The District of Columbia: in Superior Court
The District of Columbia: in Superior Court
IN SUPERIOR COURT
In
re:
AYMANABUAITA
Beit Sahour, Bethlehem, West
Bank
Palestine,
('
\fC
Plaintiff,
1n
versus
and
DAN MAZER
12-26 Lexington
Street WIF OLE
London
United
Kingdom,
FILED
CIVIL AGTfOSS
BRANCH
APR 3 0 2010
SUPilOl COURT
OFTHE OlSOICTOFOOUiWA
WASHINGTON,
DC
e
and
Telephone: (212)975-4321,
serve: Corporation Service Company
1090 Vermont Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20005,
and
and
PARTIES
I.
That your plaintiff, viz., AYMAN ABU Al TA, is a natural adult person, of
Palestinian
nationality, whom, at all times relevant herein, has been, and is presently, domiciled in
the village
of Beit Sahour, West Bank, in the teritory known as Palestine, whom, until recently, supported
his
wife and four children as a grocer; he is also a Board Member, as well as the Treasurer, of the
Holy
Land Trust, based in Bethlehem, a charitable organization committed to promoting peace
and
reconciliation among Israelis and Palestinians, of all religious faiths, and he is a Chrisian whom
is a
member and congregant of the Greek Orthodqx
Church;
II.
That, upon information and belief, your defendant known as SACHA NOAM
BARON
COHEN, also known as SACHA BARON COHEN (hereinafter referenced qua "COHEN"), is
a
natural adult person, who is a Bitish Subject,domiciled in the State of California, whom is
employed
as, inter alia, an actor, comedian and writer, whom was featured in, inter alia, the "Btino" Movie,
and
it also bears mention herein that COHEN also| was a producer of the "Brtjno"
Movie
m.
That, upon information and belief, your defendant known as DAVID
MICHAEL
LETTERMAN (hereinater referenced qua "L ETTERMAN"), is a natural adult person, domiciled
in
the State of New York, residing at 193 BaxterRoad, North Salem, New York 10560,
whom is
employed as, inter alia, a comedian and televi sion host, who hosts, inter alia, *'Late Show With
David
Letterman," at the Ed Sullivan Theater, in New York City, which show is broadcast over the
CBS
Television Network, and, as more fully descibed hereinater, said defendant hosted The Late
Show
With David Lettennan on 7 July
2009;
IV.
That, upon information and belief, your dt fendant known as LARRY CHARLES WENGROD,
also
known as LARRY CHARLES (hereinafter reerenced qua "CHARLES") is a natural adult person,
and
citizen of the United States of America, whorris believed to be domiciled in the State of
California, is
employed as a witer, director and producer, aid was the director of, inter alia, the "BrUno"
Movie;
V.
That, upon information and belief, your defendant known as JONAH HILL FELDSTEIN,
also
known as JONAH HILL (hereinafter referenced qua "HILL1') is a natural adult person,
and
citizen of the United States of Ameica, whom is believed to be domiciled in the State of California,
is
employed as a witer, director and producer, a^id was a co-producer of, inter alia, the "Biino"
Movie;
VI.
That, upon information and belief, your defendant known as DAN MAZER (hereinafter
referenced
qua "MAZER") is a natural adult person, and British subject, whom is believed to be domiciled
in
London, is employed as a witer, diector and producer, and was a co-producer of, inter alia,
the
14BrUno"
Movie;
Vll.
That, upon information and belief, your defendant known as MATTHEW JAY ROACH,
also
known as JAY ROACH (hereinater reference 1 qua "ROACH") is a natural adult person,
and
citizen of the United States of Ameica, whom is believed to be domiciled in the State of California,
is
employed as a writer, director and producer, and was a co-producer of, inter alia, the "BrUno'*
Movie;
VIII.
That, upon information and belief, your defendant known as NBC UNIVERSAL, INC.
(hereinafter
referenced qua "UNIVERSAL"), is a dejure < orporate personality, organized under the laws of
the
State of Delaware, and having its pincipal place of business at 30 Rockefeller Plaza, New York,
New
York 10009; upon futher information and belief, said corporate defendant is one of the world's
larger
media and entertainment companies, and is involved, inter aliay in the business of
distibuting
cinematic ilms, through its "Universal Pictuw s" division, as well as in the distribution and
marketing
for retail to the public of DVD format recordir gs of cinematic works, through its "Universal
Studios
Home Entertainment" business; upon further ilformation and belief, UNIVERSAL was
and is the
domestic and worldwide distibutor and marks ter of both the cinematic and DVD versions of
the
"BtJno" Movie; UNIVERSAL, thus, acted, t publish and republish the "BrUno" Movie at
several
movie theaters in the Distict of Columbia, well as throughout the United States, and around
the
as
world
as well, at the times
and has, likewise, distibuted and marketed
specified hereinaft
the
"Briino" Movie in numerous retail establishm snts in the Distict of Columbia, and elsewhere, at
the
times speciied hereinafter; in addition, UNIVERSAL continues to market and distribute the
"Btlno"
Movie through various media, in the Distiict of Columbia, inter loci, including, but not limited to:
Best
Buy (DVD); Distict Cablevision on dema id movies; Dish Network ; Netflicks ;
Veizon FIOS ; Redbox (DVD); and Target <S>
(DVD);
DC..
That, upon information and belief, your defendant known as CBS BROADCASTING,
INC.
(hereinater refeenced qua "CBS"), is a dejure corporate personality, organized under the laws of
the
State of Delaware, and having its pincipal pice of business at 51 West 52nd Street, New
York, New
York 10019; upon further information and belief, said corporate defendant is a major
Ameican
television broadcasting network which distrib tes for broadcast on its numerous television
station
affiliates across the Stales, including, inter alii, WUSA Television, Channel 9, in Washington,
D.C., a
full compliment of regular and special events programming, including, inter alia, "The Late
Show
With David
Letterman";
X.
That, upon information and belief, your dc fendant known as WORLDWIDE PANTS,
INC.
(hereinafter referenced qua "WORLDWIDE" I, is a dejure corporate personality, organized under
the
laws of the State of Delaware, and having its Pincipal place of business at 1697 Broadway, New
York,
New York 10019; upon further information and belief, at ail times relevant herein, said
corporate
defendant is the producer of "The Late Show with David
Letterman";
o
XL
That, upon information and belief, your defendant known as GANNETT COMPANY,
INC.
("WUSA"), is a dejure corporate
organized under the laws of the State of Delaware,
personality,
and
Jones Branch Drive, McLean, Virginia 22107-0150;
having its pincipal place of business at
upon
7950
further information and belief, said
defendant is a major newspaper and television
corporate
media
company in the United States, which owns, ir ter alia, WUSA Television, Channel 9, in
Washington,
D.C., the longest-tenured afiliate of the CBSTelevision Network; upon further information and
belief,
WUSA broadcast, on a customary taped delaj basis, inter alia, the unexpurgated 7 July 2009
edition of
"The Late Show With David
Letterman";
XH
That, upon information and belief, your defendant known as BLOCKBUSTER, INC.
(hereinafter
referenced qua "BLOCKBUSTER"), is a dejure corporate personality, organized under the laws of
the
State of Delaware, and having its principal place of business in the State of Texas, at
Renaissance
upon further information and belief, said defendant is
Tower, 1201 Elm Street, Dallas, Texas
an
75270;
Ameican-based chain of DVD, Blu-ray Disk and video game rental stores, with more than
9,000
stores in 25 counties worldwide, including two stores situate in the Distict of Columbia, viz.,
one
outlet located at 1805 Columbia Road, N.W.,Washington, D.C. 20009, and a second outlet
located at
410 Eighth Street, S.E., Washington, D.C. 20()03, which stores carry, inter alia, inter alia,
the
"Briino" Movie;
XIII.
That this Honorable Court has juisdictior over the instant matter under the provisions of Title
1I,
921, of the Distict of Columbia Code of Geeral and Permanent Laws (2001 ed.); this
Honorable
Court may exercise, properly, in personam juisdiction over each of your within-named
defendants,
pursuant to the enabling provisions of Title 1:, 423 (a) of the Distict of Columbia Code of
General
and Permanent Laws (2001 ed.) (the "Long-Arm Statute"), inasmuch as, inter alia, the subject
matter
of the instant litigation, viz., certain calumnious accusations implicating your plaintiff were
contained
in certain discrete media, viz., the cinematic ard DVD versions of the "Bruno" Movie, and the
7 July
2009, broadcast of 'The Late Show With David Letterman," were all deliberately and
intentionally
published and or republished, and sold and rer ted to the public, and continue to be so
distributed in,
inter loci, the Distict of Columbia, by your d fendants, each of them, acting, vaiously, separately,
and
or in
concert;
FACTl AL AVERMENTS
(inducement)
XIV.
That, in accordance with 219 of
gration and Nationality Act, as amended,
the
the
Secretary of State has designated the "Al-Aqsa Martyrs Bigade" as a Foreign
Terrorist
Organization (hereinafter designated qua
"FTp")1;
XV.
That, for the purposes of identifying a FTC K inter alia, the United States Code (Title
22,
Chapter 38, Paragraph 2656f(d)) defines "terroism" as "... premeditated, politically
motivated
violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine
agents";
XVI.
That 18 U.S.C., 2331 deines "terroism" as:
". , activities that involve violent... or life-threatening acts ... that are a violation of the criminal
laws of the United States or of any State and . .. appear to be intended (i.) to intimidate or
coerce population;
a
civilian
(ii.) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii.)
to
affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination or
";
kidnapping
See: Curent List of Foeign Terrorist Organizations posted by the Secretary of Stale's Coordinator for Counterterroism, on the United States Department of State Inte met website:
http://www.5tate.gOv/s/ct/rts/other/des/123Q85.htm
XVII.
That, at all time relevant herein, alien representatives and members of a designated
FTO are
inadmissible to the United States, and are, in certain circumstances, removable from the
United
States2
;
xvm.
That, in addition to its having been
ited by, inter alia, The Government of the United
desig
States
of Ameica as a terroist organization, as referenced supra, the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade is
generally
and widely recognized throughout the world, ind, perforce, in the Middle East, as a notoious
terrorist
group, culpable in the wanton slaughter of dozens of innocent people, and in the targeted
assassination<s
of many
others;
XIX.
That* as adverted to above, your plaintiff is a peace-loving person who abhors violence, and,
pior
to the publication and republication of the cal imnies complained of herein, enjoyed a good
reputation
XX.
That, on or about 30 June 2009, the "Brunt" Movie premiered in
Hollywood;
XXI.
COHEN appeared with, inter alios, LETTERMAN, on
That, as adverted to supra, on 7 July
2009
'The Late Show With David Letterman," whi ;h show was broadcast, on a tape-delayed basis,
over
CBS's eponymous broadcasting television network, including, inter alia, over
WUSATelevision,
Channel 9, which broadcast, upon informatioi and belief, reached thousands of television
viewers in
the Distict of Columbia, and millions more tiLroughout the rest of the United States, through other
CBS
See: 8 U.S.C., 1182 (a) (3) (B) (i) (IV)-(V) 1227.
affiliates;
XXII.
That, in the course of his aforesaid appear* nee with LETTERMAN, COHEN went to great
lengths
to portray falsely your plaintiff as a "terrorist jjroup leader al-aqsa martyrs brigade {sic.)*",
and
suggested that he learned such putative association through a contact at the "C.I.A.",
presumably, the
United States of Ameica's Central Intelligence
Agency";
xxin.
That, although couched in some banter, a (Jiscernment of the warp and woof of the
COHEN
mpression that each defendant was
LETTERMAN dialog gives the
desirous of
unmistakable
conveying the message to the audience that your plaintiff was, indeed, a "terroist , who is a
group
leader of the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Bigade, as evinced by the following excerpts from the colloquy
between
COHEN & LETTERMAN, set forth, haec verba,
thusly:
BY COHEN: You know, when we were making this ilm, we wanted it to be better than Borat and
we
thought :what could people see that they've never seen before on ilm? And we thought one
thing
would be a comedian interviewing a terroist, >o, which I think has never been done before for
good and so we showed the scipt you know the outline of the script to the studio and they said:
reason,
'oh,
this is great, and who's going to play the terrorist?' And we said: 'no, we're going to ind a real
terrorist.
Now, it's not that easy to find an actual terroist. In fact, your government has been looking for one
for
about nine
years.
10
you're looking for them. And he said: 'Yeah, y >u know, there is a terroist who lives in my town';
so
I 'Great! You know: Can we interview him? But I'm a little bit scared about reprisal attacks from
said:
the people in the you know in your city.1 And he said: 'Don't worry, you know, everybody loves
other
you,
we love the Ali G Show!* So, so the next thing was 1 thought I needed some secuity to get
to the because it (sic.) was in the West Bank, the guy picks this secret location, so we called
terroist
around
some secuity irms. Everybody said: 'no way!' And, eventually, I found one guy who was
an
Englishman
who had done the Enrique Iglesia; Hero Tour
(sic).
BY LETTERMAN: You gotta go where you f otta go.
Wow!
BY COHEN: You know, his main job had been protecting Enrique from flying underwear (sic).
You you know, I knew, if it came to it, this guy would take a bra for me. So we get there, and I
know,
said:
'Alight, listen! Tm a little bit scared that the tt rroist and his body guards' gonna be armed,
so, if armed, let's have a code word. So, if th sir armed, say that it's going to be hot weather,
they're
and, if not armed, there's no guns, say it's going to be cold.' So we end up at this secet
they're
location.
The in with his body guard. They've been checked by my body guard; my body guard
terroist comes
comes
in and I said: 'So what's the weather going to be?1, and he says: 'Un, well, 1 think it's going to be
cold
weather
but there's a chance it could be quite warm and it might even be boiling hot!' At which
point,
the terroist said: 'No, no, no. It is not cold. It ijs warm'. And then I realize I'm pretty sure that
my
terroist either did or did not have a gun on
hi
BY LETTERMAN: You're certainly getting ybur money's worth
there.
BY COHEN: And then, my body guard says: Ya, you're right you know. It is quite warm out here.
It's of much, much warmer out here. It's kind of much, much warmer than North England', at
kind
which
point, I realized that my body guard had forgo ten about our role
play.
BY LETTERMAN: He was talking about
theweather.
BY COHEN: I was discussing the weather wi :h a
terroist.
BY LETTERMAN: Now, will these guys eventually see the ilm? Did you invite them to the
premiere,
or?
11
al-aqsa martyrs brigade9'; the COHEN - LETTERMAN interview then draws to a close, with
LETTERMAN, essentially, predicting that tht "BrUno" Movie would be a "blockbuster (sic.)"
like
"Borat", COHENs last cinematic
release;
XXIV.
That, as adverted to supra, the "Bruno" Movie was released nationwide, in the United States,
on 10
July 2009, after having been released the day t>efore in Australia and New Zealand;
subsequently, upon
information and belief, the "BrUno" Movie has been released in many other counties around the
world,
including, inter loci, Israel, where it was shown with Hebrew
subtitles;
XXV.
BrUno" Movie was released nationwide, in the
That, on or about 17 November 2009,
United
thei
States, on DVD recording, for sale and rental to the general public, both on-line and
through
innumerable retail outlets, including scores of stores in the Distict of Columbia, including, inter
alia,
the Distict of Columbia BLOCKBUSTER oi tlets eferenced supra;
XXVI.
That, on even date, id est, 17 November 2Q09, COHEN and CHARLES appeared as guests on
Terry
Gross' respected, high brow radio show on Ni tional Public Radio ("NPR"). "Fresh Air'\ to discuss
and
promote the "BrUno" Movie; said interview was aied nationwide on NPR affiliates, including,
inter
alia, locally, on WAMU and WHUR; although the scene from the "Bruno" Movie in which your
plaintif was depicted was not explicitly mentoned, COHEN and CHARLES waxed expansively
about
how the "BrUno" Movie represented a new gene of comedy, in which the comedic actor is
placed is
real, dangerous situations, in which he (the ccjmedian) thereupon deigns to make some sort of
comic
effect;
XXVII.
That the dusi jacket encasing the retail DVD of the "Biino" Movie explicitly mentions "terrorists",
with said term deigned to reference your plair tiff and the latter's ictional bodyguard; upon
information
12
and belief, all packaging and promotional mateials respecting the "BrUno" Movie were designed
and
or approved by
UNIVERSAL;
XXVIII.
That, contrary to the false insinuations misrepresentations contained in both the
"BrUno"
and
Movie, the "BrUno" Movie DVD and the aforesaid COHEN - LETTERMAN interview, at no time
was COHEN in any danger, whatsoever, when he interviewed your plaintiff, nor was the interview
at a
"secret location"; in fact, upon information and belief, the interview took place at a spot selected
by
COHEN, CHARLES, HILL, MAZER and ROACH, viz., the Everest Hotel, which, although located
on
the West Bank, in Beit Jala, is in an area designated by the Israeli military forces as "ZONE 'C"\
which
is under full Israeli military control; it is also noteworthy that the Everest Hotel is flanked by an
Israeli
police academy and an Israeli military
base;
XXIX.
That, upon information and belief, your de fendants, each of them, evinced either actual
malice or
else a reckless disegard for the truth, in rcspejct of their respective actions vis-d-vis your
plaintiff;
XXX.
That the subject interview of your plaintiff by COHEN took place some months prior to the
release
to the the "BrUno" Movie, under a palpably false pretense, viz., that COHEN was a
German
"journalist", whom was desirous of interview ng your plaintiff about the plight of the
Palestinian
people;
XXXI.
That, upon information and belief. COHEN, CHARLES, HILL, MAZER and ROACH schemed
to
find an unwitting person (read: your plaintiff)to participate in the subject interview at the
Everest
Hotel, by having a currently unknown emissaj-y of COHEN, CHARLES, HILL, MAZER and
ROACH
contact a representative of the Holy Land Truit, in Bethlehem, seeking a interview subject who
was: i.)
a Christian; ii.) who had been administratively detained by Israel at some point; and iii.) who
was a
13
XXXII.
HILL, MAZER and ROACH, and their unknown
That such efforts by COHEN,
CHARLES
confederates, ultimately resulted in your plaintiffs traveling to the Everest Hotel, for what he
thought
would be a simple interview with some Germ m journalist who was interested in learning about
his
peaceful activism with the Palestinian and Ismeli peoples; as an aside, it bears mention that, at no
time
pior to the subject interview did your plaintif suspect anything untoward especting the
subject
interview equest, inasmuch as the Everest Hotel has long been a well known and popular
gatheing
place for Palestinian and Israeli peace
activists;
XXXIII.
That, upon information and belief, when he arrived at the Everest Hotel for his subject
interview,
your plaintiff was met by an unidentified confederate of COHEN and CHARLES, who led him to
a
room upstairs in the Hotel, to meet "the German journalist" for the
interview;
xxxrv.
That, upon information and belief, unbekriownst to your plaintiff, confederates of
COHEN,
CHARLES, HILL, MAZER and ROACH had rented out an entire floor of the Everest Hotel in
advance
of the subject interview, and had had contractors configure the interview room with a false wall
and a
double-mirror, where CHARLES could surreptitiously monitor the subject
interview;
XXXV.
That, at no time pior to the commencemeht of the subject interview, or else ater the interview,
was
your plaintiff made aware that excerpts of theinterview would be featured in the
"BrUno" Movie;
XXXVI.
That, at no time pior to the subject interview or else after the conclusion of the interview, did
either
CHARLES or COHEN or any of their confederates disclose to your plaintiff that he would be
featured
in any movie, much less the "BrUno"
Movie;
14
XXXVII.
That, at no time either pior to the subject |interview, or ater the interview, did CHARLES
or
COHEN, or, for that matter, anyone else, pres ;nt your plaintiff with any sort of release or
request for
permission to utilize your plaintiffs identity, or else his image, in any commercial activity, enterpise
or
production;
(Colloquium)
XXXVIII.
That, as adverted to above, your plaintif ^as identiied explicitly in the "BrUno" Movie as
'terroist group leader al-aqsa martyrs brigade", under a bold display of his full name, viz.:
xxxrx.
That, upon information and belief, the excjerpt from the "BrUno" Movie in which your plaintif
was
depicted, when viewed by the public on television sets and video monitors, through the WUSA
outlet,
inter alia, included the CBS trademarked "ey?" logo, connoting the impimatur of CBS
News;
XL.
That the depiction of your plaintiff in the JBrUno" Movie shows a full-facial view, such that there
is
no mistaking whom is being characterized as i "terroist" in the "BrUno"
Movie;
XLI.
That, upon information and belief, your plaintiffs likeness has been misappropriated and
used by
COHEN, CHARLES, HILL, MAZER, ROACH, LETTERMAN, CHARLES, UNIVERSAL, CBS,
WORLDWIDE, and WUSA, inter alios, to p 'omote and market the "Bruno" Movie and "The Late
jacket for the "Biino" Movie, which reference s, inter alia, "terroists";
XLIL
That, upon further information and belief, UNIVERSAL is the holder of the U.S. Copyright for the
"BrUno" Movie, and UNIVERSAL has approve d and condoned the viral publication and re-publication of
the "Biino" Movie on YouTube.com and other social media over the Internet, for marketing purposes.
with particular emphasis on the publication andre-publication of the subject calumnious scene from the
"BrUno" Movie, even ater it had been noticed by your plaintiff, per the iling of the subject antecedent
distict court litigation, on 2 December 2009; th js, there can be not gainsaying that UNIVERSAL was not
merely the distibutor of the "BrUno" Movie, b it, rather, was intimately involved with the publication and
successive e-publication of the subject calumn es against your plaintiff; moeover, thee can be no
denying UNIVERSAL's key role in the continu ng distibution and promotion of the subject calumnies
against your plaintiff as there is no indication that it has deigned to asserting its prerogative of removing
the subject calumnious copyighted video from YouTube and other Internet social media; ditto, for CBS,
LETTERMAN and WORLDWDE, as regards the video excerpts from the aforesaid COHEN TTERMAN interview0;
See: Stowe, Debbie & Paul Stump, "Who is Boral? The Unauthoized Biography of Sacha Boron Cohen", ((Candour
Limited, Denmark (2007)), at p. 149.
See, e.g.: "BrunoTerroist (sic.) interview": hto://www^qutubefcom/watch?v=ElTgT35fZWs .It is noteworthy that said
video posting alone, one of dozens known to rcmair extant on the 1 ntemet, has had some 255,573 vie wings as of
29 2010. Upon information and belief, the pheno nenon known as viral video has caused a geometic multiplication
April
of publications of such calumnious video.
See, e.g.: "The Late Show With David Letterman -Sacha Baron Cohen Interviews a Terrorist":
htfp://wvvw.voultibe.com/waich?v==Ok2oce2kfT8Atature^fvw It is also noteworthy that, upon further information and
belief, like, the "BrunoTerrorist (sic.) interview", sdid latter Letterman - Cohen interview video has had some
3,724,277, vie wings, as of 29 Apil 2010, and has, through the viral video phenomenon, resulted in a geometric
multiplication of millions of moe vie wings over thej Internet.
16
xun.
That, upon information and belief, COHEN CHARLES, HILL, LETTERMAN. MAZER, ROACH,
CBS, WORLDWDE and UNIVERSAL, inter [tlios, schemed to use the insidious publication and republication of the defamation of your plaintiff z s the center piece of their strategy to market the "BrUno"
Movie, and, that said defendants continue to in< ulge in such promotion by defamation strategy, all to the
[Innuendo)
XLIY
That, upon information and belief, the confluence of the foregoing enumerated circumstances,
foreseeably and deliberately, were intended toand, in fact, did, brand falsely your plaintiff, a
peace
activist, family man and prominent businessm in, as a "terroist", and that, upon further information and
belief, a substantial proportion of people in yo jr plaintiffs hometown, as well as people throughout the
world, including, inter loci, the District of Columbia, believe your plaintiff to be a terroist and massmurderer, based solely upon the malicious depiction of him as a "terroist", both in the "Briino"
Movie, as well as on the David Letterman Shpw;
XLV.
That the within-described accusations, insinuations and representations that your plaintiff is, or ever
was, associated with the notorious Al-Aqsa Mkrtyrs Bigade, or, for that matter, any other terroist
activity or cause, is utterly false and untrue, an d your defendants, each of them, had every eason to
XLVI.
That the calumnies descibed hereinbefore have caused your plaintiff to suffer extensive damage
and loss, including, but not limited to, the following, viz.: death threats; shame; loss of reputation; loss
17
of effectiveness as a community organizer an< conciliator; depression and anxiety; loss of business to
his family market; and fear for the well-being and safety of his wife, children, and his relatives, both on
the West Bank, the District of Columbia, and, elsewhere in the United States, and, indeed, throughout
the world;
XLVn.
That, in addition to the above-referenced range of harm to your plaintiff, the misappropiation of
your plaintiffs likeness in the "Biino" Movie, 4The Late Show With David Letterman", and in
promotional mateials respecting such productions, has intruded upon your plaintiffs pivate life, and has
falsely associated your plaintiff with a scurrilous and scandalous movie, causing him great emotional
distress, depression and shame, to say nothing of loss of reputation and loss of business;
xlviii.
That, in addition, your plaintiff has incurred considerable attorneys' fees and travel expenses as he
has been obliged to travel to the United States to vindicate his good name and, concomitantly, to
salvage his reputation;
to posit the ill-gotten gains realized by your corporate and individual defendants, upon information and
belief, such gains were, indeed, substantial, ar d, as a benchmark in such regard, upon further
informaion and belief, the current box ofice take rom the "Biino" Movie, exclusive of DVD sales, is
approaching the sum of Two Hundred Million IJollais ($200,000,000);
18
L.
That it bears further mention that, on 2 Dec :mber 2009, your plaintiff iled a Complaint for Damages
Civil Action No. 1:09-cv-02285-RWR, thereby puting said defendants on notice of your plaintiffs claims
and of your plaintiffs demand that the subject calumnious mateial be withdrawn from distribution and
sale, yet, notwithstanding same, your defendant have continued to promote and market the "Biino"
Movie, thereby exacerbating the harm to your plaintiff and putting paid to any notion that any of your said
defendants were unaware of the defamatory nature of the "Biino" Movie, as regards your plaintiff;
FIRST COUNT
(UBELAND SLANDER Published on 7 My 2009 Against COHEN, LETTERMAN, CHARLES,
HILL, MAZER, ROACH, UNIVERSAL, CBS, WORLDWIDE, and GANNETT)
LI.
That your plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference heein, as if set out in full, each and every one
of the foregoing averments contained in this ('omplainf.
It should be noted that your plaintiff added BLOCKBUSTER as a defendant in the district court action per the filing of
an Amended Complaint on 5 February 2010. Ultimately, UNIVERSAL, LETTERMAN, WORLDWIDE, CBS and
GANNETT were served with process in e spec I of jhc abovc-rcfcrcnced United States Distict Court action. On 4 March
2010, UNIVERSAL moved to dismiss said distict court action, challenging jurisdiction under diversity of citizenship.
Subsequently, on 1 Apil 2010, LETTERMAN, WORLDWIDE, CBS and GANNETT joined in UNlVERSALs Motion
to Dismiss. Essentially, said defendants have contended that diversity juisdiction cannot be maintained because of
the
fact that your plaintiff and COHEN arc non-U.S. Cozens, even though COHEN is believed to reside in Los Angeles,
and, concomJtanUy, because your "[pjlaintiff. as a Palestinian national, does not qualify as a 'citizen [] or subject of a
foreign nation1 who can invoke alienage jurisdiction because Palestine is not recognized by the United
States
government."
(Memorandum of Poi nts and Authoities in Support of Motion of (UNIVERSAL) to Dismiss the First
Amended Complaint" I Document 6 @ p.3] Accordingly, your plaintiff did signify to the distict court, on 6 Apil 2010,
that he docs not oppose the motion dismiss and that your plaintiff intended to recommence his claims before
this
Honorable Court - hence the instant action. It should also be noted that, inter alia, the instant action adds HILL,
MAZER and ROACH, co-producers, with COHEN of the "BrUno" Movie, as parties defendant.
19
LIL
That the depictions of your plaintiff in the "Biino" Movie and on "The Late Show With David
Letterman*', as a "terroist" were intended to, and in fact did, brand falsely your plaintif as a
terroist
and criminal, causing the harm complained of
herein;
SECOND COUNT
(UBELAND SLANDER Published on 10 July 2009 Against COHEN, CHARLES, HILL, MAZER,
ROACH, and UNIVERSAL)
LIIL
That your plaintiff hereby incorporates by reference herein, as if set out in full, each and every
one
of the foregoing averments contained in this
tomplainv.
LIV
cinematic release of the "Biino" Movie as a "terrorist"
That the depictions of your plaintiff in
the
were intended to, and in fact did, brand falsely your plaintiff as a terorist and criminal, causing
the
harm complained of
herein;
THIRD COUNT
(UBELAND SLANDER Published on IX November 2009Against COHEN, CHARLES, HILL,
MAZER, ROACH, UNIVERSAL and BLOCKBUSTER)
LV.
That your plaintiff hereby incorporates reference herein, as if set out in full, each and every
one
by
of the foregoing averments contained in this
Complaint;
LV1.
20
FO URTH COUNT
(TORTOUS MISAPPROPRIATION OF NAME OR LIKENESS (Restatement of the Law, Second,
Torts, 652) Against All
Defendants)
LVII.
That your plaintiff hereby incorporates reference herein, as if set out in full, each and every
by
one
of the foregoing averments contained in this
Complaint;
LVIII.
That the misappropriation of your plaintiffs name and likeness in the "Biino" Movie, "The
Late
Show With David Letterman", and in accomp uiying and ancillary promotional images, videos
and
materials, was without your plaintiffs conseni or permission, and contrary to his intent, and has
led.
inter alia, to your plaintiffs name and likene:s falsely being associated with the promotion
and
production of a scurrilous and scandalous mo1 ie, causing, actually, directly and proximately,
your
plaintif to suffer the harm complained of herpin, and resulting in unjust enrichment to
your
defendants;
FiFTH COUNT
(UBELAND SLANDER Published on, inter tempus, on 30 April 2010, Against COHEN,
LETTERMAN, CHARLES, HILL, MAZER, ROACH, UNIVERSAL, CBS, and WORLDWIDE)
LVIV.
That your plaintiff hereby incorporates reference herein, as if set out in full, each and every
by
one
of the foregoing averments contained in this
Complaint;
LVV.
That the continuing publication and repub ication of the Internet viral video known as the
"Bruno
Terroist (sic.) interview ", falsely depicting yaur plaintiff as a "terrorist", as described hereinbefoe,
is
intended to, and, in fact, has, defamed your phintiff, causing him to suffer signiicant
harm;
8 See, e.g.: "Bruno Terroist (sic.) interview": http://uww.voutube.com/watch?v=EITg"nSf2Ws
21
SIXTH COUNT
(UBELAND SLANDER Published on, intertempus, on 30 April 2010, Against COHEN,
LETTERMAN, CHARLES, HILL, MAZIR, ROACH, UNIVERSAL, CBS, and WORLDWIDE)
LVVI.
That your plaintiff hereby incorporates reference herein, as if set out in full, each and every
by
one
of the foregoing averments contained in this
Complaint;
LVVH
That the continuing publication and repub|lication of the Internet viral video known as the
"The
Late Show With David Letterman - Sacha Bafron Cohen Interviews a Terroist9", falsely depicting
your
plaintif as a "terroist", as descibed hereinbt foe, is intended to, and, in fact, has, defamed
your
plaintif, causing him to sufer significant har ti;
22
*+
determined by the tier of fact or else the sumof Ten Million Dollars ($10,000,000), and
exemplary
damages in the sum of One Hundred Million 1 dollars ($100,000,000) against each liable
defendant;
(v.) That, in consideration of a finding of liability in respect of his FIFTH COUNT, he be
awarded
compensatory damages against all liable defendants, jointly and severally, in an amount
to be
determined by the trier of fact or else the sumof Ten Million Dollars ($10,000,000), and
exemplary
damages in the sum of One Hundred Million Dollars ($100,000,000) against each liable
defendant;
(vi.) That, in consideration of a finding oj liability in espect of his SIXTH COUNT, he be awarded
compensatory damages against all liable defendants, jointly and severally, in an amount
to be
determined by the tier of fact or else the sumof Ten Million Dollars ($10,000,000),
and exemplary
damages in the sum of One Hundred Million Dollars ($100,000,000) against each liable
defendant;
(viL) That your defendants be enjoined, both pendente lite and permanently, to withdraw
the
(x.) That your plaintiff receive such otherand further relief against your
defendants as this
Honorable Court may deem just and properin.der the existent
circumstances.
23
Res
fully subrni
* //Hmm>^
OSEPJf PETER DRENNAN
istict of Columbia Unified
ar No. 358196
18 North Lee Street
rhird Floor
\Jexandia, Virginia 22314
Telephone: (703) 519-3773
Telecopier: (703) 5484399
\l-Mail: Josephiosephpeterdrer|nan.com
SAM W. BURG
Distict of Colu]
Unified
24
Respecfully
submitted
/ltt*#3
OSEP
TER DRENNAN
Distict of Columbia Uniied
Bar No.
358196
218 North Lee
StreetFloor
Third
Alexandia, Virginia
22314
Telephone: (703)
519-3773 (703)
Telecopier:
548-4399
E-Mail:
[email protected]
25
CA Form 1
TA
*\ ^ ** o r\ r> i*s
Plaintif
vs.
-10
f>LOCKBuS-ri^,%
Defendant
SUMMONS
You are hereby summoned and required to serve an Answer to the attached Complaint, either
personally or through an attorney, within twenty (20) days after service of this summons upon you,
of
the day of service. If you are being sued as an oficer or agency of the United States Government or the
exclusive
Distict of Columbia Govenment, you have sixty (60) days ater service of this summons to serve your
Answer. A copy of the Answer must be mailed t > the attoney for the party plaintiff who is suing you. The
attorney's name and address appear below. If plaintiff has no attorney, a copy of the Answer must be
mailed to the plaintiff at the address stated on this
Summons.
You arc also required to file the original Answer with the Court in Room JM 170 at 500 Indiana
Avenue, N.W., between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Mondays through Fidays or between 9:00 a.m. and
noon
12:00 on Saturdays. You may ile the oiginal Answer with the Cout either before you serve a copy of the
Answer on the plaintiff or within ive (5) days ater you have served the plaintiff If you fail to ile an
Answer judgment by default may be entered against you for the relief demanded in the
complaint.
Clerk of the Court
oS
hivne of P
bint i
/wy\
Attorney
%^\3r> <
y
3 ~7
"23
o/d
Date
Telephone
CAForml
Plaintif
vs.mMtJ*"n
/AC
UMMONS
Summons.
You are also required to ile the oiginal Answer with the Court in Room JM 170 at S00 Indiana
Avenue, N.W., between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Mondays through Fidays or between 9:00 a.m. and
noon
12:00 on Saturdays. You may ile the oiginal Answer with the Cout either before you serve a copy of the
Answer on the plaintiff or within ive (5) days ater you have served the plaintiff If you fail to file an
Answer, judgment by default may be entered agai isi you for the relief demanded in the
complaint.
Clerk of the Court
ie,
?eksr\)f<**K
2 1
Address
aAWv
By
y
2l7
lerk
Date
Telephone
kF
CJ
A Form 1
aYmm
TTA
ABU
1C
Plaintif
vs.
Civil Action No
CBS Bioi>ASTZ/l/G,Zi/c.
Defendant
SUMMONS
Distict of Columbia Government, you have si |ty (60) days ater service of this summons to serve your
Answer. A copy of the Answer must be mailed t t the attoney for the paty plaintiff who is suing you. The
attorney's name and address appear below. I plaintiff has no attoney, a copy of the Answer must be
mailed to the plaintiff at the address stated on
Summons.
thi
You are also required to file the oiginal Answer with the Court in Room JM 170 at 500 Indiana
Avenue, N.W., between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Mondays through Fidays or between 9:00 a.m. and
noon
12:00 on Saturdays. You may ile the oiginal Answer with the Cout either before you serve a copy of the
Answer on the plaintiff or within five (5) days ater you have served the plaintiff If you fail to ile an
Answer, judgment by default may be enteed agai ist you for the relief demanded in the
complaint.
Clerk of the Court
k Pelro'^rew
AA
Addrea
/ yp^^JrrV
ty
lybo/O
Date
Telephone
( A Form 1
Ay/W A&V Al
0002966*10
Plaintif
vs.
NBCt>l*e,2,
y\c
UMMONS
You are hereby summoned and required to serve an Answer to the attached Complaint, either
personally or though ah attoney, within twenty (20) days ater service of this summons upon you, exclusive
of the day of service. If you are being sued as an officer or agency of the United States Government or the
District of Columbia Government, you have sixty (60) days ater service of this summons to serve your
Answer. A copy of the Answer must be mailed t> the attoney for the party plaintiff who is suing you. The
attoney's name and address appear below. If plaintiff has no attoney, a copy of the Answer must be
mailed to the plaintiff at the addess stated on this
Summons.
You are also required to file the original Answer with the Court in Room JM 170 at 500 Indiana
Avenue, N.W,, between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Mondays though Fidays or between 9:00 a.m. and 12:00
noon on Saturdays. You may ile the oiginal Answer with the Court either beforeyou serve a copy of the
Answer on the plaintiff or within ive (5; days ater you have served the plaintiff If you fail to ile an
Answer, judgment by default may be entered against you for the relief demanded in the
complaint.
Clerk of the Court
ee
ee^e
Name of Plainlilri Attorney
yCTerk
Date
Telephone
GA Form 1
Aym*/
ABU AITA
0002966-id
Plaintif
vs.
MarMMjAV Roach
SJMMONS
To the above named
Defendant:
You are hereby summoned and requi
personally or through an attoney, within twenty
of the day of service. If you are being sued as i
District of Columbia Government, you have six
Answer. A copy of the Answer must be mailed t
Answer on the plaintiff or within ive (5) days after you have served the plaintiff If you fail to f\\t an
Answer, judgment by default may be entered against you for the elief demanded in the
complaint.
Clerk of the Court
eae IXeeUW
lame o! PlnntifTi Atiwney
2/g M L* g
f~\ *. 3A
Address
/<&
torBy
A
9^20
Date
Telephone
VOU MAY OBTAIN A COPY OF THIS FORM IN SPANISH AT THE SUPERIOR COURT OF D.C, 500 INDIANA
AVENUE, N.W ROOM JM 170
NOTE: SEE IMPORTANT IN! ORMATION ON BACK OF THIS FORM
CV(H-U**U> u
CJ
Cj
CAForal
Plaintif
vs.
"PAA/
Defendant
5UMMONS
To the) above named
Defendant:
You are hereby summoned and requi
personally or though an attoney, within twenty
of the day of service. If you are being sued as i
Distict of Columbia Government, you have si y (60) days ater service of this summons to serve your
Answer. A copy of the Answer must be mailed t the attorney for the paty plaintiff who is suing you. The
attorney's name and address appear below. If plaintiff has no attoney, a copy of the Answer must be
Summons.
mailed to the plaintiff at the address stated on
thi
You are also required to file the oiginal Answer with the Court in Room JM 170 at 500 Indiana
Avenue, N.W., between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00
Mondays through Fridays or between 9:00 a.m. and
noon
with the Court either before you serve a copy of the
p.m.. on Saturdays. You may ile the oiginal Answer
12:00
Answer on the plaintiff or within five (5) days ater you have served the plaintiff If you fail to file an
Answer, judgment by default may be entered against you for the relief demanded in the
complaint.
Clerk of the Court
>
By
Address
o^.
2
37
3^
Date
Telephone
PUEDE OBTENERSE COP IAS DE ESTE FORMUtARIO EN ESPANOL EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPERIOR DEL
DISTRITO DC COLUMBIA, 500 INDIANA AVENUE, N.W^SAXAJM 170
YOU MAY OBTAIN A COPY OF THIS FORM IN SPANISH AT THE SUPERIOR COURT OF D.C. 500 INDIANA
AVENUE, N.W., ROOM JM 170
NOTE: SEE IMPORTANT INFORMATION ON BACK OF THIS FORM.
CVfl twli M
(JA Form 1
AMMABO A%iA
0002966-10
Plaintif
Civil Action No.
vs.
SUMMONS
attorney's name and address appear below. If plaintiff has no attorney, a copy of the Answer must be
mailed to the plaintiff at the address stated on
this
Summons.
You are also required to ile the oiginal Answer with the Court in Room JM 170 at 500 Indiana
Answer on the plaintiff or within ive (5) days iter you have served the plaintiff. If you fail to ile an
Answer, judgment by default may be entered agai ist you for the relief demanded in the
complaint.
Clerk of the Court
TXCAW
-7jf AA 1. %3rJ
wr
By
Address
k
Date
Telephone
CA Form 1
Plaintif
vs.
Hill FU>[5TEZ*I
'Jonah
Defendant
IUMMONS
To the above named
Defendant:
You are hereby summoned and required to serve an Answer to the atached Complaint, either
personally or through ah attorney, within twenty (20) days ater service of this summons upon you,
of
the day of service. If you are being sued as ait officer or agency of the United States Government or the
exclusive
Distict of Columbia Govenment, you have sixty (60) days ater service of this summons to serve your
Answer. A copy of the Answer must be mailed lb the attorney for the parly plaintiff who is suing you. The
attorney's name and address appear below. If plaintiff has no attorney, a copy of the Answer must be
You are also required to ile the original Answer with the Cout in Room JM 170 at 500 Indiana
Avenue, N.W., between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Mondays through Fidays or between 9:00 a.m. and
noon
12:00 on Saturdays. You may ile the oiginal Answer with the Court either before you serve a copy of the
Answer on the plaintiff or within five (5) days ater you have served the plaintiff If you fail to ile an
Answer, judgment by default may be entered agai ist you for the relief demanded in the
complaint.
Clerk of the Court
\t
Address
Clerk
t*
J
Date
Telephone
YOU MAY OBTAIN A COPY OF THIS FORM IN SPANISH AT THE SUPERIOR COURT OF D.C, 500 INDIANA
AVENUE, N.W., ROOM JM 170
n
NOTE; SEE IMPORTANT INFORMATION ON BACK OF THIS FORM.
CVuHWItiT U
CAForml
Ay mm Mo crA
002966-10
Civil Action No.
VS.
SUMMONS
attorney's name and address appear below. If laintiff has no attorney, a copy of the Answer must be
mailed to the plaintiff at the address stated on
this
Summons.
You are also required to ile the original Answer with the Court in Room JM 170 at 500 Indiana
Avenue, N.W., between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Mondays through Fridays or between 9:00 a.m. and
noon
12:00 on Saturdays. You may ile the oiginal Ar swer with the Cout either before you serve a copy of the
Answer on the plaintiff or within ive (5) days ifler you have served the plaintiff If you fail to file an
Answer, judgment by default may be entered against you for the relief demanded in the
complaint.
Clerk of the Court
^^ P
Address
51?
3 71?
Clerk
Date
Telephone
Cd
:A Form 1
Plaintif
Civil Action No.
vs.
Cohe\I
Defendant
SUMMONS
You are hereby summoned and required to serve an Answer to the attached Complaint, either
personally or through an attorney, within twenty i20) days after service of this summons upon you,
of the day of service. If you are being sued as ar officer or agency of the United States Government or the
exclusive
District of Columbia Government, you have sixty (60) days ater service of this summons to serve your
Answer. A copy of the Answer must be mailed to the attorney for the party plaintiff who is suing you. The
attorney's name and address appear below. If plaintiff has no attorney, a copy of the Answer must be
mailed to the plaintiff at the address stated on this
Summons.
You are also required to File the original Answer with the Court in Room JM 170 at 500 Indiana
Avenue, N.W., between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Mondays through Fidays or between 9:00 a.m. and
noon
12:00 on Saturdays. You may file the oiginal Answer with the Court either before you serve a copy of the
Answer on the plaintiff or within five (5) days ater you have served the plaintiff; If you fail to ile an
Answer, judgment by default may be entered against you for the relief demanded in the
complaint.
Clerk of the Court
*\
SL,r
g NosbL L
Address
By
3rJ f^ffOf
M*
ty
Clerk
30/2DI0
Telephone
44
Date
co
CO
0002860-10
Case Number:
<J/2o/2e>lo
VS.
Date:
cto.)
^}
-3h(please
<sA rprint) /)eies
**~T*>
Pre*^^
"~~
Finn Name; /
cph
No.: ^
TYPE OF CASE:
? Non-Jury
Relationship to Lawsuit
ia^i/\
T
<*
__
^ Lo 1/r> s
Other:
? 12 Person Jury
%6Person Jury
Demand: $ WO,M0,nlD:
Other:
Judge
Calendar #
Case No.
Judge
Calendar #
NATURE OF SUIT:
A. CONTRACTS
D 01 Breach of Contract
D 02 Breach of Warranty
D 06 Negotiable Instrument
D 15 Other:
COLLECTION CASES
D 07 Personal P operty
? 09 Real Property-Real Estate
D 12 Specific Performance
D 17 OVER $25,000
B. PROPERTY TORTS
D 09 Harassment
? 02 Alienation of Affecion O 10 Invasion off Privacy
D 03 Assault and Battery t JS 11 Libel and Slander
D 04 Automobile
D 05 Deceit (Misrepresentation)
? 06 False Accusation
D 07 False Arrest
? 08 Fraud
'? 12
Malicious Interference
? 13 Malicious Prosecution
D 14 Malpractice Legal
? 15 Malpractice] Medical
D 16 Negligence
? 17 Personal Injury
D 18 Wrongful Death
? 19 Wrongful Eviction
? 20 Other:
? 21 Asbestos
? 22 Toxic/Mass Torts
5-WVlwd-3J4
9w
+&
CIVIL DIVISION
&
Vs.
2010 CA 002966
B
9
ADDENDUM TO INITIAL ORDER AFFECTING
ALL MEDICAlt MALPRACTICE CASES
In accordance with the Medical Malpractice Proceedings Act of 2006, D.C. Code
et seq.16-2801,
(2007 Winter Supp.), "[ajter an action is iled in the court against a healthcare provider
alleging medical malpractice, die court shall require the parties to enter into mediation, without
discovery or, if all parties agree[,] with qnly limited discovery that will not interfere with the
completion of mediaion within 30 days of the Initial Scheduling and Settlement Conference
("ISSC"), pior to any further litigation in an effort to reach a settlement agreement. The early
mediation schedule shall be included in the Scheduling Order following the ISSC. Unless all
parties agree, the stay of discovery shall be more than 30 days ater the ISSC." D.C. Code
16not
2821.
To ensure compliance with this legislation, on or before the date of the ISSC, the Court
will
notify all
attorneys wd pro se parties of the date and time of the early mediation session and the
name of the assigned mediator. Information about the early mediation date also is available
overinternet at https://www:dccouts.gov/pa/. To facilitate this process, all counsel and pro se
the
parties in every medical malpractice case [are required to confer, jointly complete and sign an
EARLY MEDIATION FORM, which must be iled no later than ten (10) calendar days pior to the
ISSC. Two separate Early Mediation Fcrms are available. Both forms may be obtained at
www.dccourts.gov/medmalmediation. One form is to be used for early mediation with a mediator
from the multi-door medical malpractice mediator roster; the second form is to be used for early
mediation with a private mediator. Both forms also are available in the Multi-Door Dispute
Resolution Ofice, Suite 105, 515 5th Street, N.W. (enter at Police Memoial Plaza entrance).
Plaintiffs counsel is responsible for eFiling the form and is required to e-mail a courtesy copy to
[email protected]. Pro se Plaintiffs wjho elect not to eFile may ile by hand in the
Multi-Door
Dispute Resolution
Office.
A roster of medical malpractice med ators available through the Court's Multi-Door
Dispute
Resolution
Division, with biographical information about each mediator, can be found at
www.dccourts.gov/medmalmediation/media orproiles. All individuals on the roster are judges or
lawyers with at least 10 years of significant < xpeience in medical malpractice litigation. D.C.
Code
16-2823(a). If the parties cannot agree oiji a mediator, the Court will appoint one. D.C. Code
16-2823(b).
The following persons are required by statute to attend personally the Early Mediation
Conference: (1) all parties; (2) for parties that arc not individuals, a representative with
settlement
authoity; (3) in cases involving an insurance company, a representative of the company with
settlement authoity; and (4) attorneys representing each party with primary responsibility for the
case. D.C. Code
16-2824.
No later than ten (10) days ater the early mediation session has terminated, Plaintiff
mediator, including a pivate mediator, regarding: (1)
eFile with the Court a report prepared by must
th
ached; or, (3) if a settlement was not reached, any
attendance;
(2) whether a settlement
was
agreements to narrow the scope of the di ute, limit discovery, facilitate future settlement, hold
another mediation session, or otherwise ce the cost and time of trial preparation. D.C. Code
ed
16-2826. Any Plaintiff who is pro se may elect to ile the report by hand with the Civil Clerk's
Oice.
www.dccouts.gov/medmalmediation.
a*
CIVIL DIVISION
0+
cQ
Vs.
2010 CA 002966 B
INITIAL
ER AND ADDENDUM
Pursuant to D.C. Code 11-906 and District of Columbia Supeior Court Rule of Civil Procedure
("SCR Civ") 40-1, it is hereby ORDERED as fo Hows:
(1) Effective this date, this case has assigned to the individual calendar designated below. All future ilings
in this case shall bear the calendar number and the judge's name beneath the case number in the caption. On
iling any motion or paper related thereto, one cqpy (for the judge) must be delivered to the Clerk along with the
oiginal.
(2) Within 60 days of the iling of the comp aint, plaintiff must ile proof of serving on each defendant:
copies of the Summons, the Complaint, and thi s Initial Order. As to any defendant for whom such proof of
service has not been iled, the Complaint will be dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution unless the
time for serving the defendant has been extended as provided in SCR Civ 4(m).
(3) Within 20 days of service as described sbove, except as otherwise noted in SCR Civ 12, each defendant
must respond to the Complaint by iling an Answer or other responsive pleading. As to the defendant who has
failed to respond, a default and judgment will be entered unless the time to respond has been extended as
provided in SCR Civ 55(a).
(4) At the time and place noted below, all counsel and unrepresented parties shall appear before the
assigned judge at an Initial Scheduling and Settlement Conference to discuss the possibilities of settlement and
to establish a schedule for the completion of all proceedings, including, normally, either mediation, case
evaluation, or arbitration. Counsel shall discuss' vith their clients prior to the conference whether the clients are
agreeable to binding or non-binding arbitration. This order is the only notice that parties and counsel will
receive concerning this Conference.
(5) Upon advice that the date noted below is inconvenient for any party or counsel, the Quality Review
Branch (202) 879-1750 may continue the Confeence once, with the consent of all parties, to either of the two
succeeding Fridays. Request must be made not less than six business days before the scheduling conference date.
No other continuance of the conference will be granted except upon motion for good cause shown.
(6) Parties are responsible for obtaining andl complying with all equirements of the General Order for Civil
cases, each Judge's Supplement to the General Order and the General Mediation Order. Copies of these orders
are available in the Courtroom and on the Court'! website http://www.dccourts.gov/.
WASHINGTON, DC 20001
Cato.doc
ADDENDUM TO
ALL MEDIC
In accordance with the Medical Malpractice Proceedings Act of 2006, D.C. Code
16-2801,
et
(2007 Winter Supp.), "[ajter an action is iled in the court against a healthcare provider
seq.
alleging medical malpractice, the court shall require the parties to enter into mediation, without
discovery or, if all parties agree[,] with only limited discovery that will not interfere with the
completion of mediation within 30 days of the Initial Scheduling and Settlement Conference
("ISSC"), prior to any further litigation in an effot to reach a settlement agreement. The early
mediation schedule shall be included in the Scheduling Order following the ISSC. Unless all
paties agree, the stay of discovery shall not be more than 30 days ater the ISSC." D.C. Code
162821.
To ensure compliance with this legislation, on or before the date of the ISSC, the Court
willatorneys and pro se parties of th i date and time of the early mediation session and the
notify all
name of the assigned mediator. Informatio i about the early mediation date also is available over
the internet at https://www:dccourts.gov/p/. To facilitate this process, all counsel and pro se
parties in every medical malpractice case are required to confer, jointly complete and sign an
EARLY MEDIATION FORM, which must >e iled no later than ten (10) calendar days prior to the
ISSC. Two separate Early Mediation Forms are available. Both forms may be obtained at
www.dccourts.gov/medmalmediation. One form is to be used for early mediation with a mediator
rom the multi-door medical malpractice mediator roster; the second form is to be used for early
mediation with a pivate mediator. Both forms also are available in the Multi-Door Dispute
Resolution Oice, Suite 105, 515 5th Str et, N.W. (enter at Police Memoial Plaza entrance).
Plaintiffs counsel is responsible for eFilingj the form and is required to e-mail a courtesy copy to
[email protected]. Pro se Plaintiffs who elect not to eFile may file by hand in the
Multi-Door
Dispute Resolution
Ofice.
A roster of medical malpractice mediators available through the Court's Multi-Door
Dispute
Resolution
Division, with biographical information about each mediator, can be found at
www.dccourts.gov/medmalmediation/mediajorproiles. All individuals on the roster are judges or
lawyers with at least 10 years of signiicant experience in medical malpractice litigation. D.C.
Code
l6-2823(a). If the parties cannot agree oiji a mediator, the Court will appoint one. D.C. Code
16-2823(b).
Oice.
www.dccourts.gov/medmalmediation.