United States v. Glen Mark, JR., 46 F.3d 1128, 4th Cir. (1995)
Uploaded by
Scribd Government DocsUnited States v. Glen Mark, JR., 46 F.3d 1128, 4th Cir. (1995)
Uploaded by
Scribd Government Docs46 F.
3d 1128
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of
unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
Glen MARK, Jr., Defendant Appellant.
No. 93-6912.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: December 20, 1994
Decided: January 9, 1995.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of
North Carolina, at Greensboro. Richard C. Erwin, Senior District Judge.
(CR-89-263-G, CA-92-600)
Glen Mark, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Harry L. Hobgood, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, NC, for
Appellee.
M.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before MURNAGHAN and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS,
Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec.
2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal
is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
United States v. Mark, Nos. CR-89-263-G; CAn-92-600 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 9,
1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.*
AFFIRMED
In light of this disposition, Mark's motion for appointment of counsel is hereby
denied
