Scribd
Upload
15 views2 pages

Bal Dev Enand v. Atlis Systems, Incorporated Atlis Federal Services, Incorporated, 23 F.3d 400, 4th Cir. (1994)

This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Atlis Systems, Inc. and Atlis Federal Services, Inc., in a case brought against them by the appellant Bal Dev Enand. The appeals court found the appeal to be without merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court. It denied Enand's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral arguments as it determined the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
15 views2 pages

Bal Dev Enand v. Atlis Systems, Incorporated Atlis Federal Services, Incorporated, 23 F.3d 400, 4th Cir. (1994)

This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court affirmed the district court's granting of summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Atlis Systems, Inc. and Atlis Federal Services, Inc., in a case brought against them by the appellant Bal Dev Enand. The appeals court found the appeal to be without merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court. It denied Enand's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral arguments as it determined the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

23 F.

3d 400
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished
dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
Fourth Circuit.

Bal Dev ENAND, Plaintiff Appellant,


v.
ATLIS SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED; Atlis Federal Services,
Incorporated, Defendants Appellees.
No. 94-1040.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted April 21, 1994.
Decided May 10, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
at Baltimore. Frank A. Kaufman, Senior District Judge. (CA-92-1141-K)
Bal Dev Enand, appellant pro se.
Glenn Marshal Cooper, Hope B. Eastman, Paley, Rothman, Goldstein,
Rosenberg & Cooper, Bethesda, MD, for appellees.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge and CHAPMAN,
Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment in
favor of the Defendants. Our review of the record and the district court's
opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court.* Enand v. Atlis Systems, Inc., No. CA-921141-K (D. Md. Dec. 27, 1993). We deny Enand's motion for appointment of

counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

We note that the district court inadvertently stated that Louis Hicks was older
than Appellant. However, the court also specifically found that Tony Enriquez
was older than Appellant and apparently confused the names of Appellant's
former co-workers. The error had no effect on the outcome

You might also like