Scribd
Upload
858 views1 page

IPCR Form for Government Employees

This document contains an Individual Performance Commitment and Review (IPCR) form for Maria Teresa Juanich from the Social Security System Strategic Performance Management System. The form outlines her performance commitment for July 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 including key performance indicators across strategic functions like compliance with ARTA requirements, core functions to increase electronic registration and filing, and service quality. It also includes an assessment of her actual accomplishments against targets, resulting in an overall score of 97 and a performance rating of "Very Satisfactory".

Uploaded by

Sam Lago
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as ODS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
858 views1 page

IPCR Form for Government Employees

This document contains an Individual Performance Commitment and Review (IPCR) form for Maria Teresa Juanich from the Social Security System Strategic Performance Management System. The form outlines her performance commitment for July 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 including key performance indicators across strategic functions like compliance with ARTA requirements, core functions to increase electronic registration and filing, and service quality. It also includes an assessment of her actual accomplishments against targets, resulting in an overall score of 97 and a performance rating of "Very Satisfactory".

Uploaded by

Sam Lago
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as ODS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

SSS SPMS FORM 1

SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM


INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (IPCR) FORM
For Supervisory and Non-Supervisory Positions
(Please read instructions at the back before filling out this form)

NAME (Last Name) (First Name) (Middle Name) (Suffix) POSITION TITLE/DESIGNATED POSITION (if applicable) EMPLOYEE ID NO.
JUANICH MARIA TERESA SANCHEZ CORPORATE EXECUTIVE OFFICER II 851158
SECTION/TEAM (if applicable) BRANCH/DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/UNIT DIVISION/GROUP/SECTOR OFFICIAL TIME
MEMBER SERVICES SECTION GENERAL SANTOS BRANCH SOUTHERN MINDANAO DIVISION 8:00 AM 5:00 PM
C O M M I T M E N T C O N T R A C T
I commit to deliver and agree to be rated on the attainment of the Performance Commitment (Part I) in accordance with the indicated Success Indicators for the period 07/01/2015 to 12/31/2015.
07/01/2015
Ratee's Signature Date
APPROVED BY:
JOVE L. COLASITO 07/01/2015 JOVE L. COLASITO 07/01/2015
Signature over Printed Name and Position Title of Immediate Supervisor Date Signature over Printed Name and Position Title of Next Higher Supervisor Date

PART I P E R F O R M A N C E C O M M I T M E N T PART II A C T U A L A C C O M P L I S H M E N T A N D R A T I N G
WEIGHT MAJOR FINAL OUTPUT SUCCESS INDICATOR (SI) % WEIGHTED REMARK
CATEGORY ACTUAL ACCOMPLISHMENT
ALLOCATION (MFO) (Target + Measure) ACCOMPLISHED SCORE (Use separate sheet, if necessary)
Strategic Function/s
Compliance to ARTA REQUIREMENTS 10 Arta rating obtained 92% ARTA rating obtained 92.39% 100% 10.00

Core Function/s
Increase in the number of Ers registered in the 5 Ers registerd in the web increased 40% of Ers under the Branch Account registered in the 94.00% 94% 5.00
web web
Increase in the number of Ers fling R3s 5 Ers filing R3s electronically 100% of paying Ers under the Branch Acct filing 2785 of 3818 73% 3.70
electronically during the period maintained electronically during the period
Increase in the number of Ers submitting ML2s 5 Ers submitting ML2s electronically 100% of Ers under the Branch Accout with more than 410 of 635 65% 3.30
electronically increased 10EEs with existing salary loans (except HH Ers)
submitting ML2s electronically (moving target)

Compliance to SLA on processing time 65 Application reviewed Application/s reviewed within the approved committed 100.00% 100% 65.00
processing time for 2015
Service Quality 10 Service Quality rating obtained 75% Service Quality raiting obtained 78.37% 100% 10.00

Support Function/s
100 0.00

Total Score 97.00


Numerical Rating 4
Adjectival Rating VS
COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT PURPOSES

DISCUSSED WITH: RECOMMENDING APPROVAL: APPROVED BY: RATING SCALE


The assessment of my performance in Part II have been shown and discussed with Score Numerical Adjectival
me by my immediate supervisor. JOVE L.COLASITO 01/28/16 100.00 5 Outstanding (O)
Signature over Printed Name of Immediate Date 95-99.99 4 Very Satisfactory (VS)
I agree with the Performance Rating Supervisor 90-94.99 3 Satisfactory (S)
I disagree with the Performance Rating. Specify reasons/s_______________ 75-89.99 2 Unsatisfactory (US)
01/28/16 JOVE L.COLASITO 01/28/16 JOVE L. COLASITO 01/28/16 74.99-below 1 Poor (P)
Ratee's Signature Date Signature over Printed Name of Date Signature over Printed Name of Date
Next Higher Supervisor Branch/Dept./Office/Unit Head Rating Scale is based on GCG MC No. 2013-02

You might also like