0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views1 page

Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. District 65, Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union Afl-Cio, 393 F.2d 932, 2d Cir. (1968)

Owens-Illinois brought an action seeking a declaratory judgment to permanently stay an arbitration demanded by District 65 union. Both sides moved for summary judgment. The district court granted Owens-Illinois' motion to restrain arbitration and denied the union's motion to dismiss. The union appealed. The Second Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment in a per curiam opinion, relying on the reasoning in the district court's published opinion.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views1 page

Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. District 65, Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union Afl-Cio, 393 F.2d 932, 2d Cir. (1968)

Owens-Illinois brought an action seeking a declaratory judgment to permanently stay an arbitration demanded by District 65 union. Both sides moved for summary judgment. The district court granted Owens-Illinois' motion to restrain arbitration and denied the union's motion to dismiss. The union appealed. The Second Circuit affirmed the district court's judgment in a per curiam opinion, relying on the reasoning in the district court's published opinion.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

393 F.

2d 932

OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,


v.
DISTRICT 65, RETAIL, WHOLESALE AND DEPARTMENT
STORE UNION AFL-CIO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 472.
Docket 31698.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.


Argued May 2, 1968.
Decided May 2, 1968.

Plaintiff-appellee brought its action in the United States District Court for
the Southern District of New York, for a declaratory judgment
permanently staying an arbitration which had been demanded against it by
defendant-appellant. Plaintiff and defendant cross-moved for summary
judgment. Plaintiff-appellee's motion to restrain permanently an
arbitration proceeding was granted and defendant-appellant's motion to
dismiss the action was denied. Defendant-appellant appeals.
Emanuel Dannett, New York City, Fred E. Fuller, Richard S. Baker,
Toledo, Ohio, Jacob Silverman, New York City, Fuller, Seney, Henry &
Hodge, Toledo, Ohio, McGoldrick, Dannett, Horowitz & Golub, New
York City, for plaintiff-appellee.
Eugene G. Eisner, New York City, for defendant-appellant.
Before WATERMAN, FRIENDLY and KAUFMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

We affirm in open court the judgment below upon the opinion of Judge
McLean, reported at 276 F.Supp. 740 (S.D.N.Y. 1967).

You might also like