11 questions to help you make sense of a trial
How to use this appraisal tool
Three broad issues need to be considered when appraising the report of a randomised controlled trial:
Are the results of the trial valid?
What are the results?
Will the results help locally?
(Section A)
(Section B)
(Section C)
The 11 questions on the following pages are designed to help you think about these issues
systematically.
The first two questions are screening questions and can be answered quickly. If the answer to both is
yes, it is worth proceeding with the remaining questions.
There is some degree of overlap between the questions, you are asked to record a yes, no or cant
tell to most of the questions. A number of italicised prompts are given after each question. These are
designed to remind you why the question is important. Record your reasons for your answers in the
spaces provided.
There will not be time in the small groups to answer them all in detail!
CASP This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. To
view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/. www.casp-uk.net
Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Randomised Controlled Trials Checklist 31.05.13
(A) Are the results of the review valid?
Screening Questions
1. Did the trial address a clearly focused issue?
Yes Cant tell No
HINT: An issue can be focused In terms of
The population studied
The intervention given
The comparator given
The outcomes considered
2. Was the assignment of patients to treatments
Yes Cant tell No
randomised?
HINT: Consider
How was this carried out?
Was the allocation sequence concealed from
researchers and patients?
3. Were all of the patients who entered
Yes Cant tell No
the trial properly accounted for at its
conclusion?
HINT: Consider
Was the trial stopped early?
Were patients analysed in the groups to which
they were randomised?
Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Randomised Controlled Trials Checklist 31.05.13
Is it worth continuing?
Detailed questions
4. Were patients, health workers and study
Yes
Cant tell No
personnel blind to treatment?
HINT: Think about
Patients?
Health workers?
Study personnel?
5. Were the groups similar at the start of the trial?
Yes Cant tell No
HINT: Look at
Other factors that might affect the outcome such as age,
sex, social class
Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Randomised Controlled Trials Checklist 31.05.13
6. Aside from the experimental intervention,
Yes Cant tell No
were the groups treated equally?
(B) What are the results?
7. How large was the treatment effect?
HINT: Consider
What outcomes were measured?
Is the primary outcome clearly specified?
What results were found for each outcome?
8. How precise was the estimate of the treatment effect?
HINT: Consider
What are the confidence limits?
Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Randomised Controlled Trials Checklist 31.05.13
(C) Will the results help locally?
9. Can the results be applied in your context?
Yes Cant tell No
(or to the local population?)
HINT: Consider whether
Do you think that the patients covered by the trial
are similar enough to the patients to whom you will
apply this?, if not how to they differ?
10. Were all clinically important outcomes
Yes Cant tell No
considered?
HINT: Consider
Is there other information you would like to have seen?
If not, does this affect the decision?
11. Are the benefits worth the harms and costs?
Yes Cant tell No
HINT: Consider
Even if this is not addressed by the review,
what do you think?
Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Randomised Controlled Trials Checklist 31.05.13
