United States v. William Mark Strickland, 32 F.3d 563, 4th Cir. (1994)
Uploaded by
Scribd Government DocsUnited States v. William Mark Strickland, 32 F.3d 563, 4th Cir. (1994)
Uploaded by
Scribd Government Docs32 F.
3d 563
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of
unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
William Mark STRICKLAND, Defendant Appellant.
No. 94-6385.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted June 23, 1994.
Decided July 21, 1994.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CR-9282, CA-94-33)
William Mark Strickland, appellant pro se.
John Howarth Bennett, Office of the United States Atty., Raleigh, NC, for
appellee.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE,
Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec.
2255 (1988) motion and denying reconsideration. Our review of the record and
the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.
Strickland, Nos. CR-92-82; CA-94-33 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 7, 1994; Mar. 24, 1994).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
2
AFFIRMED.
