James Elliott Price, Sr. v. John Williams Harold Pearsons, and Charles M. Creecy Nathan Rice William Carroll, 9 F.3d 1544, 4th Cir. (1993)
Uploaded by
Scribd Government DocsJames Elliott Price, Sr. v. John Williams Harold Pearsons, and Charles M. Creecy Nathan Rice William Carroll, 9 F.3d 1544, 4th Cir. (1993)
Uploaded by
Scribd Government Docs9 F.
3d 1544
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of
unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
James Elliott PRICE, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
John WILLIAMS; Harold Pearsons, Defendants-Appellees,
and
Charles M. Creecy; Nathan Rice; William Carroll, Defendants.
No. 92-7176.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 21, 1993.
Decided: November 10, 1993.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James Elliott Price, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Jacob Leonard Safron, Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellees.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE,
Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
James Elliott Price, Sr., appeals from the district court's order denying relief
under 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's
opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that
this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Price v. Williams, No. CA-91-737 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 24, 1992). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
