0% found this document useful (0 votes)
61 views2 pages

United States v. James Thomas Wilkerson, A/K/A J.T., 23 F.3d 404, 4th Cir. (1994)

The document is an appeals court decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of James Thomas Wilkerson's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The appeals court reviewed the record and found the appeal was without merit, affirming the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in its opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
61 views2 pages

United States v. James Thomas Wilkerson, A/K/A J.T., 23 F.3d 404, 4th Cir. (1994)

The document is an appeals court decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of James Thomas Wilkerson's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The appeals court reviewed the record and found the appeal was without merit, affirming the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in its opinion. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

23 F.

3d 404
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished
dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,


v.
James Thomas WILKERSON, a/k/a J.T., Defendant Appellant.
No. 93-6952.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted: April 5, 1994.
April 28, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of
North Carolina, at Greensboro. Richard C. Erwin, Senior District Judge.
(CR-89-129, CA-92-656-1)
James Thomas Wilkerson, Appellant Pro Se.
David Bernard Smith, Asst. U.S. Atty., Greensboro, NC, for Appellee.
M.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, HAMILTON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec.
2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. United States v. Wilkerson, Nos. CR-89-129;
CA-92-656-1 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 10, 1993). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

You might also like