0% found this document useful (0 votes)
29 views2 pages

United States v. Anthony G. Wozny, 43 F.3d 1469, 4th Cir. (1994)

This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court affirmed the district court's denial of Anthony G. Wozny's motion under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 to challenge his conviction. The Fourth Circuit found the appeal was without merit after reviewing the record, district court opinion, and supplemental authority. The facts and legal issues were adequately presented, so the court affirmed the lower court's ruling without needing oral arguments.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
29 views2 pages

United States v. Anthony G. Wozny, 43 F.3d 1469, 4th Cir. (1994)

This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court affirmed the district court's denial of Anthony G. Wozny's motion under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 to challenge his conviction. The Fourth Circuit found the appeal was without merit after reviewing the record, district court opinion, and supplemental authority. The facts and legal issues were adequately presented, so the court affirmed the lower court's ruling without needing oral arguments.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

43 F.

3d 1469

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
Anthony G. WOZNY, Defendant Appellant.
No. 94-6247.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted July 19, 1994.
Decided December 15, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CR92-128, CA-93-566)
Anthony G. Wozny, appellant pro se. Roger William Frydrychowski,
Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, VA, for appellee.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS,
Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM
1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec.
2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion,
as well as supplemental authority submitted by Appellant under Fed. R.App. P.
28(j), discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. United States v. Wozny, Nos. CR-92-128; CA-

93-566 (E.D. Va. Feb. 28, 1994). We deny as moot Wozny's motion to expedite
his appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

You might also like