0% found this document useful (0 votes)
108 views15 pages

Poor Mobile Network Coverage Explained

Poor mobile network coverage can be caused by terrain, buildings, foliage, or antenna configuration. Terrain like hills can block signals, creating "shadows" with little to no reception. Buildings can reflect or absorb cellular signals, reducing indoor coverage. Trees and other foliage can also weaken signals through blockage or multipath effects. Additionally, if a tower's antennas are not configured to provide full 360 degree coverage, areas outside the main transmission sectors will have weaker signals. Proper antenna selection and placement is needed to minimize coverage gaps.

Uploaded by

Tim Kabi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
108 views15 pages

Poor Mobile Network Coverage Explained

Poor mobile network coverage can be caused by terrain, buildings, foliage, or antenna configuration. Terrain like hills can block signals, creating "shadows" with little to no reception. Buildings can reflect or absorb cellular signals, reducing indoor coverage. Trees and other foliage can also weaken signals through blockage or multipath effects. Additionally, if a tower's antennas are not configured to provide full 360 degree coverage, areas outside the main transmission sectors will have weaker signals. Proper antenna selection and placement is needed to minimize coverage gaps.

Uploaded by

Tim Kabi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 15

Poor Mobile Network Coverage Explained - Weak Signal

What is a Signal Blackspot?


A phone reception or coverage blackspot is generally defined as a geographic area that experiences reduced mobile phone signal
due to factors other than being too far from a cell tower. Blackspots have a similar impact as being too far from a cell tower and are
typically associated with symptoms such as:

Call drop-outs

Digital garbling/noise during a call

Difficulty hearing other caller

Highly variable signal

Slow mobile internet

Internet timeouts

Increased battery usage

Causes
There are several causes for coverage blackspots, some of which can be planned for and impacts mitigated/minimised by the
network operator, and others that are invisible to the network. To help demonstrate the impact of the different causes we're going
to use a real world cell tower and model performance under different conditions.

Terrain

Terrain geography is the number one cause for coverage blackspots. Both being part of the electromagnetic spectrum, radio waves
and light waves act the same way when it comes to obstructions. Moving an object into the path of a light beam causes a shadow,
likewise moving an object into the path of radio waves also results in a signal shadow - it can help to visualise a cell tower as a
powerful spotlight.

If you've ever cast a shadow you've no doubt noticed the closer an object is to a surface the crisper it's shadow becomes, the
further you move the object away from the surface the fuzzier the shadow becomes. The cause of this effect is something known as
knife-edge diffraction, where a sudden obstruction causes electromagnetic waves to bend inwards to the shadowed region. If you'd
like to understand a little deeper why this happens please check out this tutorial here.
If you like your maths the intensity of light, or in our case RF field strength, at any given point along the shadowed region follows a
log-normal process and for this reason we call signal reduction due to terrain shielding 'log-normal fading'. As you may suspect the
amount a radio wave bends depends on it's frequency - the lower the frequency the more it will bend (or in terms of a log-normal
process - the greater it's standard deviation).
In the following images we've run a series of coverage simulations at common frequencies to help visualise the diffraction process.
This location is a real Telstra cell tower with a 90 degree (Argus CPX410R) sector antenna transmitting 330 degrees (north northwest). The below four images show 156MHz, 477MHz, 885MHz, and 2147MHz, at identical output powers.

In the above situation a large coverage blackspot is caused by the cell tower's placement, leaving those living at the base of the hill
completely without phone coverage. It's immediately obvious that while the shadowed area stays the same, its effects are
minimised by each frequencies level of diffraction.
You might also notice that the lower the frequency the hotter the colours, this is because lower frequencies suffer less 'free space
path loss' allowing them to travel greater distances. This greater coverage distance and reduced log-normal fading is one of the
major pushes towards operating 4G networks on lower frequencies like the 700MHz Digital Dividend band recently purchased.

Non-Terrain Obstructions
Objects along the path of a radio transmission are a big contributor to channel fading. Physical obstructions such as buildings and
trees are the typical culprits, and may act in a similar manner to terrain depending on the materials level of penetrability. Physical
objects also create a multipath environment - transmissions that bounce off objects at an acute angle cause signal reflections (ie

echos) called multipath signals. Having travelled a further distance than a straight line transmission these signals are delayed
(longer propagation delay), and to a simple receiver would be nothing more than interference. However thanks to clever technology
used in cellular communications, multipath signals can recovered by a RAKE combiner. To digress quickly, a RAKE receiver consists
of a series of sub-radios which read the incoming signal at different delay periods (typically one chip in WCDMA) and then combined
to result in a higher quality signal. Unfortunately not all delayed signals can be successfully reinterpreted - if the phase delay is
within chip (or within the RAKE's finger) the signal will become interference.
Those of us operating mobile devices inside buildings or behind the cover of dense trees owe a great deal of thanks to our device's
RAKE receiver. Of course the best method of combating the impact of multipath is to relocate our device's antenna to a position
that is less impacted by path obstructions. This can often be as simple as trialling a few different positions - for example those of us
placing an antenna on the roof should consider moving as little as a few metres either side and reassess signal quality (through
RSCP, RSRP, Ec/Io, or SINR metrics).

In-Building Penetration
Experiencing poor reception indoors, despite ample coverage outside the house/office is a clear indication that the building itself
may be the culprit. Dense or metal-based building materials can reflect or absorb RF signals, reducing the level of signal that
reaches indoors. Unfortunately during building construction indoor coverage is rarely considered, in fact materials that insulate best
and provide most structural strength are typically the worst offenders for reducing indoor coverage. These materials can include:

Window Insulation/Tinting

Foil-based Roof Insulation

Metal Roofing (eg. Colorbond)

Concrete & Brick

Metal Support Structures

Large Metallic Surfaces (eg. Garage Roller Doors)

Copper Plumbing & Wiring


Thankfully due to the presence of a strong signal outside the building it's usually not difficult to resolve this type of 'blackspot'. An
external antenna is usually positioned on the top of the building with it's cable run inside to a Smart Repeater unit for mobile
phones, or patch lead to connect a 3G/4G modem.

Small to medium sized buildings expand on this principle by using multiple Smart Repeaters or antennas to extend coverage to
mutiple floors or combine several repeater units on one floor to increase capacity. Larger complexes such as high-rise buildings and
shopping centres use a more complicated "Distributed Antenna System" solution involving a rooftop donor antenna connected into
a basement amplifier and optical transfer system, which then routes signal to a series of ceiling antennas. As this type of system
involves active amplification it must be licensed and organised through the carrier, and can cost anywhere from $50,000 to
$1,000,000 depending on complexity.
For further information on organising a carrier-licensed Distributed Antenna System, we'd encourage you to contact our partner RFI
Wireless on 1300 000 734.

Antenna Angle & Tilt


In some cases the distance to the cell tower isn't too far and there aren't any major terrain obstructions, but signal is still weak
outside. In these cases the culprit is typically the angling of the broadcasting antenna - most rural cell towers use three directional
broadcasting antennas each focusing signal to cover a 120 degree sector.
More basic cell towers only have one omnidirectional transmission antenna that services every user north, south, east, and west
(omnidirectional antennas cover the full 360 degree radius). However as each transmitter has a capacity limit (in 3G systems each
additional user has a negative impact on the allocated radio channel's SINR), having one transmitter covering the entire area
greatly limits the number of users and speed available. Instead towers that serve a large area or large volume of users have three
transmission antennas installed to triple capacity. Intra-cell interference limits the effectiveness of this technique, which is why you
typically don't see more than four sectors in operation.
A transmitting antenna can be tilted to face below the horizon to focus their power at a smaller coverage area, creating a microcell. This is often used in high density areas to allow the carrier to pack more cell towers in to a smaller area without causing cochannel interference.
The issue of antenna angling arises when a carrier does not deploy enough sectors to cover off the full 360 degree radius.
Occasionally the carrier may deploy sector antennas favouring a particular direction, providing increased capacity in that direction
at a cost of another area. In other cases the carrier might deploy two sectors along a highway, one facing in each traffic direction to
provide longer range and capacity along the path of the highway. Unfortunately in these cases those on the edge or outside the
coverage sector experience diminished signal strength due to the sector antenna focusing transmission power in a different
direction.
To help illustrate the reduction in signal strength we've simulated coverage from the most popular types of antenna installed on
Telstra cell towers.

Argus CNA010H - Omnidirectional Antenna


Coverage area is the full 360 degrees.

Argus CNPX610R - 120 Degree (Half-Power) Sector Antenna

Approximate coverage sector = 240 degrees. Note the area of reduced coverage to the south.

Argus CNPX410R - 90 Degree (Half-Power) Sector Antenna

Approximate coverage sector = 180 degrees. Note the narrowing of the coverage area, and increased size of blackspots.

Argus CNPX310R - 65 Degree (Half-Power) Sector Antenna

Approximate coverage sector = 120 degrees. Further diminished coverage to the south, south-western, and eastern directions.

Argus CNPX210R - 36 Degree (Half-Power) Sector Antenna

Approximate coverage sector = 60 degrees. Dramatically reduced coverage area.

Cell Overlap - Co-Channel Interference


When two cell towers are receivable from one location, a mobile phone may experience reduced overall signal due to an effect
called co-channel interference, or sometimes called crosstalk. Because both cell towers transmit different information on the same
frequency band, the combination of the two radio waves makes it more difficult for your device to listen in to what one of the cell
towers are saying. This follows the same principle as having a conversation in a crowded room. Techniques are used to mitigate the
impact of co-channel interference, LTE for example uses a clever scrambling mechanism to shift subcarrier frequencies or symbols
to reduce the probability of collisions, and in some deployments Inter-Cell Interference Coordination (ICIC) to schedule frequency
allocations. A raised noise floor is to some degree unavoidable, especially on fully loaded cells, however careful cell placement
limits the extent of co-channel interference experienced in the real world.

Cell Overlap - Pilot Pollution


In mobile networks the presence of multiple cell towers causes more than simple co-channel interference. Each cell tower transmits
a uniquely coded pilot signal called the CPICH which transmits a constant pattern of data at a predefined power, allowing a mobile
to decide between towers by measuring signal strength and quality. The presence of two or more equally dominant cell towers
results in your mobile phone or modem hearing equally strong CPICH signals which can lead to your device constantly swapping
between towers (a process coined 'ping pong handoff').

You might also like