0% found this document useful (0 votes)
25 views2 pages

United States v. Paul Donald Washington, 35 F.3d 558, 4th Cir. (1994)

The document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of Paul Donald Washington's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit finds the appeal is without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. It affirms the lower court's ruling and finds oral arguments are not necessary in making its decision.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
25 views2 pages

United States v. Paul Donald Washington, 35 F.3d 558, 4th Cir. (1994)

The document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of Paul Donald Washington's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit finds the appeal is without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. It affirms the lower court's ruling and finds oral arguments are not necessary in making its decision.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

35 F.

3d 558

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
Paul Donald WASHINGTON, Defendant Appellant.
No. 94-6096.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted July 5, 1994.
Decided Sept 7, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CR-92-614, CA-93-91-4)
Paul Donald Washington, appellant pro se.
Robert Joseph Seidel, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Norfolk, VA, for appellee.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, WILKINSON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec.
2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. United States v. Washington, Nos. CR-92-61-4,
CA-93-91-4 (E.D. Va. Jan. 6, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

You might also like