0% found this document useful (0 votes)
240 views4 pages

The Joker Is Satan, and So Are We: Girard and The Dark Knight - by Charles K. Bellinger

This essay comments on The Dark Knight from the point of view of Rene Girard's theory of violence. The notable Girardian resonances of the film are mentioned in connection with such themes as socially mediated desire for money, romantic rivalry, and scapegoating. The Joker is interpreted as a particularly powerful Satan figure, who illuminates Girard's conception of the satanic basis of human culture.

Uploaded by

philteoh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
240 views4 pages

The Joker Is Satan, and So Are We: Girard and The Dark Knight - by Charles K. Bellinger

This essay comments on The Dark Knight from the point of view of Rene Girard's theory of violence. The notable Girardian resonances of the film are mentioned in connection with such themes as socially mediated desire for money, romantic rivalry, and scapegoating. The Joker is interpreted as a particularly powerful Satan figure, who illuminates Girard's conception of the satanic basis of human culture.

Uploaded by

philteoh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

JournalofReligionandFilm

TheJokerIsSatan,andSoAreWe:Girard
andTheDarkKnight
ByCharlesK.Bellinger
TheologicalLibrarian
Assoc.Prof.ofTheologyandEthics
BriteDivinitySchool

Vol.13,No.1April2009
TheJokerIsSatan,andSoAreWe:
GirardandTheDarkKnight
ByCharlesK.Bellinger
TheologicalLibrarian
Assoc.Prof.ofTheologyandEthics
BriteDivinitySchool
Abstract
ThisessaycommentsonTheDarkKnightfromthepointofviewofRene
Girard'stheoryofviolence.ThenotableGirardianresonancesofthefilmare
mentionedinconnectionwithsuchthemesassociallymediateddesirefor
money,romanticrivalry,andscapegoating.TheJokerisinterpretedasa
particularlypowerfulSatanfigure,whoilluminatesGirard'sconceptionofthe
satanicbasisofhumanculture.
Article
[1]TheDarkKnightisamoviethatisbreakingboxofficerecords.Why?Becauseitisapowerful
expressionoftheologicalideas.Ineedtoelaborateabitonthisapparentlyoddstatement.Let'slist,in
noparticularorder,someofthemainthemesofthemovie:TheJoker'smaingoalisnotacquiring
money,butsowingchaosanddestructionBruceWayneandHarveyDentarerivalsfortheaffectionof
RachelDawesthepoliceforceisfilledwithcorruptionBatman'sexploitshaveproducedcopycats,
imitatorsthe"lawabidingcitizens"andthe"criminals"aredistinctgroupsofpeople...aren'tthey?..
.oraretheyallinthesameboat?asymbolof"justice,"suchasHarveyDent,canbeseducedtojoin
"thedarkside"criminalsoftenkilleachother,takinggreedtoanirrationalextreme.Thesethemescan
beelucidatedveryeffectivelywithreferencetothewritingsofRenGirard.
[2]IfyouarenotfamiliarwithGirard,Iwillprovideabriefoutlineofhistheoryofculture.Thetheory
beginswiththeconceptofdesire.Humanbeingshavebasicnaturaldesires.Ifmystomachsendshunger
signalstomybrain,thenIhaveadesireforfood.Butbecausehumanbeingsarehighlysocialcreatures,
ourbasicnaturaldesiresveryquicklybecomeoverlaidwithcomplexpatternsofsocialmediation.Imay
feelhungry,whichisaninternal,naturaldesire,butifIseeacommercialforBurgerKinganddecideto
satisfymyhungerbyeatingaWhopper,thenmydesirehasbecomesociallymediated.
[3]Girardusesthephrase"mimeticdesire"todescribethisbedrockphenomenonofhumanpsychology.
Wemaythinkthatourdesiresareinternallygenerated,butmostofthetimewedonotknowwhatwe
shoulddesireuntilwelookaroundatothersandseewhattheyaredesiring.Wemime,mimic,imitate
thedesiresofothers,particularlythoseotherswhoappeartousasmodelsofsuccessfulliving.The

modelsstrikeusashavingagreaterfullnessofbeingthanwehaveinordertobelikethemwemust
desiretopossessthethingsthattheypossess.Therearemanyexamplesofmimeticdesire.Iftwosmall
childrenareinaroomthathasmanytoysinit,whatwillhappen?Onechildwillstartplayingwitha
particulartoyandtheotherchildwillthenwantthattoyalso,andatugofwarwillensue.Thiswill
happenevenifthereisanidenticalorequivalenttoyintheroom.Thisisaperfectexampleofthe
phenomenonofmimeticdesire,whichisnotpredicatedonscarcitythescarcityofobjectsisnot
relevantbecauseanartificialscarcityiscreatedbytheprocessofmimickinganotherperson.When
childrengrowintoadults,mimeticdesiredoesnotfadeawayitsimplytakesmoresophisticatedforms.
Ihavealreadyreferredtoadvertizingasakeyshaperofsociallymediateddesires.Ingeneral,the
strategyofadvertisersistopresenthappy,beautiful,successfulpeoplewhoownoruseacertain
product.Youshouldowntheproductalsoifyouwanttomimictheirsuccessinlife.Inmanywaysthe
stockmarketisamimeticphenomenon,asisfashion.Theconceptof"fashion"isnotlimitedonlyto
clothingitalsoincludeslifestyleitemssuchasiPods,cars,computers,andaviddevotiontosports
teamsorNASCARdrivers.Thephenomenonoftheromantictriangle,twomenfightingoverawoman,
isacommonthemeinliterature,television,andmovies.Inhisworksofliterarycriticism,Girardtraces
therootsofromanticrivalryasitisunveiledintheworksofkeyauthorssuchasShakespeare,
Cervantes,Flaubert,andDostoevsky.
[4]ThisconceptofrivalryisthesecondmajorelementofGirard'stheoryofculture.Ifhumanbeingsare
copyingthedesiresofotherhumanbeings,thestageissetforenvy,rivalry,conflict,andviolence.IfI
amimitatingsomeoneelse'sdesireforanobject,thenbydefinitionIamsettingmyselfupasarivaland
potentialenemyoftheotherperson.Ifmimeticdesireisthebedrockofhumansocialpsychology,then
humansocietyisalwaysaconflictualfieldofmutualantagonismswhichcanleadtogeneralizedchaos.
IfIimitateothersthenthoseothersarealwaysstumblingblocksforme,impedingmyabilitytogetwhat
I(andthey)want.Thephenomenonofthestumblingblockisdesignatedbyaverypreciseterminthe
Greeklanguageoftheancientworld:skandalon.Mimeticdesireandtherivalrytowhichitleadsare
inexhaustiblesourcesofscandal,whichGirardinterpretsasourinabilitytobreakfreefromthe
entanglingwebsofimitationandtheviolencetowhichitleads.
[5]Howdosocietiespreventthemselvesfromsufferingameltdownintogeneralizedchaos,intoawar
ofallagainstall?Girardanswersthisquestionbypointingtothephenomenonofscapegoating.Ifthe
membersofasocietycansingleoutavictim,theycanchanneltheirviolentemotionstowardthatvictim
anddoawaywithhim.Thiscatharticreleaseofpentupviolenceservestogivethesocietyanewsense
ofunanimityandpurpose.Insteadofhatingeachother,peoplecanagreetohateaparticularvictimor
perhapsaminoritygrouporclasswithinsociety.Itiseasytofindexamplesthatillustratethescapegoat
mechanism.IntheMiddleAgesinEurope,iftheplagueweretobreakoutinacertaincity,usually
whatwouldhappenisthatarumorwouldbestartedthattheplaguewascausedbytheJewspoisoning
thedrinkingwater.ThisrumorwouldleadtoamassacreoflocalJews.ThefactthattheJewswerealso
dyingoftheplagueandhadbeendrinkingfromthesamewatersourcesaseveryoneelseisirrelevant.
Scapegoatingviolenceisirrationalandsubconscious.Itiscommonlynotedbyhistoriansthatthosewho
werepreachinginfavoroftheCrusadesandwhippinguppublicfervorforthem,suchasPopeUrbanII,
BernardofClairvaux,andCatherineofSiena,wouldcommonlysaytothepeoplethatEuropean
Christiansshouldstopkillingeachotherinpettyinternalwars.Instead,theyshouldbecomeunited,
marchtotheHolyLand,andslaughtertheinfidelMuslims.Thisisaclearexampleofhowthe
scapegoatmechanismservestounitepeopleandchanneltheirviolencetowardascapegoatedOther.The
lynchingofblacksintheUnitedStatesisanotherparticularlystarkexampleofthescapegoat
mechanismatwork.TheideologyofslaveholdingspecificallytaughtthatpersonsofAfricandescentare
subhumanandcanthereforebekilledwithimpunitytomaintainwhatwasclaimedtobeasuperior
whitecivilization.ThekillingofJewsbytheNazisisanotherimmenseexampleofscapegoatingat
work,asisthekillingofsocalledcounterrevolutionaries"inStalinistRussia.InJapanin1923,there
wasamajorearthquakethatkilledthousandsofpeople.Falserumorsbegantocirculatethatpersonsof
KoreandescentlivinginJapanweretakingadvantageofthesituationbylooting,robbing,andraping.
VigilantegroupsofJapanesemenbegantomassacreanyonetheysuspectedofbeingKorean.The
similaritybetweenthissituationandthemedievalplagueisstrikingandundeniable.Italsoshowsthat
thephenomenonthatGirardisdescribingisnotsimplyWestern."Heisunveilingthesocial
psychologyofhumanbeingsassuch.Humancultureisalynchmobwhichhasnormalizedand
structuredtheprocessbywhichscapegoatsareidentified,vilified,andkilled.Thelynchmobalways

seesitselfasinnocentandthevictimasaguiltytransgressorwhomustbekilledtorestore"lawand
order"intheuniverse.
[6]Girard'stheoryofviolencecomestoaheadinhisdiscussionofSatan.HesaysthatSatanisnota
individualpersonbutrathertheentirecomplexprocessthatwehavejustsummarized.Satanisthe
seducerwhoalienatespeoplefromGodandinsinuatestothemthattheymustlongforsomethingthat
theysupposedlylack.Theymustseekoutmodelsofsuccessandimitatethem.Satanisalsotheonewho
"kicksitupanotch"intorivalry,conflict,andchaoticviolence.AndSatanisthewhispererbehindthe
lynchmob,thevoicedemandingthatOnemustbesacrificedfortheMany.Inthisway,"lawandorder"
willberestored.
[7]Somescholarshavecommented,regardingJohnMilton'spoemParadiseLost,thatSatanisthe
mostinterestingcharacter,muchmoresothanAdam,Eve,theangels,orChrist.Inasimilarway,the
JokerisclearlythemostinterestingcharacterinTheDarkKnight,andheisobviouslyafigurative
versionofSatan.Hismainpurposeistosowchaos,confusion,anddestructionamonghumanbeings.
Hedoesthisbystokingtheflamesoftheskandalontheintensefascinationthathumanbeingshave
witheachotherinthepursuitoftheirdesires.ThereistheobviousromantictriangleofBruceWayne,
HarveyDent,andRachelDawestwomenseekingtheaffectionofonewomanisoneofthemost
commonmimeticplots.TheJokersaystoBatmanatonepoint:"DoesHarveyknowaboutyouandhis
littlebunny?"whichthrowsBatmanintoapredictablejealousrage.Onalargerscale,thereistherivalry
betweenthecriminalsandthe"lawabidingcitizens,"whoareallseekingmoney,mammon.Inmodern
Westernculture,whichishighlysecularized,moneyisthenewgodthatpeopleworship.Themovieis
sayingthatallpeoplearegreedythedifferencebetweenthecitizensandthecriminalsisthatthelatter
takegreedtoanabsurdextreme,killingeachotheroffintheprocess.TheJokerrecognizesallofthis
andusesthefascinationwithmoneytocreateallkindsoftemptationsandconflicts,sothatthepolice
becomejustascorruptasthecriminals.
[8]TheDarkKnightisamoviethathassomanyresonanceswithGirard'sideasthatthequestion
inevitablyrisesastowhetherornotthefilmmakershavereadhim.Itmaybethathisideashavefiltered
intotheconsciousnessoftheHollywoodintelligentsia.Itmaybethatthecomicbookauthorsandthe
filmmakersaresimplydrawingonthesameinspirationsthatGirarddrawson:theBibleandgreat
worksofliterature.Theanswertothisquestionisnotgermanetoourdiscussionhere,butitisan
interestingsidebar.ThequotationsfromTheJokerthatIwillpresentshortlyhavesuchstrongGirardian
resonancesthatitishardtobelievethatthefilmmakershavenotreadGirard.Onecanspeculatethat
theyknewGirard'sideaswouldmakethemoviephilosophicallypowerfulinadditiontobeingvisually
dazzling.Thecombinationwouldbeaboxofficehitbecauseofthepublic'smimeticdesire(wordof
mouthpatronage).Thefilmmakers,motivatedbyadesiretomakemillionsofdollars,employGirard's
ideas.Deliciousirony,isn'tit?
[9]Theinterrogationroomsceneinthemiddleofmovieisitscenter,wheretheentirestoryisrevealed
undertheblindinglights.ThissceneshowsthatTheJokeristhemostastuteobserverofhuman
pyschologyinthefilm.Hisinsightsintomimeticdesireandthescapegoatingactivitiesofthe"civilized"
peoplerevealatranscendentperspectivepreciselythesortoftranscendentperspectivethatGirard
claimsisthefruitofbiblicalrevelation.TheJokersaystoBatman:"Theyneedyourightnow.When
theydon't,they'llcastyououtlikealeper.Yousee,theircode,theirmorals,it'sabadjoke."Girard's
theorymaintainsthatanindividualwhoisliftedupasaherotodayislikelytobecomethescapegoat
tomorrow.TheKingwhoisobeyedbyhisloyalsubjectstodaywillhavehisheadchoppedoff
tomorrow.Societyseesitselfasmoral,asbeingcomprisedofthegoodpeoplewhocanjudgethebad
people.Butwhatsocietycannotadmittoitselfisthatitsneedforscapegoatsisitselfimmoral.Society
cannotrecognizeitshypocrisy.TheJokersaysthat"Whenthechipsaredown,thesecivilizedpeople,
they'lleateachother."Healsosays"I'mnotamonster,I'mjustaheadofthecurve."Heisrevealingthat
"lawabidingsociety"isamystificationhumancultureisalynchmobridingthebuckingbroncoof
chaoticviolence.BythinkingthatitisattackingSatanintheformofthescapegoat,societyisactually
actingaccordingtothesatanicprinciple.WhenTheJokersays"theonlysensiblewaytoliveinthis
worldiswithoutrules"heisspeakingthevoiceofchaotic,Dionysianviolence.Buthealsorevealsin
thisscenethatthe"rules,"thelawsandprohibitionsthatsocietyinventstocontainviolence,areasham.
Thepoliceandthelegalsystemthinkofthemselvesasstemmingfromadifferentspiritualsourcethan
thedemoniccriminalsbutinrealitytheyallflowoutofthefountainofthecomplex,shapeshifting

satanicevent.Theviolenceofthecriminalsandthebrutalityofthepolice,symbolizedbyBatman
slammingtheJoker'sheadintothetable,revealthattheultimatebasisofviolenceisreciprocity.The
enemieswhoattackeachothercometoresembleeachothermoreandmoreuntiltheyare
indistinguishable.Thisisrecognizedimplicitlyinthefilm'sunderlyingquestion:"Howcanevilbe
struggledagainstwithoutallowingeviltoovercometheonewhoisstruggling,turninghimtothedark
side?"
[10]TheJoker'sstatementtoBatman"Youcompleteme"isprofound,perhapsmoreprofoundthan
thefilmmakersrealize.Likethephrasefromthegospels,"Itisfinished,"itofferstheperfectsummary
oftheentirestory.TheJokerissayingthathisroleasthechaoticSataniscomplementedbyBatman's
roleasthe"lawandorder"Satan,whosegoodviolenceissupposedlycastingouttheotherSatan'sbad
violence.ThisiswhyTheJokercansaywithsuchconfidence"Youhavenothingtofrightenmewith,
nothingtodowithallyourstrength."HerealizesthatBatmanisactuallyhisallyinthesatanicevent.
TheJokerknowsaboutsatanicshapeshifting,Batmandoesnot.
[11]Itiscustomaryinmoviestopresentthecriminalsasevilandthecopsasgood.Buttheradical
implicationofGirard'stheoryisthatevilispresentinthestructureof"lawabidingsociety"Satanis
ultimatelynotapersonbutacomplexprocess.Satanisatworkintheactionsofthecriminal,butwhen
thecriminalisapprehended,tried,andretributivelypunished,societyisactingasalynchmobwhichis
alsosecretlyinspiredbySatan.Whenthisisseen,therhetoricof"Justice"becomesempty,orworse
thanempty,itbecomestheevilofhypocrisy.ThisiswhyIsaythatthefilmmakersmayhaveputinto
TheJoker'smouthalinethatismoreprofoundthantheyrealize.TounderstandthatSatanisa
shapeshifterwhocanbeinthecriminalandinadefenderofJustice,suchasHarveyDentorBatman,is
todeconstructthe(goodguysvs.badguys)genreofthefilm.Incontemporarypoliticalparlance,ifthe
badguys,theevildoers,andthosewhoarecarryingouttheWaronEvildoingareallfulfillingSatan's
agendawithoutrealizingit,thentheworldisutterlydark.Howcansuchaworldeverchange?"Who
candeliverusfromthisbodyofdeath?"(Rom.7:24)Thisisaquestionthatcanonlyhavea
christologicalanswer,whichisarticulatedinRomans12:21:"Donotbeovercomebyevil,but
overcomeevilwithgood."ButwhileTheJokerisclearlyaSatanfigure,itismyargumentthatBatman
isatbestanambiguousChristfigure,inthathewillinglyacceptstheroleofscapegoatattheendofthe
movie.Hiswillingnesstouseviolencewithinthemovieworksagainstthenotionthatheisagenuine
Christfigure.
[12]Christisnotacharacterinthemovie,butheispresentthroughout,inthesensethathisdefeatof
Satanonthecross,throughnonviolentlove,putSatanondisplay,thusmakingtherevelatoryinsightsof
themoviepossible.ThisalsoisanideawhichisarticulatedclearlybyGirard.WhenTheJokersaysto
Batman"Iknowthetruth.There'snogoingback.You'vechangedthingsforever..."hiswordsintimate
thatheisreallyaddressinganotherconversationpartner,thesameonetowhomDostoevsky'sGrand
Inquisitorwasspeaking.
FILMCREDITS
TheDarkKnight

JR&F
Vol.13,No.1

JR&F
HomePage

CopyrightedbyJournalofReligionandFilm2009
SiteMaintainedby
DepartmentofPhilosophyandReligion
UniversityofNebraskaatOmaha
ContactWebmasteraboutsite

You might also like