Hunter Wolfram
Reflections on Rehearsing the Band, by John Williamson
Rehearsing the Band, by John E. Williamson, was a very helpful and insightful piece of
literature when it comes to being a band director. Every conductor that was cited in the book was
very reputable and had very good advice on different areas in the band rehearsing world. In this
reflection, I will cover the topics of tone, intonation, rhythm, balance, interpretation, technique,
rehearsal pace and environment, and non-verbal communication.
This book had a lot to say on the topic of tone. Every director cited in the book held tone
as a very important musical concept. According to John Whitwell, tone is the most important
part of playing. Whitwell even goes as far to say that students should not be sent home with their
instruments until they have a good understanding of their embouchure, so that they do not make
the mistake of developing bad habits and therefore learning an incorrect tone. Professor Allan
McMurray argues that tone should be worked on, for students, individually and in a one-on-one
setting, so that you can deal with each instrument and player individually based on the needs of
that individual and instrument. This is not where tone ends though. McMurray argues that tone is
also very important as an ensemble, and that the tone comes from breath support and breathing
deeply and in the right places. (58) In the end, the conductor is the ultimate authority on tone,
because he or she leads the ensemble. I think that James Croft says it best, when he says that it is
okay to try out different tones and sounds, as long as you stay within the parameters of a good
sound. (21) We always need to be conscious of the tone of our ensemble, but most importantly,
we need to make sure that our ensemble is creating a good tone.
Intonation is a very important part of the musical process. If we are not in tune with each
other in an ensemble, then nothing will sound as it should. The frustrating thing about this is that
it is one of the most difficult things to do. So how do we achieve this as an ensemble? According
to Frank Battisti, we need to make sure the students know to listen to each other, otherwise they
will not be able to play in tune. Specifically, as conductors, we should ask the students to listen
to the root, and sing it so that they know where the foundation of their intonation is. If they
cannot do that, they should not move on. I really like what Donald R. Hunsberger says about
intonation, that No one is right and no one is wrong. (32) We need to emphasize listening to
our neighbors to that we all can play right as an ensemble. In addition, John E. Williamson
reminds us that teaching students about intonation is a long process, and it is something we need
to train students on (with ear training exercises) on a daily basis, so that they develop good
intonation tendencies.
We would not have good music, or music at all, if it werent for rhythm, so naturally it is
something important for directors to address when we are teaching our ensembles. According to
H. Robert Reynolds, there are certain tendencies that players, especially young players, play
when it comes to rhythm, like speeding up when there are more notes and playing slower when
there are less notes in a measure. Different directors have different solutions for this. One
solution could be, as stated by Reynolds, could be encouraging foot patting so that they can feel
the beat. Other directors, like Jerry F. Junkin, recommend focusing on articulation in rehearsal. I
think that I agree with James Croft best when he recommends conducting in a way that is precise
and well subdivided, so that your kids can see a good example of good tempo and not rush.
This book was very helpful when it came to addressing balance issues within a band. This
is something that all bands struggle with, and even experienced directors like Jerry F. Junkin are
still trying to figure out what a good band balance is. Junkin has been experimenting for over 15
years on the subject, and found that the best way to get a good band balance is to just make sure
that all students are making a good sound on their instrument, and not trying to be like another
instrument so to speak. H. Robert Reynolds makes the argument that if you go for one specific
sound as a band, then you may have no room for interpretation and musicality. It is important to
learn as much about the music as possible, the composer, etc., but one should apply those
stylistic approaches to the balance of their band. I like what Eugene Corporon suggests to do
when rehearsing the band when the students are playing, you need to be actively conducting, so
that you can focus on things like balance and listen for what you want and what the music needs
from the performance.
Similar to balance, interpretation is an important stylistic choice when it comes to
rehearsing the band. According to John Whitwell, this area of rehearsals in modern music
programs is most lacking. He makes the argument that directors nowadays are tempted to play it
too safe because of the contest atmosphere that we have in our schools, and that the judges want
to hear everything the same way. Whitwell argues that the way to combat this is to vary the
music, because that makes the music have a certain spontaneity to it and makes students more
open to different interpretations of the piece. Craig Kirchhoff argues that your interpretation of a
piece happens over time rehearsing pieces, and to leave each piece open to interpretation as we
play and perform. Donald R. Hunsberger talks about how interpretation is deeply connected to
style, so therefore if your students have a good understanding of the style of the piece, they will
have a good interpretation of the piece.
Jerry F. Junkin makes the point that all students are in different places with their music
life, and that applies to technique as well. Because bands are so big, and you will have so many
students potentially in your school, it is important to keep in touch with private teachers. I also
really like how James Croft talks about how it is okay to go to those good players in an ensemble
to lead their sections in technique and get things like fingerings from them, because odds are
they are better at that instrument than you because they specialize in it, in a sense. I think that H.
Robert Reynolds puts it best when he says If you dont know your craft, you cant get the art,
and you can never know too much about the instruments. (71) We, as conductors and directors,
need to know the technique as well or better than the students so that we can properly teach them
to play.
Rehearsal pace and environment is something that can go easily unnoticed if one does not
go out of their way to address it. One thing that is very important is that there is a normal warm-
up routine before the rehearsal really begins, and that it is well-defined as Frank Battisti puts it.
In my own high school band experience, that meant playing a concert F right on the first
downbeat. Our director didnt even have to explain what he was doing, all he had to do was give
the downbeat and we knew what to do. Then we would get into the rest of the warm up. I like
how Craig Kirchhoff rehearses in a macro-micro-macro way. Introduce the student to a concept
or piece, and then break it down and put it back together. That can arc over the time of a concert
cycle and happen within a rehearsal as well (imagine sight reading, then rehearsing, then
performing). Within each rehearsal, John E. Williamson recommends a P-R-E cycle, or
preparation (which should happen before the rehearsal), rehearsal and evaluation. I think that this
is a very effective way of rehearsing our bands, and should be used most of the time.
A good conductor is not one that just focuses on keeping time and telling students what to
do. They are very good at giving non-verbal cues and are very expressive. In fact, Eugene
Corporon argues that his students have the best rehearsals when he did very little talking. So how
do we achieve this as a director? Donald R. Hunsberger argues that conductors need to know the
pieces and composers as well as they possibly can, and even pieces that were written at the same,
in order to not conduct with our hands tied. If we know the music, it is easier to live the music
so to speak. Also, James Smith makes the observation that directors need to watch how other
directors move, and make a conscious decision to move with intention when conducting. The
more we work at it, the more natural our non-verbal cues become.
Overall, there are a lot of important details in being a director, and the more that you
work at them and study them, the better you will be at directing.