Larry Webb v. James White, JR., Superintendent, 57 F.3d 1067, 4th Cir. (1995)
Uploaded by
Scribd Government DocsLarry Webb v. James White, JR., Superintendent, 57 F.3d 1067, 4th Cir. (1995)
Uploaded by
Scribd Government Docs57 F.
3d 1067
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished
dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
Fourth Circuit.
Larry WEBB, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
James WHITE, Jr., Superintendent, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 94-7237.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 16, 1995.
Larry Webb, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, Office of The Attorney
General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,
Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order * denying relief on his 42
U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the
magistrate judge's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Webb v. White, No. CA-94-392 (E.D.
Va. Sep. 30, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
The parties consented to trial by magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec.
636(c)(2) (1988)
