Scribd
Upload
16 views1 page

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit

The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the judgment of the District Court of New Jersey in a case between a national bank and a construction corporation and its surety company. The appeals court found no error after reviewing the record. They affirmed the lower court's decision for the reasons provided in the district court's excellent opinion published at 217 F. Supp. 341 (D.N.J. 1963).

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
16 views1 page

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit

The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit affirmed the judgment of the District Court of New Jersey in a case between a national bank and a construction corporation and its surety company. The appeals court found no error after reviewing the record. They affirmed the lower court's decision for the reasons provided in the district court's excellent opinion published at 217 F. Supp. 341 (D.N.J. 1963).

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

328 F.

2d 315

The NATIONAL STATE BANK OF NEWARK, a National


Banking Association
v.
TERMINAL CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, a New
Jersey Corporation and American Surety Company of New
York, a New York Corporation, Appellants.
No. 14559.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.


Argued February 18, 1964.
Decided March 4, 1964.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New
Jersey, Arthur S. Lane, Judge.
Aaron Heller, Passaic, N. J. (Heller & Laiks, Passaic, N. J., on the brief),
for appellants.
Samuel A. Larner, Newark, N. J. (Budd, Larner & Kent, Newark, N. J.,
Toner, Crowley, Woelper & Vanderbilt, Newark, N. J., John A.
Ackerman, Newark, N. J., on the brief), for appellee.
Before KALODNER and HASTIE, Circuit Judges and KIRKPATRICK,
District Judge.
PER CURIAM.

On review of the record we find no error. The judgment of the District Court
will be affirmed for the reasons stated by Judge Lane in his excellent opinion
reported at 217 F.Supp. 341 (D.N.J.1963).

You might also like