I. Teaching: Performance in The Last Two Completed Semesters
I. Teaching: Performance in The Last Two Completed Semesters
Date of Joining:
Highest Qualification & Year of Passing of Master Degree and Ph.D. as applicable:
Mobile no & Email id:
Total Experience:
Experience in GRIET:
Faculty Ratification Status (Position and date) @GRIET & JNTUH Reg. No:
Academi
c Year
Sem
este
r
Course(s) taught
Student
feedbac
k
Usage of
ICT
(Proof
must be
there)
Resul
t
(pass
%)
**Nature
of theory
course
analytical
/non
analytical
)
Screening
score
1
2
3
4
5
6
* Workload to be as per norms, sharing of subject will be considered for 50% of score, 1 Lab = 0.5 Theory class.
** 20 % more weightage for analytical and fundamental courses
II. Other Academic Activities: *Please attach relevant proofs
S.
No.
5
6
Notes
1 Extension and dissemination activities: Public lectures, guest talks, seminars, popular wrings
Screenin
g score
Administrative responsibilities:
Name of
Nature of assignment
responsibility
2
Period
Specific achievements
III. Research & Publications (Refereed Journals): *Please attach relevant proofs
Publications: 2015- 2016 - *Please attach relevant proofs
S. No.
/Chapter/Book
Publication details
Screening
score
1.
2.
3.
4.
Title of Paper
Name of
Conference
Institute
that
organize
d
Remarks if any
Screening
score
1.
2.
3.
Members of Journal Editorial Boards, Review and patents: *Please attach relevant proofs
S. No.
Refereed Journal /
Periodical with ISBN/ISSN
number
Refereed Journal /
Periodical without
ISBN/ISSN number
Screening
score
1.
2.
Research Project (Sponsored projects, consultancy projects): last Two Years
S. No.
Funding Agency
Screening
score
Institute that
organized
No. of days
of
programme
Screening
score
1.
2.
3.
2 Administrative responsibility : including Dean, Chairperson, Convener, Teacher counsellor, BOS, Academic and
Administrative committees
4.
Name of the
Programme
Institute that
organized
No. of days
of
programm
e
Remarks if any
Screening
score
1.
2.
3.
Screening
score
2.
3.
iv Resource Person in FDP/Seminar/Conferences/Guest Lecture (Please attach relevant proofs)
S.
Name of the
Institute that
No. of
Remarks if any
No.
Programme
organized
hours
resource
sharing
1.
Screening
score
2.
3.
Total hrs
V. Management Review (To be filled by Management Representative): Attributes of the faculty
Knowledge,
Communicatio
n
Initiative,
Team
work
Commitment
, Integrity
Attitud
e
Innovation,
Leadership
skills
Dress Code,
Behavior
Acceptance
level for
admin works
Screening member
Professor
Associate
Professor
Assistant
Professor
Teaching
20+
(Bonus 10 Admin roles)
40+
(Bonus 10 - Admin roles)
60+
(Bonus 10 - Admin roles)
Other
Academi
c
Activities
Research
Projects &
Publications
Management
Review
20
Seminars/
Conferences
/ Workshops
(attended &
Organized)
25
25
Total
Marks
10
100
20
15
15
10
100
10
10
10
10
100
I Teaching:
i Professor
S. No.
Academic Year
*
A
Class room teaching As per allocation
B
Results
Less than 25%
25% to 50%
50% to 75%
75% to 100%
C
Student feedback and Evaluation
Very good (5), Good (4), Average (3), Poor (-2), Very poor (-5)
Evaluation
Total Marks
10 Marks
5 Marks
-10 Mark
-5 Mark
2 Mark
5 Mark
5 Marks
* Workload to be as per norms, sharing of subject will be considered for 50% of score, 1 Lab = 0.5 Theory class.
ii Associate Professor
S. No.
Academic Year
A
Class room teaching *As per allocation
B
Results
Less than 25%
25% to 50%
50% to 75%
75% to 100%
C
Student feedback and Evaluation
Very good (5), Good (4), Average (3), Poor (-2), Very poor (-5)
Evaluation
Total Marks
20 Marks
15 Marks
-10 Mark
-5 Mark
10 Mark
15 Mark
5 Marks
* Workload to be as per norms, sharing of subject will be considered for 50% of score, 1 Lab = 0.5 Theory class.
iii Assistant Professor
S. No.
Academic Year
A
Class room teaching *As per allocation
B
Results
Less than 25%
25% to 50%
50% to 75%
75% to 100%
C
Student feedback and Evaluation
Very good (10), Good (8), Average (6), Poor (4), Very poor(-10)
Evaluation
Total Marks
30 Marks
20 Marks
- 5Mark
0 Mark
15 Mark
20 Mark
10 Marks
* Workload to be as per norms, sharing of subject will be considered for 50% of score, 1 Lab = 0.5 Theory class.
Professo
r
9
Associate
Professor
6
Assistant
Professor
1
25
20
10
5
6
7
III. Research Projects, Publications (Refereed Journals), Conference publications and Members in
Editorial/ Review boards:
i Overall split-up
Activity
Research Projects
Journal Publications
Conference presentation
Editorial Boards
Total Marks
Professor
8
6
3
3
20
Associate Professor
5
5
3
2
15
Assistant Professor
4
3
2
1
10
Assistant Professor
4
+ 5 Bonus Points
+ 6 Bonus Points
+ 10 Bonus Points
7
Assistant Professor
(Minimum 1)
+5 (Bonus points)
+4 (Bonus points)
3
4
3 Extension and dissemination activities: Public lectures, guest talks, seminars, popular wrings
Professor
(Minimum 3)
Associate Professor
(Minimum 2)
Assistant Professor
(Minimum 1)
3
2
1
+3
2
1
+3(Bonus points)
2
1
Professor
Associate Professor
Assistant Professor
3
2
1
+3 (Bonus points)
2
1
+3 (Bonus points)
+2 (Bonus points)
1
Participating:
Professor
Associate Professor
Assistant Professor
3
2
1
3
2
1
3
2
1
ii Organising
Programmes Organized
3 or more activities
2 activities
1 activity
Total Marks
Professor
Associate Professor
Assistant Professor
12
8
4
+6 (Bonus points)
+5(Bonus points)
4
+6 (Bonus points)
+5 (Bonus points)
4
12
Professor
Associate Professor
Assistant Professor
1 more activities
Professor
Associate Professor
Assistant Professor
+2 (Bonus points)
+5 (Bonus points)
5
2
5
2
+3 (Bonus points)
+2(Bonus points)
Knowledge,
Communicati
on
Initiativ
e, Team
work
Commitme
nt, Integrity
Attitud
e
Dress
Code,
Behavi
or
2
Acceptan
ce level
for admin
works
+5 (Bonus
points)
Total
Mark
s
Innovatio
n,
Leadershi
p skills
1
Professor
Associate
Professor
+5 (Bonus
points)
20
Assistant
Professor
+5 (Bonus
points)
20
20
Note:
A. In publications, scores calculation and marks are distributed based the type of journal, no of authors
B. In conferences, workshops, FDP participation the type of Programme, faculty involvement, level of the
programme will be considered for marks calculation.
C. In organizing conferences, workshops, FDP the faculty position in the programme will be considered for
marks calculation.
D. All the calculation will be done based on the proofs submitted by the faculty.
E. In teaching, the type of course (fundamental or analytical or theoretical) handled will be accounted for
calculating marks.