James Byrd Miller v. Joseph L. Hamilton Charles M. Creecy Harry L. Allbrooks Larry E. Davis James W. Cook Mrs. Thompson Doctor Stanley, 25 F.3d 1040, 4th Cir. (1994)
Uploaded by
Scribd Government DocsJames Byrd Miller v. Joseph L. Hamilton Charles M. Creecy Harry L. Allbrooks Larry E. Davis James W. Cook Mrs. Thompson Doctor Stanley, 25 F.3d 1040, 4th Cir. (1994)
Uploaded by
Scribd Government Docs25 F.
3d 1040
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished
dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
Fourth Circuit.
James Byrd MILLER, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Joseph L. HAMILTON; Charles M. Creecy; Harry L.
Allbrooks;
Larry E. Davis; James W. Cook; Mrs. Thompson;
Doctor Stanley, Defendants Appellees.
No. 93-7023.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 24, 1994.
Decided June 7, 1994.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
North Carolina, at Raleigh. Franklin T. Dupree, Jr., Senior District Judge.
(CA-90-521-CRT-D).
James Byrd Miller, Appellant Pro Se.
Sylvia Hargett Thibaut, Ass't Atty. Gen., Raleigh, NC, for Appellees.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, HALL, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's
opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. Miller v. Hamilton, No. CA-90-521-CRT-D
(E.D.N.C. Aug. 25, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court
and argument would not aid the decisional process. We also deny Appellant's
motion for appointment of counsel.
AFFIRMED
