Scribd
Upload
34 views2 pages

David Stirling, JR., and William G. Stirling v. Chemical Bank, Individually, and As Agent, 516 F.2d 1396, 2d Cir. (1975)

This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit from 1975. The court affirmed a lower court's decision in a case brought by David Stirling Jr. and William Stirling against Chemical Bank and other banks. The appeals court affirmed the district court's opinion in this case based on the lower court's well-considered opinion published in 1974.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
34 views2 pages

David Stirling, JR., and William G. Stirling v. Chemical Bank, Individually, and As Agent, 516 F.2d 1396, 2d Cir. (1975)

This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit from 1975. The court affirmed a lower court's decision in a case brought by David Stirling Jr. and William Stirling against Chemical Bank and other banks. The appeals court affirmed the district court's opinion in this case based on the lower court's well-considered opinion published in 1974.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

516 F.

2d 1396

David STIRLING, Jr., and William G. Stirling, PlaintiffsAppellants,


v.
CHEMICAL BANK, Individually, and as Agent, et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 1026, Docket 75-7006.

United States Court of Appeals,


Second Circuit.
Submitted May 29, 1975.
Decided May 30, 1975.

Feldshuh, Weinberger & Derfner, New York City (Sidney Feldshuh,


Donald A. Derfner, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs-appellants.
Cravath, Swaine & Moore, New York City (Ralph L. McAfee, Richard S.
Simmons, New York City, of counsel), for defendants-appellees Chemical
Bank, Frank Beatty, John J. Irish and Paavo Prima.
Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, New York City, for defendantappellee The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.
Phillips, Lytle, Hitchcock, Blaine & Huber, Buffalo, Bleakley, Platt,
Schmidt, Hart & Fritz, New York City, for defendants-appellees Marine
Midland Bank Western and Marine Midland Bank Rochester.
Nixon, Hargrave, Devans & Doyle, Rochester, N. Y., Townley, Updike,
Carter & Rodgers, New York City, for defendant-appellee Lincoln First
Bank of Rochester.
Debevoise, Plimpton, Lyons & Gates, New York City, for defendantappellee Union Commerce Bank.
Before CLARK, Associate Justice, * and HAYS and MANSFIELD,
Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

We affirm upon Judge Bonsal's well considered opinion reported at 382


F.Supp. 1146 (S.D.N.Y.1974).

United States Supreme Court, retired, sitting by designation

You might also like