Region: _______________
ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT (SUMMARY)
Paper Evaluation
INSTITUTION
Branch (for systems)
Department / College
Address
Dean / Head of Program
CRITERIA FULL SUB TOTAL
POINTS TOTAL POINTS
EVALUATORS:
INSTRUCTIONAL QUALITY 45
FACULTY 24
LABORATORIES 7
LIBRARIES 3
CURRICULUM 1 Name and Signature
PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION 2
STUDENT SUPPORT 2
IT CAPABILITY 2
GRADUATE PROGRAM 3
GRADUATE PROFILE 0.5 Name and Signature
GRADUATE TRACER 0.5
RESEARCH AND PUBLICATION 30
INTERNALLY FUNDED 7 ATTESTED BY:
EXTERNALLY FUNDED 7
PUBLICATION 7
PRESENTATION IN CONFERENCES 7
COMMERCIALIZATION INITIATIVES 2
EXTENSION AND LINKAGE 20 Name and Signature
INDUSTRY - ACADEME LINKAGES 8
ACADEMIC LINKAGES 6
IT OUTREACH PROGRAMS 6 DATE:
INSTITUTIONAL QUALIFICATIONS 5
ACCREDITATION PROCESS 2
RECOGNITION (NAT'L / INT'L) 1.5
IT - ENABLED PROCESSES 1.5
TOTAL
Region: __________
ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT (DETAILED)
Paper Evaluation
INSTITUTION
Branch (for systems)
Department / College TOTAL
Address POINTS
Dean / Head of Program
CRITERIA WEIGHTBREAKDOWN REMARKS SUB
(Specific Area) (Criteria Description) POINTS POINTS
INSTRUCTIONAL QUALITY
FACULTY 24.00
Number of students ___
Number of FT faculty members ___
Number of FT faculty members with at least
master's degree ___
Number of PT faculty members
Academic Qualifications
FT Faculty members with at least Masters (number of FTE faculty with at least masters degree / total number
Degree (aligned and allied Degree) 12.00 of FTE faculty) * 12 pts.
Other Qualifications 12.00
Faculty Development Initiatives 2.00 With implemented faculty development plan with achieved
outcomes (0.5 point for each achieved objective, such as
publication, graduate degrees, study leave with pay, awards)
Faculty - Student Ratio 4.00 total # of FTE teachers/(total # of students/40)* 4 pts.
Faculty with PhD 4.00 [(1 count for aligned; 0.75 for allied; 0.50 for non-allied) / total
number of FTE faculty] * 8 pts.
Faculty Industry Experience 2.00 (total number of FTE with industry experience or certification / total
number of FTE facutly)* 2 pts.
Sub-Total (Faculty)
Comments by evaluator:
LABORATORIES 7.00
Research Laboratory 1.50 (No. of dedicated research computers / No. of FTE faculty members)
* 1.5 pts.
1.50 Quality of Research output using the research laboratory
Instructional Laboratory 1.50 (No. of dedicated instructional computers / (Total number of
students in ITE/3)) * 1.5 pts.
1.50 Quality of course portfolio used in the instructional laboratory
Access to the Internet (bandwidth) 1.00 Use: Total bandwith in Mbps / No. of students
5 to less than 10 kbps = 0.5 pts. and above = 1 pt
Sub-Total (Laboratories)
Comments by evaluator:
CRITERIA WEIGHTBREAKDOWN REMARKS POINTS
(Specific Area) (Criteria Description)
Institutional Quality continued
LIBRARIES 3.00
Printed Collection 1.00 Updated collection of of printed materials including tectbooks and
referecence materials covering all knowledge areas in the curricula
Electronic Holdings/Online Subscription 1.00 Substantial electronic collection such as electronic library or paid
subscrioption to online databases
Library Development Program 1.00 Presence of Implemented development program for the last 5 years,
including library systems, facilities, resources and services.
Sub-Total (Libraries)
Comments by evaluator:
CURRICULUM 1.00
Syllabus (OBE) 1.00 Quality of course portfolio for all courses (including OBE)
Sub-Total (Curriculum)
Comments by evaluator:
PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION 2.00
1.00 proportionate to the number of program heads including the dean
Experienced and effective program heads
Strategic / Development Plan aligned 1.00 Presence of strategic / development plan aligned with Graduate
Outcomes
with Graduate Outcomes
Sub-Total (Program Administration)
Comments by evaluator:
CRITERIA WEIGHTBREAKDOWN REMARKS POINTS
(Specific Area) (Criteria Description)
Institutional Quality continued
STUDENT SUPPORT 2.00
Availability of Study Centers 1.00 Presence of effectively utilized learning commons
Student - Faculty Consultations 0.50 Extensive quality student - faculty consultations / tutorials
Co-curricular Programs 0.50 Extensive quality co - curricular programs for students
Sub-Total (Student Support)
Comments by evaluator:
IT CAPABILITY 2.00
Student Information System 2.00 Including enrolment and grades system
Sub-Total (IT Capability)
Comments by evaluator:
GRADUATE PROGRAMS 3.00
Masters Offering 2.00 Effective and compliant ITE master's programs
PhD Offering 1.00 Effective and compliant ITE doctorate programs
Sub-Total (Graduate Programs)
Comments by evaluator:
GRADUATE PROFILE 0.50
Attainment of program outcomes 0.50 Based on interview of graduates
Sub-Total (Graduate Profile)
Comments by evaluator:
GRADUATE TRACER 0.50 Existence of tracer system of graduates
Sub-Total (Graduate Tracer)
Comments by evaluator:
SUB-TOTAL INSTITUTIONAL QUALITY
CRITERIA WEIGHTBREAKDOWN REMARKS POINTS
(Specific Area) (Criteria Description)
RESEARCH AND PUBLICATION Maximum 30.00 points
INTERNALLY FUNDED APPLICATIONS, 7.00 Includes faculty and students projects (maximum 10.00 points)
DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH PROJECTS
1.00 On-going research projects (0.25 point per project)
3.00 Completed research terminal reports (0.50 point per report)
3.00 Publications or conference papers (0.50 per paper)
Sub-Total (Internal Funding)
Comments by evaluator:
EXTERNALLY FUNDED APPLICATIONS, 7.00 Includes students and faculty projects (maximum 10.00 points)
DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH PROJECTS
1.00 On-going research projects (0.25 point per project):(no double
counting of publication)
3.00 Completed research terminal reports (0.50 point per report):(no
double counting of publication)
3.00 Publications or conference papers (0.50 per paper) 1.00 point for
each SCI, ISI, Scopus Indexed paper. (no double counting of
publication)
Comments by evaluator:
PUBLICATION 7.00 0.5 point for refereed articles, proceedings, books, or book chapters
(no double counting), 1.00 point for each SCI, ISI, Scopus Indexed
paper. (no double counting of publication)
Sub-Total (Publication)
Comments by evaluator:
PRESENTATION IN CONFERENCES 7.00 0.5 point - local/international per presentation (maximum of 7
points): no double counting
Sub-Total (Presentation)
Comments by evaluator:
COMMERCIALIZATION INITIATIVES 2.00 0.50 point per start-up or commercialized IT product (maximum of
5.00 points) *commercialized IT product used by an external
institution
Sub-Total (Publication)
Comments by evaluator:
SUB-TOTAL RESEARCH
CRITERIA WEIGHTBREAKDOWN REMARKS POINTS
(Specific Area) (Criteria Description)
EXTENSION AND LINKAGES
INDUSTRY - ACADEME LINKAGES 7.00 1 point per linkage within the last 8 years (pro-rated)
INDUSTRY - ACADEME LINKAGES
Each linkage must result to one (1) activity per year for three (3)
years (OJT activities are not included)
Linkage must be evidenced by documentation on research
collaboration, projects, trainings, immersion programs and the like
(that involved ITE faculty and/or students).
Sub-Total (Industry Linkages)
Comments by evaluator:
ACADEMIC LINKAGES 5.00 1 point per linkage with HEIs within the last 8 years (pro-rated)
Each linkage must result to one (1) activity per year for three (3)
years.
Linkage must be evidenced by documentation on student exchange,
faculty exchange, joint research and the like (that involved ITE
faculty and/or students).
Sub-Total (Academic Linkages)
Comments by evaluator:
GOVERNMENT AND PROFESSIONAL 4.00 0.5 point for each government agency/unit
ORGANIZATION LINKAGE
0.5 point for each position in national organization/journal
0.25 for national/international conference
steering/program/organizing committee
0.5 point for each position in ITE body, (regional, national,
international)
Sub-Total (Government & Professional Linkages)
Comments by evaluator:
IT OUTREACH PROGRAMS 4.00 0.25 point each activity within the last 8 years(pro-rated)
0.25 point per hosting of national or international conference/event.
only ITE related programs will be considered.
e.g., IT trainings, seminars, workshops conducted by the
faculty/students
maximum of 6 points
Sub-Total (Outreach)
Comments by evaluator:
SUB-TOTAL EXTENSION AND LINKAGES
CRITERIA WEIGHTBREAKDOWN REMARKS POINTS
(Specific Area) (Criteria Description)
INSTITUTIONAL QUALIFICATIONS
ACCREDITATION PROCESS 2.00 School must have undergone accreditation process (gets full points)
provided 1 of each program (1 point per CHED recognized or
international accrediting agency [may include ISO])
maximum of 2 points
Sub-Total (Accreditation)
Comments by evaluator:
NATIONAL / INTERNATIONAL RECOGNITION 1.50 If any of the programs with international recognition or the national
institutional recognition gets full points
Includes individual recognitions (0.50 each)
maximum of 1.50 point
Sub-Total (Recognition)
Comments by evaluator:
CRITERIA WEIGHTBREAKDOWN REMARKS POINTS
(Specific Area) (Criteria Description)
IT - ENABLED PROCESSES 1.50 Presence of IT enabled administrative processes (0.50 per area)
e.g., financial processes, human resources, and other admin
processes (no double counting)
Sub-Total (Accreditation)
Comments by evaluator:
SUB-TOTAL INSTITUTIONAL QUALIFICATIONS
EVALUATED BY: (TPITE Member / TASKFORCE COE member / COE EVALUATOR)
Name and Signature Date
Name and Signature Date
Name and Signature Date
ATTESTED BY: (CHED-CO Representative)
CHED-CO Representative
Name and Signature Date
Capacity Building Workshop in OBE for VPAA
HEI Participants Assigned Status
Region 1 (114 HEIs)
1. (57) Malou
2. (57) Jay
Region II 73
1. (73) Via
Region III 226
1. (56) Marie
2. (56) Kat
3. (57) Julie
4. (57) Wina
CAR 57
1. (57) Eugene
Strategies:
1. Email/Fax
2. Confirmation
