Scribd
Upload
75 views1 page

Interview Rating

This document contains a summary of ratings for 15 candidates interviewed for a position on October 14, 2006. It includes each candidate's name, experience, and ratings on personal attributes, analytical ability, communication ability, imagination/creativity, personal values, confidence, presence of mind, stress management, commitment, and potential factors. Each metric is rated on a scale of average, above average, or superior. The document also notes the overall assessment and rating for each candidate as very good, good, average, poor, appointed, shortlisted, or rejected. The interviewer is identified as PKU Chandran, the managing director.

Uploaded by

RaviArryan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
75 views1 page

Interview Rating

This document contains a summary of ratings for 15 candidates interviewed for a position on October 14, 2006. It includes each candidate's name, experience, and ratings on personal attributes, analytical ability, communication ability, imagination/creativity, personal values, confidence, presence of mind, stress management, commitment, and potential factors. Each metric is rated on a scale of average, above average, or superior. The document also notes the overall assessment and rating for each candidate as very good, good, average, poor, appointed, shortlisted, or rejected. The interviewer is identified as PKU Chandran, the managing director.

Uploaded by

RaviArryan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

KEROMIYONS Intech Private Limited

Candidates rating for interview conducted on: 14/10/2006

Position:
Sl Exp Personal Analytical Comm. Imagin/ Personal Confiden Presence of Stress Commitme Potenctial
Name DOB/Age Qufn Working Knowledge Maturity Assessment
No (Yrs) Attribute Ability Ability Creativity Value ce Mind mgmt nt Factors

Average (AG)/
1 Superior (S)
Above Avg (AA)

Average (AG)/
2 Superior (S)
Above Avg (AA)

Average (AG)/
3 Superior (S)
Above Avg (AA)

Average (AG)/
4 Superior (S)
Above Avg (AA)

Average (AG)/
5 Superior (S)
Above Avg (AA)

Average (AG)/
6 Superior (S)
Above Avg (AA)

Average (AG)/
7 Superior (S)
Above Avg (AA)

Average (AG)/
8 Superior (S)
Above Avg (AA)

Average (AG)/
9 Superior (S)
Above Avg (AA)

Average (AG)/
10 Superior (S)
Above Avg (AA)

Average (AG)/
11 Superior (S)
Above Avg (AA)

Average (AG)/
12 Superior (S)
Above Avg (AA)

Average (AG)/
13 Superior (S)
Above Avg (AA)

Average (AG)/
14 Superior (S)
Above Avg (AA)

Average (AG)/
15 Superior (S)
Above Avg (AA)

Rating Assessment
VG-Very Good A-Appointed
G-Good S-Shortlisted
AV-Average R-Rejected
P-Poor Interviewer: PKU Chandran (Managing Director)

You might also like