0% found this document useful (0 votes)
84 views2 pages

United States v. Amanda Deese, 4th Cir. (2014)

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Amanda Deese's motion to correct her sentence. Specifically, Deese sought to reduce the amount of restitution she owed and lower her offense level under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As such, the court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
84 views2 pages

United States v. Amanda Deese, 4th Cir. (2014)

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Amanda Deese's motion to correct her sentence. Specifically, Deese sought to reduce the amount of restitution she owed and lower her offense level under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. The appellate court found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As such, the court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its opinion.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6442

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
AMANDA DEESE,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief
District Judge. (2:12-cr-00110-RBS-LRL-1)

Submitted:

July 24, 2014

Before FLOYD and


Circuit Judge.

THACKER,

Decided: July 28, 2014

Circuit

Judges,

and

DAVIS,

Senior

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Amanda Deese, Appellant Pro Se.


Alan Mark Salsbury, Assistant
United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:
Amanda

Deese

appeals

the

district

courts

order

denying her motion to correct her sentence to reduce the amount


of restitution she owes and to reduce her Guidelines offense
level.

We

have

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court.

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

United States v. Deese, No. 2:12-cr-00110-RBS-

LRL-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 7, 2014).

We grant Deeses motion to

proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.

We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

You might also like