0% found this document useful (0 votes)
31 views2 pages

United States v. Henry Evans, 922 F.2d 836, 4th Cir. (1991)

This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a decision to affirm a lower district court's denial of a defendant's motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. The Fourth Circuit found the appeal lacked merit and affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the lower district court in its previous denial of the motion.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
31 views2 pages

United States v. Henry Evans, 922 F.2d 836, 4th Cir. (1991)

This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a decision to affirm a lower district court's denial of a defendant's motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. The Fourth Circuit found the appeal lacked merit and affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the lower district court in its previous denial of the motion.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

922 F.

2d 836
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Henry EVANS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 90-6404.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted: Dec. 13, 1990.
Decided: Jan. 10, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge.
(CR-83-107-R; CA-87-25-R)
Henry Evans, appellant pro se.
N. George Metcalf, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Va., for
appellee.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before K.K. HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,
Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

Henry Evans appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28
U.S.C. Sec. 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. United States v. Evans, CR-83-107-R; CA-8725-R (E.D.Va. Sept. 17, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

You might also like