Product Innovation Best Practices Series

Doing it Right:
Winning with New Products
Reference Paper # 10

By Dr. Robert G. Cooper

Compliments of:
Stage-Gate International and
Product Development Institute Inc.

This article was published by the

Ivey Business Journal in July/August 2000

For information call +1-905-304-8797

www.stage-gate.com

Product Development Institute Inc. 2000-2012

Product Development Institute Inc. and Stage-Gate are registered trademarks.
Logo for Product Development Institute Inc. used under license by Stage-Gate International.
Logo for Stage-Gate used under license where appropriate.

Doing it Right
Winning with New Products
By Dr. Robert G. Cooper

This paper examines the two ways to win at product innovation: doing projects
right and doing the right projects. Dr. Cooper explores the critical success factors
that make the difference between winning and losing at innovation. He outlines
key components of the authentic Stage-Gate system and the four goals of
successful portfolio management.
Keywords:
Stage-Gate , New Product Process, Critical Success Factors, Portfolio Management, Scoring Criteria

These pages contain copyright information of Product Development Institute and member company Stage-Gate International,
including logos, tag lines, trademarks and the content of this article. Reproducing in whole or any part of this document is
strictly forbidden without written permission from Product Development Institute Inc. or Stage-Gate International.

2
2000-2012 Product Development Institute Inc.
Product Development Institute Inc. and Stage-Gate International are registered trademarks.

www.stage-gate.com

Doing it Right
Winning with New Products
By Dr. Robert G. Cooper

There are two ways that the best companies can

win when they develop new products. One is to
do projects right.
That is, leading companies have focused on the
process of innovation: They have re-engineered
their new-product process and, in so doing, have
built in the critical success factors that make the
difference between winning and losing. Many
companies now utilize a Stage-Gate newproduct process to drive their new-product projects to market quickly and successfully.
The second way to win is by doing the right
projects. Here, management focuses on project
selection and ultimately implements the portfolio
management principle for product innovation.
Both approaches - Stage-Gate processes and
portfolio management for new products - are the
topics of this article.
INNOVATE OR DIE
The need for product innovation has never been
greater. Product life cycles are shorter than ever
and new products make your old ones obsolete.
One German study revealed that product life cycles have shrunk by 400 percent across a broad
array of product categories over the last 50
years. Driven by the globalization of markets,
technological advances and ever-changing
customer needs, product innovation is now the
No. 1 plank in many companies strategic platforms. For example, in the United States, new
products now account for about 50 percent of
companies revenues from sales and 40 percent
of their profits. The Fortune list of the Most
Admired Companies contains the most innovative firms in America: Pfizer, 3M, Intel, General
Electric, Johnson & Johnson, Procter & Gamble
and others.

Companies that fail to

innovate face a grim
future. Their product lines
fall victim to more aggressive, innovative competitors. And customers vote
with their feet: As they
switch
allegiances,
market share starts to
suffer. Even stock market
share prices weaken:
These days, the financial
markets place a high value on a companys
ability to innovate.
The problem is that winning with new products is
not so easy. An estimated 46 percent of the
resources that companies devote to the conception, development and launch of new products go
to ventures that dont succeedthey fail in the
marketplace or never even make it to market.
Only one out of four development projects
succeeds commercially and one-third of all newproduct launches fail.
In recent years, much research has been
directed to uncovering the secrets to new-product
success: What do the winners do differently? Our
research has led to many prescriptions - including Stage-Gate methods and portfolio management tools - to heighten the odds of success
(R.G. Cooper, Winning at New Products: Accelerating the Process From Idea To Launch, 1993;
Cooper, Portfolio Management for New Products,
1998). But before we discuss these prescriptions,
lets consider the major conclusions of studies on
why new products succeed - the critical success
factors. Even more, as you review each one, ask
what your company has done to build these
factors into their new-product game plan.

3
2000-2012 Product Development Institute Inc.
Product Development Institute Inc. and Stage-Gate International are registered trademarks.

www.stage-gate.com

Doing it Right - Winning with New Products

CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS

1.

Seek differentiated, superior products

The top success factor is delivering a differentiated product with unique customer benefits and
superior value. Such superior products have five
times the success rate, more than four times
the market share and four times the profitability
of products that lack this ingredient. But most
new products miss the mark here: The majority
of products in our studies are tired me too
products with little to distinguish them from competitors. A second, very popular scenario, which
also yields poor results, is the engineer building a
monument to himself - the technical solution in
search of a market. When it comes to explaining
their methodology, very few firms can point to
those specific facets that emphasize this one vital
ingredient for success. Often, product superiority is absent as a project selection criterion,
while steps that encourage the design of
such superior products are rarely built into the
process. Indeed, quite the reverse is true: The
preoccupation with cycle-time reduction and the
tendency to favor simple, inexpensive projects
actually penalize projects that lead to product
superiority.
MESSAGE: Spare no effort in the search for
product advantage. Build in a user needs-andwants study early in your new-product process in
order to identify the components of a truly superior product. Use fly-on-the-wall or camping out
with the customer research to identify his or her
true and often unarticulated needs. Conduct a
thorough analysis to identify weaknesses in your
competitors products. And once you arrive at a
viable product concept, test it constantly with the
customer via concept tests, protocept tests, rapid
prototypes and, finally, full-product tests.
2. Up-front homework pays off

product success rates significantly and is strongly

correlated to financial performance. Sadly, firms
devote on average only seven percent of a
projects funding and 16 percent of the persondays to these critical upfront homework activities.
Its simply not enough.
MESSAGE: More time and resources must be
devoted to the activities that precede the design
and development of the product. Up-front homework means undertaking thorough market and
competitive analyses, research on the customers
needs and wants, concept testing, and technical
and operations feasibility assessments. All of
these activities in turn lead to the preparation of a
full business case prior to beginning serious
development work.
3. Build in the voice of the customer
Successful businesses and teams that drive
winning new-product projects have a slave like
dedication to the voice of the customer. According to our research, new-product projects that
feature high-quality marketing actions are
blessed with more than double the success rates
and 70-percent higher market shares than those
projects with poor marketing actions. Sadly, a
strong market orientation and customer focus is
noticeably absent from many businesses newproduct projects.
MESSAGE: The voice of the customer must be
an integral part of your new-product process.
This begins with idea generation - focus groups,
customer panels and working with lead users.
Use market research and customers as input into
the products design, not just as a confirmation of
it. Make the customer a part of the development
process via constant rapid-prototype-and-test
iterations. Finally, ensure that the launch is well
planned, adequately resourced and based on
solid market information.

Too many new-product projects move from the

idea stage right into development with little or no
up-front homework. The results of this ready,
fire, aim approach are usually disastrous. Solid
pre-development homework drives up new4
2000-2012 Product Development Institute Inc.
Product Development Institute Inc. and Stage-Gate International are registered trademarks.

www.stage-gate.com

Doing it Right - Winning with New Products

4. Demand sharp, stable and early

product definition
A failure to define the product before development begins is a major cause of both newproduct failure and serious delays in time-tomarket. In spite of the fact that early and stable
product definition is consistently cited as a key to
success, firms continue to perform poorly here.
Terms such as unstable product specs and
project scope creep describe far too many newproduct projects in our studies.
MESSAGE: Make it a rule: No project moves to
the development stage without a sharp definition
of the product, including:
A target market definition
A product concept and benefits to be delivered (written in the language of the customer)
The positioning strategy (including the price
point)
Product features, attributes, performance requirements and high-level specs.
This definition must be fact-based and signed off
by the project team. Senior management should
also commit itself to the definition. Build this definition checkpoint into your new- product process.
5. Plan and resource the market launch
early in the game
Not surprisingly, a strong market launch underlies the success of any product. For example,
new-product winners devote more than twice as
many person-days and dollars to the launch
as do those that fail. Similarly, the quality of execution of the market launch is significantly higher
for winners. The need for a quality launch - well
planned, properly resourced and well executed should be obvious. But not every project team
and business devote the same effort and attention. In some businesses, its almost as though
the launch is an afterthought - something to
worry about after the product is fully developed.
MESSAGE: Marketing planning is an integral
part of the new-product process. It should begin
early. The best companies require a launch plan
on the table even before development proceeds.
And set aside the launch resources early - the
launch must be properly resourced.

6. Build tough Go/Kill decision points

into your process a funnel, not a
tunnel
Too many projects move too far into development without serious scrutiny. In fact, once a project begins, there is very little chance that it will
ever be killed. The result is that many marginal
projects are approved and scarce resources are
allocated improperly. Indeed, having tough Go/
Kill decision points (or gates) is strongly correlated to the profitability of new-product efforts.
But tough Go/Kill decision points is the weakest
ingredient of all process factors we have studied!
MESSAGE: Move towards effective portfolio
management, where you view each new-product
project as an investment. Build tough Go/Kill
decision points into your new-product process - a
funneling approach - and use consistent, rigorous
criteria at these gates. (There is more on portfolio
management and project selection later in the
article.)
7. Organize around true crossfunctional project teams
Says Tom Peters, Rip apart a badly developed
project and you will unfailingly find 75 percent of
slippage is attributable to (1) siloing, or sending
memos up and down vertical organizational
silos or stovepipes for decisions, and (2)
sequential problem solving. Numerous studies
agree that good organizational design is strongly
linked to success. Good organizational design
means projects that are organized with a crossfunctional team, led by a strong project leader
accountable for the entire project from beginning
to end, dedicated and focused (as opposed to
spread over many projects). While the ingredients of a good team should be familiar ones,
surprisingly many projects are found lacking in
this regard.
MESSAGE: Move to team approaches that cut
across functional lines. Functional managers
must increasingly play the role of resource
providers to project teams and team advisers,
rather than bosses. Three approaches that
appear to work well are the balanced matrix, the
project matrix and the project team. All three
emphasize the autonomy of the team and the
independent authority of the project leader.
5

2000-2012 Product Development Institute Inc.

Product Development Institute Inc. and Stage-Gate International are registered trademarks.

www.stage-gate.com

Doing it Right - Winning with New Products

8. Attack from a position of strength

This may be an old adage, but it certainly applies
to the launch of new products. The new product
fares better when it leverages the businesss
core competencies. Leveraging core competencies means having a strong fit between the
needs of the new-product project and the
resources, strengths and experience of the
company in terms of marketing, distribution, selling, technology and operations.
MESSAGE: These five ingredients become obvious checklist items in a scoring or rating model to
help prioritize new-product projects. If your leverage score is low, then there must be other
compelling reasons to proceed with the project.
Leverage is not essential, but it certainly
improves the odds of winning.
9. Build an international orientation into
your new-product process
New products aimed at international markets and
with inter national requirements built in from the
outset fare better. By contrast, products that are
developed for domestic markets and sold locally
are not nearly as profitable. The strategy of
design for local needs and adjust for export later
also does not work well; the product is usually
compromised. North American companies often
fail to consider the international dimension.
MESSAGE: An international orientation means
defining the market as an international one and
designing products to meet international requirements, not just domestic ones. The result is
either a global product (one version for the entire
world) or a glocal product (one development
effort and one product concept, but perhaps
several product variants to satisfy different international markets). An international orientation
also means adopting a transnational new-product
process, utilizing cross-functional teams with
members from different countries, and gathering
information for the new products design from
multiple international markets.
10. The role of top management is central to success
Top-management support is a necessary ingredient for product innovation, though it must provide
the right kind of support. Many senior people get
it wrong!

Top managements main role is to set the stage

for product innovation, to be a behind-thescenes facilitator who is much less an actor,
front and centre. This stage-setting role is vital,
according to our research.
MESSAGE: Management must make the longterm commitment to product development as a
source of growth; it must develop a vision, objectives and strategy for product innovation. It must
make available the necessary resources and
ensure that they arent diverted to more immediate needs in times of shortage. It must commit to
a disciplined game plan to drive products to
market. And most important, senior management
must empower project teams and support committed champions by acting as mentors, facilitators, godfathers or sponsors of project leaders
and teams. Senior managements role is not to
get involved in projects on a day-to-day basis,
nor to be constantly meddling and interfering in
the project, nor to micromanage projects from
afar.

ADOPT A STAGE-GATE NEW-PRODUCT

PROCESS
How does one go about building these success
factors into a new-product game plan? Leading
companies have overhauled their new-product
processes, incorporating the 10 success factors
in the form of a Stage-Gate new product process.
According to a Product Development & Management Association (PDMA) best-practices study,
68 percent of U.S. product developers now use
some type of Stage-Gate process (A. Griffin,
Drivers of NPD Success: The I997PDMA Report,
1997). Numerous global firms have implemented
Stage-Gate processes including DuPont, Procter
& Gamble, Exxon, Guinness, Unilever, Lego and
Royal Bank of Canada. Ironically, Stage-Gate
methods were first developed in Canada but they
are now, for the most part, applied outside of this
country.
The payoffs of such processes have been
frequently reported: improved teamwork, less
recycling and rework, improved success rates,
earlier detection of failures, a better launch, and
even shorter cycle times (by about 30 percent).

2000-2012 Product Development Institute Inc.

Product Development Institute Inc. and Stage-Gate International are registered trademarks.

6
www.stage-gate.com

Doing it Right - Winning with New Products

WHAT IS A STAGE-GATE PROCESS?

A Stage-Gate process is a conceptual and operational road map for moving a new-product project from
idea to launch a blueprint for managing the new-product process to improve effectiveness and
efficiency. Stage-Gate approaches break the innovation process into a predetermined set of stages, with
each one consisting of a set of prescribed, cross-functional and parallel activities (see diagram below).
At the entrance to each stage is a gate, which serves as the quality control and Go/Kill check point in
the process.

Simple Map of a Stage-Gate Process

THE STAGES

Stage 1

Stages are where the action occurs. The

players on the project team undertake key
tasks to gather information needed to
advance the project to the next gate or
decision point. Stages are cross-functional:
There is no R&D or marketing stage. Rather,
each stage consists of a set of parallel activities undertaken by people from different
functional areas in the firm, working together
as a team and led by a project team leader.

Scoping: a quick investigation and sculpting of

the project.

To manage risk via a Stage-Gate method,

the parallel activities in a certain stage must
be designed to gather vital information - technical, market, financial, operations - in order
to drive down the technical arid business
risks. Each stage costs more than the preceding one, so that the game plan is based
on incremental commitments. As uncertainties decrease, expenditures are allowed to
mount and risk is managed.
The diagram shows the general flow of the
typical, or generic, Stage-Gate process.
Here, following idea generation, are the five
key stages:

Stage 2
Build the business case: the detailed homework
and up-front investigation work leading to a
business case; a defined product, a business
justification and a detailed plan of action for the
next stages.

Stage 3
Development: the actual design and development of the new product. Additionally, the manufacturing (or operations) process is mapped out,
the marketing launch and operating plans are
developed, and the test plans for the next stage
are defined.

Stage 4
Testing & validation: the verification and validation of the proposed new product, its marketing
and production.

Stage 5
Launch: full commercialization of the product
the beginning of full production and commercial
launch and selling.
7

2000-2012 Product Development Institute Inc.

Product Development Institute Inc. and Stage-Gate International are registered trademarks.

www.stage-gate.com

Doing it Right - Winning with New Products

At first glance, this overview portrays the stages

as relatively simple steps in a logical process.
But dont be fooled. What you see in the diagram
is only a high-level view of a generic process a
concept. In a real company process, drilling down
into the details of each stage reveals a much
more sophisticated and complex set of activities.
Here youll find a detailed list of activities in a
stage, the how-to of each activity, best practices
that the team ought to consider, and even the
required deliverables for each activity in that
stage. In short, the drill-down provides a detailed
and operational road map for the project team everything it needs to know and do to successfully complete that stage of the process and
project.
THE GATES
Preceding each stage is an entry gate or a
Go/Kill decision point, shown in the diagram.
Effective gates are central to the success of a
fast-paced, new-product process:

Gates serve as quality-control checkpoints:

Is this project being executed in a quality
fashion?
Gates also serve as Go/Kill and prioritization
decision points: Gates provide the funnels
where mediocre projects are successively
culled out.
Finally, gates are where the path forward for
the next stage is decided, along with resource commitments. Gate meetings are
usually staffed by senior managers from different functions, who own the resources the
project leader and team require for the next
stage. These decision-makers are called
gatekeepers.

An action plan is approved, and the date and

deliverables for the next gate are agreed
upon. If your business does not have a
systematic Stage-Gate process in place, or if
your process is creaky or broken, the time is
ripe for an overhaul. Those firms that have
made the effort to design and implement
such a process have reaped the benefits
faster: They are more successful and enjoy
more efficient product developments.

From Idea to Launch:

A Typical Stage-Gate Model
IDEA Discovery Stage
Gate 1 Idea Screen

Does the idea merit any work?

1
Stage 1 Preliminary Investigation
Prelim market assessment
Prelim technical assessment
Prelim financial & business assessment
Action plan for Stage 2
Stage

Gate 2 Second Screen

Does the idea justify extensive investigation?

Stage 2 Detailed Investigation

User needs & wants study

Competitive analysis
Value proposition defined
Technical feasibility assessment
Operations assessment
Product Definition

Gate 3 Decision to Develop

Gates have a common format:

Is the business case sound?

Deliverables: These are the inputs into the gate

review what the project leader and team
deliver to the meeting. They are the results of the
actions of the previous stage, and are based on a
standard menu of deliverables for each gate.

Stage 3 Development

Criteria: These are questions or metrics on

which the project is judged in order to make
the Go/Kill and prioritization decision.
Outputs: These are the results of the gate
reviewa decision (Go/Kill/Hold/Recycle).

Technical development work

Rapid prototypes
Initial customer feedback
Prototype development
In-house product testing
Operations process development
Full launch & operations plans
8

2000-2012 Product Development Institute Inc.

Product Development Institute Inc. and Stage-Gate International are registered trademarks.

www.stage-gate.com

Doing it Right - Winning with New Products

Gate 4 Decision to Test

3. MARKET ATTRACTIVENESS

Should the project be moved to external testing?

Stage 4 Testing & Validation

Extend in-house testing

Customer field trials
Acquisition of production equipment
Production/operation trials
Test market/trial sell
Finalized launch and operations plans
Post-launch & life cycle plans

Gate 5 Decision to Launch

Is the product ready for commercial launch?

Stage 5 Launch

Market launch & roll-out

Full production/operations
Selling begin
Results monitoring
Post-Launch & life cycle plans under way

Post-Launch Review

How did we do vs. projections?

What did we learn?

SAMPLE GATE 3 GO/KILL AND

PRIORITIZATION (SCORING) CRITERIA
1. STRATEGIC

project aligns with the businesss

strategy
strategic importance to the business

2. PRODUCT & COMPETITIVE

ADVANTAGE

offers unique benefits to users/customers

meets customer needs better than competitive products
provides excellent value for money to the
customer

market size
market growth rate
competitive situation

4. LEVERAGES CORE COMPETENCIES

leverages our marketing, distribution & selling resources

leverages our technological expertise & resources
leverages our operations capabilities & facilities

5. TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY

size of the technical gap (small)

complexity of the project, technically (low)
technical uncertainty of outcome (low)

6. RISK VS. RETURN

expected profitability (NPV)

percent return (IRR % or ROI %)
payback period (years)
certainty of estimates
low cost and fast to do (low risk)

These questions are scored at the gate meeting

(e.g., 1-5 or 0-10 point scales) and added to
yield six Factor Scores, and added (weighted or
unweighted) to yield the Project Score. This
Project Score must pass a minimum hurdle for a
Pass, and is also used to rank projects against
each other.
PICKING THE RIGHT PROJECTS PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT
The second way to win with a new product is to
do the right projects - in short, project selection
and portfolio management - which effectively
complement a Stage-Gate process. Portfolio
management deals with the vital question:

9
2000-2012 Product Development Institute Inc.
Product Development Institute Inc. and Stage-Gate International are registered trademarks.

www.stage-gate.com

Doing it Right - Winning with New Products

How should the corporation most effectively

invest its R&D and new-product resources?
Much like a stock market portfolio manager,
those senior executives who optimize their
R&D investments - define the right new product
strategy for the firm, select winning newproduct projects and achieve the ideal balance
of projects - will win in the long run.
There are four goals in portfolio management:
1. Maximizing the value of the portfolio. The
goal is to ensure that the total worth of newproduct projects in the development pipeline
yields maximum value to the corporation. To
achieve this goal, try to combine the use of a
financial model with a scoring model. Many
firms have elected commercially available
probabilistic financial models (e.g., At Risk;
Crystal Ball) to handle uncertain new-product
projects. But as a recent study on portfolio
management revealed, financial models
typically yield erroneous results; when used as
the dominant selection tool, they yield inferior
portfolios. Thus, scoring models, where
projects are rated and scored on qualitative
criteria, are recommended: They yield efficient,
effective decisions, according to the firms that
use them (a sample scoring model is shown in
the previous table).
2. Achieving the right balance of projects.
Dont put all your eggs in one basket is a
popular saying. Ideally, there is a balance
between high-risk and low-risk, short-term
versus long-term, genuine new products versus
product improvements and extensions, and so
on, and product categories.

3. Achieving a strategically aligned portfolio.

Leading firms have defined a product innovation
and technology strategy that will direct investments in R&D. A popular portfolio model is the
risk/return bubble diagram. Your portfolio of projects is plotted on two axes: the projects value
(e.g., NPV, or net present value) on the horizontal axis, and its risk of probability on the vertical.
The size of the bubbles shows the resources
committed, so that at a glance, one can see
where the money is being spent. Projects are
classified as one of four types, each represented
by a quadrant: pearls, oysters, bread and butter,
and white elephants. An appropriate balance of
projects is sought across the diagram and
between risk and reward. Also, pie charts effectively reveal the breakdown of spending in your
portfolio - across project types (new products,
platform developments and improvements),
markets. A strategically aligned portfolio is one
where all the projects are on strategy, and where
the spending breakdown mirrors the strategic
priorities of the business. First, it is necessary to
develop a product innovation and technology
strategyone that defines your businesss newproduct goals, the arenas of strategic thrust, and
the spending splits (priorities) across these
arenas. Strategy begins when you start spending
money! Next, build strategic criteria into your project selection approaches, so that all projects are
on strategy Finally, ensure that spending splits
by arena and by project type mirror the desired
splits and strategy.
4. Resource balancing - the right number of
projects. Most firms have far too many projects
for the limited resources available. And the
results are predictable: corners get cut, quality of
execution suffers, projects under perform and
take too long to get to market. An ideal portfolio
sees the correct balance of projects resource
demands with resources available.
Monitor the demand-versus-supply of people
resources - what people are available and what
people commitments you have made across all
projects in the pipeline. Some project management software (See http://www.stage-gate.com/
directory.php)) enables one to look for resource
bottlenecks, matching resource availability with
demand.
10

2000-2012 Product Development Institute Inc.

Product Development Institute Inc. and Stage-Gate International are registered trademarks.

www.stage-gate.com

Doing it Right - Winning with New Products

THE PATH FORWARD

Product innovation is a vital task for the
modern corporation. Your success with new
products may well decide the fate of your business. If you lack a systematic new-product
process, or if portfolio management for new
products is a foreign concept, then now is the
time to act. Put together a task force and
challenge it to design an effective Stage-Gate
road map from idea to launch. And while
theyre at it, ask them to develop and implement an effective portfolio management
system. The effort is significantit may take a
year or so of hard work. But those firms that
have successfully implemented Stage-Gate
and portfolio management methods for product
innovation are reaping the benefits.

-end3

11
2000-2012 Product Development Institute Inc.
Product Development Institute Inc. and Stage-Gate International are registered trademarks.

www.stage-gate.com

Stage-Gate International is the world's leading full-service provider of solutions which enable
organizations to improve their Product Innovation and Portfolio Management capabilities and
performance. Our clients include 5000+ organizations of all sizes across all industries.

+1-905-304-8797
www.stage-gate.com
Visit our website and subscribe to receive the latest research, information and
complimentary articles to keep you current in product innovation!