0% found this document useful (0 votes)
27 views2 pages

United States v. Homer W. Walker, 72 F.3d 128, 4th Cir. (1995)

The document summarizes a court case in which Homer W. Walker appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The court affirmed the lower court's denial of Walker's motion.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
27 views2 pages

United States v. Homer W. Walker, 72 F.3d 128, 4th Cir. (1995)

The document summarizes a court case in which Homer W. Walker appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials. The court affirmed the lower court's denial of Walker's motion.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

72 F.

3d 128
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished
dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,


v.
Homer W. WALKER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 95-7428.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted Nov. 16, 1995.
Decided Dec. 12, 1995.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CR-93-6, CA95-745-5-BR)
Homer W. Walker, Appellant Pro Se. John Douglas McCullough,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, NC, for Appellee.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec.
2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. United States v. Walker, Nos. CR-93-6; CA-95-745-5-BR
(E.D.N.C. Sept. 13, 1995).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.


2

AFFIRMED.

In light of this disposition, Walker's motion to expedite his appeal is denied as


moot

You might also like