Parallel Ledgers in Asset
Parallel Ledgers in Asset
ACCOUNTING
We can use parallel ledgers in asset accounting for different valuations as per different
accounting principles. In our scenario, company code AIPL (Hindustan Mills Ltd) follows two
accounting principles that is US GAAP and Indian GAAP. In General Ledger accounting we have
created ledgers for each GAAP i.e. leading ledger 0L for US GAAP and Non-leading ledger
X1 for Indian GAAP. In asset accounting, we use master area i.e. area 01 for leading ledger
valuation. For valuation of non-leading ledger, we create one separate real depreciation area
and one derived depreciation area for each accounting principle so that the values of Asset
Accounting and General Ledger Accounting can be reconciled. The derived depreciation area
triggers adjustment postings to keep the general ledger and subsidiary ledgers in sync. We have
already created ledger group for each ledger in General Ledger accounting, the same ledger
group will be assigned in depreciation area of each accounting principle in asset accounting. The
following depreciation areas will be created:
Depr Area
Description
Posting in GL
30
55
Transaction Code
OADB
Using above menu path or T.code we will assign the ledger groups in the respective depreciation area i.e.
ledger group '0L' in area 1 and ledger 'X1' in area 30:
In the above step, we have specified ledger group 0L as target ledger group for master
depreciation area 01 that means asset values of depreciation area 01 will be updated in leading
ledger 0L in General Ledger Accounting. The ledger group which we assign to master area must
contain leading ledger. In the same way we will specify ledger group X1 for depreciation area
30 which we use for parallel valuation for Indian GAAP. The ledger group of the area for parallel
valuation is not allowed to contain the leading ledger. Asset values in area 30 will be posted to
Non-Leading ledger X1, as shown in the below screen:
Posting control in depreciation area 30 should be set as Area posts Depreciation Only.
We do not have to set up a separate set of GL accounts for this new depreciation areas 30. Instead we use the
same set of GL accounts of the master depreciation area 01. In this scenario, we do not have to create any
new GL accounts in the chart of accounts or in the company code. We also do not have to create a new
financial statement version for different parallel valuations and Ledgers. Depreciation area 30
uses the GL account set of depreciation area 01. Ledger group X1 is not allowed to contain the
leading ledger when we specify X1 as target ledger group in depreciation area.
To enable this setting, we have to select 1 in the field Different Depreciation Area in
depreciation area 30 as shown in the above picture.
SAP Menu
Transaction Code
OADB_WZ
Enter the real depreciation area 30 for parallel valuation and target ledger group X1 and click on "Continue"
button.
Since we have not created any derived or delta depreciation area in chart of depreciation ALTM
for company code AIPL, here we will select option Create New Depreciation Area so that system
automatically creates the delta depreciation area for parallel valuation. System shows the
difference between local and parallel valuation in this area and posts these differences in the
ledger group for parallel valuation i.e. X1.
Click on "Continue" button.
Notice that ledger group X1 has assigned in both depreciation area 30, which is for parallel valuation and
depreciation area 55 which is delta depreciation area for area 30 to post the difference between area 1 and 30.
Transaction Code
OAYZ
Select asset class 3000 furniture and fittings and double click on Depreciation areas in dialog
structure:
Deselect the check box deactivate for depreciation area 30 so that all the depreciation areas will
appear when we create an asset master under this asset class.
We have specified useful life 2 years for area 01 and 4 years for area 30.
Transaction Code
AO90
Similarly assign balance sheet GL accounts to depreciation area 30 and then assign depreciation GL accounts
for depreciation area 1 and 30 as follows:
Depreciation area 1:
We have completed the necessary configuration steps for parallel ledgers in asset accounting. Now we will test
the same settings for the business scenario in the following steps:
Useful life
01 (For US GAAP)
2 Years
50%
30 (Indian GAAP)
4 Years
25%
Depreciation calculation for asset value 2, 40,000/- for each depreciation area is as under:
Depreciation area
01 (For US GAAP)
2 x 12 = 24
2,40,000/24 = 10,000
30 (Indian GAAP)
4 x 12 = 48
2,40,000/48 = 5,000
Now, do the asset acquisition for above asset and then run depreciation for one period and finally retirement of
the asset and see the effect in parallel ledgers.
Transaction Code
AS01
Click on Deprec.Area tab page and give useful life and depreciatoin key are 1 and 30 as follows:
Now save the data, system has created asset master number 300011 for furniture.
8. Asset acquisition
Do asset purchase on date 01.03.2013 for amount 240,000 using following menu path or transaction code:
SAP Menu
Transaction Code
F-90
Transaction Code
AW01N
In the above screenshot, we can see the value in depreciation area 01 (Leading ledger valuation in local
currency).
Now see the comparison value of depreciation area 30 as follows:
In the above picture, for depreciation area 30 (Non-Leading ledger valuation in local currency), system shows
comparisons for four years (2013, 2014, 2015 & 2016) because we have given useful life four years in asset
master 300011 for this depreciation area.
Note: System also shows value 10, 000 in fifth year i.e. 2017 this is because we have done asset acquisition in
third period of the current year 2013 so in current year system could calculate depreciation only for 10 months
and for remaining 2 periods, depreciation will be posted in year 2017 (5, 000 x 2 = 10,000).
Now display the comparison value of delta depreciation area 55. Here we can see that system shows the
difference value between area 01 and 30 under depreciation area 55.
Example: For the year 2013, ordinary depreciation is 1, 00,000 in depreciation area 01 and for area 30 ordinary
depreciation is 50, 000 in the same year so difference 50,000 (area 01minus area30) has shown under delta
area 55. See the below picture:
Transaction Code
FAGLL03
SAP Menu
Transaction Code
AFAB
Execute:
Notice that system has created two separate depreciation documents with different values for
each depreciation area i.e. area 1 and area 30. Since area 1 is assigned to ledger 0L and area 30
is assigned to ledger X1 in customizing so system will post separate depreciation values to each
ledger.
12.
Display book depreciation G/L account line items for the each ledger using following menu path
or transaction code:
SAP Menu
Transaction Code
FAGLL03
Notice that system has posted depreciation value 10,000 for ledger "0L" and 5,000 for ledger "X1"
Thus depreciation amount of 10, 000 under US GAAP is posted in leading ledger 0L and the
depreciation amount of 5, 000 under Indian GAAP is posted in non-leading ledger X1
13.
We will retire the asset through sale for a value of Rs.2, 33,000 so that in US GAAP depreciation area, there
will be a gain of Rs.3, 000. On the other hand, there will be a loss of Rs. 2, 000 in the Indian GAAP. The
following are the accounting entries which should be updated in each ledger:
2,40,000.00
Cr
2,33,000.00
Dr
10,000.00
Dr
3,000.00
Cr
2,40,000.00
Cr
2,33,000.00
Dr
5,000.00
Dr
2,000.00
Dr
But when we do retirement postings in SAP, system does not post the separate values to each ledger i.e. 0L
and X1 as explained in the above example rather the entries made in the leading ledger is duplicated in the
non-leading ledger. In this case, system will pass the following entry in area 30 (Ledger X1) which is the same
accounting entry updated in area 01 (Ledger 0L):
2,40,000.00
Cr
2,33,000.00
Dr
10,000.00
Dr
3,000.00
Cr
Due to this posting in Indian GAAP area, we can see the following mismatches in Indian GAAP ledger X1:
1. The reverse of accumulated depreciation is more by 5,000 because 10,000 has been reversed instead of
5,000
2. There is no posting for actual loss of 2,000 in this ledger
To correct all these mismatches, the system automatically posts the entries necessary to reflect the correct
position in Indian GAAP (Ledger X1) when we run the periodic asset posting program. This adjustment is done
using the Delta depreciation area.
The following entry will be passed for adjustment using periodic program run:
5,000.00
Cr
3,000.00
Dr
2,000.00
Dr
Lets see replicate the above scenario in SAP using the following menu path or transaction code to do asset
retirement posting:
SAP Menu
Transaction Code
ABAON
Note: Line item 2 is for accumulated depreciation account in the above screenshot.
Display asset values in asset explorer for each depreciation area after retirement as shown below:
Now display balance for G/L account 30000004 (Profits on asset disposal / sale) after doing asset retirement
and notice that system has posted the same value to both ledger i.e. 0l and X1:
Transaction code: FAGLL03
In the above two screenshots, we can see that system has updated same value in both ledgers.
Now we need to correct these values and post the adjustment entry in non-leading ledgers using asset periodic
posting as explained earlier in the example, use the following menu path or transaction code:
Transaction Code
ASKB
Give the asset number 300011 in initial screen for which we want to post the adjustment entry.
First execute in test mode and then execute update run as follows:
In the above screenshot, we can see that system posts this adjustment document to ledger group X1 only.
When we execute the update run, system creates the following document as per accounting entry explained in
the example:
Note: Line item 3 is for accumulated depreciation account in the above screenshot.
This way system nullifies the balance of Profit on sale account for ledger X1 and posts to Loss
on sale account, see the below picture:
Finally, after completing the above steps, we will find the GL balances for each ledger as per the accounting
entries given in the example as mentioned below:
2,40,000.00
Cr
2,33,000.00
Dr
10,000.00
Dr
3,000.00
Cr
2,40,000.00
Cr
2,33,000.00
Dr
5,000.00
Dr
2,000.00
Dr
=====================================================================================
Thanks for your valuable feedback, advice and suggestions.
Please correct me if I have missed out something
Best Regards,
Ram Kumar Swami