0% found this document useful (0 votes)
27 views2 pages

Thomas J. Totten v. Doctor Toler Doctor Locklear Mrs. Davis, Nurse, 33 F.3d 52, 4th Cir. (1994)

Thomas J. Totten filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against three medical professionals which was dismissed as frivolous by the district court. Totten appealed the dismissal. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling in a per curiam opinion, finding the appeal was without merit based on the district court's reasoning that the action was frivolous. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
27 views2 pages

Thomas J. Totten v. Doctor Toler Doctor Locklear Mrs. Davis, Nurse, 33 F.3d 52, 4th Cir. (1994)

Thomas J. Totten filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against three medical professionals which was dismissed as frivolous by the district court. Totten appealed the dismissal. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling in a per curiam opinion, finding the appeal was without merit based on the district court's reasoning that the action was frivolous. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

33 F.

3d 52

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
Thomas J. TOTTEN, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
DOCTOR TOLER; Doctor Locklear; Mrs. Davis, Nurse,
Defendants Appellees.
No. 94-6664.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted July 19, 1994.
Decided Aug. 17, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-94366-5)
Thomas J. Totten, appellant pro se.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Thomas J. Totten appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
Sec. 1983 (1988) action as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(d) (1988).
Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this
appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Totten v. Toler, No. CA-94-366-5 (E.D.N.C. June 6, 1994). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

You might also like