Obesity in Older Adults: Epidemiology and Implications for
Disability and Disease
Rafael Samper-Ternent, MD, PhD Candidate1 and Soham Al Snih, MD, PhD1,2,3
1Sealy Center on Ageing, University of Texas Medical Branch
2Division of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch
3Division of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch
Summary
Obesity is a worldwide problem with increasing prevalence and incidence in both developed and
developing countries. In older adults, excess weight is associated with a higher prevalence of
cardiovascular disease, metabolic disease, several important cancers, and numerous other medical
conditions. Obesity has been also associated with increased functional limitations, disability, and
poorer quality of life. Additionally, obesity has been independently associated with all-cause
mortality. The obesity epidemic has important social and economic implications, representing an
important source of increased public health care costs. The aim of this review is to report the
epidemiology of obesity world-wide and the implications of obesity on disability and chronic
diseases.
Keywords
Obesity; Older Adults; Disability; Chronic Disease
Obesity is a health concern in both developed and developing countries. Numerous studies
have documented an increase in the prevalence of obesity worldwide, a trend that has been
described as an epidemic. Increases in the prevalence of obesity have been observed in
men and women, in all age groups, in all major ethnic groups, and at all educational levels.
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), obesity prevalence has doubled since
1980 1. Some authors argue that up to one third of the life expectancy gains over time
attributable to public health achievements, such as reductions in smoking are counteracted
by the simultaneous increase in obesity prevalence 2;3. Among older adults, obesity has been
related to higher rates of disability and poor overall health 4. This is especially relevant
given the expected worldwide growth of older adult populations.
We searched Medline, PubMed, EMBASE and World of Science databases and websites for
the World Health Organization, and for major longitudinal studies on ageing such as the
English Longitudinal Study on Ageing (ELSA)
[http://www.esds.ac.uk/longitudinal/access/elsa/] the Survey of Health, Ageing and
Retirement in Europe (SHARE) [http://www.share-project.org/], the Health and Retirement
Study (HRS) [http://hrsonline.isr.umich.edu/], The Health, Well-Being, and Ageing
Survey (SABE). We did not limit the search by type of study given the complexity of the
Corresponding Author: Soham Al Snih, MD, PhD. Rebecca Sealy Bldg room 5.112 301 University Blvd. Galveston, TX 77555-0177
[email protected].
Conflict of interest The authors have nothing to disclose.
NIH Public Access
Author Manuscript
Rev Clin Gerontol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 February 1.
Published in final edited form as:
Rev Clin Gerontol. 2012 February 1; 22(1): 1034.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
topics addressed; however, we did limit the search to manuscripts published in core clinical
and epidemiological journals between 1991 and 2011, given the focus of the review. Our
initial search terms included obesity, prevalence, trends, older adults and
epidemiology. We went on to conduct several further searches to find articles related to
obesity and disability and obesity and chronic diseases for each of the sub-sections covered
in this article.
Epidemiology of Obesity around the World
Comparisons between regions around the world indicate a wide variation in prevalence of
obesity. Despite these regional differences, over time the prevalence of obesity has increased
worldwide 1. Table 1 summarizes the prevalence of obesity according to studies published in
the last two decades using information from three regions in the world: North America
(USA and Canada), Latin America and Europe.
In the United States, studies using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination
Survey (NHANES) report increasing trends in obesity over time 5-10. Ford and colleagues
reported an increase in the prevalence of obesity from 11.1% in the 1970s to 19.3% in the
early 2000s 9. The most recent data from NHANES report obesity prevalence to be
approximately 32% for men and 36% for women 8;10. The difference between men and
women is not statistically significant based on the overlapping confidence intervals.
Nevertheless, the trend over time has continued to increase for men, while for women it
seems to be stabilizing 8;11. Race /ethnic differences are also reported in the increasing
obesity trends, with African-Americans having the highest rates, followed by Hispanics 8.
Obesity in Canada is lower. The overall prevalence of obesity in the mid 1990s was
reported at 12.8% 12, half that reported in the USA using data from the NHANES study in a
similar time period (Table 1). A steady rise in the obesity trends is observed in Canada as
well, with obesity rates of 8.1% for men in the 1970s increasing to 13.4% in the 1990s and
rates of 12.7% rising to 15.4% in women 13. MacDonald and colleagues, using the cut-off
point of 27 kg/m2 for obesity, found obesity rate of 35% for men 27% for women in ten
provinces from Canada 14. The lower cut-off point explains the large difference in the
prevalence between this and the other Canadian studies (Table 1). Nevertheless, we cannot
determine why the prevalence rate is higher in men than in women, in contrast to studies in
North America. Ethnic differences are also observed in Canada, with Aboriginals reporting
higher rates of obesity 15;16.
The few studies available on prevalence of obesity in Latin America and the Caribbean in
older adults also report an increase over time. A large variation between countries is also
observed 17-19. Using data from the Health, Well-being and Ageing Survey (SABE), the
prevalence of category I obesity (BMI of 30 to < 35 Kg/m2) for men and women combined,
ranged between 10.4% in Havana to 22.9% in Santiago; the prevalence of category II and
extreme obesity (BMI = 35 Kg/m2) ranged from 2.9% in Havana to 15.7% in
Montevideo 17. Thus, obesity of any category ranged between 13.3% and 38.6% in the
SABE study (Table 1). The two remaining studies summarized in Table 1 on Latin America,
were conducted only in Brazil and Mexico. In Brazil the prevalence of obesity seemed to
reach a plateau in the early 2000s for women,while for men the trend continued to
increase 18. The prevalence reported in the single country studies falls in the range reported
in the SABE study (Table 1).
In Europe, both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies report a large variation in the
prevalence of obesity between countries. Using data from the Europe Action on Secondary
and Primary Intervention through Intervention to Reduce Events (EUROASPIRE) surveys,
the average prevalence of obesity increased from 25% in EUROASPIRE I to 38% in
Samper-Ternent and Al Snih Page 2
Rev Clin Gerontol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 February 1.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
EUROASPIRE III 20. Studies using data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement
in Europe (SHARE) and the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) reported
average prevalence of obesity for men of 16.2% and 17.8% for women 21. Nevertheless the
variation observed ranges between 12.8% for men in Sweden to 20.2% for men in Spain,
and between 12.3% for women in Switzerland to 21.9% for women in Greece (Table 1).
Studies using data from only one country also reported a difference in the prevalence of
obesity between men and women and an increasing trend in the prevalence of obesity over
time 22-27. In most countries the prevalence of obesity is higher for women (Table 1).
Cross-sectional studies comparing USA to Europe showed that obesity rates in USA were
higher for both men and women(Table 1). In 2004, the prevalence of obesity for the USA
was reported at 30.7% for men compared to 17.6% in Europe, and 37.9% in women
compared to 24.2% respectively 28. A large variability is noted again between obesity rates
in the different European countries. However, no country reaches the exceedingly high
obesity rates of the USA. One last study examined obesity rates among Inuit people in
Canada, Alaska and Greenland and reported no significant differences between countries,
with an overall prevalence of obesity of 15.8% for Inuit men and 25.5% for Inuit women 29.
Finally, Stewart and colleagues used data from the NHANES to predict obesity rates in 2020
and estimate its impact on mortality 3. Their projections showed that life expectancy is
decreased by almost 1 year in the USA for a representative 18 year-old person, assuming
trends in smoking continue to decrease and trends in body mass index (BMI) continue to
increase at the same rate observed between 1973 and 2005. Additionally, the projection
shows that the overall prevalence of obesity for adults in the USA will be 45% by the year
2020 3.
We did not include Asia or Australia as regions in Table 1 because of the limited number of
studies available on the epidemiology of obesity in older adults in these continents.
Additionally, a large variability in the prevalence of obesity has been reported in the
literature on Asian older adults. However, to include all major regions in the world we
analyzed two documents that analyze obesity in Asia and Australia. Based on a report by the
WHO, the major difficulty with accurately examining obesity among Asians is the large
variation in cultural and economic conditions of Asian populations and the fact that current
WHO cut-off points for obesity seem to provide an erroneous estimate based on higher
prevalence of adverse events at lower BMI values. This report by the WHO proposes that
the cut-off point for obesity among Asian adults should be 25 kg/m2 30.
The WHO report on Asia summarizes some studies that have looked at epidemiology of
obesity. Most data on obesity in Asia come from single country studies or from countries
where a large portion of the population is of Asian origin, like the island of Mauritius.
Obesity trends are rapidly rising in all Asian nations. Obesity rates range between less than
1% in rural populations in countries like China, to around 9% in urban areas of Malaysia. A
large variation by gender and ethnicity is observed in several countries including Malaysia
and China. In summary, the data from Asian countries reports much lower obesity rates
compared to other regions. The WHO however, strongly advocates for a new definition of
obesity with different cut-off points based on the trends in obesity rates and the increase in
the prevalence of obesity associated complications such as cardiovascular diseases.
In Australia, analysis of trends from cross-sectional surveys conducted since the 1980s
were summarized by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare in a bulletin published in
2004 31. Similar to what has been reported in other continents, the rates of obesity among
older adults has increased over time. Between the 1980s and the early 2000s an increase in
Samper-Ternent and Al Snih Page 3
Rev Clin Gerontol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 February 1.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
prevalence of obesity was observed from 11% to 23% in adults over 65 31. The most recent
reports show that between 25-30% of adults approaching retirement in Australia are obese.
In summary, obesity has increased noticeably in all continents among older adults. Large
variations between countries, race/ethnic groups and genders are observed. Despite these
variations, public health implications need to be carefully analyzed and addressed to prevent
disability and decreased quality of life for older adults around the world in the near future.
Obesity and Disability
Disability is a broad term that can be defined in many different ways. Lack of a single
definition and availability of several validated tools to measure different types of disability
make cross-study comparisons on disability difficult. Nevertheless, the ample literature
showing that disability increases the risk of mortality and institutionalization and affects
quality of life in older age make disability a concept that must be carefully analyzed and
better understood 32-35. Conditions that increase the risk of disability are therefore highly
important.
Table 2 summarizes relevant studies that analyze the relationship between obesity and
disability. Obesity is not measured consistently although all studies use either BMI, waist
circumference or body composition to define obesity. Similarly, the definition of disability
varies between the different studies. The first studies listed are longitudinal studies. They are
consistent in showing that, over time, the presence of obesity increases the risk of becoming
disabled 25;36-43. Nevertheless, of the nine longitudinal studies listed, seven studies use
Activities of Daily Living (ADL) to define disability 25;36;38;39;41-43. Five of the seven
studies use the same six activities (walking across a room, bathing, eating, dressing, toileting
and transferring in and out of bed) and define disability as difficulty performing one or more
activities 25;36;38;39;43. From these studies we can conclude that obesity is an independent
risk factor for developing ADL disability over time. The remaining studies use upper and
lower body function and work related disability. Each study concludes that obesity increases
the risk of the defined disability 37;40. The studies by Reynolds et al. and Walter et al. also
conclude that obesity hampers the probability of recovery from disability in older
adults 38;41. In some of the longitudinal studies, the effect of obesity on disability was larger
for women compared to men (Table 2).
Following the longitudinal studies, cross-sectional studies analyzing the relationship
between obesity and disability are listed (Table 2). Similar to the longitudinal studies,
disability is defined in different ways. Of the 11 cross-sectional studies included, seven use
ADL exclusively or in combination with other functionality measures to define
disability 44-50. Three studies also use Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) to
define disability 46;48;50. The remaining studies use either physical function or mobility
disability to define disability 51-54. All studies conclude that obesity is related to increased
disability regardless of how it is measured. Some of the studies analyze the relationship
between obesity and muscle strength and suggest that, despite the deleterious effects of
obesity on muscle function, additional pathways need to be analyzed to understand the
pathophysiology behind the onset of disability in older obese adults 50-54.
Several studies report that the relationship between weight or BMI and disability has a U
or a J shape, meaning that not only obesity but underweight older adults have increased
risk of disability 36;45;48. Normal weight and maybe some overweight older adults seem to
have the lowest risk of disability of all weight or BMI groups. This has important
implications for prevention and treatment schemes, since losing too much weight can be
detrimental for older adults as well.
Samper-Ternent and Al Snih Page 4
Rev Clin Gerontol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 February 1.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
In summary, obesity is related to increased risk of disability among older adult populations.
Obesity also seems to affect recovery from disability over time. Obesity not only affects
functional status but it also affects mobility. Policy makers and healthcare providers need to
keep this relationship in mind, and design obesity prevention and obesity management
programmes that can improve functional status in older adults and protect them from
becoming disabled, with resultant poor quality of life.
Implications of obesity on chronic diseases
Despite the widely know deleterious effects of obesity on overall health, obesity in older age
has to be analyzed with caution. Obesity significantly increases the risk of death among
older adults. Never the less, the relationship between BMI and mortality is unique in the
older adult population because very low BMI values are related to the highest mortality risk,
this risk decreases as BMI increases to normal and overweight values and then mortality risk
increases again, with a sharp increase in BMI values greater than 35kg/m2 36;55;56.
Additionally, weight loss has been reported as a risk factor for adverse events in some older
adults including fractures, falls and mortality 57;58. Despite this, healthcare costs for older
obese adults are higher than for older adults with normal weight59;60. Similarly, disability
rates and complications from obesity have been widely reported among the older adult
population 61-63. We reviewed the literature and have summarized the implications of
obesity on different diseases in the older adult population.
Obesity and Cardiovascular disease
Obesity is an independent risk factor for development of heart failure, acute events like
myocardial infarctions and stroke in older adults 64;65. Obesity increases the risk of
hypertension and affects overall response to anti-hypertensive medications 66-68. A U
shaped relationship between BMI and hypertension has been reported 69. Two major causes
have emerged as explanatory causes for cardiovascular disease resulting from obesity:
anatomic and physiologic alterations. Anatomic alterations are explained because obesity
affects the architecture and physiology of the cardiovascular system. Obesity causes atrial
and ventricular enlargement and plaque formation in the vessels 70-72. These changes not
only affect cardiovascular function, but also increase the risk of developing potentially lethal
conditions like atrial fibrillation and abdominal aortic aneurysms 73;74.
Obesity triggers metabolic dysregulation and inflammation 50;75;76. Decreased levels of
natriuretic peptide, a peptide that protects against acute events like myocardial infarctions,
have been reported 68;77. Other physiologic alterations include increased levels of
inflammatory markers (interleukin-6, C - reactive protein and tumor necrosis factor) that
affect the bodys response to physiologic changes and put an additional burden on the
cardiovascular system 76. Increased adiposity enhances insulin resistance and therefore the
risk for adverse cardiovascular events overall 50;78.
Obesity, Diabetes and the Metabolic Syndrome
Obesity, diabetes and the metabolic syndrome are closely related. Obesity and diabetes are
distinct clinical conditions that occur independently despite sharing some pathophysiologic
pathways. The metabolic syndrome is also independent from obesity and diabetes. It is a
collection of risk factors that cause damage to the cardiovascular system, increasing the risk
of heart attack, stroke and other cardiovascular diseases. Increased body fat and increased
blood sugar are two of the eight components of the metabolic syndrome79;80.
Unlike the relationship between obesity and mortality in older adults, the relationship
between obesity, diabetes and the metabolic syndrome is very similar in older adults
compared to younger adults. A large body of evidence has shown that obesity increases the
Samper-Ternent and Al Snih Page 5
Rev Clin Gerontol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 February 1.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
risk of developing diabetes and the metabolic syndrome 80;81. There is also evidence that
obesity, diabetes and the metabolic syndrome are independent risk factors for cardiovascular
disease 80. Increased oxidative stress in fatty tissue of obese individuals has been proposed
as a pathogenic mechanism leading to the metabolic syndrome 82. Additionally, severity of
obesity (determined by National Heart Lung and Blood Institute Task Force categories: class
1, class 2 and class 3) is associated with an increasing trend in risk of development of
diabetes and the metabolic syndrome 83. It has been reported that this relationship between
obesity, diabetes and the metabolic syndrome is especially important among minority
populations in developed countries given the higher rates of obesity compared to other
population groups and the higher rates of complications and mortality 79.
Obesity and Cancer
More than 60% of cancers occur over the age of 65 84. In the last decade, findings in cancer
epidemiology have highlighted the importance of the relation between obesity and cancer 85.
Increased body mass and adiposity have been established as risk factors for the development
of cancers that affect a large portion of the older adult population such as colon cancer,
breast cancer, and prostate cancer 85. Three hormonal systems have been proposed as causal
pathways : insulin and insulin-like growth factor axis, sex steroids and adipokines 85;86.
These hormonal systems are altered in obesity; however, their role in the development of
cancer is probably different for each cancer site. Additionally, the link between obesity and
cancer seem to be different for men and women 85-87.
To date there have been no clinical trials exploring the effect of losing weight, or even
maintaining weight, on cancer incidence 85;86. However, there is evidence from
observational studies that weight maintenance and controlled weight loss may decrease the
risk of developing some types of cancers 88;89. Despite the limited information, it has been
shown that obesity increases the risk of delayed cancer diagnosis, complications during
cancer treatment and poor outcomes after treatment 90;91.
Obesity and arthritis
A common limitation when addressing arthritis in older adults is the lack of differentiation
between the types of arthritis described. The most common types of arthritis affecting older
adults are osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and gout. The pathophysiology, treatment and
course of each type of arthritis are very different. However, the negative effect of arthritis on
older adults is mostly due to its effect on overall physical and mental health and disability
rather than a direct increase in mortality risk 92.
The relationship between obesity and arthritis has not been completely explained. Despite
the differences in the most common types of arthritis in older adults, both obesity and
arthritis are pro-inflammatory conditions that increases the concentration of cytokines and
adipokines as previously reported 93. Additionally, arthritis impairs physical activity,
necessary for weight loss, and a cornerstone for self-management of arthritis because it
diminishes pain and improves physical function 92;94. Both increased levels of inflammatory
markers and decreased physical activity in relation to obesity impede adequate management
of arthritis and increase the long term effects of the disease 95. In addition, obesity
accelerates the deterioration of joint function in older adults with arthritis and negatively
affects some outcomes from surgical interventions 92;95.
Obesity and some Geriatric syndromes
Obesity has been linked to some geriatric syndromes. The pro-inflammatory state caused by
obesity has been linked to age related muscle loss or sarcopenia 4;50. Sarcopenia has been
shown to increase disability and overall mortality and may explain some of the
Samper-Ternent and Al Snih Page 6
Rev Clin Gerontol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 February 1.
NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript
complications reported in obese older adults 4. Sarcopenia and obesity are independent
conditions with separate pathophysiologic pathways. However, older adults with comorbid
sarcopenia and obesity have become the centre of several studies. Co-occurrence of
sarcopenia and obesity places older adults in a unique state of disease that increases the risk
of adverse events and requires special interventions 4;50;52;54. Additionally, the proinflammatory
state has also been related to vascular dysfunction in the brain that increases
the production of beta-amyloid, a key component of senile plaques that accumulate in the
brain in Alzheimers disease 96-98.
In summary, the pro-inflammatory state caused by obesity, in addition to the limitations in
physical function, are common links to the added burden of disease when obesity is present
concomitantly with many chronic conditions in older adults. Additionally, obesity is a
marker of poor outcomes for most interventions for chronic conditions and interferes with
management of most chronic diseases in older adults.
Conclusions
Obesity among older adults has increased noticeably in the last two decades in all
continents. However, large variations between countries, race/ethnic groups and genders are
observed. Obesity is related to increased risk of disability among older adult populations
regardless of the measures used. Obesity affects functional status and mobility.
Inflammation caused by obesity is linked to the added burden of disease when obesity is
present concomitantly with many chronic conditions in older adults. Additionally, it is a
marker of poor outcomes for most interventions for chronic conditions and interferes with
management of most chronic diseases in older adults.
Policy makers and healthcare providers need to keep obesity-related health outcomes in
mind and design obesity prevention and management programmes that can improve
functional status in older adults and protect them from becoming disabled with resultant
poor quality of life.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by grants R03-AG029959, R01-AG017638, and R01-AG010939 from the National
Institute on Aging, U.S. Dr. Al Snih is supported by a research career development award (K12HD052023:
Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Womens Health ProgramBIRCWH) from the Eunice Kennedy
Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development; the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
Diseases; and the Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health.