0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views2 pages

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.: No. 321, Docket 26646

This document is a court case summary dismissing an appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The appeal was premature as the complaint being appealed contained a single claim against multiple defendants, and there had not yet been a final determination regarding one of the defendants. The court examined the record filed by the appellant and found it clearly showed the appeal was premature. As such, the court dismissed the appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
15 views2 pages

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.: No. 321, Docket 26646

This document is a court case summary dismissing an appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The appeal was premature as the complaint being appealed contained a single claim against multiple defendants, and there had not yet been a final determination regarding one of the defendants. The court examined the record filed by the appellant and found it clearly showed the appeal was premature. As such, the court dismissed the appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

290 F.

2d 585

Paul J. KERN, Plaintiff-Appellant,


v.
A. J. HETTINGER, Jr., individually and as a Director of The
Western Pacific Railroad Company, The Western Pacific
Railroad Company, 'Richard Rowe' fictitious, the real name
of the defendant or defendants being unknown to the
plaintiff, said fictitious name being intended to designate
any one or more persons who were Directors of the Defendant,
The Western Pacific Railroad Company between the months of
June and October 1957, Samuel P. Mason, The Chase
Manhattan
Bank and the Chemical Corn Exchange Bank, DefendantsAppellees.
No. 321, Docket 26646.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.


Argued April 21, 1961.
Decided May 24, 1961.

Eleanor Jackson Piel, New York City (Donner, Kinoy, Perlin & Piel, New
York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.
Royall, Koegel & Rogers, New York City (John F. Caskey, Herbert C.
Earnshaw, Donald A. Krenz, New York City, of counsel), for respondent
Hettinger.
Milbank, Tweed, Hope & Hadley, New York City (A. Donald
MacKinnon, Arthur V. Savage, New York City, of counsel), for Chase
Manhattan Bank and Chemical Corn Exchange Bank.
Before WATERMAN, MOORE and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.

When the within appeal was calendared for argument we examined the record
filed by appellant. It clearly appears from that record that the appeal is
premature inasmuch as the complaint sets forth a single claim for relief against
multiple party defendants and there has been no final determination below as to
one of these defendants.

Appeal dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction. Mull v. Ackerman, 2 Cir.,


1960, 279 F.2d 25; Goldlawr, Inc. v. Heiman, 2 Cir., 1959, 273 F.2d 729.

You might also like