Legal Appeal Outcome: Jones v. US
Uploaded by
Scribd Government DocsLegal Appeal Outcome: Jones v. US
Uploaded by
Scribd Government Docs991 F.
2d 792
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of
unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Henry D. JONES, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 93-6011.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 29, 1993
Decided: April 23, 1993
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-92603)
Henry D. Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before LUTTIG, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and CHAPMAN, Senior
Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
1
Henry D. Jones appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28
U.S.C. 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm substantially
on the reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Jones, No. CA-92-603
(E.D.N.C. Nov. 20, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
To the extent that Jones raised an ineffective assistance of counsel claim based
on the failure of counsel to advise him of the alleged grand jury infirmity, the
claim is without merit. Tollett v. Henderson, 411 U.S. 258, 267 (1973)
