0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views2 pages

United States v. Michael Horace Long, 23 F.3d 404, 4th Cir. (1994)

This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of a defendant's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The appeals court adopts the reasoning of the district court and finds the appeal is without merit. It denies the defendant's motion for appointment of counsel.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views2 pages

United States v. Michael Horace Long, 23 F.3d 404, 4th Cir. (1994)

This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of a defendant's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The appeals court adopts the reasoning of the district court and finds the appeal is without merit. It denies the defendant's motion for appointment of counsel.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

23 F.

3d 404
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished
dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,


v.
Michael Horace LONG, Defendant Appellant.
No. 93-6614.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted April 21, 1994.
Decided May 5, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of
North Carolina, at Asheville. Richard L. Voorhees, Chief District Judge.
(CR-90-227-A-3, CA-92-136-1)
Michael Horace Long, appellant pro se.
Jerry Wayne Miller, Office of the United States Attorney, Asheville,
North Carolina, for appellee.
W.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN,
Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec.
2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. United States v. Long, Nos. CR-90-227-A-3;
CA-92-136-1 (W.D.N.C. May 26, 1993). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
The motion for appointment of counsel is denied.
AFFIRMED

You might also like