Scribd
Upload
34 views2 pages

United States v. Wayland Williamson, JR., 977 F.2d 575, 4th Cir. (1992)

The document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Wayland Williamson Jr. appealed a district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling without need for oral argument, finding the appeal lacked merit based on the record and reasoning of the lower court.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
34 views2 pages

United States v. Wayland Williamson, JR., 977 F.2d 575, 4th Cir. (1992)

The document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Wayland Williamson Jr. appealed a district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling without need for oral argument, finding the appeal lacked merit based on the record and reasoning of the lower court.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

977 F.

2d 575

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Wayland WILLIAMSON, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
No. 92-6495.

United States Court of Appeals,


Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: September 10, 1992
Decided: October 21, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
North Carolina, at Wilmington.
Before WIDENER and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,
Senior Circuit Judge.

Wayland Williamson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Richard Bruce Conely, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North


Carolina, for Appellee.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.
PER CURIAM:

Wayland Williamson, Jr., appeals from the district court's order refusing relief

under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's
opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Williamson, Nos. CR-90-22,
CA-92-41-7-CIVBR (E.D.N.C. Apr. 6, 1992). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

You might also like