Scribd
Upload
23 views2 pages

United States v. Michael Lovell Hinton, 45 F.3d 428, 4th Cir. (1995)

Michael Lovell Hinton appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal to be without merit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial based on the reasoning provided in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit found that the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials such that oral arguments would not aid in the decision.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
23 views2 pages

United States v. Michael Lovell Hinton, 45 F.3d 428, 4th Cir. (1995)

Michael Lovell Hinton appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal to be without merit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial based on the reasoning provided in the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit found that the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials such that oral arguments would not aid in the decision.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

45 F.

3d 428
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished
dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,


v.
Michael Lovell HINTON, Defendant Appellant.
No. 94-6747.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted Oct. 18, 1994.
Decided Jan. 6, 1995.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR-89-434-S, CA-933977-S)
Michael Lovell Hinton, appellant pro se.
Harvey Ellis Eisenberg, Asst. U.S. Atty., Baltimore, MD, for appellee.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINSON, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec.
2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hinton, Nos. CR-89-434-S; CA93-3977-S (D. Md. May 3, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

You might also like