0% found this document useful (0 votes)
79 views7 pages

I. Teaching: Performance in The Last Two Completed Semesters

This document provides a faculty performance report template to assess faculty members across various criteria. It includes sections to evaluate teaching performance based on student feedback, results, and workload. Other academic activities, research publications in journals and conferences, projects, seminar participation and organization, industry certifications, and administrative roles are also assessed. Scores are allocated for each criteria and designations have total possible marks of 100. The management representative also provides ratings for faculty attributes and acceptance of administrative work. Overall, the template aims to provide a comprehensive and structured evaluation of faculty performance both within teaching and other scholarly activities.

Uploaded by

vempadareddy
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
79 views7 pages

I. Teaching: Performance in The Last Two Completed Semesters

This document provides a faculty performance report template to assess faculty members across various criteria. It includes sections to evaluate teaching performance based on student feedback, results, and workload. Other academic activities, research publications in journals and conferences, projects, seminar participation and organization, industry certifications, and administrative roles are also assessed. Scores are allocated for each criteria and designations have total possible marks of 100. The management representative also provides ratings for faculty attributes and acceptance of administrative work. Overall, the template aims to provide a comprehensive and structured evaluation of faculty performance both within teaching and other scholarly activities.

Uploaded by

vempadareddy
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

FACULTY PERFORMANCE REPORT

Name of the Faculty Member and ID no:


Department & Designation:

Date of Joining:

Highest Qualification & Year of Passing of Master Degree and Ph.D. as applicable:
Mobile no & Email id:
Total Experience:

Experience in GRIET:

Faculty Ratification Status (Position and date) @GRIET & JNTUH Reg. No:

I. Teaching: Performance in the last two completed Semesters


S.
No.

Academi
c Year

Sem
este
r

Course(s) taught

Student
feedbac
k

Usage of
ICT
(Proof
must be
there)

Resul
t
(pass
%)

**Nature
of theory
course
analytical
/non
analytical
)

Screening
score

1
2
3
4
5
6

* Workload to be as per norms, sharing of subject will be considered for 50% of score, 1 Lab = 0.5 Theory class.
** 20 % more weightage for analytical and fundamental courses
II. Other Academic Activities: *Please attach relevant proofs
S.
No.

Other Academic activity

Teaching innovation including preparation of


innovative course, methodology, Preparation of new
teaching & learning material (study material,
similar additional resource for students)
Question paper setting, moderation related works

Invigilation/ supervision and related examination


duties

Evaluation of answer scripts and Internal, external


projects
Course file updating and attendance posting in the
specified portal
Role of the faculty in co-curricular, 1extension and
professional development related

5
6

Notes

1 Extension and dissemination activities: Public lectures, guest talks, seminars, popular wrings

Screenin
g score

Research supervision (including Masters Thesis),


mentoring and counselling the students

Administrative responsibilities:
Name of
Nature of assignment
responsibility
2

Period

Specific achievements

III. Research & Publications (Refereed Journals): *Please attach relevant proofs
Publications: 2015- 2016 - *Please attach relevant proofs
S. No.
/Chapter/Book
Publication details

ISSN / ISBN Number, Index


Thomson/Scopus, No of Authors

Screening
score

1.
2.
3.
4.

Papers Presented in Conferences


S.
No.

Title of Paper

Name of
Conference

Institute
that
organize
d

Remarks if any

Screening
score

1.
2.
3.

Members of Journal Editorial Boards, Review and patents: *Please attach relevant proofs
S. No.

Refereed Journal /
Periodical with ISBN/ISSN
number

Refereed Journal /
Periodical without
ISBN/ISSN number

Member of Text book


committee & Review

Screening
score

1.
2.
Research Project (Sponsored projects, consultancy projects): last Two Years
S. No.

Title of the Project

Funding Agency

Status of the project

Screening
score

IV. Seminars/Conferences/Workshops/FDPs-Oragnising, participating and resourceful: *Please


attach relevant proofs
i. Participating
S.
Name of the
No.
Programme

Institute that
organized

No. of days
of
programme

Type of participation and no.


of days

Screening
score

1.
2.
3.
2 Administrative responsibility : including Dean, Chairperson, Convener, Teacher counsellor, BOS, Academic and
Administrative committees

4.

ii. Organising: *Please attach relevant proofs


S.
No.

Name of the
Programme

Institute that
organized

No. of days
of
programm
e

Remarks if any

Screening
score

1.
2.
3.

iii Industry Certification (Please attach relevant proofs)


S.
Name of certification
Name of
Remarks if any
No.
Industry
1.

Screening
score

2.
3.
iv Resource Person in FDP/Seminar/Conferences/Guest Lecture (Please attach relevant proofs)
S.
Name of the
Institute that
No. of
Remarks if any
No.
Programme
organized
hours
resource
sharing
1.

Screening
score

2.
3.
Total hrs
V. Management Review (To be filled by Management Representative): Attributes of the faculty
Knowledge,
Communicatio
n

Initiative,
Team
work

Commitment
, Integrity

Attitud
e

Innovation,
Leadership
skills

Dress Code,
Behavior

Signature of the HOD


Signature of the staff member
Note: please attach additional sheets if necessary.

Acceptance
level for
admin works

Screening member

FACULTY PERFORMANCE REPORT ASSESSMENT SCORES


Designation

Professor
Associate
Professor
Assistant
Professor

Teaching

20+
(Bonus 10 Admin roles)
40+
(Bonus 10 - Admin roles)
60+
(Bonus 10 - Admin roles)

Other
Academi
c
Activities

Research
Projects &
Publications

Management
Review

20

Seminars/
Conferences
/ Workshops
(attended &
Organized)
25

25

Total
Marks

10

100

20

15

15

10

100

10

10

10

10

100

I Teaching:
i Professor
S. No.
Academic Year
*
A
Class room teaching As per allocation
B
Results
Less than 25%
25% to 50%
50% to 75%
75% to 100%
C
Student feedback and Evaluation
Very good (5), Good (4), Average (3), Poor (-2), Very poor (-5)

Evaluation

Total Marks
10 Marks
5 Marks

-10 Mark
-5 Mark
2 Mark
5 Mark
5 Marks

* Workload to be as per norms, sharing of subject will be considered for 50% of score, 1 Lab = 0.5 Theory class.
ii Associate Professor
S. No.
Academic Year
A
Class room teaching *As per allocation
B
Results
Less than 25%
25% to 50%
50% to 75%
75% to 100%
C
Student feedback and Evaluation
Very good (5), Good (4), Average (3), Poor (-2), Very poor (-5)

Evaluation

Total Marks
20 Marks
15 Marks

-10 Mark
-5 Mark
10 Mark
15 Mark
5 Marks

* Workload to be as per norms, sharing of subject will be considered for 50% of score, 1 Lab = 0.5 Theory class.
iii Assistant Professor
S. No.
Academic Year
A
Class room teaching *As per allocation
B
Results
Less than 25%
25% to 50%
50% to 75%
75% to 100%
C
Student feedback and Evaluation
Very good (10), Good (8), Average (6), Poor (4), Very poor(-10)

Evaluation

Total Marks
30 Marks
20 Marks

- 5Mark
0 Mark
15 Mark
20 Mark
10 Marks

* Workload to be as per norms, sharing of subject will be considered for 50% of score, 1 Lab = 0.5 Theory class.

II. Other Academic Activities:


S.
No.
1

Other Academic activity


Teaching innovation including preparation of
innovative course, methodology, Preparation of new
teaching & learning material (study material, similar
additional resource for students)
Question paper setting, moderation related works

Professo
r
9

Associate
Professor
6

Assistant
Professor
1

Invigilation/ supervision and related examination


duties

Evaluation of answer scripts and Internal, external


projects
Course file updating and attendance posting in the
specified portal
Role of the faculty in co-curricular, 3extension and
professional development related
Research supervision (including Masters Thesis),
mentoring and counselling the students
Total Marks

25

20

10

5
6
7

III. Research Projects, Publications (Refereed Journals), Conference publications and Members in
Editorial/ Review boards:
i Overall split-up
Activity
Research Projects
Journal Publications
Conference presentation
Editorial Boards
Total Marks

Professor
8
6
3
3
20

Associate Professor
5
5
3
2
15

Assistant Professor
4
3
2
1
10

ii Splitup for Research Projects


Research Project (Sponsored projects, consultancy projects) : last Two Years
Grant Value
Professor
Associate Professor
Less than 2 Lacks
-3
-2
2 Lacks 5 lacks
4
3
5 Lacks 10 Lacks
6
5
More than 10 Lacks
8
7
Total Marks (Max)
8
iii Splitup for Publications: 2015- 2016 - *Please attach relevant proofs
Type & number of
Professor
Associate Professor
Publications (with
(Minimum 3)
(Minimum 2)
ISSN Or without)
3 or more publications
6
+4 (Bonus points)
2 publications
4
4
1 publication
2
2
Total Marks
6

Assistant Professor
4
+ 5 Bonus Points
+ 6 Bonus Points
+ 10 Bonus Points
7

Assistant Professor
(Minimum 1)
+5 (Bonus points)
+4 (Bonus points)
3
4

3 Extension and dissemination activities: Public lectures, guest talks, seminars, popular wrings

iv Splitup for Conference Publication


Type & number of
Publications (with
ISSN Or without)
3 or more publications
2 publications
1 publication
Total Marks

Professor
(Minimum 3)

Associate Professor
(Minimum 2)

Assistant Professor
(Minimum 1)

3
2
1

+3
2
1

+3(Bonus points)
2
1

v Splitup for Members of Journal Editorial Boards, Review and patents:


Type of membership & number of
Boards (with ISSN Or without)
Member in 3 or more board
Member in 2 board
Member in 1 board
Total Marks

Professor

Associate Professor

Assistant Professor

3
2
1

+3 (Bonus points)
2
1

+3 (Bonus points)
+2 (Bonus points)
1

IV. Seminars/Conferences/Workshops/FDPs- Oragnising, participating and resourceful :


i

Participating:

Type of seminar & number of days


3 or more activities
2 activities
1 activity
Total Marks

Professor

Associate Professor

Assistant Professor

3
2
1

3
2
1

3
2
1

ii Organising
Programmes Organized
3 or more activities
2 activities
1 activity
Total Marks

Professor

Associate Professor

Assistant Professor

12
8
4

+6 (Bonus points)
+5(Bonus points)
4

+6 (Bonus points)
+5 (Bonus points)
4

12

iii Industry Certification


Programmes Organized

Professor

Associate Professor

Assistant Professor

1 more activities

Professor

Associate Professor

Assistant Professor

+2 (Bonus points)

+5 (Bonus points)

5
2

5
2

+3 (Bonus points)
+2(Bonus points)

iv Resource Person in FDP/Seminar/Conferences/Guest Lecture


Programmes Organized
For equal to or more than 25
hours
15 to less than 25
Less than 15 hrs
Total Marks

V. Management Review (To be filled by Management Representative): Attributes of the faculty


Designati
on

Knowledge,
Communicati
on

Initiativ
e, Team
work

Commitme
nt, Integrity

Attitud
e

Dress
Code,
Behavi
or
2

Acceptan
ce level
for admin
works
+5 (Bonus
points)

Total
Mark
s

Innovatio
n,
Leadershi
p skills
1

Professor

Associate
Professor

+5 (Bonus
points)

20

Assistant
Professor

+5 (Bonus
points)

20

20

Note:
A. In publications, scores calculation and marks are distributed based the type of journal, no of authors
B. In conferences, workshops, FDP participation the type of Programme, faculty involvement, level of the
programme will be considered for marks calculation.
C. In organizing conferences, workshops, FDP the faculty position in the programme will be considered for
marks calculation.
D. All the calculation will be done based on the proofs submitted by the faculty.
E. In teaching, the type of course (fundamental or analytical or theoretical) handled will be accounted for
calculating marks.

You might also like