Scribd
Upload
19 views2 pages

Maurice R. Wilkerson v. Howard Lyles, Warden, 812 F.2d 1402, 4th Cir. (1987)

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny Maurice Wilkerson's request for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The appeals court found Wilkerson's appeal to be without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. As the issues had been recently decided in other cases, the appeals court affirmed the lower court's judgment without holding oral arguments.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
19 views2 pages

Maurice R. Wilkerson v. Howard Lyles, Warden, 812 F.2d 1402, 4th Cir. (1987)

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision to deny Maurice Wilkerson's request for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The appeals court found Wilkerson's appeal to be without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. As the issues had been recently decided in other cases, the appeals court affirmed the lower court's judgment without holding oral arguments.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

812 F.

2d 1402
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
Maurice R. WILKERSON, Appellant,
v.
Howard LYLES, Warden, Appellee.
No. 86-7075.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted Jan 21, 1987.
Decided Feb. 17, 1987.

Maurice R. Wilkerson, appellant pro se.


David Yuan Li, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, District Judge. (C/A No. HAR-84-1257).
Before RUSSELL, SPROUSE and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

A review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal from its order
refusing relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the
dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with
oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district
court. Wilkerson v. Lyles, C/A No. HAR-84-1257 (D. Md., Jan. 31, 1986).

AFFIRMED.

You might also like