0% found this document useful (0 votes)
30 views2 pages

United States v. Timothy Ernest Davis, And, 19 F.3d 12, 4th Cir. (1994)

The document is a court case notice from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Timothy Ernest Davis's appeal of a district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal without merit based on the reasoning provided in the district court's opinion dated September 3, 1993. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
30 views2 pages

United States v. Timothy Ernest Davis, And, 19 F.3d 12, 4th Cir. (1994)

The document is a court case notice from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Timothy Ernest Davis's appeal of a district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal without merit based on the reasoning provided in the district court's opinion dated September 3, 1993. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

19 F.

3d 12

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
Timothy Ernest DAVIS, Defendant and Appellant.
No. 93-7121.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted Feb. 28, 1994.
Decided March 8, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of
North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, District Judge. (CR-90-6,
CA-93-2-P).
Timothy Ernest Davis, appellant pro se.
Harry Thomas Church, Asst. U.S. Atty., Charlotte, NC, for appellee.
W.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and SPROUSE,
Senior Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec.
2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal
is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
United States v. Davis, Nos. CR-90-6; CA-93-2-P (W.D.N.C. Sept. 3, 1993).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

You might also like