LEARNING STRATEGIES

A. What is the difference between teaching and learning?

The definition of teaching and learning is overlapping depending upon where one
looks at it from. The process of teaching is viewed mostly from the agent, in this
case: teacher. Whereas learning is mostly viewed from the part of the student who
becomes the object of the process of teaching conducted by the teacher.
When teaching is regarded as the transfer of knowledge from a person
called teacher to the student (s) who receive the knowledge, this is called the
transmission process. Hence, transmission curriculum is founded. It seems to me,
this is an old style of instruction in which the teacher banks or saves knowledge at the
brains of the student (s).
In regards to this Orlich et.al. comments:
The act of teaching is always a dynamic interaction of individuals (teachers and
teachers, teachers and learners, learners and learners, in which decisions constantly
are being made by all concerned. We believe that teaching must be deliberate and
planned. (1985:3).
Obviously, according to this definition, the concept of teaching and learning
may be overlapping. To make sure that we have a good idea about the two terms, let
us look back at the concepts of curriculum for both teaching and learning models are
generated from how curriculum looks like. Few experts have little bit diffent concepts
on the curriculum definitions as we can see as follows!
Franklin Bobbit defines it as a series of experiences which children and
youth must have by way of attaining --- objectives (1981).

Vernon Anderson has a broader view on the curriculum definition, saying:

Curriculum is the whole of interacting forces of the total environment.

Many experts, however, regard curriculum as a field. Curriculum as a field

includes: curriculum theory, development, implementation (that is instruction) and
evaluation.
Johnson, on the other hand, restricts the definition to intended learning
outcomes. And this is actually what is going on with the education system of our
Junior High and Senior High Schools in Indonesia in which the success of the study is
measured from the passing grades in six subjects: math, Indonesian, English, Physics,
biology and chemistry (as the writer watched on newstick of Metro TV).
Beauchamp, however, suggests that a legitimate use of the term curriculum is
to refer to a curriculum system. A curriculum in schools is the system within which
decisions are made about what curriculum will be and how it will be implemented.
And the last but more interesting definition says: curriculum is the relationship
between the knower and the known. (Giroux at.al. 198:13). Since the term curriculum
is the core of education, it can be interpreted as everything or everyactivity that takes
place in the campus or school under the auspices of the school principal or lecturers.

B. The Model of Curriculum

Nana Saodih S. in his paper, Pengembangan Kurikulum Berbasis
Kompetensi di Perguruan Tinggi (2004:2) distinguished the curriculum models into:
1. Subject (academic) curriculum.
This is the model of curriculum which is based on knowledge or science
derived from various fields of science or knowledge.
2. Technological curriculum.
This model is called Competence Based Curriculum (KBK) which
emphasizes the content of curriculum which is a competence or skill on work.
In Indonesian education system it is commonly called Kurikulum Berbasis
Kompetensi (KBK). This KBK curriculum has once immensely affected

teachers and educators to implement it but the result is yet to be proved to the
public and stakeholders.
3. Humanistic Curriculum
This model of curriculum emphasizes the development of the characteristics
of the student (s) as the focus of education treatment. One of the learning
strategies resulted from this model is Student Active Learning which in
Indonesian is called Cara Belajar Siswa Aktif. Different and special
treatments of learning phase must be offered to the gifted students when a
school wants to adopt this model of curriculum.
4. Social Reconstruction Curriculum
This model of curriculum focuses on the social problems to solve through the
cooperative learning strategies. One of the examples is role play strategy in
learning foreign languages. Another is how to handle floods in Jakarta.
Quantum Learning, Iam sure, is still another example of this model.

Meanwhile John P. Miller and Wayne Seller in their book, Curriculum,

perspectives and practice, divide curriculum into three orientations, these are:
a. The Transmission Position to Curriculum
In the transmission position, the function of education is to transmit facts,
skills and values to the students. Specifically, this orientation stresses the mastery of
traditional school subjects through traditional teaching methodologies, particularly
textbook learning (subject orientation); acquisition by students of basic skills and
certain cultural values and mores that are necessary in order to function in a society
(cultural transmission orientation); and the application of a mechanistic view of
human behavior to curriculum planning, whereby student skills are developed
through specific instructional strategies (competency- based learning orientation). In
this position, there is primarily one way movement to convey to students certain
skills, knowledge and values. The philosophical-scientific paradigm for this position

is an atomistic view of nature in which reality is seen interms of separate, isolated

building blocks. Historically, the transmission position is linked with rote learning
methods that have been used in schools since colonial times.

b. The Transaction Position

Here the individual is seen as rational and capable in intelligent problem
solving. Education is viewed as a dialog between the student and the curriculum in
which the student reconstructs knowledge through the dialog process. The central
elements in the transaction position are an emphasis on curriculum strategies that
facilitate problem solving (cognitive process orientation); application of problem
solving skills within social contexts in general and within the context of the
democratic process and development of cognitive skills within the academic
disciplines.
Historically, the transacition position can be traced to the Englightenment and
its impact on such American thinkers as Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson
who argued for a curriculum that would develop the students intellectual abilities.

c. The Transformation Position

This transformation position focuses on personal and social change,
encompassing three specific orientations: teaching students skills that promote
personal and social transformation (humanistic and social change orientations); a
vision of social change as a movement toward harmony with the environment rather
than as an effort to exert control over it, and the attribution of a spiritual dimension
to the environment, in which the ecological system is viewed with respect and
reverence (transpersonal orientation). The paradigm for transformation position is an
ecologically interdependent conception of nature that emphasizes the interrelatedness
of phenomena.

Historically, the transformation position is linked to two different strands of

thought. One is romantic element, which can be traced to Rousseaus thinking and is
also found in the work of Froebel, Tolstoy, A.S. neil and John Holt. According to
Giroux et.al. These educators have argued that the child is essentially good and that
education should allow the inner nature of the child to unfold with minimumly
interference. (1985:8). The second strand is found in the social change orientation,
which argues that education must take a more critical view of the role of schools in
society so that schools do not just mirror dominant economic interests and that
schools must be on the cutting edge of social and political change. Today, the work
of educators such as Michael apple and Friere's work in brazil reflect this orientation.
This position embodies what Huxley (1970) called the perennial philosophy the
idea that all phenomenon are part of an interconnected whole. Socially, this position
is identified with a cultural tendency that advocated decentralized, pluralistic
political networks, small is beautiful economics and holistic medicine.

d. Various Teaching Strategies

Joyce and Weil in their book, Models of Teaching (1996:11) open their
chapter 2 by asking a question. Where Do Models of Teaching Come From? Soon
they also gave the answer by saying, The core of the teaching process is the
arrangement of environments within which the students can interact and study
how to learn. (Dewey in Joyces 1996). This is in line with what Rose and J. Nicholl
say in their book, Accelerated Learning for the 21st Century, We will argue that in a
time of such rapid change, the first priority is to teach our children how to learn and
how to think. Only with these two super skills can you cope with change and
complexity and become economically independent and employable in the 21st
Century. (1997:2).

A model of teaching is a description of a learning environment. The descriptions

have many uses, ranging from:
1. planning curriculum,
2. courses,
3. units and lessons to
4. designing instructional materials books and workbooks, multimedia
programs, and computer assisted learning programs.

Joyce and Weil also described their idea on learning models as follows:
Models of teaching are reality models of learning. As we help students acquire
information, ideas, skills, values, ways of thinking and means of expressing
themselves, we are also teaching them how to learn.
In fact, the most important long-term outcome of instruction may be the
students increased capabilities to learn more easily and effectively in the future, both
because of the knowledge and skill they have acquired and because they have
mastered learning processes. (1996:7).
The fact that teaching and learning are overlapping is actually answered by
Joyce and Weil in commenting on the title of the book they have written.
Every once in a while I think we should have called the book Models of Learning.
Then, I remember that real teaching is teaching kids how to learn. So I guess the title
is all right. Marsha Weil to Bruce Joyce, January 1974. (Joyce 1996:3)
This quotation is sufficiently reasonable to support the writer in discussing
both the teaching and learning strategies overlappingly. Since, teaching and learning
are not separated from the teachers classroom, it is not wrong when the writer starts
from the models of teaching which, in turn, may produce the strategies of teaching
and learning.
Bruce Joyce and Marshal Weil have classified the models of teaching into (4)
four families as follows:

1. The Social Family

The social family capitalizes on our nature as social creatures to further
learning and to expand our ability to relate productively to one another. The models
range from the simple processes of organizing students to work together to elaborate
models that teach democratic social organization and the analysis of major social
problems and critical social values and issues. Three examples of these are: learning
with partners the simplest form of which is cooperative learning. This strategy
organizes students to help one another respond to the cognitive and social tasks of
the information processing models of teaching. Cooperative learning is strongly
believed to positively affect academic learning, social development. Robert E. Slavin
in his book, Cooperative Learning, comments:
Cooperative learning refers to a variety of teaching methods in which students work
in small groups to help one another learn academic content. One of the most
important reasons that cooperative learning methods were developed is that
educators and social scientists have long known about destrimental effects of
competition as it is usually used in the classroom.
(1995:3)
Second is Role playing which is usually designed to help students understand and
develop their social values. Role playing of problematic situations is used to open up
discussions of values and how they operate in our daily lives. The model permits
values to be studied as a core of the growing self-the place where social norms and
personal identity and sense of meaning come together.

2. The Information-Processing Family (Learning to Think by Thinking)

A variety of models can increase students ability to seek and master
information, organize it, build and test hypotheses and apply what they are learning
in their reading and writing and their exploration of themselves and the world about
them. This family includes. Thinking inductively which begins with concept

formation and proceeds to the development of generalization, hypotheses and

inferences about causation.
Another is attaining concepts, that is helpful to the students who learn
categories and study how to learn and apply them. The model also provides teachers
with an alternative to induction, enabling them to control data sets and help students
develop precise knowledge of concepts.
Still another example of this family is memorization. Recent research on
memorization, especially on the use of link words to facilitate associations, has
produced some dramatic effects on the rate at which students can acquire
information and concepts.
The last one is synetics, that is the ability to go beyond the known and
synthesize fresh ideas and solutions is called the ultimate information processing
skill.

3. The Personal Family

These models focus on the development of integrated feeling, thinking selfthe personal identity. They shape the environment around the capacity for selfeducation and need to develop self-awareness and understanding. They comprise:
Nondirective Teaching (The Learner at the Center).
Carl Roger says the teacher operates from a counselling stance, helping the students
understand themselves, clarify their goals and accept responbility for the growth and
the direction of their lives.
Another member of this group is concept of self. The ultimate evidence of
whether education has been effective is in the reciprocal relationships of educated
people with their world-contributing to it and profiting from it. For this purpose a
framework for examinating the growing self and modelling for students a selfactualizing way of life can be designed.

4. The Behavioral Systems Family

Founded by B.F. Skinner a large number of approaches to learning have been
developed, each taking advantage of the human beings ability to modify behavior in
response to tasks and feedback. These models are used in a wide variety of
applications, from teaching information, concepts and skills to increasing comfort
and relaxation, decreasing phobias, changing habits and learning to control ones
behavior. Some examples, pertaining to this group include Mastery Learning and
Programed Instruction. Often these systems organize material to be learned in
relatively small, sequenced, instructional modules presented to the students with
assessments of learning attached to them. These mastery learning and program
instruction systems have wide applicability in academic curriculum areas.
Another example is Direct Instruction which involves a straightforward use
of tasks and feedback to help students mastery academic content.
The next one is learning from simulations. These are commonly developed in
industrial, military, athletic an deducational settings. Computer based simulations
are readily adding to curricular options in elementary and secondary schools.

5. Other Learning Strategies

The first strategy of learning is proposed by Colin Rose and Malcolm J.
Nicholl called, Accelerated Learning for 21st Century (1997). This model was based
on the assumption saying it is no accident that when words are combined with music
or with pictures, or when words are delivered with emotion, they are easier and faster
to learn. Accelerated Learning capitalizes on this fact (1997:35). Further Rose &
Nichol say: In essence, it recognizes that each of us has individual preferred way of
learning that suits us best. When you learn the techniques that exactly match your
personal learning style, you will be learning in the way that is most natural for you.
(1997:19)

The commonest steps made in this strategy are called M.A.S.T.E.R.

(Motivating your mind, Acquiring information, Searching out the meaning,
Triggering out the memory, Exhibiting what you know and Reflect how you have
learnt).
Another learning strategy is called the Mind-Map strategy. Proposed by Tony
Buzan (1993). This strategy is unique in a sense that it is a reaction against standard
note commonly used today. Attacking the weaknesses of the current system in taking
notes, Buzan suggested that we design note taking parallel to the direction into which
the dendrites of humans brain cells spread. Note that each of our brain has 100
billion cells and each of these brain cells has 20.000 dendrites. Considering this fact
Buzan made an assumption that we should not be pessimistic with human learning
capacity.
Now it is the participants to guess to which family these two strategies
belong?

10

R E F E R E N CE
Buzan, Tony (1993). The Mind Map Book. London: BBC (enterprese
Limited)
E. Slavin, Robert (1995). Cooperative Learning. Boston: Allyn and
Bacon.
Joyce, Bruce and Marsha Weil (1996). Models of Teaching. Boston:
Allyn and Bacon

P. Miller, John (1983). Curriculum. London: Longman

Rose, Colin and Malcolm J. Nicholl (1997). Accelerated Learning for

the 21st Century. New York: A Dell Trade Paperback.
Sukmadinata, Nana, Sy. (2003). Pengembangan Kurikulum : Teori dan
Praktek. Bandung: PT. Rosda Karya.
Sukmadinata, Nana, Sy. (2004). Pengembangan Kurikulum Berbasis
Kompetensi di Perguruan Tinggi. (Paper). Bandung :
STBA YAPARI-ABA Bandung.

11

About the Writer

Odo Fadloeli was born in 1954 in Bandung. His tales of education

are as follows:
1. Elementary School : SD Cidadap III, Bandung (1966)
2. SMP XII Bandung (1969)
3. SMA Lab School IKIP Bandung (1972)
4. B.A. (English Dept. FKSS-IKIP Bandung, 1977)
5. Doctorandus (English Dept. FKSS-IKIP Bandung, 1978)
6. M.A. in ESL (English as Second Language, Kansas University,
Lawrence KS 1983)
7. Doctorate in Education PPS-UPI Bandung, 2005
8. Lecturer at UPI Bandung for 30 years.

12

Odo Fadloeli

A paper Presented at the International Conference

Maranatha Christian University

November 29 2007

Bandung

13

LEARNING STRATEGIES
A. What is the difference between teaching and learning?
The definition of teaching and learning is overlapping depending upon where
one looks at it from. The process of teaching is viewed mostly from the agent, in this
case: teacher. Whereas learning is mostly viewed from the part of the student who
becomes the object of the process of teaching conducted by the teacher.
When teaching is regarded as the transfer of knowledge from a person
called teacher to the student (s) who receive the knowledge, this is called the
transmission process. Hence, transmission curriculum is founded. It seems to me,
this is an old style of instruction in which the teacher banks or saves knowledge at the
brains of the student (s).
In regards to this Orlich et.al. comments:
The act of teaching is always a dynamic interaction of individuals (teachers and
teachers, teachers and learners, learners and learners, in which decisions
constantly are being made by all concerned. We believe that teaching must be
deliberate and planned. (1985:3).
Obviously, according to this definition, the concept of teaching and learning
may be overlapping.
To make sure that we have a good idea about the two terms, let us look back
at the concepts of curriculum for both teaching and learning models are generated
from how curriculum looks like. Few experts have little bit diffent concepts on the
curriculum definitions as we can see as follows!
Franklin Bobbit defines it as a series of experiences which children and
youth must have by way of attaining --- objectives (1981).
Vernon Anderson has a broader view on the curriculum definition, saying:
Curriculum is the whole of interacting forces of the total environment.

14

Many experts, however, regard curriculum as a field. Curriculum as a field

includes: curriculum theory, development, implementation (that is instruction)
and evaluation.
Johnson, on the other hand, restricts the definition to intended learning
outcomes. And this is actually what is going on with the education system of
our Junior High and Senior High Schools in Indonesia in which the success of
the study is measured from the passing grades in six subjects: math,
Indonesian, English, Physics, biology and chemistry (as the writer watched on
newstick of Metro TV).
Beauchamp, however, suggests that a legitimate use of the term curriculum is
to refer to a curriculum system. A curriculum in schools is the system within
which decisions are made about what curriculum will be and how it will be
implemented. And the last but more interesting definition says: curriculum is
the relationship between the knower and the known. (Giroux at.al. 198:13).
Since the term curriculum is the core of education, it can be interpreted as
everything or everyactivity that takes place in the campus or school under the
auspices of the school principal or lecturers.

B. The Model of Curriculum

Nana Saodih S. in his paper, Pengembangan Kurikulum Berbasis
Kompetensi di Perguruan Tinggi (2004:2) distinguished the curriculum models into:
4. Subject (academic) curriculum.
This is the model of curriculum which is based on knowledge or science
derived from various fields of science or knowledge.

5. Technological curriculum.
This model is called Competence Based Curriculum (KBK) which
emphasizes the content of curriculum which is a competence or skill on work.

15

In Indonesian education system it is commonly called Kurikulum Berbasis

Kompetensi (KBK). This KBK curriculum has once immensely affected
teachers and educators to implement it but the result is yet to be proved to the
public and stakeholders.

6. Humanistic Curriculum
This model of curriculum emphasizes the development of the characteristics
of the student (s) as the focus of education treatment. One of the learning
strategies resulted from this model is Student Active Learning which in
Indonesian is called Cara Belajar Siswa Aktif. Different and special
treatments of learning phase must be offered to the gifted students when a
school wants to adopt this model of curriculum.

7. Social Reconstruction Curriculum

This model of curriculum focuses on the social problems to solve through the
cooperative learning strategies. One of the examples is role play strategy in
learning foreign languages. Another is how to handle floods in Jakarta.
Quantum Learning, Iam sure, is still another example of this model.

Meanwhile John P. Miller and Wayne Seller in their book,

Curriculum, perspectives and practice, divide curriculum into three orientations,
these are:
a. The Transmission Position to Curriculum
In the transmission position, the function of education is to transmit facts,
skills and values to the students. Specifically, this orientation stresses the mastery of
traditional school subjects through traditional teaching methodologies, particularly
textbook learning (subject orientation); acquisition by students of basic skills and
certain cultural values and mores that are necessary in order to function in a society

16

(cultural transmission orientation); and the application of a mechanistic view of

human behavior to curriculum planning, whereby student skills are developed
through specific instructional strategies (competency- based learning orientation). In
this position, there is primarily one way movement to convey to students certain
skills, knowledge and values. The philosophical-scientific paradigm for this position
is an atomistic view of nature in which reality is seen interms of separate, isolated
building blocks. Historically, the transmission position is linked with rote learning
methods that have been used in schools since colonial times.

b. The Transaction Position

Here the individual is seen as rational and capable in intelligent problem
solving. Education is viewed as a dialog between the student and the curriculum in
which the student reconstructs knowledge through the dialog process. The central
elements in the transaction position are an emphasis on curriculum strategies that
facilitate problem solving (cognitive process orientation); application of problem
solving skills within social contexts in general and within the context of the
democratic process and development of cognitive skills within the academic
disciplines.
Historically, the transacition position can be traced to the Englightenment and
its impact on such American thinkers as Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson
who argued for a curriculum that would develop the students intellectual abilities.

c. The Transformation Position

This transformation position focuses on personal and social change,
encompassing three specific orientations: teaching students skills that promote
personal and social transformation (humanistic and social change orientations); a
vision of social change as a movement toward harmony with the environment rather
than as an effort to exert control over it, and the attribution of a spiritual dimension

17

to the environment, in which the ecological system is viewed with respect and
reverence (transpersonal orientation). The paradigm for transformation position is an
ecologically interdependent conception of nature that emphasizes the interrelatedness
of phenomena.
Historically, the transformation position is linked to two different strands of
thought. One is romantic element, which can be traced to Rousseaus thinking and is
also found in the work of Froebel, Tolstoy, A.S. neil and John Holt. According to
Giroux et.al. These educators have argued that the child is essentially good and that
education should allow the inner nature of the child to unfold with minimumly
interference. (1985:8). The second strand is found in the social change orientation,
which argues that education must take a more critical view of the role of schools in
society so that schools do not just mirror dominant economic interests and that
schools must be on the cutting edge of social and political change. Today, the work
of educators such as Michael apple and Friere's work in brazil reflect this orientation.
This position embodies what Huxley (1970) called the perennial philosophy the
idea that all phenomenon are part of an interconnected whole. Socially, this position
is identified with a cultural tendency that advocated decentralized, pluralistic
political networks, small is beautiful economics and holistic medicine.

d. Various Teaching Strategies

Joyce and Weil in their book, Models of Teaching (1996:11) open their
chapter 2 by asking a question. Where Do Models of Teaching Come From? Soon
they also gave the answer by saying, The core of the teaching process is the
arrangement of environments within which the students can interact and study
how to learn. (Dewey in Joyces 1996). This is in line with what Rose and J. Nicholl
say in their book, Accelerated Learning for the 21st Century, We will argue that in a
time of such rapid change, the first priority is to teach our children how to learn and
how to think. Only with these two super skills can you cope with change and

18

complexity and become economically independent and employable in the 21st

Century. (1997:2).
A model of teaching is a description of a learning environment. The descriptions
have many uses, ranging from:
5. planning curriculum,
6. courses,
7. units and lessons to
8. designing instructional materials books and workbooks, multimedia
programs, and computer assisted learning programs.

Joyce and Weil also described their idea on learning models as follows:
Models of teaching are reality models of learning. As we help students acquire
information, ideas, skills, values, ways of thinking and means of expressing
themselves, we are also teaching them how to learn.
In fact, the most important long-term outcome of instruction may be the
students increased capabilities to learn more easily and effectively in the future, both
because of the knowledge and skill they have acquired and because they have
mastered learning processes. (1996:7).
The fact that teaching and learning are overlapping is actually answered by
Joyce and Weil in commenting on the title of the book they have written.
Every once in a while I think we should have called the book Models of
Learning. Then, I remember that real teaching is teaching kids how to learn. So
I guess the title is all right. Marsha Weil to Bruce Joyce, January 1974. (Joyce
1996:3)
This quotation is sufficiently reasonable to support the writer in discussing
both the teaching and learning strategies overlappingly. Since, teaching and learning
are not separated from the teachers classroom, it is not wrong when the writer starts

19

from the models of teaching which, in turn, may produce the strategies of teaching
and learning.
Bruce Joyce and Marshal Weil have classified the models of teaching into (4)
four families as follows:

1. The Social Family

The social family capitalizes on our nature as social creatures to further
learning and to expand our ability to relate productively to one another. The models
range from the simple processes of organizing students to work together to elaborate
models that teach democratic social organization and the analysis of major social
problems and critical social values and issues. Three examples of these are: learning
with partners the simplest form of which is cooperative learning. This strategy
organizes students to help one another respond to the cognitive and social tasks of
the information processing models of teaching. Cooperative learning is strongly
believed to positively affect academic learning, social development. Robert E. Slavin
in his book, Cooperative Learning, comments:
Cooperative learning refers to a variety of teaching methods in which
students work in small groups to help one another learn academic content.
One of the most important reasons that cooperative learning methods were
developed is that educators and social scientists have long known about
destrimental effects of competition as it is usually used in the classroom.
(1995:3)

Second is Role playing which is usually designed to help students understand

and develop their social values. Role playing of problematic situations is used to
open up discussions of values and how they operate in our daily lives. The model
permits values to be studied as a core of the growing self-the place where social
norms and personal identity and sense of meaning come together.

20

2. The Information-Processing Family (Learning to Think by Thinking)

A variety of models can increase students ability to seek and master
information, organize it, build and test hypotheses and apply what they are learning
in their reading and writing and their exploration of themselves and the world about
them. This family includes. Thinking inductively which begins with concept
formation and proceeds to the development of generalization, hypotheses and
inferences about causation.
Another is attaining concepts, that is helpful to the students who learn
categories and study how to learn and apply them. The model also provides teachers
with an alternative to induction, enabling them to control data sets and help students
develop precise knowledge of concepts.
Still another example of this family is memorization. Recent research on
memorization, especially on the use of link words to facilitate associations, has
produced some dramatic effects on the rate at which students can acquire
information and concepts.
The last one is synetics, that is the ability to go beyond the known and
synthesize fresh ideas and solutions is called the ultimate information processing
skill.

3. The Personal Family

These models focus on the development of integrated feeling, thinking selfthe personal identity. They shape the environment around the capacity for selfeducation and need to develop self-awareness and understanding. They comprise:
Nondirective Teaching (The Learner at the Center).
Carl Roger says the teacher operates from a counselling stance, helping the students
understand themselves, clarify their goals and accept responbility for the growth and
the direction of their lives.

21

Another member of this group is concept of self. The ultimate evidence of

whether education has been effective is in the reciprocal relationships of educated
people with their world-contributing to it and profiting from it. For this purpose a
framework for examinating the growing self and modelling for students a selfactualizing way of life can be designed.

4. The Behavioral Systems Family

Founded by B.F. Skinner a large number of approaches to learning have been
developed, each taking advantage of the human beings ability to modify behavior in
response to tasks and feedback. These models are used in a wide variety of
applications, from teaching information, concepts and skills to increasing comfort
and relaxation, decreasing phobias, changing habits and learning to control ones
behavior. Some examples, pertaining to this group include Mastery Learning and
Programed Instruction. Often these systems organize material to be learned in
relatively small, sequenced, instructional modules presented to the students with
assessments of learning attached to them. These mastery learning and program
instruction systems have wide applicability in academic curriculum areas.
Another example is Direct Instruction which involves a straightforward use
of tasks and feedback to help students mastery academic content.
The next one is learning from simulations. These are commonly developed in
industrial, military, athletic an deducational settings. Computer based simulations
are readily adding to curricular options in elementary and secondary schools.

5. Other Learning Strategies

The first strategy of learning is proposed by Colin Rose and Malcolm J.
Nicholl called, Accelerated Learning for 21st Century (1997). This model was based
on the assumption saying it is no accident that when words are combined with music
or with pictures, or when words are delivered with emotion, they are easier and faster

22

to learn. Accelerated Learning capitalizes on this fact (1997:35). Further Rose &
Nichol say: In essence, it recognizes that each of us has individual preferred way of
learning that suits us best. When you learn the techniques that exactly match your
personal learning style, you will be learning in the way that is most natural for you.
(1997:19)
The commonest steps made in this strategy are called M.A.S.T.E.R.
(Motivating your mind, Acquiring information, Searching out the meaning,
Triggering out the memory, Exhibiting what you know and Reflect how you have
learnt).
Another learning strategy is called the Mind-Map strategy. Proposed by Tony
Buzan (1993). This strategy is unique in a sense that it is a reaction against standard
note commonly used today. Attacking the weaknesses of the current system in taking
notes, Buzan suggested that we design note taking parallel to the direction into which
the dendrites of humans brain cells spread. Note that each of our brain has 100
billion cells and each of these brain cells has 20.000 dendrites. Considering this fact
Buzan made an assumption that we should not be pessimistic with human learning
capacity.
Now it is the participants to guess to which family these two strategies
belong?

23

R E F E R E N CE
Buzan, Tony (1993). The Mind Map Book. London: BBC (enterprese
Limited)
E. Slavin, Robert (1995). Cooperative Learning. Boston: Allyn and
Bacon.
Joyce, Bruce and Marsha Weil (1996). Models of Teaching. Boston:
Allyn and Bacon

P. Miller, John (1983). Curriculum. London: Longman

Rose, Colin and Malcolm J. Nicholl (1997). Accelerated Learning for

the 21st Century. New York: A Dell Trade Paperback.
Sukmadinata, Nana, Sy. (2003). Pengembangan Kurikulum : Teori dan
Praktek. Bandung: PT. Rosda karya.
Sukmadinata, Nana, Sy. (2004). Pengembangan Kurikulum Berbasis
Kompetensi di Perguruan Tinggi. (Paper). Bandung : STBA
YAPARI-ABA Bandung.

24

About the Writer

Odo Fadloeli was born in 1954 in Bandung. His tales of education

are as follows:
9. Elementary School : SD Cidadap III, Bandung (1966)
10. SMP XII Bandung (1969)
11. SMA Lab School IKIP Bandung (1972)
12. B.A. (English Dept. FKSS-IKIP Bandung, 1977)
13. Doctorandus (English Dept. FKSS-IKIP Bandung, 1978)
14. M.A. in ESL (English as Second Language, Kansas University,
Lawrence KS 1983)
15. Doctorate in Education PPS-UPI Bandung, 2005
16. Lecturer at UPI Bandung for 30 years.

25

LANGUAGE LEARNING STRATEGIES

Oleh :
Odo Fadloeli

FAKULTAS PENDIDIKAN BAHASA DAN SENI

UNIVERSITAS PENDIDIKAN INDONESIA
BANDUNG
2008 - 2009

26

FOREWORD
This piece of writing entitled. The Sound Features as one of the Basic
Linguistic Equipments for Teachers, Teaching Oral Skill is presented on the
seminar of professorship held by the FPBS (Faculty of Language and Arts
Education) UPI Bandung 18 October, 2008. Upon the acceptance of this paper, the
writer is obliged to express his deepest thanks to:
1. Prof. Dr. H. Fuad Abdul Hamied, M.A., (group peer I)
2. Prof. Dr. H. Chaedar Alwasillah, M.A. (group peer II)
3. Prof. Dr. H. Aminudin Aziz, M.A., (group peer III)
for their guidance, supervision and assistance during the writers consultation on
writing the paper.
The content of this paper may be unsatisfactory due to the writers novice
linguistic competence and lack of experience in the field concerned. He, however, is
committed to his ideals and career to pursue his professorship for the sake of himself,
family and insitution to keep up with nation development and that of the world.
In the end the writer wishes to convey his Dean and the Rector for their
invaluable supervision and guidance on the professorship project.

18 October, 2008

The writer

27