
Directlyconnectednoncodedsystemsweredevelopedforusewithremotestationfirealarm
systems.Theremotestationstandard(NFPA72C)wasfirstissuedin1960,whenthefireservice
beganmonitoringfirealarmsystemsdirectlyatthefirestationoremergencydispatchcenter.
Directlyconnectednoncodedsystemsusedsubvoicegradecoppertelephonelines,and
incorporatedapolarityreversaltechniquetosignalthefiredispatchcenter.Unfortunately,this

systemonlytransmittedafirealarmsignal,notsupervisoryortroublesignalsoriginatingatthefire
alarmcontrolpanel.Also,sinceitwasageneralfirealarmsignal,annunciatorpanelswererequired
tobeinstalledateachprotectedpremisestoindicatespecificzoneofinitiation.Today,aslocal
telephonecompaniesareremovingcopperlines,andarenotmakingtheseries1000subvoicelines
available,thistechnologyisoutofdateandwasremovedfromthe2010editionofthecode.In
addition,anyexistingdirectlyconnectednoncodedsystemsstillmeettherequirementsofOther
TransmissionTechnologies.
PrivateMicrowaveRadioSystems
Privatemicrowaveradiosystemswereprovidedbyahandfulof
manufacturersintheearly1980s.Sincenoprivatemicrowaveradio
systemssurvive,andthetestinglabsreportedthatnoprivate
microwaveradiosystemsarecurrentlylisted,thistechnologywas
removedfromthe2010editionoftheNationalFireAlarmand
SignalingCode.
NFPA722010OrganizationWiththeeliminationofthefourlegacymethods,theorganization
ofthetransmissiontechnologiessectionofNFPA72waschangedtorequirecompliancewithOther
TransmissionTechnologies(changedin2010toGeneral),withexceptionsforDACSandradio,
whichwerefoundtobenotincompliancewiththeperformancerequirementsofOther
TransmissionTechnologies.
IfDACSisselectedasatransmissiontechnology,theDACSsectionshouldbefollowed.Ifanylisted
radiotechnologyisused,theradiosections(onewayandtwoway)shouldbeconsultedforthe
requirements.
DACS
Digitalalarmcommunicationssystemswerefirstintroducedtothetechnicalcommitteeinthemid
1980s,andwererejectedbythecommitteetwicebecauseithadbeendeterminedthatusingregular
telephonelineswasnotreliableenough.Thiswasthefirsttimethatanyproposedcommunications
methodwasnotcontrolledendtoendbythetechnicalcommittee.Instead,itwasproposedtobe
underNFPAjurisdictiononlytothepointofdemarcationattheprotectedpremises,andonce
throughthephonecompany,backunderNFPAjurisdictionfromthepointofdemarcationatthe
supervisingstation.Thiswasrelativelyradicalthinking,andittookaleapoffaithinthetelephone
systemforDACStobeapproved,finally,onthethirdattempt.However,thetechnicalcommittee
membersaskedfor,andreceived,somemodifications,specificallyregardingredundancy.DACSis
theonlycommunicationsmethodeverallowedforfirealarmthatrequiresredundantlines
throughouttheprocess.
HowDACSWork
Adigitalalarmcommunicatortransmitter(DACT)isrequiredtobe
connectedtothepublicswitchedtelephonenetwork(PSTN)aheadof
anycustomerownedequipment.Theconnectionneedstobeonloop
startPOTStelephonelines.(POTSisatelephonecompanyacronym
meaningplainoldtelephoneservicei.e.,standardtelephone
numbers.)DACTsarerequiredtoseizethetelephonelineand

disconnectanyotheruseofthelineusingaRJ31Xjackprovidedbythetelephonecompany.
DACTscannotbeconnectedtopartylinesorpayphonelines.DACTsneedtogetadialtone,dial
thedigitalalarmcommunicatorreceiver(DACR)atthesupervisingstation,getverificationthatthe
DACRisreadytoreceive,transmitthesignal,andreceiveacknowledgementthattheDACRhas
receivedandunderstoodthesignal.
Originally,therequirementforaDACSwasthattwotelephonelinesneededtobeused.However,by
1996,thetechnicalcommitteehadchangedthatrequirementsothatonlytheprimarymeansof
communicationneededtobeaPOTSloopstarttelephoneline.Thesecondarymeansof
communicationcouldbeanotherphoneline,acellularphone,aonewayradiosystem,aderived
localchannel,aonewayprivateradiosystem,aprivatemicrowaveradiosystem,oratwowayRF
multiplexradiosystem.4
ThetraditionalwayofconnectingaDACTtothefirealarmcontrolpanelusestwoendtoend
copperPOTSloopstarttelephonelines,connectedtothefirealarmsystemviaanRJ31Xjack,as
showninFigure1.
WithtelephonecompaniesintheUnitedStatesrapidlyreplacingcoppertelephonelineswithfiber
opticlines,theinfrastructurethatexistedwhenDACSwereoriginallyapprovedhaschanged.Useof
telephonecompanyfiberopticlinesshouldcausenotechnicalproblemswithsignaltransmission,
butthereisonedrawbacksecondarypower.Wherestandardcoppertelephonelinesarepoweredby
thetelephonecompanycentraloffice(atleast96hoursofstandbybackedupbystoragebatteries,
generatorsandsufficientdieselfuelsupply),telephonefiberopticlinesarepoweredbyeighthour
standbybatterieslocatedinthefield(onthepolesorinthestreetpedestals),whichisaproblem
becausethetelephonelinesareonlyverifiedbythefirealarmcontrolpanelat24hourintervals.
Figure2,comparedwithFigure1,showsthatexceptforthetransmissionmethodoffpremises,there
isnosignificantdifferencebetweentelephonecompanycopperandtelephonecompanyfiberoptic.
Thethirdoptiontodayistousecablecompanytelephoneservice.Whenthecableindustryfirst
beganprovidingvoicetelephoneservice,therewasatechnicalproblemwiththeCODECusedfor
voicecompressionbythecableindustry.
Sincethen,themajorcableprovidershavemodifiedtheirsoftwaretoemulatethetelephone
company,sofromatechnicaltransmissionviewpoint,thereisnosignificantdifference.Theissues
involvedwithcablecompanytelephoneserviceareessentiallythoseofstandbypower.Likethe
telephonecompanyfiberopticservice,cablecompanystandbypowersuppliesareinthestreet
pedestals,andareonlysizedforeighthoursofservice,sothelineverificationissuesarethesame.
Theaddedproblemwithcablecompanytelephones,however,isthatthereisacableboxlocatedat
theprotectedpremisesthatrequiresbuildingpowertooperate.ThelossofACpoweratthe
protectedpremisesmaydeenergizethecablebox,leavingnotelephoneservice.IfthereisaUPS
connectedtothebox,theUPSisgenerallysizedforlessthaneighthoursofservice,which
exacerbatesthelineverificationissue.Inaddition,thereisasinglepointoffailurebetweenthecable
boxandthepointofdemarcationtothecablecompany,which,ifcompromised,takesoutboth
telephonelinesprovidedbythecablecompany.

Figure3showsthetypicalinstallationofacabletelephoneconnectiontothefirealarmcontrol
panel.Therearetwoissuesnotpresentwiththetraditionaltelephonecompanyinstallations.First,
thereisapowerrequirementforthecablebox.Additionally,thereisasinglepointoffailure
betweenthecableboxandthedemarcationtothecablecompany.
Radio
Therearecurrentlyseveralcommunicationtechnologieslistedtoeithertheonewayortwoway
radiolegacymethodsinNFPA72.1Themostpromisingoftheseradiomethodsusesoneoftwo
technologies,whichhavebeenshowntobereliableand,sincetheyprovideheartbeatsonaregular
basis,willindicatelossofchannelimmediately.ThetwotechnologiesaremeshradioandGSM
cellularradio.
TheFutureofFireAlarmCommunications
Therewerenochangesintechnologyincorporatedintothe2010editionofNFPA72.Thechanges
inthiseditionwerehousekeepinginnature,removingobsoletetechnologiesandreorganizationof
theremainingtechnologies.
OnDec.21,2009,AT&TpetitionedtheFederalCommunicationsCommissiontoeliminatethe
landlinetelephonesystem.Intheirpetition,AT&Tstatedthatwitheachpassingday,moreand
morecommunicationsservicesmigratetobroadbandandIPbasedservices,leavingthepublic
switchedtelephonenetwork(PSTN)andplainoldtelephoneservice(POTS)asrelicsofabygone
era.Obviously,thisdoesnotaugerwellforthefutureoflandlinebasedtelephoneservices,and
whenthishappens,itwillspelltheofficialendofthedigitalalarmcommunicatoraswell.
InJanuary2011,theNFPATechnicalCommitteeforSupervisingStationsFireAlarmSystems
approvedtwoproposalsthat,iftheyareacceptedthroughtheNFPAprocess,willalsohavean
impactonthefutureoftheDACT.First,therewasaproposaltodroptherequirementforasecond
telephoneline,makingthealternatecommunicationsmethodanothertechnology.Thiswill
essentiallykilltheDACT,sinceallothercommunicationsmethodsinthestandardarestandalone
methods.Second,anotherproposalwillchangethetimertestforDACTsfrom24hourstosixhours,
tocompensateforthechangetoaneighthourstandbypowersupply.
ArtBlackiswithCarmelFireProtectionAssociates.
References:
1. NFPA72,NationalFireAlarmandSignalingCode,NationalFireProtectionAssociation,Quincy,
MA,2010.
2. NFPA72,NationalFireAlarmCode,NationalFireProtectionAssociation,Quincy,MA,1993.
3. NFPA72,NationalFireAlarmCode,NationalFireProtectionAssociation,Quincy,MA,1999.
4. NFPA72,NationalFireAlarmCode,NationalFireProtectionAssociation,Quincy,MA,1996.

You might also like