United States v. Albert Thomas Clark, 46 F.3d 1127, 4th Cir. (1995)
Uploaded by
Scribd Government DocsUnited States v. Albert Thomas Clark, 46 F.3d 1127, 4th Cir. (1995)
Uploaded by
Scribd Government Docs46 F.
3d 1127
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of
unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
Albert Thomas CLARK, Defendant Appellant.
No. 94-6873.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: December 13, 1994
Decided: January 12, 1995.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
North Carolina, at Wilmington. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CR-91-497, CA-94-50-7)
Albert Thomas Clark, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, NC, for Appellee.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS,
Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec.
2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. United States v. Clark, Nos. CR-91-49-7; CA94-50-7 (E.D.N.C. July 21, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
