Continuing Medical Education Article
Approach to the comatose patient
Robert D. Stevens, MD; Anish Bhardwaj, MD, FCCM
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
On completion of this article, the reader should be able to:
1. Describe changes in the level of consciousness.
2. Identify the indicators of prognosis in comatose patients.
3. Use this information in a clinical setting.
Dr. Stevens has disclosed that he is the recipient of direct grant/research funds from the National Institutes of Health, Public
Health Service; Dr. Bhardwaj has disclosed that he was the recipient of direct grant/research funds from the American Heart
Association and that he is/was the recipient of grant/research funds from the National Institutes of Health, Public Health
Service.
Wolters Kluwer Health has identified and resolved all faculty conflicts of interests regarding this educational activity.
Visit the Critical Care Medicine Web site (www.ccmjournal.org) for information in obtaining continuing medical education
credit.
Background: Coma is a medical emergency and may constitute
a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for the intensivist.
Objective: To review currently available data on the etiology,
diagnosis, and outcome of coma. To propose an evidence-based
approach for the clinical management of the comatose patient.
Data Source: Search of Medline and Cochrane databases;
manual review of bibliographies from selected articles and monographs.
Data Synthesis and Conclusions: Coma and other states of
impaired consciousness are signs of extensive dysfunction or
injury involving the brainstem, diencephalon, or cerebral cortex
oma and other states of impaired consciousness represent a severe derangement in
cerebral function that may be
structural or nonstructural (toxic-metabolic, pharmacologic, seizures) in origin.
Many of the underlying processes leading
to coma can be both life-threatening and
and are associated with a substantial risk of death and disability.
Management of impaired consciousness includes prompt stabilization of vital physiologic functions to prevent secondary neurologic injury, etiological diagnosis, and the institution of braindirected therapeutic or preventive measures. Neurologic
prognosis is determined by the underlying etiology and may be
predicted by the combination of clinical signs and electrophysiological tests. (Crit Care Med 2006; 34:3141)
KEY WORDS: coma; vegetative state; hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy; traumatic brain injury; neurologic diagnosis; outcome
prediction
potentially reversible with the timely institution of medical or surgical therapy.
Physicians in the emergency and intensive care arena have a central role in
diagnosing and treating comatose patients, the principles of which are outlined in this review.
Disorders of Consciousness
Assistant Professor, Division of Neurosciences
Critical Care, Department of Anesthesiology/Critical
Care Medicine, Neurology and Neurosurgery (RDS),
Vice Chairman, Department of Neurology, Co-Director,
Division of Neurosciences Critical Care, Associate Professor of Neurology, Neurological Surgery, Anesthesiology/Critical Care Medicine (AB), The Johns Hopkins
University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Supported, in part, by grant NS 046379 from the
U.S. Public Health Service National Institutes of Health.
Copyright 2005 by the Society of Critical Care
Medicine and Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000194534.42661.9F
Crit Care Med 2006 Vol. 34, No. 1
From a clinical perspective, consciousness may be schematized as the
product of two closely related cerebral
functions: wakefulness (i.e., arousal, vigilance, alertness), and awareness of self or
of the environment, often referred to as
the content of consciousness (1). The
content of consciousness encompasses,
in turn, several other overlapping brain
functions including attention, sensation
and perception, explicit memory, execu-
tive function, and motivation (2). The relationship between wakefulness and
awareness is hierarchical: Awareness cannot occur without wakefulness, but wakefulness may be observed in the absence of
awareness (e.g., the vegetative state; discussed subsequently).
Although many aspects of consciousness remain unexplained, its neuroanatomical underpinnings have been studied
extensively. Wakefulness is linked to the
ascending reticular activating system
(ARAS), a network of neurons originating
in the tegmentum of the pons and midbrain and projecting to diencephalic and
cortical structures (3, 4). Awareness is
dependent on the integrity of the cerebral
cortex and its subcortical connections
(5). Biochemical analysis of the ARAS reveals cholinergic and glutamatergic (pon31
Table 1. Global disorders of consciousness
Arousal
Awareness
Sleep/Wake
Pattern of
Cyclic
Arousal
Brain death
Absent
Absent
Absent
Absent
Absent
Coma
Absent
Absent
Absent
Nonpurposeful
Vegetative state
Present
Absent
Present
Nonpurposeful
Variable;
abnormal
patterns
Present
Minimally conscious
state
Akinetic mutism
Present
Partial
Present
Present
Present
Partial
Present
Intermittently
purposeful
Paucity of
movement
Delirium
Present
Partial
Present
Normal
Present
Locked-in syndrome
Present
Present
Present
Quadriplegia,
anarthria.
Vertical eye
movement and
blinking only
Present
Motor Function
Respiratory
Function
Present
EEG Activity
Electrographic
silence
Polymorphic
delta or theta
Polymorphic
delta or theta,
sometimes
slow alpha
Mixed theta and
alpha activity
Diffuse
nonspecific
slowing
Diffuse
nonspecific
slowing
Normal
Cerebral
Metabolism
(% Normal)a
0
50
4060
5060
4080
70100
90100
EEG, electroencephalograph.
As assessed by fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography.
tomesencephalic origin), adrenergic (locus ceruleus), serotonergic and
dopaminergic (brainstem), and histaminergic (hypothalamic) pathways (5). Many
of these neurons converge on the thalamus, which then sends projections to the
cerebral cortex. Additional neurons of the
ARAS project directly to the cerebral cortex or to other diencephalic structures
such as the hypothalamus.
Pathologic changes in consciousness
(Table 1) imply a significant alteration in
the awareness of self and of the environment, with variable degrees of wakefulness (6). Descriptive terms such as somnolence, stupor, obtundation, and
lethargy used to denote different levels of
wakefulness are best avoided, given the
lack of uniformity in the way these states
are defined in the literature (1, 6) and the
availability of objective measures such as
the Glasgow Coma Scale (Table 2) (1, 7,
8).
Brain Death. Consciousness disorders
must be distinguished from brain death,
which is the irreversible loss of all brain
and brainstem function, clinically diagnosed by demonstrating absence of consciousness, lack of motor response to
noxious stimulus, and the disappearance
of brainstem reflexes and respiratory
drive (9). Before this determination,
32
pharmacologic, physiologic, and metabolic causes of coma should be excluded.
Coma. Coma is characterized by the
total absence of arousal and of awareness.
As opposed to states of transient unconsciousness such as syncope or concussion, coma must last 1 hr (10). Comatose patients have no eye opening and do
Table 2. Glasgow Coma Scale
Motor response (M)
Follows commands
Localizes pain
Withdraws to pain
Flexion
Extension
None
Verbal response (V)
Oriented
Confused speech
Inappropriate words
Incomprehensible
None
Eye opening (E)
Spontaneous
To command
To pain
None
6
5
4
3
2
1
5
4
3
2
1
4
3
2
1
When assessing record best motor and response. Endotracheal tube or tracheostomy invalidates the verbal component. Coma defined as
M 4, V 2, E 2 (Glasgow Coma Scale 8).
Adapted from Teasdale and Jennett (8).
not speak or move spontaneously. They
do not follow commands, and when provoked by a noxious stimulus their eyes
remain closed, vocalization is limited or
absent, and motor activity is absent or
abnormal and reflexive rather than purposeful or defensive (1). Sleep-wake cycles are lacking. Coma is typically a transitional state, evolving toward recovery of
consciousness, the vegetative state, the
minimally conscious state, or brain death
(Fig. 1). Coma is associated with injury to
or functional disruption of bilateral cortical structures or of the ARAS. Lesions
involving the brainstem portion of the
ARAS frequently coexist with oculomotor
findings and pathologic breathing patterns.
Vegetative State. The vegetative state
(VS) is notable for preserved arousal
mechanisms associated with a complete
lack of self or environmental awareness
(10, 11). Patients in a VS open their eyes
spontaneously; however, there is no evidence of sustained visual pursuit (tracking) or visual fixation. They do not follow
commands and do not move in any meaningful or purposeful manner. They evolve
through temporal cycles of increased and
decreased arousal akin to a sleep-wake
pattern. Cardiovascular regulatory function, breathing patterns, and cranial
Crit Care Med 2006 Vol. 34, No. 1
Figure 1. Spectrum of consciousness disorders.
nerves are usually intact. Although some
patients who are in a VS regain partial or
complete consciousness, others remain
for extended periods without significant
changes in their neurologic state (Fig. 1),
prompting the term persistent vegetative state (PVS). The Multi-Society Task
Force, an interdisciplinary consensus
group, defined PVS as a VS present 1
month after an acute traumatic or nontraumatic injury (10). There has been debate regarding the significance of this
designation, and one expert panel suggested that the term PVS be abandoned
altogether (12). The VS is caused by widespread damage to bilateral cerebral hemispheres with sparing of the brainstem;
trauma and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy are the most common acute
causes of VS.
Minimally Conscious State. The minimally conscious state (MCS) describes a
subset of patients who do not meet the
criteria for coma or VS. Patients in MCS
have a severe alteration in consciousness
but demonstrate wakefulness and cyclic
arousal and intermittently demonstrate
self or environmental awareness, such as
following of commands, the ability to signal yes/no (regardless of accuracy), intelligible speech, or purposeful behavior
(13). Emergence from the MCS to higher
states of consciousness is signaled by the
ability to communicate reliably or use
objects functionally (13). Although data
are limited, it is believed that the MCS
represents a greater likelihood of recovery compared with the VS. As in the VS,
lesions or dysfunction associated with the
MCS involve the cerebral hemispheres,
with possibly greater sparing of corticocortical and cortico-thalamic connective
fibers (14, 15).
Crit Care Med 2006 Vol. 34, No. 1
Akinetic Mutism. Akinetic mutism
(AM) is a state of wakefulness with limited objective evidence of awareness (16,
17). Patients with this condition generally seem unable to move or speak and
have cyclic periods of increased arousal as
indicated by eye opening. Some authors
describe elements of visual pursuit and
an intent gaze suggesting an unfulfilled
promise of speech (18). Contrary to the
MCS, there is no motor responsiveness to
verbal, tactile, or noxious stimuli. A distinguishing feature from the VS is that
patients with AM do not have spasticity or
abnormal reflexes, suggesting relative
sparing of the corticospinal tract (19). AM
has been associated with bilateral medial
frontal lobe (e.g., cingulate gyrus) injury
or dysfunction, leading to a profound deficiency in motivation and an inability to
plan and initiate activity (executive dysfunction) (17).
Delirium. Delirium is synonymous
with the acute confusional state and with
acute encephalopathy (20, 21). Its is characterized by an acutely developing impairment in attention, associated with
changes in the level of consciousness,
disorganized thinking, and a fluctuating
course (22, 23). Additional features include perceptual disturbances, altered
sleep-wake cycle, increased or decreased
psychomotor activity, and memory impairment. Delirium is exceedingly common in hospitalized patients and particularly in the intensive care unit (24). It
may precede or may evolve from other
disorders of consciousness, namely coma
(Fig. 1) (25). Delirium should be distinguished from dementia. Both disorders
are characterized by memory impairment, but patients with dementia alone
are more commonly alert and do not have
the acute onset and fluctuating level of
consciousness that are characteristic of a
delirium (21). Delirium is frequently seen
in acute toxic, metabolic, or endocrine
derangements but may also result from
more focal injury to the frontal or right
parietal lobes (26). Nonconvulsive seizure
activity and the postictal state may also
mimic delirium.
Locked-In Syndrome. The locked-in
syndrome (LIS) consists of quadriplegia
and anarthria in the setting of preserved
awareness and arousal (1). It not a consciousness disorder per se but may be
clinically confused with one given the
limited expressive capability of these patients. It is associated with acute injury to
the ventral pons, just below the level of
the third nerve nuclei, thus classically
sparing vertical eye movements and
blinking and not interfering with the
more dorsally located ARAS. More rostral
lesions may induce a total LIS, in which
even eye and lid movement is lost, prohibiting all communication. Common
etiologies of the LIS are pontine infarction, hemorrhage, and trauma (27). An
analogous awake but de-efferented state
may occur in patients with severe Guillain-Barr syndrome, botulism, and critical illness neuropathy and those receiving neuromuscular blocking agents
without adequate sedation (28).
Other States of Impaired Consciousness. Several other states involve or suggest a global perturbation in consciousness. Hypersomnia or excessive daytime
somnolence is an increase in sleeping
time with preserved sleep-wake cycles,
most often seen in the setting of sleep
deprivation, sleep-related breathing disorders, narcolepsy, drug toxicity, metabolic encephalopathy, or damage to the
ARAS (29). When aroused, patients with
hypersomnia typically have a normal
neurologic examination. Catatonia is a
complication of psychiatric illnesses such
as severe depression, bipolar disorder, or
schizophrenia, in which patients have
open eyes but do not speak or move spontaneously and do not follow commands,
with an otherwise normal neurologic examination and an electroencephalogram
showing low voltage but no slowing (21,
30). General anesthesia and barbiturate
coma are pharmacologically induced
states of decreased arousal and awareness, associated with minimal or absent
responses to noxious (surgical) stimuli
and prominent brainstem dysfunction
and respiratory depression (31). Generalized convulsive or complex partial sei33
Table 3. Etiology of coma and altered consciousness
I. Primary cerebral disorders
Bilateral or diffuse hemispheric disorders
Traumatic brain injury (contusions, diffuse axonal injury)
Ischemic (watershed, cardioembolism, vasculitis, hypercoagulable disorder)
Hemorrhagic (subarachnoid hemorrhage, intraventricular hemorrhage)
Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy
Cerebral venous thrombosis
Malignancy
Meningitis; encephalitis
Generalized or complex partial seizures; status epilepticus (convulsive, nonconvulsive)
Hypertensive encephalopathy
Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome
Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis
Hydrocephalus
Unilateral hemispheric disorders (with displacement of midline structures)
Traumatic (contusions, subdural hematoma, epidural hematoma)
Large hemispheric ischemic stroke
Primary intracerebral hemorrhage
Cerebral abscess
Brain tumor
Brain stem disorders (pons, midbrain)
Hemorrhage, infarction, tumor, trauma
Central pontine myelinolysis
Compression from cerebellar infarct, hematoma, abscess, tumor
II. Systemic derangements causing coma
Toxic
Medication overdose/adverse effects (opioids, benzodiazepines, barbiturates, tricyclics, neuroleptics, aspirin, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors,
acetaminophen, anticonvulsants)
Drugs of abuse (opioids, alcohol, methanol, ethylene glycol, amphetamines, cocaine)
Exposures (carbon monoxide, heavy metals)
Metabolic
Systemic inflammatory response syndrome-sepsis
Hypoxia; hypercapnia
Hypothermia
Hypoglycemia; hyperglycemic crises (diabetic ketoacidosis, nonketotic hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state)
Hyponatremia, hypernatremia
Hypercalcemia
Hepatic failure
Renal failure
Wernickes encephalopathy
Endocrine
Panhypopituitarism
Adrenal insufficiency
Hypothyroidism; hyperthyroidism
zures or a resulting postictal state may
also lead to altered consciousness.
Etiology and Pathogenesis
Common causes of coma are traumatic
brain injury (TBI), hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), drug overdose, ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, central nervous system infections, and brain
tumors. From a pathophysiologic standpoint, coma may be viewed as the expression of a) primary insults to the cerebral
cortex, diencephalic structures, midbrain
or rostral pons; and b) secondary cerebral
manifestations of systemic toxic, metabolic,
or endocrine derangements (Table 3) (1,
32).
To affect consciousness, lesions of the
cerebral cortex must involve both hemispheres or must be unilateral lesions large
34
enough to cause displacement of midline
structures (shift) (1). Brainstem and diencephalic lesions resulting in coma may be
comparatively small; however, they must
also involve bilateral structures (4). Compartmental shift of sufficient magnitude
will disrupt the structural integrity or function of contralateral reticulothalamic or
thalamocortical fibers, impairing the ARAS
and its projections. Shift may also cause
central or tentorial herniation with compression of the midbrain, compromising
more proximal elements of the ARAS (32).
The pathophysiology of toxic and metabolic coma is specific to the underlying
cause and in many instances incompletely understood (33). In a simplified
view, these conditions have been linked
to an interruption in the delivery or utilization of oxygen or substrate (hypoxia,
ischemia, hypoglycemia, carbon monox-
ide), alterations in neuronal excitability
and signaling (seizures, acidosis, drug
toxicity), or changes in brain volume (hypernatremia, hyponatremia). The degree
of neurologic impairment is related to
the time course of the underlying cerebral pathology. Thus, an acute hemispheric or brainstem hemorrhage with
mass effect will be associated with depressed consciousness, whereas a slowly
developing brain tumor of identical location and volume may be asymptomatic. A
similar observation can be made for metabolic changes, such as acute vs. progressive hyponatremia.
Approach to the Comatose
Patient
Disorders of consciousness such as
coma are potentially life threatening and
Crit Care Med 2006 Vol. 34, No. 1
Figure 2. Algorithm for initial emergent management of the comatose patient. GCS, Glasgow Coma
Scale; MAP, mean arterial pressure; ICP, intracranial pressure; IV, intravenous; CT, computed tomography; EEG, electroencephalograph; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging. Adapted from Reference 122.
warrant a rapid and structured approach.
A basic sequence of steps is outlined hereafter. These include stabilization of vital
physiologic functions, performing a focused neurologic examination, targeted
diagnostic tests, and when available the
institution of specific therapeutic measures (Fig. 2).
Initial Stabilization. As in any medical
or surgical emergency, initial steps
should be directed to ensuring adequacy
of airway, breathing, and circulatory
function. In patients who are comatose
from TBI, or in whom the trauma cannot
be ruled out as an etiological factor, the
neck should be immobilized until cervical spine instability has been ruled out by
clinical examination and appropriate imaging (34). Efforts should be made to
swiftly identify the causes of, and correct,
systemic derangements such as hypertension, hypotension, hypoxemia, anemia,
acidosis, hypothermia, hyperglycemia,
and hyperthermia.
Systemic Derangements. The relationship of acute neurologic disorders
with derangements in circulatory and respiratory function is complex, and it is
frequently not possible at the outset to
accurately determine whether the systemic derangement occurred secondary
to coma, was a cause of it, or was independent of it. Hypertension in the comaCrit Care Med 2006 Vol. 34, No. 1
tose patient suggests elevated intracranial
pressure,
drug
overdose
(amphetamines, cocaine), or hypertensive encephalopathy, but more frequently
hypertension is a nonspecific hyperadrenergic response to an acutely evolving intracranial or systemic process (35). Hypotension and shock in the comatose
patient usually reflect nonneurogenic
mechanisms of circulatory failure but
may also be a consequence of severe brain
damage (neurogenic stunned myocardium) (36). Acute respiratory failure in
the comatose patient may occur secondary to airway obstruction, pulmonary aspiration, acute lung injury, or lesions affecting the pontine and medullary
respiratory centers. Acute central nervous system insults have been linked to
neurogenic pulmonary edema, characterized by severe hypoxemia and proteinrich diffuse alveolar exudates (37). Coma
may also represent a consequence of hypercapnic or hypoxemic respiratory failure, suggesting a vicious cycle mutually
reinforcing brain and respiratory dysfunction.
The importance of appropriately treating systemic derangements is underscored by studies demonstrating that
neurologic outcomes are substantially
worse in patients with TBI who develop
hypotension and/or hypoxia (38 41).
Similar observations have been made in
patients with ischemic stroke (42).
Neurologic Evaluation. The goal of
the neurologic examination is to recognize the type of consciousness disorder
and make inferences about its etiology.
Essential neuroanatomically localizing
information may be gleaned by a relatively rapid survey, which should include
the level of consciousness (wakefulness),
cranial nerve examination, motor examination, and respiratory pattern (1). Additional clues may be sought by examining
the head and neck (e.g., meningismus),
the optic fundi (e.g., subhyaloid hemorrhage in subarachnoid hemorrhage), and
the skin (e.g., purpuric lesions in meningococcal meningitis) (32, 43). An important early step is to differentiate patients
who have a structural cause of coma from
those with a metabolic one. Structural
causes are indicated by the presence of
lateralizing deficits and a rostrocaudal
progression of brainstem dysfunction
(Tables 4 and 5). The presence of involuntary movements (seizures, myoclonus,
asterixis), especially if generalized, suggests a metabolic etiology.
Level of Consciousness. The patient
should be inspected for spontaneous body
position, motor activity, eye opening, or
verbalization. Purposeful movements
(e.g., reaching for endotracheal tube) and
comfort postures (e.g., crossing the legs)
are signs of cortical integration. The response to stimuli of graded intensity
should then be observed, starting with
verbal commands, progressing to tactile
cues and finally to noxious provocation.
Noxious stimuli should be delivered without inducing tissue trauma and with regard to the possibility of conscious pain
perception; preferable sites are the nailbed and the notch of the supra-orbital
nerve.
The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) (Table
2) was initially devised for patients with
TBI (8) but has gained widespread acceptance as a bedside tool for evaluating the
level of consciousness in virtually all
acutely ill patients (44). It has good interobserver reliability (45) and is a powerful predictor of survival and neurologic
outcomes after head trauma (46 49),
nontraumatic coma (50), ischemic stroke
(51, 52), subarachnoid hemorrhage (53),
intracerebral hemorrhage (54, 55), and
meningitis (56). The GCS is also an independent predictor of survival in the general critically ill population (57) and has
been incorporated into a number of
widely used prognostic intensive care
35
scoring systems (58 64). Not withstanding, the GCS has several important limitations (44, 65, 66). Subtle alterations in
wakefulness and brainstem findings may
not be captured by the GCS. A full GCS
cannot be obtained in patients who are
endotracheally intubated, are sedated, or
have craniofacial trauma or in patients
with dominant hemisphere lesions and
aphasia. Midrange scores (6 12) may result in different combinations of the
three components yielding equivalent total scores that do not reflect the same
degree of unconsciousness (65, 67). Finally, differences in the higher GCS
range (1315) correlate poorly with outcome and neuroimaging findings (68,
69).
Cranial Nerve Examination. Examination of the eyes may yield valuable information about the level of brainstem
disease causing coma, given the proximity of centers governing eye movement,
pupillary function, and elements of the
ARAS. Completely normal pupillary function and eye movements suggest that the
lesion causing coma is rostral to the midbrain (70). Detection of brainstem injury
may also aid in prognostication (discussed subsequently).
Table 4. Signs of intracranial hypertension and associated herniation syndromes
Sign
Mechanism
Coma
Pupillary dilation
Miosis
Lateral gaze palsy
Hemiparesisa
Decerebrate posturing
Hypertension,
bradycardia
Abnormal breathing
patterns
Posterior cerebral artery
infarction
Anterior cerebral artery
infarction
a
Compression of midbrain tegmentum
Compression of ipsilateral third nerve
Compression of the midbrain
Stretching of the sixth nerves
Compression of contralateral cerebral
peduncle against tentorium
Compression of the midbrain
Compression of the medulla
Type of Herniation
Uncal, central
Uncal
Central
Central
Uncal
Vascular compression
Central, uncal
Central, uncal, cerebellar
(tonsillar)
Central, uncal, cerebellar
(tonsillar)
Uncal
Vascular compression
Subfalcine (cingulate)
Compression of the pons or medulla
Hemiparesis will occur ipsilateral to the hemispheric lesion (false-localizing sign).
Unilateral pupillary dilation in the comatose patient is evidence of oculomotor
nerve compression from ipsilateral uncal
herniation until demonstrated otherwise.
This presentation may also occur in patients with posterior communicating artery aneurysmal rupture. Bilateral dilated
pupils that do not react to light are a sign
of extensive midbrain injury, central herniation, drug intoxication (tricyclic antidepressants, anticholinergic agents, amphetamines, carbamazepine), or brain
death. Unilateral miosis is suggestive of
Horners syndrome due to sympathetic
denervation. Bilateral miosis is seen with
lesions in the pontine tegmentum, opioid
overdose, and cholinergic toxicity (organophosphates and other cholinesterase
inhibitors).
Abnormalities of eye position and
movement may be informative. Conjugate lateral deviation of the eyes is a sign
either of an ipsilateral hemisphere lesion,
a contralateral hemisphere seizure focus,
or damage involving the contralateral
pontine horizontal gaze center (parapontine reticular formation). Lateral gaze
palsy may signal central herniation with
compression of bilateral sixth nerves.
Tonic downward deviation of gaze is suggestive of injury or compression involving the thalamus or dorsal midbrain such
as may occur with acute obstructive hydrocephalus or midline thalamic hemor-
Table 5. Brainstem reflexes in the comatose patient
Examination
Technique
Pupils
Response to
light
Oculocephalic
Turn head from
side to side
Vestibulooculocephalic
Irrigate external
auditory
canal with
cold water
Corneal reflex
Stimulation of
cornea
Stimulation of
carina
Cough reflex
Gag reflex
36
Stimulation of
soft palate
Normal
Response
Afferent Pathway
Brainstem
Efferent Pathway
Direct and
consensual
pupillary
constriction
Eyes move
conjugately
in direction
opposite to
head
Nystagmus with
fast
component
beating away
from
stimulus
Eyelid closure
Retina, optic
nerve, chiasm,
optic tract
Edinger-Westphal nucleus
(midbrain)
Semicircular
canals,
vestibular
nerve
Vestibular nucleus. Medial
longitudinal fasciculus.
Parapontine reticular
formation (pons)
Semicircular
canals,
vestibular
nerve
Vestibular nucleus. Medial
longitudinal fasciculus.
Parapontine reticular
formation (pons)
Oculomotor and
abducens
nerves
Trigeminal nerve
Facial nerve
Cough
Glossopharyngeal
and vagus
nerves
Glossopharyngeal
and vagus
nerves
Trigeminal and facial nuclei
(pons)
Medullary cough center
Symmetric
elevation of
soft palate
Medulla
Oculomotor
nerve,
sympathetic
fibers
Oculomotor and
abducens
nerves
Glossopharyngeal
and vagus
nerves
Glossopharyngeal
and vagus
nerves
Crit Care Med 2006 Vol. 34, No. 1
rhage. Tonic upward gaze has been associated with bilateral hemispheric
damage. Ocular bobbing, a rapid downward jerk followed by a slow return to
midposition, is indicative of pontine lesions. Rapid intermittent horizontal eye
movements suggest seizure activity.
Integrity of the brainstem may be further ascertained by eliciting specific reflexes (Table 4). Disappearance of brainstem reflexes may also aid in
prognostication (45) (discussed subsequently).
Motor Examination. Movements may
be classified as involuntary, reflexic, or
purposeful. Involuntary movements include seizures, myoclonus, or tremor
(e.g., toxic-metabolic encephalopathy).
Reflexes are stereotypical responses of the
extremities evoked in patients who lack
descending hemispheric modulation of
motor function. Purposeful movements
(e.g., localization) imply cortical processing of environmental variables.
Extensor (decerebrate) posturing is
characterized by adduction, extension,
and pronation of the upper extremities
and extension of the lower extremities; it
is indicative of injury to the caudal diencephalon, midbrain, or pons. Flexor
(decorticate) posturing involves flexion
and adduction of arms and wrists with
extension of lower extremities; it suggests hemispheric or thalamic damage,
with sparing of structures below the diencephalons (1).
Respiratory Pattern. Coma has been
associated with disordered breathing patterns, reflecting injury to brainstem respiratory centers or interference with suprabulbar regulation of these sites (1, 71).
Circulatory or respiratory failure, toxicmetabolic disorders, drugs used for sedation or analgesia, and mechanical ventilation may also contribute to abnormal
breathing, limiting the inferential value
of specific patterns. Cheyne-Stokes respiration denotes a cyclic pattern of alternating hyperpnea and apnea. It is seen in
patients with a bilateral hemispheric or
diencephalic insult but may also be
present in congestive heart failure,
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,
and sleep apnea. Hyperventilation has
been linked to injury in the pontine or
midbrain tegmentum; however, it can
also result from respiratory failure, hemodynamic shock, fever, sepsis, metabolic disarray, and psychiatric disease.
Apneustic breathing is characterized by a
prolonged pause at the end of inspiration
and indicates lesions of the mid- and cauCrit Care Med 2006 Vol. 34, No. 1
dal portions of the pons. Ataxic breathing
is irregular in both rate and tidal volume
and suggests damage to the medulla.
Diagnostic Tests. Patients with coma
should be placed on monitors including
pulse oximetry, blood pressure, and electrocardiogram, and blood should be immediately sent for glucose, electrolytes,
and arterial blood gas analysis. Routine
serum tests of liver, renal, thyroid, and
adrenal function and urine toxicology
screens should be obtained without delay.
Computed tomography (CT) of the
brain is warranted in virtually all patients
with an acute onset of unexplained coma.
CT will readily identify intracranial hemorrhage, hydrocephalus, brain edema,
and compartmental shift and may suggest stroke, abscess, or tumor. CT is unrevealing in most instances of hypoxicischemic or toxic-metabolic coma. Also,
the usefulness of CT in patients who become comatose during the course of a
critical illness is unclear. One study
found that CT was unlikely to reveal abnormalities in intensive care unit patients who did not have new neurologic
deficits or seizures (72). In each case, the
anticipated benefit of CT in terms of actionable information should be carefully
weighed against the risks of transporting
a critically ill patient outside the intensive care unit.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
should be sought in patients with unexplained coma and normal or equivocal CT
findings. MRI is highly sensitive to acute
ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis,
brain edema, brain tumor, inflammatory
processes, and cerebral abscess. MRI is
more sensitive than CT to diffuse axonal
injury, a pattern of damage seen in TBI
patients (73, 74). Studies in encephalopathic or comatose patients with sepsis or
after cardiac surgery have found that MRI
may be highly sensitive for the detection
of lesions not suspected by clinical examination or CT (7578).
Lumbar puncture and cerebrospinal
fluid analysis should be considered in comatose patients with a suspected infectious or inflammatory central nervous
system condition (79). However, in immunologically competent critically ill patients being worked up for fever and encephalopathy who have not undergone a
recent neurosurgical procedure, the diagnostic yield of this test is low (80, 81).
Patients with alterations in consciousness should undergo CT of the head before lumbar puncture to identify occult
intracranial abnormalities that might
cause brain herniation after removal of
cerebrospinal fluid (82).
Electroencephalography (EEG) is frequently indicated in patients with unexplained coma as it may diagnose clinically
occult seizure activity and in particular
nonconvulsive status epilepticus. Recent
studies indicate that nonconvulsive status epilepticus is present in 8 19% of
patients who undergo EEG as part of the
workup for an unexplained decrease in
level of consciousness (83 85). The specificity of EEG for the etiological diagnosis
of nonepileptic causes of coma is low;
however, certain characteristic abnormalities have been described. In patients
with coma of metabolic origin, a generic
pattern of diffusely decreased frequency
and increased amplitude has been described, often in association with triphasic waves (86). Some comatose patients
have an EEG that superficially resembles
an awake (alpha) pattern. This alphacoma is most commonly seen in patients
with extensive damage or dysfunction involving the brainstem or cerebral cortex
and generally carries a poor prognosis
(87). Finally, herpesvirus encephalitis has
been associated with changes such as periodic sharp waves or epileptiform discharges (88, 89). Although the diagnostic
capabilities of EEG are disappointing, it
has emerged as a valuable tool in the
prognostication of comatose patients
(discussed subsequently).
Prognosis
Outcomes after coma include death,
VS, various degrees of functional impairment, and complete neurologic recovery.
Such categories have been formalized in
scoring systems such as the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) (90) (Table 6) and extended GOS (91). There are many other
outcomes of coma including nonvegetative disorders of awareness (e.g., MCS,
AM) and gradations of cognitive dysfunction that are not captured by systems
such as the GOS (92). Nevertheless, the
GOS is widely used by clinical investigators in both traumatic and nontraumatic
coma.
The prediction of neurologic outcome
is a central concern in the management
of patients with coma. Surveys indicate
that many individuals would prefer death
to the prospect of living in a vegetative or
highly dependent state (93). Prognostic
information, when available, provides a
rational basis for decision making about
37
Table 6. Glasgow Outcome Scale
1
2
3
Death
Persistent vegetative state
Severe disability
Moderate disability
Good recovery
Patient exhibits no obvious cortical function.
(Conscious but disabled). Patient depends on others for
daily support due to mental or physical disability or
both.
(Disabled but independent). Patient is independent as far as
daily life is concerned. The disabilities found include
varying degrees of dysphasia, hemiparesis, or ataxia, as
well as intellectual and memory deficits and personality
changes
Resumption of normal activities even though there may be
minor neurological or psychological deficits.
Adapted from Jennett and Bond (90).
therapeutic intensity, withdrawal of life
support, and rehabilitation (94). Prognostication of comatose patients is based on
a consideration of etiology, clinical signs,
electrophysiology, neuroimaging, and
biochemical data (95).
Etiology. The prognosis of coma is
determined in large part by the underlying etiology. It is widely believed that
toxic/metabolic coma carries a better
prognosis than coma of structural origin;
however, direct evidence demonstrating
this is limited. On the other hand, the
better prognosis of traumatic vs. anoxic
coma is supported in a number of studies
and two recent systematic reviews (96,
97). In adults with PVS secondary to TBI
who were reevaluated at 1 yr, the proportion with a good recovery was 7%, moderate disability 17%, severe disability
28%, PVS 15%, and dead 33% (96). In
patients with nontraumatic PVS (principally HIE), these outcomes were significantly worse (respectively 1%, 3%, 11%,
32%, and 53%) (96). Younger age and
better general health of TBI patients may
account for some of this difference.
Clinical Signs. Clinical signs that correlate with poor prognosis after coma include the motor component of the GCS
(46, 47, 50, 51, 53, 55, 56), the length of
time a patient remains in coma (97, 98),
and signs of brainstem damage. In two
separate systematic reviews of postanoxic
coma, absent motor responses (GCS motor score 1) on day 3 were highly predictive of poor outcome (death or VS) (45,
99). Absent pupillary responses on day 1
(45) or 3 (99) and absent corneal reflexes
on day 1 (45) were also strongly correlated with poor outcome. Clinical signs
appeared to be less accurate in the prediction of outcome after TBI (100).
Electrophysiologic Tests. Electrophysiologic tests that have been used for
predicting coma outcome include EEG,
38
somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP),
transcranial motor evoked potentials,
brainstem auditory evoked potentials
(BAEP), and event-related potentials (86,
101). In patients with postanoxic coma,
meta-analysis revealed that EEG with an
isoelectric or burst-suppression pattern
was independently associated with poor
outcome (99). A recent systematic review
implied that in patients with an alphacoma after HIE or TBI, mortality rate was
6190%, whereas mortality rate was 27%
when alpha-coma was metabolic in origin
(87). Although it remains a dependable
tool for epilepsy assessment, EEG is limited by its high sensitivity to the electrical
environmental noise, its alteration by
sedative drugs, and its inability to test the
brainstem.
Data from SSEP are strongly predictive of outcome. A systematic review revealed that among comatose patients
with bilaterally absent cortical SSEP, the
incidence of death or VS was 100% after
HIE, 99% after intracranial hemorrhage,
95% after TBI, and 93% in children and
adolescents 18 yrs old with coma of
diverse etiologies (102). These results
were consistent with the meta-analysis
that concluded from a review of 33 studies that bilateral absence of cortical SSEP
within the first week after anoxic coma
was 100% specific in identifying patients
with poor outcome (99). Most studies of
BAEP to assess prognosis after coma were
conducted with patients with TBI (101). A
pooled analysis demonstrated that of 107
patients with absence of peak V (generated in the upper pons and in the midbrain) on BAEP recorded 159 days after
TBI, 106 were dead or vegetative at 312
months follow-up (100). At our institution, BAEP and SSEP are obtained in
selected comatose patients in whom
prognosis is not readily predictable from
clinical parameters alone.
Neuroimaging. Neuroimaging is essential to coma diagnosis and may have
prognostic value. In patients with traumatic coma, patterns on CT that have
been associated with worse neurologic
outcome include lesions in the brainstem, encroachment of the basal cisterns,
and diffuse axonal injury (103108). CT
findings are also predictive of outcome in
comatose patients with intracerebral
hemorrhage (55) and subarachnoid hemorrhage (109). However, when compared
with electrophysiologic and clinical variables, the predictive value of CT is reported to be low (110). MRI in comatose
patients may disclose pathologic changes
of prognostic importance (73, 74, 111). In
a study of patients with posttraumatic
PVS, Kampfl et al. (112) assessed the relationship between MRI findings and outcome at 12 months. They noted that lesions in the corpus callosum and
dorsolateral brainstem were highly predictive of nonrecovery, whereas initial
GCS and pupillary findings were not
(112). A relationship between MRI abnormalities and outcome is also suggested in
comatose patients following ischemic
stroke (113) and hypoxic-ischemic injury
(114).
Biochemical Markers. The presence of
brain-specific molecules in the blood or
cerebrospinal fluid has been postulated to
reflect the severity of brain damage. Molecules that have been studied in the prognostic evaluation of coma include neuron
specific enolase (115118), s100 beta
(118), glial fibrillary acidic protein (117,
119), and the BB isoform of creatine kinase (120). Although sensitive to brain
injury, the specificity and predictive value
of these tests have been insufficient when
compared with clinical variables and
studies such as SSEP (101, 121, 122).
CONCLUSIONS
The goal of acute care of patients with
coma is to maximize the likelihood of
neurologic recovery. Initial resuscitative
steps should be as in any other medical
emergency. Subsequent therapeutic intervention is dependent on the underlying etiology, and the clinician must rapidly integrate clinical examination,
laboratory, and imaging data in the formulation of a presumptive diagnosis. Prediction of outcome may be accomplished
by clinical examination and electrophysiological tests.
Crit Care Med 2006 Vol. 34, No. 1
anagement of
impaired consciousness in-
cludes prompt stabilization
of vital physiologic functions
to prevent secondary neurologic injury, etiological diagnosis, and the institution of
brain-directed therapeutic or
preventive measures.
REFERENCES
1. Plum F, Posner JB: The Diagnosis of Stupor
and Coma. Contemporary Neurology Series
19. Third Edition. Philadelphia, Davis, 1980
2. Young GB, Pigott SE: Neurobiological basis
of consciousness. Arch Neurol 1999; 56:
153157
3. Moruzzi G, Magoun HW: Brain stem reticular formation and activation of the EEG.
1949. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci
1995; 7:251267
4. Parvizi J, Damasio AR: Neuroanatomical
correlates of brainstem coma. Brain 2003;
126:1524 1536
5. Zeman A: Consciousness. Brain 2001; 124:
12631289
6. Laureys S, Owen AM, Schiff ND: Brain function in coma, vegetative state, and related
disorders. Lancet Neurol 2004; 3:537546
7. Bateman DE: Neurological assessment of
coma. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001;
71(Suppl 1):i13i17
8. Teasdale G, Jennett B: Assessment of coma
and impaired consciousness. A practical
scale. Lancet 1974; 2:81 84
9. Wijdicks EF: The diagnosis of brain death.
N Engl J Med 2001; 344:12151221
10. Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative
state (1): The Multi-Society Task Force on
PVS. N Engl J Med 1994; 330:1499 1508
11. Jennett B, Plum F: Persistent vegetative
state after brain damage. A syndrome in
search of a name. Lancet 1972; 1:734 737
12. Giacino J, Whyte J: The vegetative and minimally conscious States: current knowledge
and remaining questions. J Head Trauma
Rehabil 2005; 20:30 50
13. Giacino JT, Ashwal S, Childs N, et al: The
minimally conscious state: Definition and
diagnostic criteria. Neurology 2002; 58:
349 353
14. Laureys S, Perrin F, Faymonville ME, et al:
Cerebral processing in the minimally conscious state. Neurology 2004; 63:916 918
Crit Care Med 2006 Vol. 34, No. 1
15. Coleman MR, Menon DR, Fryer TD, et al:
Neurometabolic coupling in the vegetative
and minimally conscious states: preliminary findings. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005; 76:432 434
16. Cairns HWB, Whitteridge D: Akinetic mutism with an epidermoid cyst of the 3rd
ventricle. Brain 1941; 64:273291
17. Ackermann H, Ziegler W: Akinetic mutismA review of the literature. Fortschr
Neurol Psychiatr 1995; 63:59 67
18. Recommendations for use of uniform nomenclature pertinent to patients with severe alterations in consciousness: American
Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Arch
Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76:205209
19. Cartlidge N: States related to or confused
with coma. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry
2001; 71(Suppl 1):i18 i19
20. Mesulam MM: Principles of Behavioral and
Cognitive Neurology. Second Edition. New
York, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000
21. American Psychiatric Association: Task
Force on DSM-IV. Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV-TR.
Fourth Edition. Washington, DC, American
Psychiatric Association, 2000
22. American Psychiatric Association: Task
Force on DSM-IV. Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV.
Fourth Edition. Washington, DC, American
Psychiatric Association, 1994
23. Inouye SK, van Dyck CH, Alessi CA: Clarifying confusion: the confusion assessment
method. A new method for detection of delirium. Ann Intern Med 1990; 113:941948
24. Ely EW, Shintani A, Truman B, et al: Delirium as a predictor of mortality in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive
care unit. JAMA 2004; 291:17531762
25. McNicoll L, Pisani MA, Zhang Y, et al: Delirium in the intensive care unit: Occurrence and clinical course in older patients.
J Am Geriatr Soc 2003; 51:591598
26. Burns A, Gallagley A, Byrne J: Delirium.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004; 75:
362367
27. Smith E, Delargy M: Locked-in syndrome.
BMJ 2005; 330:406 409
28. Vargas F, Hilbert G, Gruson D, et al: Fulminant Guillain-Barre syndrome mimicking cerebral death: Case report and literature review. Intensive Care Med 2000; 26:
623 627
29. Douglas NJ: The sleepy patient. J Neurol
Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001; 71(Suppl 1):
i3i6
30. Taylor MA, Fink M: Catatonia in psychiatric
classification: A home of its own. Am J Psychiatry 2003; 160:12331241
31. Rudolph U, Antkowiak B: Molecular and
neuronal substrates for general anaesthetics. Nat Rev Neurosci 2004; 5:709 720
32. Wijdicks EFM: Neurologic Complications of
Critical Illness. Contemporary Neurology
Series 64. Second Edition. Oxford; New
York, Oxford University Press, 2002
33. Kunze K: Metabolic encephalopathies.
J Neurol 2002; 249:1150 1159
34. Cervical spine immobilization before admission to the hospital. Neurosurgery 2002;
50:S7S17
35. Varon J, Marik PE: The diagnosis and management of hypertensive crises. Chest 2000;
118:214 227
36. Samuels MA: Neurally induced cardiac
damage. Definition of the problem. Neurol
Clin 1993; 11:273292
37. Colice GL, Matthay MA, Bass E, et al: Neurogenic pulmonary edema. Am Rev Respir
Dis 1984; 130:941948
38. Chesnut RM, Marshall LF, Klauber MR, et
al: The role of secondary brain injury in
determining outcome from severe head injury. J Trauma 1993; 34:216 222
39. Fearnside MR, Cook RJ, McDougall P, et al:
The Westmead Head Injury Project outcome in severe head injury. A comparative
analysis of pre-hospital, clinical and CT
variables. Br J Neurosurg 1993; 7:267279
40. Zygun DA, Kortbeek JB, Fick GH, et al:
Non-neurologic organ dysfunction in severe
traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med 2005;
33:654 660
41. Robertson CS, Valadka AB, Hannay HJ, et
al: Prevention of secondary ischemic insults
after severe head injury. Crit Care Med
1999; 27:2086 2095
42. Sulte G, Elting JW, Langedijk M, et al: Admitting acute ischemic stroke patients to a
stroke care monitoring unit versus a conventional stroke unit: A randomized pilot
study. Stroke 2003; 34:101104
43. Ziai WC: Coma and altered consciousness.
In: Handbook of Neurocritical Care. Current Clinical Neurology. Bhardwaj A, Mirski
MA, Ulatowski JA (Eds.) Totowa, NJ, Humana Press, 2004
44. The Brain Trauma Foundation: The American Association of Neurological Surgeons.
The Joint Section on Neurotrauma and
Critical Care. Glasgow Coma Scale Score.
J Neurotrauma 2000; 17:563571
45. Booth CM, Boone RH, Tomlinson G, et al: Is
this patient dead, vegetative, or severely
neurologically impaired? Assessing outcome for comatose survivors of cardiac arrest. JAMA 2004; 291:870 879
46. Winkler JV, Rosen P, Alfry EJ: Prehospital
use of the Glasgow Coma Scale in severe
head injury. J Emerg Med 1984; 2:1 6
47. Baxt WG, Moody P: The impact of advanced
prehospital emergency care on the mortality of severely brain-injured patients.
J Trauma 1987; 27:365369
48. Massagli TL, Michaud LJ, Rivara FP: Association between injury indices and outcome
after severe traumatic brain injury in children. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77:
125132
49. Servadei F, Nasi MT, Cremonini AM, et al:
Importance of a reliable admission Glasgow
Coma Scale score for determining the need
for evacuation of posttraumatic subdural
39
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
40
hematomas: A prospective study of 65 patients. J Trauma 1998; 44:868 873
Sacco RL, VanGool R, Mohr JP, et al: Nontraumatic coma. Glasgow Coma Score and
coma etiology as predictors of 2-week outcome. Arch Neurol 1990; 47:11811184
Rordorf GW, Koroshetz W, Efird JT, et al:
Predictors of mortality in stroke patients
admitted to an intensive care unit. Crit
Care Med 2000; 28:13011305
Steiner T, Mendoza G, De Georgia M, et al:
Prognosis of stroke patients requiring mechanical ventilation in a neurological critical care unit. Stroke 1997; 28:711715
Qureshi AI, Sung GY, Razumovsky AY, et al:
Early identification of patients at risk for
symptomatic vasospasm after aneurysmal
subarachnoid hemorrhage. Crit Care Med
2000; 28:984 990
Tuhrim S, Dambrosia JM, Price TR, et al:
Intracerebral hemorrhage: External validation and extension of a model for prediction
of 30-day survival. Ann Neurol 1991; 29:
658 663
Tuhrim S, Dambrosia JM, Price TR, et al:
Prediction of intracerebral hemorrhage survival. Ann Neurol 1988; 24:258 263
van de Beek D, de Gans DJ, Spanjaard L, et
al: Clinical features and prognostic factors
in adults with bacterial meningitis. N Engl
J Med 2004; 351:1849 1859
Bastos P, Sun PGX, Wagner DP, et al: Glasgow Coma Scale score in the evaluation of
outcome in the intensive care unit: Findings from the Acute Physiology and Chronic
Health Evaluation III study. Crit Care Med
1993; 21:1459 1465
Knaus W, Wagner DP, Draper EA, et al: The
APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill
hospitalized adults. Chest 1991; 100:
1619 1636
Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, et al:
APACHE II: A severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985; 13:
818 829
Knaus WA, Zimmerman JE, Wagner DP, et
al: APACHE-acute physiology and chronic
health evaluation: A physiologically based
classification system. Crit Care Med 1981;
9:591597
Le Gall JR, Loirat P, Alperovitch A, et al: A
simplified acute physiology score for ICU
patients. Crit Care Med 1984; 12:975977
Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F: A new
Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II)
based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 1993; 270:29572963
Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, et al: The
SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/
failure. On behalf of the Working Group on
Sepsis-Related Problems of the European
Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 1996; 22:707710
Marshall JC, Cook DJ, Christou NV, et al:
Multiple organ dysfunction score: A reliable
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
descriptor of a complex clinical outcome.
Crit Care Med 1995; 23:1638 1652
Segatore M, Way C: The Glasgow Coma
Scale: Time for change. Heart Lung 1992;
21:548 557
Sternbach GL: The Glasgow Coma Scale.
J Emerg Med 2000; 19:6771
Jagger J, Jane JA, Rimel R: The Glasgow
Coma Scale: To sum or not to sum? Lancet
1983; 2:97
Shackford S, Wald SL, Ross SE, et al: The
clinical utility of computed tomographic
scanning and neurologic examination in
the management of patients with minor
head injuries. J Trauma 1992; 33:385394
Borczuk P: Predictors of intracranial injury
in patients with mild head trauma. Ann
Emerg Med 1995; 25:731736
Liu GT: Coma. Neurosurg Clin N Am 1999;
10:579 586, vii-viii
North JB, Jennett S: Abnormal breathing
patterns associated with acute brain damage. Arch Neurol 1974; 31:338 344
Rafanan AL, Kakulavar P, Perl J II, et al:
Head computed tomography in medical intensive care unit patients: clinical indications. Crit Care Med 2000; 28:1306 1309
Wilberger JE Jr, Deeb Z, Rothfus W: Magnetic resonance imaging in cases of severe
head injury. Neurosurgery 1987; 20:
571576
Yokota H, Kurokawa A, Otsuka T, et al:
Significance of magnetic resonance imaging in acute head injury. J Trauma 1991;
31:351357
Restrepo L, Wityk RJ, Grega MA, et al: Diffusion- and perfusion-weighted magnetic
resonance imaging of the brain before and
after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Stroke 2002; 33:2909 2915
Wityk RJ, Goldsborough MA, Hillis A, et al:
Diffusion- and perfusion-weighted brain
magnetic resonance imaging in patients
with neurologic complications after cardiac
surgery. Arch Neurol 2001; 58:571576
Finelli PF, Uphoff DF: Magnetic resonance
imaging abnormalities with septic encephalopathy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry
2004; 75:1189 1191
Hollinger P, Zurcher R, Schroth G, et al:
Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging findings in cerebritis and brain abscesses in a
patient with septic encephalopathy. J Neurol 2000; 247:232234
Practice parameters: Lumbar puncture
(summary statement). Report of the Quality
Standards Subcommittee of the American
Academy of Neurology. Neurology 1993; 43:
625 627
Adelson-Mitty J, Fink MP, Lisbon A: The
value of lumbar puncture in the evaluation
of critically ill, non-immunosuppressed,
surgical patients: A retrospective analysis of
70 cases. Intensive Care Med 1997; 23:
749 752
Metersky ML, Williams A, Rafanan AL: Retrospective analysis: Are fever and altered
mental status indications for lumbar punc-
82.
83.
84.
85.
86.
87.
88.
89.
90.
91.
92.
93.
94.
95.
96.
97.
98.
99.
ture in a hospitalized patient who has not
undergone neurosurgery? Clin Infect Dis
1997; 25:285288
Hasbun R, Abrahams J, Jekel J, et al: Computed tomography of the head before lumbar puncture in adults with suspected meningitis. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:17271733
Towne AR, Waterhouse EJ, Boggs JG, et al:
Prevalence of nonconvulsive status epilepticus in comatose patients. Neurology 2000;
54:340 345
Claassen J, Mayer SA, Kowalski RG, et al:
Detection of electrographic seizures with
continuous EEG monitoring in critically ill
patients. Neurology 2004; 62:17431748
Varelas PN, Spanaki MV, Hacein-Bey L, et
al: Emergent EEG: Indications and diagnostic yield. Neurology 2003; 61:702704
Kaplan PW: The EEG in metabolic encephalopathy and coma. J Clin Neurophysiol
2004; 21:307318
Kaplan PW, Genoud D, Ho TW, et al: Etiology, neurologic correlations, and prognosis
in alpha coma. Clin Neurophysiol 1999;
110:205213
Chien LT, Boehm RM, Robinson H, et al:
Characteristic early electroencephalographic changes in herpes simplex encephalitis. Arch Neurol 1977; 34:361364
Smith JB, Westmoreland BF, Reagan TJ, et
al: A distinctive clinical EEG profile in herpes simplex encephalitis. Mayo Clin Proc
1975; 50:469 474
Jennett B, Bond MR: Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet
1975; 1:480 484
Jennett B, Snoek J, Bond MR, et al: Disability after severe head injury: Observations on
the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1981; 44:
285293
Kaye AH, Andrewes D: Glasgow Outcome
Scale: Research scale or blunt instrument?
Lancet 2000; 356:1540 1541
Emanuel LL, Barry MJ, Stoeckle JD, et al:
Advance directives for medical careA case
for greater use. N Engl J Med 1991; 324:
889 895
Thompson BT, Cox PN, Antonelli M, et al:
Challenges in end-of-life care in the ICU:
Statement of the 5th International Consensus Conference in Critical Care: Brussels,
Belgium, April 2003: Executive summary.
Crit Care Med 2004; 32:17811784
Bates D: The prognosis of medical coma.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001;
71(Suppl 1):i20 i23
Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative
state (2): The Multi-Society Task Force on
PVS. N Engl J Med 1994; 330:15721579
Levy DE, Caronna JJ, Singer BH, et al: Predicting outcome from hypoxic-ischemic
coma. JAMA 1985; 253:1420 1426
Madl C, Grimm G, Kramer L, et al: Early
prediction of individual outcome after cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Lancet 1993;
341:855 858
Zandbergen EG, de Haan RJ, Stoutenbeek
Crit Care Med 2006 Vol. 34, No. 1
100.
101.
102.
103.
104.
105.
106.
107.
108.
CP, et al: Systematic review of early prediction of poor outcome in anoxic-ischaemic
coma. Lancet 1998; 352:1808 1812
Attia J, Cook DJ: Prognosis in anoxic and
traumatic coma. Crit Care Clin 1998; 14:
497511
Young GB, Wang JT, Connolly JF: Prognostic determination in anoxic-ischemic and
traumatic encephalopathies. J Clin Neurophysiol 2004; 21:379 390
Robinson LR, Micklesen PJ, Tirschwell DL,
et al: Predictive value of somatosensory
evoked potentials for awakening from
coma. Crit Care Med 2003; 31:960 967
Gennarelli TA, Spielman GM, Langfitt TW,
et al: Influence of the type of intracranial
lesion on outcome from severe head injury.
J Neurosurg 1982; 56:26 32
Teasdale E, Cardoso E, Galbraith S, et al: CT
scan in severe diffuse head injury: Physiological and clinical correlations. J Neurol
Neurosurg Psychiatry 1984; 47:600 603
Teasdale G, Teasdale E, Hadley D: Computed tomographic and magnetic resonance
imaging classification of head injury. J Neurotrauma 1992; 9(Suppl 1):S249 S257
Hashimoto T, Nakamura N, Richard KE, et
al: Primary brain stem lesions caused by
closed head injuries. Neurosurg Rev 1993;
16:291298
Ruff RM, Marshall LF, Crouch J, et al: Predictors of outcome following severe head
trauma: Follow-up data from the Traumatic
Coma Data Bank. Brain Inj 1993; 7:101111
Eisenberg HM, Gary HE Jr, Aldrich EF, et
Crit Care Med 2006 Vol. 34, No. 1
109.
110.
111.
112.
113.
114.
115.
al: Initial CT findings in 753 patients with
severe head injury. A report from the NIH
Traumatic Coma Data Bank. J Neurosurg
1990; 73:688 698
Adams HP Jr, Kassell NF, Torner JC: Usefulness of computed tomography in predicting outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A preliminary report of
the Cooperative Aneurysm Study. Neurology 1985; 35:12631267
Cusumano S, Paolin A, Di Paola F, et al:
Assessing brain function in post-traumatic
coma by means of bit-mapped SEPs, BAEPs,
CT, SPET and clinical scores. Prognostic
implications. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1992; 84:499 514
Levin HS, Williams D, Crofford MJ, et al:
Relationship of depth of brain lesions to
consciousness and outcome after closed
head injury. J Neurosurg 1988; 69:861 866
Kampfl A, Schmutzhard E, Franz G, et al:
Prediction of recovery from post-traumatic
vegetative state with cerebral magneticresonance imaging. Lancet 1998; 351:
17631767
Saunders DE, Clifton AG, Brown MM: Measurement of infarct size using MRI predicts
prognosis in middle cerebral artery infarction. Stroke 1995; 26:22722276
Chalela JA, Wolf RL, Maldjian JA, et al: MRI
identification of early white matter injury in
anoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Neurology 2001; 56:481 485
Fogel W, Krieger D, Veith M, et al: Serum
neuron-specific enolase as early predictor of
116.
117.
118.
119.
120.
121.
122.
outcome after cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med
1997; 25:11331138
Schoerkhuber W, Kittler H, Sterz F, et al:
Time course of serum neuron-specific enolase. A predictor of neurological outcome in
patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest.
Stroke 1999; 30:1598 1603
Vos PE, Lamers KJ, Hendriks JC, et al: Glial
and neuronal proteins in serum predict outcome after severe traumatic brain injury.
Neurology 2004; 62:13031310
Rosen H, Sunnerhagen KS, Herlitz J, et al:
Serum levels of the brain-derived proteins
S-100 and NSE predict long-term outcome
after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2001; 49:
183191
Pelinka LE, Kroepfl A, Leixnering M, et al:
GFAP versus S100B in serum after traumatic brain injury: Relationship to brain
damage and outcome. J Neurotrauma 2004;
21:15531561
Karkela J, Pasanen M, Kaukinen S, et al:
Evaluation of hypoxic brain injury with spinal fluid enzymes, lactate, and pyruvate.
Crit Care Med 1992; 20:378 386
Zandbergen EG, de Haan RJ, Hijdra A: Systematic review of prediction of poor outcome in anoxic-ischaemic coma with biochemical markers of brain damage.
Intensive Care Med 2001; 27:16611667
Becker KJ, Ulatowski JA: Disorders of consciousness. In: Current Therapy in Neurologic Disease. Current Therapy Series. Fifth
Edition. Johnson RT, Griffin JW (Eds). St.
Louis, MO, Mosby, 1997
41