0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views2 pages

Legal Appeal Dismissal Affirmed

This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to appellant Joseph Marion Head Jr under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(d) for his appeal. The Court of Appeals finds the appeal without merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its previous opinion. The motion for appointment of counsel is also denied.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views2 pages

Legal Appeal Dismissal Affirmed

This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to appellant Joseph Marion Head Jr under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(d) for his appeal. The Court of Appeals finds the appeal without merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its previous opinion. The motion for appointment of counsel is also denied.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

19 F.

3d 1429

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
In re Joseph Marion HEAD, Jr., Plaintiff Appellant.
No. 94-6185.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted March 17, 1994.
Decided April 7, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of
North Carolina, at Asheville. Richard L. Voorhees, Chief District Judge.
(MC-93-35-1)
Joseph Marion Head, Jr., appellant pro se.
W.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before PHILLIPS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief pursuant to 28
U.S.C. Sec. 1915(d) (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's
opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that
this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. In Re: Head, No. MC-93-35-1 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 3, 1994). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not
aid the decisional process. The motion for appointment of counsel is denied.

AFFIRMED

You might also like