Electric Potential Potential Difference and Electric Potential
Electric Potential Potential Difference and Electric Potential
ELECTRIC POTENTIAL
Potential Difference and Electric Potential
Consider a charged particle of charge q in a region of an electric field
E. This filed exerts an electric force on the particle given by F= qE. When
the particle moves from initial point i to final point f this force does work on
it according to
f
W = qE dl
i
or
f
U f U i = q E dl
i
Let us now define the electric potential V as the electric potential energy per
unit charge, i.e.,
V=
U
q
Vf Vi = E dl
i
Vp = E dl
That is, the electric potential at any point p which can be defined as the work
required to bring a positive unit charge from infinity to that point. In this
sense the potential at a point is the potential difference between that point and
a point at infinity.
The electric potential is a scalar quantity.
The SI unit of V is joules per coulomb (J/C), usually represented by a special
unit called volt (V), i.e.,
1 V = 1 J/C
It follows that the electric field has a unit of volt per meter (V/m) with
1 N/C = 1 V/m
Example 25.2
A proton is released from rest in a uniform e.f. that has a
magnitude of 8.0 104 V/m. The proton undergoes a displacement of 0.5 m
in the direction of E.
a) Find VB - VA
b) Find UB - UA
c) Find the speed of the proton at point B.
Solution:
B
V = VB VA = E dl = Edl
V = E dl = Ed
c)
)(
U = qV = 1.6 10 19 4.0 10 4
= 6.4 10 15 J
K + U = 0
( mv 0)+ ( 6.4 10 )= 0
1
2
v=
15
2 6.4 10 15
1.67 10
27
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ A
+
+
+
B -
dl
rA
r
A
rB
Consider an isolated point charge q. To find the electric potential due to this
charge at a point, we have
B
VB VA = E dl
A
q
r2
r ,
VB VA = kqA
r dl
But
r dl = dr
r2
q
q
1 B
VB VA = kq = k k
rB
rA
r rA
The first term of the right hand side represents the potential at point B (VB)
and the second term represents the potential at point A (VA). The electric
potential at a point a distance r from a point charge q is then obtained if r A
, that is,
V=k
q
r
V = k
i
qi
ri
where r i is the distance from the ith charge qi to the point in question.
Do not forget that the sum is algebraic sum and not vector sum like that used
to calculate the electric filed due to a group of point charges. This fact gives
an important advantage of potential over electric field.
Example 25.3
Two
point
charges of q1= 2.0 C, q2= -6.0 C, q2= - 6.0 C
are arranged as shown. Find
a) the electric potential at the point p.
b) the change in potential energy of
3.0 m
the system plus a charge
q3= 3.0 C that moves from to
point P.
q1=2.0 C
Solution:
0.5 m
4.0 m
q q
V = k 1 + 2
r1 r2
2 6
= 9 109 10 6 = 6.29 103 V
4 5
a)
)(
q1q2
r12
For a simple system of only two point charges the potential energy is given
by
q1q2
U =k
r12
Note that if the charges are of the same sign U is positive which means that
the force is repulsive, as expected.
If the charges are of the opposite sign U is negative which means that the
force is attractive, which is the case.
Example Find the potential energy of the system given in the previous
example.
Solution:
q q
qq
q q
U = k 1 2 + 1 3 + 2 3
r13
r23
r12
(2.0)(6.0) 10 12
3.0
12
(2.0)(3.0) 10
= 9 109 +
4.0
12
+ (3.0)(6.0) 10
= 5.48 10 2 J
for
dq,
the
the
Vp = E dl
This method is useful for cases where Gauss law can be applied, i.e., for
charge distribution with high degree of symmetry.
Example 25.7
A wire of length L has a
charge Q uniformly distributed. Find the electric
potential at a point along its axis and a distance
d from one end.
Solution: We divide the wire into small
elements each of length dx and charge dq. Since
each element can be considered as a point
charge, the electric potential dV due to one of
these elements a distance x from p is
dV = k
dq
dq
=k
r
x2 + a 2
r
a
L
dq
x
dx
Since we are dealing with a scalar quantity we can integrate the above
expression directly to get the potential due to the whole wire. The result is
L
dq
V = k
x2 + a 2
= k
dx
x2 + a 2
kQ L +
ln
=
L
L2 + a 2
L2 + a 2
Example 25.5
A ring of
radius R has a uniform charge
distribution of magnitude Q.
Calculate the electric potential
along the axis of the ring at a
point P lying a distance D from
the center of the ring.
dq
r
R
dq
r
=k
2
dq
(R2 + D 2 )
Integrating we get
V=
k
R2 + D 2
dq =
Qk
R2 + D 2
Q
R
Example 25.6
A disk of radius R has a
uniform charge density . Calculate the
electric potential along the axis of the disk at a
point p lying a distance D from the center of
the disk.
r
D
dr
dq
(r 2 + D 2 )
we get
R
E=k
(r
2rdr
2
+ D2
= 2k R 2 + D 2 D
= 2k r 2 + D 2
Example 25.8
An insulating solid sphere of
radius R has a charge Q uniformly distributed
within its volume. Find the electric potential at a
point
a) outside the sphere r > R,
b) inside the sphere r < R.
Q
R
Solution: We define E1 and E2 to be the electric fields in the r > R, and r <
R regions, respectively. Using the result of the previous Example we have
E1 =
E2 =
Q
4 o r 2
r>R
Qr
4 o R3
r<R
V1 = E dr
1
=
kQ
r
2
r
V1 = kQ
=k
dr
Q
r
Note that this result is identical to that of a point charge. This means that the
problem can be treated as the entire charge was concentrated at the center of
the sphere.
b) For inside the sphere r < R, we have
V2 = E dr
But in this case the range from to the point in question enclose two regions
with different electric fields: The outside region (r > R) which extend from
to R, and the inside region (r < R) which extend from R to r. Therefore, we
have to divide the integration into two parts as
R
V2 = E 1 dr E 2 dr
r
Q R dr
Q
rdr
4 o r 2 4 o R3 R
Q
r2
3 2
8 o R
R
Note that the two expressions of V1 and V2 give the same result for r= R (at
the surface) which is
V=
Q
4 o R
Vf Vi = E dl
i
If the initial and the final points lie inside a conductor and using the first
property we conclude that the electric potential is constant inside the
conductor. Furthermore, since E is always normal to dl on the surface, the
electric potential is also constant on the surface of the conductor. Another
important property of a conductor thus follow
The electric potential inside any conductor in equilibrium is
constant and equal to the potential on its surface.
To prove this property explicitly, let us
consider a conducting sphere of radius R and
charge Q. The electric potential at a point
inside the sphere is
r
V = E dr = E out dr E in dr
Q
4 o r 2
V
kQ
R
r , so we get
r
R
V=
Q
4 o R
which is the value of the potential at the surface of the conductor. The figure
shows the variation of V as a function of the radial distance r for a
conducting sphere of radius R.
If two or more conducting objects are connected by a conducting wire, the
conductors are no longer separate but can be considered as a single
conductor. This means that the electric charges will transfer from the
conductor of higher potential to that of lower potential until the equilibrium
condition is achieved. Therefore, if two or more conductors are connected
and equilibrium is achieved, they must be at the same electric potential.
In analogue with the electric filed lines, the electric potential can be
represented by equipotential surfaces.
A surface with all its points are at the same electric potential is called
equipotential surface.
From this definition, it follows that no work is done by the electric field in
moving a charged particle between two points on the same equipotential
surface. This means that the electric filed lines must be perpendicular to the
equipotential surfaces. The surface of any conductor forms an equipotential
surface.
Example 25.9
Two conducting charged spheres with radii R1 and R2 are
separated by a distance much larger than the radius of either sphere. The two
spheres are connected by a conducting wire. The charges on the spheres in
equilibrium are q1 and q2.
a) Find the ratio of the magnitudes of the e. fields at the surfaces of the
spheres, and the ratio of the charge densities on the surfaces of the spheres.
Solution: Since the spheres are connected by a conducting wire, the
potential is the same for both spheres, i.e.,
V1 = V2
q1
q
=K 2
R1
R2
The charges are distributed over the surface of the spheres, so we have
1 =
q1
4R12
and
2 =
q2
4R22
Therefore
1 q1r22
=
2 q 2 r12
It is clear from this result that the charge density is greatest on the small
sphere as expected.
Since the e. field on the surface of a conductor is equal to
E1 1 r2
=
=
E2 2 r1
That is, the field is more intense near the smaller sphere.
we get
o