Building the Story of

Resilience
Enhancing Local Government Capacity on
Disaster Risk Reduction and Management
and Climate Change Adaptation

LGU Mandates in Climate

Change Adaptation
As a political unit, LGU is mandated
to exercise their police power, as well
as share with the national government
the responsibility in the management
and maintenance of ecological
balance in their respective territorial
jurisdiction (RA 7160, Sections 2a,
15, 3i).

LGU Mandates in Climate

Change Adaptation
Section 11(2) of RA 10121,
states that LGUs shall ensure
the integration of disaster risk
reduction and climate change
adaptation into local
development plans, programs
and budgets

LGU Mandates in Climate

Change Adaptation
Section 14 of RA 9729, as
amended by RA 10174,
provides that LGUs shall be
the frontline agencies in the
formulation, planning and
implementation of climate
change action plans in their
respective areas

LGU Mandates in Climate

Change Adaptation
Brgys. shall be directly involved in
prioritizing CC issues;
Municipal/City govts. shall
consider CC adaptation, as one of
their regular functions
Inter-local government unit
collaboration shall be maximized
in the conduct of climate-related
activities

LGU Mandates in Climate

Change Adaptation
As provided for in Sec. 24 of
RA 10174, the Commission
shall develop criteria to
prioritize use of the fund
(PSF) based on, but not
limited to, the following:
(h) availability of climate
change adaptation action plan.

LOCAL CLIMATE CHANGE

ACTION PLAN

Guiding Principles in the

Formulation of the LCCAP
1. Knowledge and understanding of the
hazard and climate change impacts
is required;
2. Understanding of exposure,
vulnerability, and adaptive capacity
3. Identify and engage relevant
stakeholders
4. Build on partnership to reduce
vulnerability and risk to CC impacts.

Framework for the LCCAP Formulation

LCCAP Planning Process

1. Forming the Planning Committees
2. Setting/Re-visiting the LGU VMG
3. Determining the Vision-Reality Gap
CDP
PROCESS

LCCAP PROCESS

LCCAP Planning Process

Analyzing the LGU Situation
(ecological profiling, data gathering, mapping, etc)
CDP PROCESS

LCCAP PROCESS

Collect and organize climate

and climate change information
Understanding projected climate
change scenarios and its potential
impacts based on past impacts
- projected changes: increase/decrease of
temperature and precipitation;
increase/decrease of extreme events for
specific future time horizon)
- Likely future climate changes in the
Philippines
2020 (time slices of 2006-2035)
2050 (time slices of 2036-2065)

Summary of PROJECTED Climate Changes in Bago City, Negros Occidental

Climate
Variable

General Changes
Expected in Climate
Variable

Specific Change Expected and

Reference Period

Information about
Patterns of Change

Temperat
ure

Increase

.9 to 1.2C in 2020
1.9 to 2.3C in 2050

Gets warmer in
summer (MAM)
season

Rainfall

Seasonal
Increase/
Decrease

Season

1971-2000

2020

2050

234.9

251.6

252

283

272.5

256.6

JJA

899.6

952.9

910.2

SON

784

828.6

795.2

DJF
MAM

Reduction in
rainfall during the
summer (DRIER
SUMMER)
Increase in rainfall
from June to
February in 2020
and 2050

Summary of PROJECTED Climate Changes in Bago City, Negros Occidental

Climate
Variable

General Changes
Expected in Climate
Variable

Specific Change Expected and

Reference Period

Information about
Patterns of Change

Extreme
Events

Increasing number of Hot

Days

1431 days exceeding 35 C in

2020
3076 days exceeding 35C in 2050
From observed baseline of 460C

Significant increase in
the number of hot days
expected in 2020 and
2050

5227 no. of days with rainfall <

2.5 mm in 2020
5226 no. of days with rainfall <
2.5 mm in 2050
From observed baseline of 7839

There will be more days

with rainfall (Less days
without rainfall)

5 days with rainfall > 300 mm by

2020
4 days with rainfall > 300 mm by
2050
From observed baseline of 4 days

More extreme daily

rainfall expected in 2020
but more or less the
same from the baseline
in 2050

Decreasing number of
dry days

Heavy Daily Rainfall

> 300 mm increasing in
2020 and decreasing by
2050

Collect and organize natural hazard

information

Gathering or preparation of
hazard maps (GIS maps)
Consultation with mandated
agencies in data gathering and
characterizing hazards (i.e.
spatial extent,
magnitude/intensity,
frequency)

Hazard Maps and Data Sources

Hazard Maps and Data Sources

Hazard Identification
Inventory of historical climate hazard &
disaster events: Compiling past/historical damage
data/statistics and anecdotal accounts;
For each disaster event, information on intensity
and magnitude, including scale of damages
(agriculture, houses, infrastructure), and how it
affects the population (number of affected
population, injured and fatalities).
Include information on the geographic extent of
the hazards, and the areas affected by disaster
events, if possible, down to purok level, or at the
very least aggregate the data on the barangay level.

Records of Previous Disasters

Summary Hazard Matrix Per Barangay

VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT

Remember the Concepts!

Exposure - is determining WHO,
WHERE, and WHAT is at risk from
climate change & geohazards (e.g.
population, resources, property)
multi-sectoral (Economic, Social,
Environment, Infrastructure)
- determine elements and sectors
exposed per hazard (e.g. SS,
Flooding, SLR, Coastal erosion,
landslides, etc ).

EXPOSURE ANALYSIS &

INFLUENCE DIAGRAM
Climate Change
Drivers/Hazards

EXAMPLE:
Wetter Rainy
Season

flooding

Primary Impact

Streets are
submerged in
water

Housing units
submerged

Secondary Impact

Tertiary Impact

Disruption in
Mobility of people
and goods

Low
productivity

structural stress
in housing unit

Increased demand
in maintenance
and repair
investment

Hazard Area Exposed Features

(People, Places, Institutions)
Location
Exposed Elements
(Brgy/Purok be
(Who and what are
specific as possible) exposed by
Sector: people,
institutions How
many?) Be specific
as possible
Considering the
In each location,
primary, secondary
specify who, what
and tertiary impacts, are affected by
locate the areas
flooding- People?
affected by flooding
Places? Institutions?
(be specific as
(Be specific as
possible (e.g. by
possible)
purok or sitio per
Example:
barangay)
Water/Sanitation
Economy (formal
& informal)
Health
Population
- Children
- Women
- Men
- Elderly
- Physically
challenged
Security
Schools
School-age
population

Climate Change Driver/Hazards,

Historical Trends& Observed Conditions,
Climate Scenarios
COLUMN 1
Climate Change
Driver/Hazard
EXAMPLE:
Climate Change Driver:
Increased in Precipitation/
Wetter Rainy
Season/Stronger Typhoon
CC Hazard:

Flooding

COLUMN 2
Historical Trends & Observed Conditions
Local/Regional Weather
Data
Eighteen typhoons
recorded (1993-2009)

Highest Rainfall
Quantity =179.6 mm

Lowest = 96 mm
Recorded Highest Wind
Speed 401 km/h (100mph)
(10-min), 940 mbar(hPA)
Lowest: 5 km/h (45 mph)
(10 min) 992 mbar (hPA)

Stakeholders
Observations

COLUMN 3
Climate Model
Scenario Projections

2020 Projections for

More incidents of
Seasonal Mean Rainfall:
rivers overflowing

Drier summer season:

despite repairs,
6% in MAM and 12% in
drainage system still
DJF
malfunctioned during

Wetter rainy season:

heavy rains
1% in SON & 16% in
increasing number of
JJA
barangays flooded
increasing number of 2050 Projections for
Seasonal Mean Rainfall:
families and
drier summer season:
individuals affected
rd
26% in MAM and 2% in
happens in the 3
DJF 2050
quarter of the year
nd

Wetter rainy season:

and not on the 2
2% in SON & 34% in
quarter when the
JJA 2050
rainy season is
expected

COLUMN 4
Probability
to Recur
(based on
consensus)
Medium

Remember the Concepts!

Sensitivity - defined as the
degree to which a system is
affected by the biophysical
(climatic & geophysical)
impact of climate change. It
considers the socioeconomic context of the
system being assessed

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
per SECTOR
Example: Social Development Sector
Climate
Impacts Location
Who,
Change
(primary,
(where
What is
Driver/Ha secondary are these at Risk?
zard
, tertiary) risks? Be (people,
as exact
systems,
or detailed activities,
as
facilities)
possible)

Triggers
(Degree of change
that creates/leads to
significant impacts
from each climate
change
driver/hazard)

Estimated
Estimated Number of
Stressors
Data Source
Threshold
People/Area at risk per given
(can be an
(be mindful of
(Maximum
threshold
external factor data sources.
level/amount of
Current (a)
Future (b)
that
Assessment is
change that the
Use current
Compute for
aggravates the not just based
community can
data
future growth
condition of
on perception.
endure/tolerate)
rate based on
elements at
It also crefers to
(May depend on the
local rates
risk)
available,
community/element
scientific,
s:
empirical data)
Risk tolerance
Values
Ability to
understand whats
at stake (requires
adjustment)

NOTE: for answers in Columns 1-4, refer

to your output of Workshop B.1a & B.1b.
Go back to the results of Exposure
Analysis for each of the identified Climate
Change Driver/Hazards
This provides opportunity to review your
previous analysis and detail further.
Use barangay base maps vs.
hazard/thematic maps, LGU ecological
profile, and CBMS results as references
EXAMPLE: FLOOD

Clogged
drainage
settlements in
low lying areas
weak housing
materials
large
population
along the coast
/riverside
high
dependency
ratio

For flooding: how

many meters
water level can
the community
endure before
declaring force
evacuation
status?
How many
hours/mm of rain
can endanger the
sector?

No of
affected
people

Projected
increase in
number of
people that
Specific area will be
affected
affected

no local
policy on
restraint
and limits
to informal
settlement
s in
riverside
or coastal
areas
ISFs
dependent
on fishing

CBMS
(year?)
CDP (what
year/period)
Ecological
Profile
(current)

Threat
Level
H(5), MH
(4), M(3),
ML(2), 1(L)

THREAT LEVEL
ANALYSIS
Serves as the summary of the
exposure and sensitivity assessment
Numerical representation of the level
of sensitivity of the exposed sector,
people and elements at risk for each
hazard
Team must agree on the parameters
and threshold levels for the sector
and LGU
27

THREAT LEVEL
ASSESSMENT: INDICATORS
THREAT LEVEL

DESCRIPTIVE EXAMPLES / PARAMETER

HIGH
(5)

MEDIUM HIGH
(4)

MEDIUM
(3)

MEDIUM-LOW
(2)

LOW
(1)

Large numbers of serious injuries or loss of lives (define what is large for the LGU what % of
exposed population)
Regional decline leading to widespread business failure, loss of employment and hardship.
major widespread damages and loss to environment and infrastructure, with progressive
irrecoverable damage.
Local government services would cease to be effective
Isolated instances of serious injuries or loss of lives
Regional local economic development impacts and stagnation. Serious impacts on livelihood.
Severe and widespread decline in the quality of life within the community
Severe damages and a danger of continuing damage to infrastructure and environment
Local government services struggle to remain effective and would be seen to be in danger of
failing completely
Small number of injuries involving the public
Significant general reduction in livelihoods.
Isolated but significant instances of environmental and infrastructure damage that might be
reversed with intensive efforts.
Local government services under severe pressure on several fronts.
Minor injuries to pubic.
Individually significant but isolated livelihood impacts.
Minor instances of environmental and infrastructure damage that could be reversed
Isolated instances of government services being under severe pressure.
Appearance of a threat but no actual harm to public safety
Minor impact on livelihood
No or significant infrastructure and environmental damage.
Minor instances of disruption to local government services.

POSSIBLE SOURCES OF
DATA AND INFORMATION

Community Based Monitoring System (CBMS) - for sex-disaggregated

population, poverty incidence and magnitude, other socio-economic information, year
covered

Community Based DRRM Plan (CBDRRM) can be referred to in

defining the community hotspots (reference year)

Disaster Preparedness Audit (reference year)

Infrastructure Audit can be used in defining integrity of infrastructures that
might be proposed in climate change options/actions

Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP) for vision review, goals and

objectives, programs, projects and services

Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) as reference for sectoral

data/studies

Ecological Profile for multi-sectoral data

Maps these may include barangay maps, Geo-hazard maps, thematic maps,
weather maps, etc.

Result of Focus Group Discussions with stakeholders/sectors

News clippings from Archives (for historical data of occurrence of
climate related hazards and disasters)

Remember the Concept!

Adaptive Capacity- is the ability of a system to
adjust to climate change (including climate
variability and extremes) to moderate potential
damages, to take advantage of opportunities, or
to cope with the consequences.
- a combination of ability and efforts in both
physical elements (infrastructure, material
wealth, technology) and social/institutional
elements (human/social capital including
information, governance/institutional strength,)
to adapt to climate change.

ADAPTIVE CAPACITY
ASSESSMENT
HAZARD
(Identified in
previous
workshops)

WEALTH
What wealth and
financial resources
are available to
address this hazard)

Score

EVIDENCE

TECHNOLOGY
What technology and
related resources are
available to address
this hazard?

Sc EVIDENCE
ore

EXAMPL 1 (L) Farmers 4

E:
have
(M
DROUGH
low
H)
T
income
very
limited
govt
funds
for
assistan
ce

INSTITUTIONS
(What institutions or
teams are addressing
this hazard? What
policies already exists)

Scor EVIDENCE
e

INFRASTRUCTURE
INFORMATION
(What infrastructure is
What is the level of
available to address this
knowledge of the
hazard? Can it
people on this hazard?
withstand climate
Is it distributed to the
projections)
people who need it?

Score

new drought 4
Agriculture 3 (M)
resistant crop (MH department
types being
)
has been
tested locally
responsive
to droughts
in the past
years
Multiple
local
agricultural
NGOs/
cooperative
with high
capacity

EVIDENCE

Sco EVIDENCE
re

Good
3
irrigatio (M
n
)
system
s on
most
farms

SOCIAL CAPITAL
What social capital is
available that could
address the impacts
from this hazard?

Sco EVIDENCE
re

Information 3
on drought (M
resistant
)
crops is not
disseminate
d well to
farmers

Farmers
cooperative
and
networking
groups share
information

AVERAGE
ADAPTIVE
CAPACITY
SCORE
(total score
divided by
number of
adaptive
capacity
factors
N / 6 = AC

18/6 = 3
MEDIUM
adaptive
capacity

SUGGESTED GUIDE FOR SCORING

THE ADAPTIVE CAPACITY LEVEL
ADAPTIVE
CAPACITY
FACTOR

ADAPTIVE CAPACITY SCORE/LEVEL

5 (High)

ECONOMIC
WEALTH

TECHNOLOGY

4 (Medium High)

3 (Medium)

have adequate
and available
financial
resources for
assistance to all
affected sector
the people in

the affected
areas have their
own resources
to respond to a
hazard

have enough
financial
resources for
assistance to
some affected
sectors
the people in
the area have
access to
resources to
respond to a
hazard

there are

equipment
available for
use and
facilities to
communicate
directly with the
people/sector
affected

there are some

equipment for
use and
facilities to
communicate
with the
affected people
/sector

2 (Medium Low)

1 (Low)

with limited

financial
resources for
assistance for
priority affected
sectors

the people in
the area have
limited access
to resources
respond to a
hazard

have very

limited financial
resources for
assistance to
affected sectors
affected people
have very
limited access
to resources to
respond to a
hazard

no available
financial
resources for
assistance to
affected sector
affected people
dont have their
own resources
to respond to a
hazard

limited

equipment and
facilities for
assistance and
communication

very limited

equipment and
facilities for
assistance

very few
facilities and
equipment for
use and
communication
with affected
sector/people is
difficult

SUGGESTED GUIDE FOR SCORING

THE ADAPTIVE CAPACITY LEVEL
ADAPTIVE
CAPACITY
FACTOR

ADAPTIVE CAPACITY SCORE/LEVEL

5 (High)

INSTITUTIONS

LGU and

community
leaders are
aware and
could effectively
manage a quick
response in the
event of a
hazard

occurrence
there are
existing
processes and
regulations to
control the
situation
relevant
legislations are
in place to
respond to a
certain hazard

4 (Medium High)
LGU and

community
leaders are
aware and can
response in the
event of a
hazard
occurrence
there are
processess and
regulations but
not yet fully
implemented
nor tested

3 (Medium)
LGU and

community
leaders are
aware but
management
set-up to
respond to a
hazard is non
existent.
Relevant
processes,
procedures and
legislations are
passed but

implementing
guidelines still
has to be
formulated

2 (Medium Low)
few LGU

officials and
leaders are
aware of the
roles and
functions during
but quick

response team
to quickly
respond during
an occurrence
of a hazard is
yet to be formed
draft process,
procedures and
relevant
legislations still
has to be
passed

1 (Low)
LGU officials
are not fully
aware of a
hazard or
disaster that
may occur
there are no
definite
processes and
regulations to
control the
situation and
respond to a
certain hazard.

SUGGESTED GUIDE FOR SCORING

THE ADAPTIVE CAPACITY LEVEL
ADAPTIVE
CAPACITY
FACTOR

ADAPTIVE CAPACITY SCORE/LEVEL

5 (High)

INFRASTRUCTURE

there is more
than
adequate
transport,
water
infrastructure,
sanitation,
energy
supply and
management
and medical
services that
can be used
to respond to
a hazard
these
facilities and
infrastructure
s are strong
enough to
withstand a
projected
hazard and
located in

4 (Medium High)
there is

enough
transport,
water
infrastructure,
energy supply
and medical
service, etc.
that can be
used to
respond to a
hazard
facilities and
equipment are
available but
not enough

3 (Medium)
there are

some
infrastructure,
transport
facilities and
necessary
equipment
that can be
used to

respond to a
hazard but not
enough to
accommodate
a projected
impact of a

hazard
infrastructure
and facilities
still has to be
retrofitted to
ensure its
safety and
strength
during a

2 (Medium Low)
infrastructures
are available
but there are
no facilities
that can be
used to
respond to a
hazard
transport

services in
some possibly
affected areas
are not
available
energy supply

1 (Low)
necessary
infrastructures
and facilities
necessary to
respond to a
hazard still
has to be
constructed
existing
infrastructures
and facilities
are not within
standard to
withstand a
projected
impact of a
hazard

SUGGESTED GUIDE FOR SCORING

THE ADAPTIVE CAPACITY LEVEL

ADAPTIVE
CAPACITY
FACTOR

ADAPTIVE CAPACITY SCORE/LEVEL

5 (High)

INFORMATION

LGU and

stakeholders in
the area/sector
are well aware
of the hazard
and its potential
impact to them
communication
facilities and
procedures are
in place to

respond in the
occurrence of a
hazard
Early warning
system in place
and drills have
been conducted

4 (Medium High)
LGU and

some
stakeholders
are aware of
the hazard

and its
potential
impact to
them
there
Early warning
system in
place

3 (Medium)
some degree
of awareness
of LGU and
stakeholders
communicatio
n facilities are
in place but
procedures
are not yet in
place
draft early
warning
system
available

2 (Medium Low)

1 (Low)

limited

awareness of
LGUs and
stakeholders
due to lack of
IEC program

LGU officials
and affected
communities
are not yet
fully aware of
the hazards
and its
potential
impact
no early
warning
system yet

SUGGESTED GUIDE FOR SCORING

THE ADAPTIVE CAPACITY LEVEL
ADAPTIVE
CAPACITY
FACTOR

ADAPTIVE CAPACITY SCORE/LEVEL

5 (High)

SOCIAL
CAPITAL

there is political

willingness to
allocate resources
to build adaptive
capacity of the LGU
there are specific
agencies,
community groups
and/or NGOs that

have the mandate

and skills to focus
on the specific
sector/area during
occurrence of
hazards
there are trained
emergency

response teams for

this sector/area

4 (Medium High)
there is some

degree of
willingness of
the leaders to
allocate funds to
build adaptive
capacity of the
LGU
some agencies
and NGOs are
available and

have skills to
assist specific
sectors during
occurrence of
hazard
there is a team
with basic skills
for emergency
response

3 (Medium)
LGU have

political
willingness but
still has to be
convinced to
allocate
resources to
build adaptive
capacity of

LGUs
there are
specific
agencies and
NGOs with
mandate to
assist affected
communities
but still lack
skills to

respond
Team have
been organized
for emergency
response

2 (Medium Low)
LGU officials
still has to be
convinced to
allocate
resources to
build adaptive
capacity of
LGUs
There are
limited
number of
agencies and
NGOs with
mandate and
skills to
assists
occurrence of
hazards
Team for
emergency
response still
has to be
organized

1 (Low)

LGU officials still

has to be
oriented on
adaptive
capacity building
Specific
agencies still
has to have
clear mandate
and plans to
assist affected
communities
No NGOs with
mandate and
skills to help
specific sector in
times of climate
hazards
No policies or
orders yet for the
creation of the
team for
emergency
response

VULNERABILITY
ASSESSMENT RATING
THREAT LEVEL
RELATIVE VULNERABILITY = __________________
ADAPTIVE CAPACITY
THREAT
ADAPTIVE
HAZARD
LEVEL
CAPACITY RELATIVE
(identified in
(summary of (summary of VULNERABI
Workshop
workshop
workshop
LITY
B.1)
B.3)
B.4)
EXAMPLE:
DROUGHT

4 (Medium
High)

3 (Medium)

4/3 = 1.33
(low
vulnerability
)

Threat
Level

Relative
Vulnerability

Adaptive Capacity Score

Quotient of TL
and AC

High
(5)
High (5)

Medium
High(4)

1.25

Medium (3) Medium

Low (2)

1.66

2.5

Low (1)

High
(4 5)

Medium
High (4)

0.8

1.33

Medium
High
(2.1 3.9)

Medium
(3)

0.6

0.75

1.5

Medium
(1.5 - 2)

Medium
Low (2)
Low (1)

0.4

0.5

0.66

Medium
Low
(1-1.49)

0.2

0.25

0.33

0.5

Low
(<1)

LCCAP Planning Process

4. Setting the Sectoral Goals, Objectives & Targets
5. Identifying PPAs, Legislations, Capacity
Development Requirements

CDP PROCESS

6. Investment Programming (LDIP)

7. Budgeting

LCCAP PROCESS

Situationing VAA in the CLUP/CDP:

- Reviewing the goals and objectives of
the CLUP & CDP to determine if
objectives are CC/DRR responsive
- Sectors/Areas with High Vulnerability
are priorities and should have
appropriate goals & objectives to
address vulnerabilities
- Enhance CLUP/CDP objectives by:
Formulating ADAPTATION objectives
Formulating MITIGATION objectives

Situationing VAA in the

CLUP/CDP:
Identify OPTIONS & INDICATORS
List down programs, projects,
activities & required legislations
Identify both adaptation and
mitigation PPAs applicable to your
LGU

OBJECTIVES & OPTIONS

must be S-M-A-R-T

BUILD RESILIENCY:
WE NEED TO MITIGATE /
WE NEED TO ADAPT

MITIGATION

ADAPTATION

ADAPTATION
Adjustment in natural or human systems
in response to actual or expected climatic
stimuli or their effects, which moderate
harm or exploits beneficial opportunities.
(IPCC)
An activity should be classified as
adaptation-related if it intends to reduce
the vulnerability of human or natural
systems to the impacts of climate change
and climate-related risks by maintaining
or increasing adaptive capacity and
resilience (OECD/DAC, 2010).

ADAPTATION
Examples:
Enhanced Vulnerability and Adaptation
Assessments
Integrated Ecosystem-Based Management
Climate-Responsive Agriculture
Water Governance & Management
Climate-Responsive Health Sector
Disaster Risk Reduction &Management
Sustainable Infrastructure
Climate-proofing of Infrastructure

MITIGATION
Anthropogenic intervention to
reduce the sources of or enhance
the sinks of greenhouse gases.
(IPCC)
Examples:
Increasing use and development of low-carbon
technologies
Improving energy efficiency and conservation
Reducing fossil fuel production
Use of Renewable Energy sources
Environmentally-Sustainable Transport
Sustainable Infrastructure
Waste Management

Situating VAA/CDRA in the CLUP/CDP

OBJECTIVES
Objectives Analysis Linking VAA/CDRA to CLUP/CDP
SECTOR: Economic Agriculture

OBJECTIVES ( as
stated in the
CLUP/CDP/ELA, may
include sub-objectives)
EXAMPLE:
Reduce poverty
Support a prosperous
economy

LINK TO
CDRA/VAA
(refer to the result
of the VAA
Hazard: drought
due to increasing
temperature &
longer and drier
summer
- 50% of riceland
affected, planting
season reduced,
one cropping per
year during el
nino.
- (name of most
affected brgy)
- number of
affected

ENHANCED
ADAPTATION
OBJECTIVES
Reduce poverty
among farmers
though improved
irrigation and
water supply

MITIGATION
OBJECTIVES (if
any, if applicable)
Improve/enhance
forest cover of
watersheds

OUTCOME
INDICATORS
(specific,
measurable)
Hectares of
enhanced
forest cover
Number of
planted trees
Level of water
in irrigation
canals
Number of
additional
irrigation/wate
r support
facilities

SETTING GOALS,
OBJECTIVES & TARGETS
Sector : ECONOMIC SECTOR Agriculture
OBJECTIVES ( as
stated in the
CLUP/CDP/ELA, may
include subobjectives)
EXAMPLE:
Reduce poverty
Support a
prosperous economy

LINK TO CLIMATE
CHANGE (refer to the
result of the VAA

Hazard: drought due to

increasing temperature &
longer and drier summer
50% of riceland
affected, planting
season reduced, one
cropping per year
during el nino.
(name of most affected
brgy)
number of affected
farmers

ENHANCED
ADAPTATION
OBJECTIVES

Reduce poverty
among farmers
through
improved
irrigation and
water supply

MITIGATION
OBJECTIVES (if
any, if applicable)

INDICATORS
(specific,
measurable)

Improve/enhance Hectares of
forest cover of
enhanced
watersheds
forest cover
Number of
planted trees
Level of water
in irrigation
canals
Number of
additional
irrigation/wat
er support
facilities

Linking OPTIONS (PPAs & Policies)

Sector: Economic -Agriculture
Enhanced
Adaptation/
Mitigation
Objectives
Linked to
CDRA/VAA

PROGRAMS

PROJECTS

ACTIVITIES

POLICIES

Insert already identified PPAs and legislations in the CLUP, CDP or ELA; then include
your additional options

(include actions directed

towards capacity
enhancement, awareness &
resilience building that
requires continuous
implementation and involves
cross sectoral participation)

(specific
actions
directed
towards
specific sector,
or as a
response to
specific need)

Specific
actions that
may be
related to a
program or
project with
specific time
line, usually
short term)

(May include
ordinances,
resolutions,
agreements,
executive
orders,
memorandum
s, etc.)

LCCAP Planning Process

8. Implementing the CDP/CLUP
9. Plan Monitoring & Evaluation
CDP PROCESS

LCCAP PROCESS

LOCAL CLIMATE CHANGE

ACTION PLAN: Plan Template

I.

Background

This should include the following:

a) Rationale (a brief discussion of the plan, how it was developed and the
purpose and limitations of the plan)
b) LGU Profile (Ecological Profile, demographic trends, current land use and
development issues and challenges)
c) Planning Context (LGU development priorities, Vision-Mission-Goal, LGU
planning context including existing and implemented climate cAange plans
and programs)
d) Planning Approach (Planning framework, guiding principles, stakeholders
and engagement)

II.

Vulnerability
Assessment

This should discuss the results of vulnerability assessment in summary with

the following details:
Identified climate-related hazards and their impacts to the LGU
Elements, sectors and institutions exposed to climate change
impacts
Summary and findings of vulnerability assessment (exposure,
sensitivity and adaptive capacity)
Vulnerability and cross-sectoral analysis
Identified climate change key development issues

LOCAL CLIMATE CHANGE

ACTION PLAN
Plan Template
III. Plan Objectives

Link LCCAP to the goals and objectives of CDP and CLUP

Convert climate change issues into objectives

IV. Adaptation &

Mitigation
Actions

This part should include the following:

Identified adaptation and mitigation options (taking into
considerations the PPAs in the CDP and ELA, LDIP)
Prioritized PPAs(using GAM and CCC matrices, Urgency test,
PFCC's ranking of Options), indicators, resource needed, budget
sources and office/person responsible
Identified enabling requirements (considering current LGU
legislative agenda)

V.

This should contain the following:

The M & E Team
M&E Plan and Targets

Monitoring and
Evaluation

VI. Annexes

Maps
Workshop Outputs per Sector
Members of the Assessment Teams
List of References

SUMMARY of LGUs TO BE
TRAINED in LCCAP
Guimaras (3) Nueva Valencia, San Lorenzo, Sibunag
Aklan (6) Buruanga, Makato, Nabas, New Washington,
Numancia, Tangalan
Capiz (2) Pilar, President Roxas
Antique (7) Barbaza, Laua-an, San Remigio, Sebaste,
Tibiao, Tobias Fornier, Valderrama

ACTION PLANNING
Activities

Output

Time
Frame

OPR

Funding

Assistance
Needed

Remarks

THANK Y U