IN '1;'IiE SdJPRE1VdF C'Q)URT OF OHIO

STATE ex rel. S'I'L'VE CHRISTOPHER

1657 C.R. 175 Case No.
Forest, Ohio 45843,

Rclator,
Original Action in Mandamus
Vs.

HON. JF"NNIFER BRUNNER Expedited Election Case IJnder

OHIO SECRETARY OF S'I'A" S.Ct. I'rac. R. 10.9
180 I'ast Broad Street
Columbus, Ohio 43215,

Respondent.

M(9TI®N FOR F.XPEDITED ISSUANCE OF ALTERNATIVE WRIT

David R. Langdon (0067046) Richard Cordray (0038034)

Counsel nfRecord OHIO A"I'"I'ORNEY GENERAL
Bradicy M. Peppo (0083847) 30 E. Broad Street, 17`h Floor
LANGUUN I,AW LLC Columbus, Oliio 43215
11175 Reading Rd., Ste. 104 (614) 466-4320
Cincinnati, Ohio 45241 (614) 466-5087 fax
(513) 577-7380
(513) 577-7383 fax Counsed for Re.sponctent
dlangdon(^langdonlaw.com Ohio Secretcny qf State Jenni_ fer Briinner
bpeppo,^i^langdonlaw.coni

('oztnset for Relator Sdeve ('hristopher

 INTRODUCTION

On February 18, 2010, Relator Steve Christopher walked into the oftice of the Secretary

of State and submitted over 240 part petitions containing over 2,700 signatures in support of his

candidacy for statewide olficc. He needed only 1,000 valid signatures to be certified to the

primary ballot. For reasons unknown, only 104 of these filed petitions, containing only 804

signatures, were ever sent to the county boards of elections lor verification. And so the Secretary

refused to certify his caitdidacy.

Upon being publicly challenged by the Secretary (in a press release) to provide proof of

the approsimately 140 submitted petitions which had never been sent to the county boards of

elections, Mr. Christopher provided copies of the same, wllieh lie had made immediately prior to

filing the originals witlt the Secretary's office- The Secretary has now received these copies but,

nevertheless, has refused either to serd tlie n to the boards of elections for verification or to

instruct the boards of election to place Mr. Christopher's name upon the ballot. In order to

protect liis rights to appear on tlie ballot (and the rights of the matiy dedicated volunteers who

circulated his candidate petitions), Mr. Christopher now seeks relief from this Court.

ARGUMENT

Rclators have requested a Writ of Mandanws against Ohio Secretary of Statc Jennifer

Brunner ordering her to certify Relator Steve Christopher as a carrdidate for the Republican

nomination i'or election to the office of Ohio Attorney General and to place liis name on the

Republican Primary ballot for the upcoming election on May 4, 2010. As argued in Relators'

Complaint (filed herewith, and incorporated herein by reference), because Mr. Christopher

submitted the requisite number of valid signatures, the Secretary has a clear legal duty to certify

his candidacy.

-I-
 ln the event the Court does not issue a peremptory writ, Relator moves the Court to issue

an alternative w*.-it ol' mandamus staying enforcement of the Secretary of State's decision to not

certify Mr. Christopher's candidacy and, further, directing the Secretary to instruct the county

boards of elections to place Stsve Clu-istophei's namc on the Republican Primary ballot, pending

the (inat outcoine of this case. See generally Stale ex rel. Gaylor, Inc. v. Goodenow, 2010-Ohio-

919 (March 12, 2010) (issuing alternative writ staying enforcement of disqualification decision

pending eatni's final resolution ofi-elator's claiti7 foriiaandaotits).

nn expedited alternative writ is necessary to prevent the potential disruption of the early

voting process. According to the expedited calendar for election cases, this case would not reach

final resolution until after the county boards of elections have already printed ballots for early

voting, which starts on March 30, 2010. At that point, if ttte Court were to decide in favor of Mr.

Christopher, it would force ttte boards to incur considerable expense in printing new ballots and,

ultimately, potentially disrupt the early voting process. It is also possible that such a delay would

prevent Mr. Christopher's unlawful exclusion from the ballot [i•om being retnedied at all.

On the other hand, should this Court determine that the Secretary was correct in not

certiiying Mr. Christopher's candidacy and that tiis name should not have been included on the

bal lot, the Secretary can instruct the boards of elections, as it has on maury occasions previously,

to take the same steps they already take when a candidate withdraws from a race. See, e.g.,

Secretary of State Directive 2006-74 (instructing county boards of elections to remove Issue I

from the ballot, based oo court order af'tirming Secretary's ctecision not to certify the issue, by

posting a noticv at the polling place and cnclosin;.= a notiee with each absentee ballot, consistent

with R.C. '15 13.30(N:)). 1

' R.C. 3513.30(L) governs the process Cor boattis of election when a candidate on a primary ballot
withdraws, requiring thein to "post a notice at each polling place on the day of the primary eleetion" and to "enclose

2
 It is not at all uncommon for the Secretary of State's office to instruct the boards to place

a candidate's natne ot• an issue on the ballot, pending final certification, when ballot placement is

uncertain at the time of ballot eertification. See, e.g., Secretary of State Directive 2006-62

(instt-ucting county boards of elections to include five statewide issues on the ballot, even though

otiIy two of them had been certified to the ballot as of the deadline for ballot certification). This

is because it is ntuch casier to remedy an improper inclusion of a candidate's name on a ballot

thanit is to remedy the eYclusion of a candidale wliose name should lawfully have been

included. Morcover, the practice is consistent with Ohio's strong public policy in favor of free

and competitive elections, in which the electorale has the opportunity to niake a choice between

candidates.

For the foregoing reasons, Relator requests the Court to issue an expedited alternative

writ of tnandamus staying the Secrotat-y's decision not to certify Steve Christopher's candidacy

and directing her to instruct the county boards of elections to place his name on the Republican

Primary ballot pending the linal outoome of this case.

(aontinued...)
with each absent voter's ballot given or mailed" a notice that votes for the withdrawn candidate "will be void and
will not bc countcd.".

-3-
 Respectfully submitted,

David K. Lar don ( 67 46) f^o7^^Vf^

('ounsetqfRecord
Bradley M. T eppo (0083847)
LANGDON Lnw LLC
11 175 Reading Rd., Ste. 104
Cincinnati, Oliio 45241
(513) 577-7380
(513) 577-7383 fax
dlangdon(ulangdonlaw.com
[email protected]

Cozrnsel for Relator Steve Chrislopher

4
 PRAECIPE TO CLERK

Please serve the foregoing Motion on the Respondent named herein, as Pollows:

HON. JENNIh'ER I3RUNNER

Ohio Secretary ofi'State
180 East Broad Street
Columbus, Ohio 43215

^
/S' `^^ v
David R. l,angd (006 046)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

"1'he undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing Motion was served by electronic

mail this 12°i day of March, 2010 upon the following:

Brian Shinn
bsh i nnriissi}sstatc.o It.}is
Aaron D. I;pstein
laron }^ s!<:in rr:ohi attornLV, pneral.nc v
i)amian Sikora
Damian.Sik^i ^^riiohioattorneygcn4l_zJ^nov
Richard N. Coglianese
12iuh 3rI.C(h inetie t^ohrmmor_nu ^^eneral gov
Pearl Chin
I1ea11.Chin_ ^ohioai10 rnevEiI.gov

1^a^®^
I-Ir

4
Uavicj R. Langdon ( 006 46) 9WeWe N J^^