0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views2 pages

Legal Appeal Outcome Affirmed

The document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where John Everett Clark appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit in Clark's appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the materials available to the court.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views2 pages

Legal Appeal Outcome Affirmed

The document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where John Everett Clark appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit in Clark's appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the materials available to the court.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

32 F.

3d 563

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
John Everett CLARK, Defendant Appellant.
No. 94-6298.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted: June 23, 1994
Decided: August 15, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of
North Carolina, at Asheville. Richard L. Voorhees, Chief District Judge.
(CR-91-93, CA-93-32-1)
John Everett Clark, Appellant Pro Se.
Thomas J. Ashcraft, Office of the United States Attorney, Charlotte,
North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE,
Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec.
2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal
is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
United States v. Clark, No. CR-91-93, No. CA-93-32-1 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 2,
1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.


AFFIRMED

You might also like