0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views2 pages

United States v. Carland Ray Davis, 45 F.3d 428, 4th Cir. (1995)

This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes the denial of Carland Ray Davis's appeal challenging the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and motion for reconsideration. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings, finding the appeal was without merit. It also denied Davis's request that the court take judicial notice of his claim that Chapman v. United States controls his final claim.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views2 pages

United States v. Carland Ray Davis, 45 F.3d 428, 4th Cir. (1995)

This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes the denial of Carland Ray Davis's appeal challenging the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and motion for reconsideration. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings, finding the appeal was without merit. It also denied Davis's request that the court take judicial notice of his claim that Chapman v. United States controls his final claim.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

45 F.

3d 428
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished
dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,


v.
Carland Ray DAVIS, Defendant Appellant.
No. 93-7169.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted August 10, 1994.
Decided January 4, 1995.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
North Carolina, at Fayetteville. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CR-91-52BR, CA-93-72-BR)
Carland Ray Davis, appellant pro se. Christine Witcover Dean, Asst. U.S.
Atty., Raleigh, NC, for appellee.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM
1

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec.
2255 (1988) motion and his motion for reconsideration under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59.
Our review of the record and the district court's opinions discloses that this
appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court.* United States v. Davis, Nos. CR-91-52-BR; CA-93-72-BR (E.D.N.C.
Oct. 4 & 21, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

We deny Appellant's motion requesting judicial notice of the alleged fact that
Chapman v. United States, 500 U.S. 453 (1991), controls his final claim

You might also like