Ce2306 Design of RC Elements PDF
Ce2306 Design of RC Elements PDF
V SEMESTER
E-LEARNING MATERIAL
BY
S.THAHIRA BANU.,
ASSISTANT PROFESSOR
Concept of Elastic Method, Ultimate load method and limit state method Advantages of Limit state Method
over other methods Design codes and specification Limit State philosophy as detailed in IS code Design
of flexural members and slabs by working stress method Principles of Design of Liquid retaining structures
Properties of uncracked section Calculation of thickness and reinforcement for Liquid retaining structures.
Analysis and design of one way and two way rectangular slab subjected to uniformly distributed load for
various boundary conditions and corner effects Analysis and design of singly and doubly reinforced
rectangular and flanged beams.
UNIT III LIMIT STATE DESIGN FOR BOND, ANCHORAGE SHEAR & TORSION
Behaviour of RC members in bond and Anchorage Design requirements as per current code Behaviour of
RC beams in shear and torsion Design of RC members for combined bending shear and torsion.
Types of columns Braced and unbraced columns Design of short column for axial, unaxial and biaxial
bending Design of long columns.
Design of wall footing Design of axially and eccentricity loaded rectangular footing Design of combined
rectangular footing for two column only Special requirements of detailing with reference to erection process.
Total: 60
TEXT BOOKS
1. Varghese P.C., Limit State Design of Reinforced Concrete, Prentice Hall of India, Pvt. Ltd., New
Delhi
2. Krishna Raju., Design of Reinforced Concrete Structures CBS Publishers & Distributors, New
Delhi
REFERENCES
2. Sinha, S.N., Reinforced Concrete Design , Tata Mc Graw Hill Publishing Company Ltd., New
Delhi
3. Unikrishna Pillai, S., Devadas Menon Reinforced Concrete Design , Tata MC Graw Hill
Publishing Company Ltd., New Delhi.
UNIT I METHODS OF DESIGN OF CONCRETE STRUCTURES
During the early part of 20th century, elastic theory of reinforced concrete sections outlined in chapter 2
was developed which formed the basis of the working stress or permissible stress method of design of
reinforced concrete members. In this method, the working or permissible stress in concrete and steel are
obtained applying appropriate partial safety factors to the characteristics strength of the materials. The
permissible stresses in concrete and steel are well within the linear elastic range of the materials.
The design based on the working stress method although ensures safety of the structures at working or
services loads, it does not provide a realistic estimate of the ultimate or collapse load of the structure in
contrast to the limit state method of design. The working stress method of design results in
comparatively larger and conservative sections of the structural elements with higher quantities of steel
reinforcement which results in conservative and costly design. Structural engineers have used this
method extensively during the 20th century and presently the method is incorporated as an alternative to
the limit state method in Annexure B of the recently revised Indian Standard Code Is : 456 2000 for
specific applications.
The permissible stresses in concrete under service loads for the various stress states of compressive,
flexure and bond is compiled in Table 2.1 (Table 21 of IS ; 456 2000)
The permissible stress in different types of steel reinforcement is shown in table 2.2 (Table 22 of IS 456
2000)
The permissible shear stress for various grades of concrete in beams is shown in Table 12.1 (Table 23 of
IS: 456 2000)
The maximum shear stress permissible in concrete for different grades is shown in Table 12.2 Table
12.2 (Table 24 of IS: 456 2000)
In the case of reinforced concrete slabs, the permissible shear stress in concrete is obtained by
multiplying the values given in Table 2.1 by factor k whose values depend upon the thickness of slab
as shown in Table 12.3 (Section 40.2.1.1. of IS; 456 2000)
Note: As is that area of longitudinal tension reinforcement which continues at least one effective depth
beyond the section being considered except at supports where the full area of tension reinforcement may
be used provided the detailing conforms to 26.2.3.
Table 12.2 Maximum Shear Stress (c, max N/mm2) (Table 24 of IS: 456 2000)
The maximum shear stress permissible in concrete for different grades is shown in Table 12.2 (Table 24
of IS 456 2000)
In the case of reinforced concrete slabs, the permissible shear stress in concrete is obtained by
multiplying the3 values in Table 2.1 by a factor k whose values depend upon the thickness of slab as
shown in Table 12.3 (Section 40.2.1.1. of IS 456 2000)
(b) General design procedure
In the working stress design, the cross sectional dimensions are assumed based on the basic span /
depth ratios outlined in Chapter 5 (Table 5.1 and 5.2) (Section 23.2.1. of IS: 456 2000)
The working load moments and shear forces are evaluated at critical sections and the required effective
depth is checked by using the relation:
d = M / Q.b
For different grades of concrete and steel the value of constant Q is compiled in Table 2.3. The depth
provided should be equal to or greater than the depth computed by the relation and the area of
reinforcement required in the section to resist the moment M is computed using the relation:
Ast = ( M )
st . j. d
The number of steel bars required is selected with due regard to the spacing of bars and cover
requirements.
After complying with flexure, the section is generally checked for resistance against shear forces by
calculating the nominal shear stress c given by v = (V / bd)
The permissible shear stress in concrete (c) depends upon the percentage reinforcements in the cross
section and grade of concrete as shown in Table 12.1
If c < v suitable shear reinforcements are designed in beams at a spacing sv given by the relation;
d = effective depth
Vs = [ V c .b .d]
If v < c, nominal shear reinforcements are provided in beams are provided in beams at a spacing given
by
In case of slabs, the permissible shear stress if k is a constant depending upon the thickness of the slab.
Also in the case of slabs the nominal shear stress (v) should not exceed half the value of c max shown in
Table 12.2. In such cases the thickness of the slab is increased and the slab is redesigned.
In the case of compression members, the axial load permissible on a short column reinforced with
longitudinal bars and lateral ties is given by
P = (cc Ac + sc Asc)
Where scc = permissible stress in concrete in direct compression (Refer Table 2.1)
DESIGN OF SLABS
1. Data
Clear span = 2.5m
2. Allowable Stresses
3. Depth of slab
Assuming 0.4 per cent of reinforcement in the slab, the value of Kt (Figure) Using Fe 415 HYSD
bars, is around 1.25
Hence (L/d) = (L/d)basic x Kt x Kc
= (20 x 1.25 x 1)
= 25
4. Effective span
5. Loads
Considering 1 m width of the slab, the uniformly distributed load is 6 kN/m2 on an effective span
of 2.60m.
6. Bending moments and shear forces
7. Effective depth
8. Main reinforcement
9. Distribution reinforcement
From Table 23 (IS: 456 2000), interpolating permissible shear stress for solid slabs is:
2. Design example of two way slab for residential floor using the following data:
1. Data
Size of floor 4 m by 5 m, simply supported on all the sides on load bearing walls 230mm thick
without any provision for torsion at corners. Adopt M- 20 grade concrete and Fe 415 HYSD.
2. Permissible Stresses
3. Type of slab
Simply supported on all sides without any provision for torsion at corners.
Lx = 4 m
Ratio (LY / Lx) = 1.25
Ly = 5 m
5. Effective Span
6. Loads
7. Bending Moments
Refer Table 7.1 and read out the moment coefficients for the ratio (Ly / Lx) = 1.25
x = 0.089, y = 0.057
Mx = (x w Lxc2) = (0.089 x 6.35 x 4.122) = 9.60kN.m
Effective depth
9. Reinforcements
Steel for long span = (6.14 x 106 / 230 x 0.9 x 110) = 270mm2
Shear and bond stresses in two way slabs are negligibly small and generally within safe
permissible limits. The reinforcement details are similar to that of two way slabs designed in
Chapter 7.
DESIGN OF BEAMS
1. Design of singly reinforced concrete beams; Design a rectangular reinforced concrete beam
simply supported on masonry walls 300mm thick with an effective span of 5 m to support a
service load of 8 kN/m and a dead load of 4 kN/m in addition to its weight. Adopt M 20 grade
concrete and Fe 415 HYSD bars. Width of support of beams = 300mm.
1. Data
Effective Span = L = 5 m
2. Allowable stresses
cb = 7 N/mm2 Q = 0.91
4. Loads
Finishes = 0.975kN/m
V = 0.5 w L = (0.5 x 17 x 5) = 43 Kn
Nominal Shear stress = v = (Vu / bd) = (43 x 103 / 300 x 500) = 0.28 N/mm2
Refer Table (IS; 456) and read out the permissible shear stress in concrete as:
Hence shear reinforcements in the form of stirrups are required since c is nearly equal to v,
provide nominal shear reinforcements given by:
Sv = Asv . sv . d / Vs
Provide 6mm diameter stirrups at 150mm centre up to quarter span length from supports and
gradually increased to 300mm centre towards the centre of span.
2. Design a doubly reinforced beam: Design a doubly reinforced concrete beam for a
residential floor of a building to suit the following data:
1. Data
Effective Span = 5 m
2. Permissible stresses
cb = 7 N/mm2 Q = 0.91
m = 13 nc = 0.284 d
3. Loads
Self weight of beam = (0.25 x 0.5 x 25) =3.125kN/m
V = 0.5 w L = (0.5 x 24 x 5) = 60 Kn
5. Resisting Moment
6. Tension reinforcement
Total tension steel = Ast = ( Ast1 + Ast2) = (493 + 315) = 808 mm2
7. Compression reinforcement
Refer Table 23 (IS: 456) and read out the permissible shear stress as
c = 0.36 N/mm2 < v
Hence shear reinforcements are to be designed to resist the balance shear computed as:
Sv = Asv . sv . d / Vs
Provide 6mm diameter two legged stirrups at 250mm centre at supports, gradually
increasing to 300mm centre towards the centre of span.
3. Design of flanged beams: Design a tee beam for an office floor using the following data.
1. Data
Effective Span = 8 m
2. Permissible stresses
cb = 7 N/mm2 Q = 0.91
m = 13
3. Sectional dimensions
Effective depth = d (span / 15) = (8000 / 15) = 534mm
4. Loads
i) bf = [ Lo / 6 + bw + 6 Df]
= [ (8000 / 6) + 300 + (6 x 150)] = 2533mm
Solving n = 106mm
Refer Table 23 (IS: 456) and read out the permissible shear stress as
c = 0.45 N/mm2 < v
Hence shear reinforcements are to be designed to resist the balance shear given by
Sv = Asv . sv . d / Vs
Provide 6mm diameter 2 legged stirrups at 150mm centre near supports and gradually
increased to 300mm towards the centre of span.
The structure shall be designed to withstand safely all loads liable to act on throughout its life. It shall also
satisfy the serviceability requirements, such as limitations on deflection and cracking.
The acceptable limit for the safety and serviceability requirements before failure occurs is called a limit state.
The aim of design is to achieve acceptable probabilities that the structural will not become unfit for the use for
which it is intended that is, that will not reach a limit state.
The limit state of collapse of the structure or part of the structure could be assessed from rupture of one or more
critical sections and from buckling due to elastic or plastic instability (including the effects of sway where
appropriate) or overturning.
Characteristic Load:
The term characteristic load means that value of load which has a 95 percent probability of not being
exceeded during the life of the structure.
0. L IS 875 (Part 1)
Imposed loads Is 875 (Part 2)
Wind loads IS 875 (Part 3)
Snow loads IS 875 IS 1893
Design Value:
Loads:
The design load, Fd is given by
Fd = F rf
Where
fy = Characteristic Strength of Steel and
ES = Modulus of Elasticity of Steel.
fck
Parabolic
Curve
0.67 fck
0.0035
0.446fck 0.002
Strain
0.42xu
xu
0.36 fck xu b.
fY
fy
fy / 1.15
Stress
0.002
Strain
fY
fy
fy / 1.15
Stress
d- xu
b T = 0.87 fy Ast
d-0.42 xu
fy + 0.002
1.15 Es
Strain Diagram
0.0035 = fy + 0.002
xu 1.15 Es
d xu
xu = 0.0035
d xu 0.87 fy + 0.002
Es
xu = 0.0035
d xu +xu 0.87 fy + 0.002 + 0.0035
Es
xu = 0.0035
d 0.87 fy + 0.002
Es
b
0.0035
0.42 xu
xu C = 0.36 fck xu max.b.
0.87 fy Ast = T
0.87 fy + 0.002
Es
xu max = 0.0035
d xu max 0.87 fy + 0.002
Es
xumax = 0.0035
d xumax +xumax 0.87 fy + 0.002 + 0.0035
Es
xumax = 0.0035
d xumax +xumax 0.87 fy + 0.002 + 0.0035
Es
xumax = 0.0035
d 0.0055 + 0.87 fy
Es
Mild Steel
xumax = 0.53
d
Fe 415
xumax = 0.48
d
Fe 500
xumax = 0.46
d
C=T
Xu = 0.87 fy Ast
0.36 fck bd
Xu = 0.87 fy Ast
d 0.36 fck bd
Xu = 0.87 fy Ast
0.36 fck b
xu = 0.87 fy Ast
d 0.36 fck . bd
Bd fck
Fck fy
250 415 500
20 1.75 0.96 0.76
25 2.19 1.20 0.95
30 2.63 1.44 1.14
A simply supported beam 250mm wide is 450mm deep to the centre of the tension reinforcement.
Determine the limiting moment of resistance of the beam section and also the limiting area of
reinforcement. Use M20 concrete and Fe 415 steel.
d = 450mm
A singly reinforced beam 250mm wide is 400mm deep to the centre of the tensile reinforcement.
Determine the limiting moment of resistance of the beam section and also the limiting area of
reinforcement. Use M20 concrete and the 250 steel.
Solution:
Given Data:
B = 200mm
D = 400mm d
Mulim = 41.4 fck / fy xumax / d
M20 & Fe 250
b
Mu = 0.149 fck bd2
= 0.149 x20x200x4002
Mulimt = 95.36 x 106 Nmm
= 1404 mm2
Design a R.C.C. beam to rsist an applied of 50 kNm. Assuming width is 230mm. Use M20 & Fe 415
grade.
Solution:
i) Data:
Applied moment = 50kNm
Factored moment = 1.5 x 50 = 75 kNm
Breadth is restricted to = 230mm
M20 fck = 20N/mm2
Fe 415 fy = 415 N/mm2
Main reinforcement =
As = 0.85
bd fy
Ast = 0.85 bd
fy
= 0.85 x 230 x 369
415
= 173.83 mm2
Solution:
6 - 16#
Given Data: 33
xumax = 0.53
d
E = Stress
Strain xumax
Stress = fsc = Esc Strain
= Esc
= 2X105 X 0.002906
= 581.20 N/mm2
Alternatively
0.87fy + 0.0020
Es
0.0035 = Esc
xumax xumax d
Asc = Ast2
= 1206.36 402.12
Ast1 = 804.25
G 1.1 (P-96)
Xumax = 194.51 mm
Mulim = M1 + M2
0.87 fy Ast
= 122.51 kNm.
Find the moment of resistance of a beam 250mm x 500mm. If reinforcement with 2/12 FF in compressive
zone and 4 / 20mm # in tension each at an effective cover of 40mm. Use M20 and Fe 415 grade.
Esc = 0.002866
fsc = Esc
= 0.002866 x 2x105
= 573.20 N/mm2 (or) 0.87fy = 361.05 N/mm
Whichever is less
0.87fy Ast2 = Asc 0.87 fy
Ast2 = Asc
Ast1 = Ast Ast2 = 1030.445 mm2
= 42.46 kNm
= 181.07 kNm
Design a rectangular beam of effective span 5m superimposed load is 75 kN/m. Size of beam is
restricted to 300 x 600mm. Use M20 and Fe 415 grades.
Solution:
Given Data: l = 5m
Breadth b = 300mm
Assume d = 40mm
D = 600 40 = 560mm
Load Calculation:
Dead Load
(0.3 x 0.6 x 1 x 25) = 4.5 kN/m
Live Load = 75 KN/m
---------------------
Total = 79.5 KN/m
xumax = 0.48
d
Mulim < Mu
= 0.0035 (268.80 d)
268.80
= 0.002979
E = f /e
(or)
0.87fy = 0.87 x 415 = 361.05
= 1608.11 + 617.86
= 2225.97mm2
-b b2 4ac
2a
8097.24 4944.74
2
A reinforced concrete beam 300mm x 600mm is to be designed for a factored moment 3.25 x 108.
Calculate the reinforcement needed. Use M20 and Fe 415. Effective cover is d = 37.5mm.
Solution
= 270mm
Ast1 =
Es = f / e
fsc = Es esc
= 0.87fy Asc
0.87 fy
Ast2 = Asc
FLANGED BEAMS
A T beam floor consists of 150mm thick R.C slab cast monolithic with 300mm wide beams. The
beams are spaced at 3.5m c/c and their effective span is 6m. If the superimposed load on the slab 5
kN/m2. Design an intermediate beam. Use M20 & Fe 250 grades.
Given data:
300mm
Note:
Width of flange = bf = lo + bw + 6 Df
6
= 6000 + 300 + 6 x 150
6
= 2200mm
(Or)
C/c of beam 3500mm
bw
bf = 2200mm
i) Load Calculation:
Dead weight of slab = 3.75 KN/m2
Superimposed load on the slab = 5.00 KN/m2
Total Load = 8.75 kN/m2
= 48.75 x 62
8
= 219.38 kNm.
Assume
Mu = 0.87fy Ast d (1-Ast fy
bd fck)
219.38 x 106 = 0.87 x 415 Ast x 360 (1- Ast x 415
2200 x 360 x 2)
= 129978 (1-0.000026 Ast)
-b b2 4ac
2a
= 38455.03 34916.59
2
ii) Check the depth of Neutral axis:
Xu = 0.87 fy Ast
d 0.36 fck bf
As = 0.85
bw d fy
As = 0.85 bw d
Fy
= 0.85 x 300 x 360
415
= 221.21 mm2
Calculate the amount of steel required in a T beam to develop a moment of resistance of 300 kNm at
working loads. The dimensions of beams are given in figure. Use M20 & Fe 415 grade.
750mm
100mm
500mm
470mm
xu = 0.87 fy Ast
d 0.36 x 20 x 750
= 199.61mm.
Xu > Df
Df = 100 = 0.20
d 500
Ast1 = 2482mm2
Find Ast 2
Asc = Ast2
Check reinforcement
Min As = 0.85
bwd fy
Depth of NA
= 0.87 fy Ast
Design a two way slab for a room 5.5m x 4m clear in size, if the superimposed load is 5kN/m2. Use M20 & Fe
415 grade.
300mm
4m
5.50m
L = 5.5 = 1.375 < 2 Two way Slab
B 4
Design Data:
xumax = 0.48
d
xumax = 0.48d
D = 142.86mm
Shorter Span lx
a) 4 + 0.3 = 4.3m
b) 4 + 0.12 = 4.12m
lx = 4.12m
ly = 5.62m
Load Calculation:
Mx = dx w/ x2
x = 0.0966 0.006
y = 0.0526
1.3 1.3 1.4
0.0066 = ?
0.1 0.06
0.0526 0.05
6
0.004
0.055 = ?
0.1 0.04
Mx = x w/x2
0.004
= 0.0966 x 12.75 x 4.122
1.3 1.36 1.4
= 20.91 kNm 6
My = y w/x2
= 11.38 kNm.
Mux = 20.91 x 106 = 0.87 x 415 Ast (175) (1- Ast 415
1000 x 175 x 20)
Ast
Asty=
Spacing of reinforcement:
Shorter span:
SV = 1000 A
Ast
Longer Span
Hence Provide
VU = W lx
2
Ld 1.3 M1 + LO
V
Design a simply supported roof slab for a room 8m x 3.5m clear in size. If the superimposed load is
5kN/m2. Use M20 & Fe 415.
300mm
3.5m
mm
8m
i) Design Data :
M20 & Fe 415
Fck 20 N/mm2
Fe 415 415 N/mm2
Xumax = 0.48
D
Xumax = 0.48d
d = span
BV x MF
Simply Supported 20
xu = 0.87 fy Ast d
d 0.36 fck.bd
= 0.36 x 20 b x 0.48 d
0.87 x 415
Ast = 0.00957 bd
100 Ast = 100 x 0.00957 bd
bd bd
M.F = 1
D = 175 + 25 = 200mm
Load Calculation:
Using 12mm #
Sv = 1000 A
Ast
i) 3d (or) 300mm
Ast = 0.12 x bD
100
= 0.12 X 1000 X 200
100
i) 5d (or) 450mm
Ld = s = 12 x 0.87 x 415
4 Tbd 4 x 1.2
= 902.625
Ld = 300.875mm
3Provide 310mm
Shear Stresses in slab are within the permissible limit, shear reinforcement are not necessary.
Near support main bar is bent up at l / 7 from the face of the wall
Near intermediate beam the reinft. Is bent up at l / 7 and projected over the beam at l / 4 from the center.Check
for Shear
Vu = 15 x 3.675 = 27.5625 kN
2
Nominal Shear Stress = = Vu = 27.56 x 1000 = 0.1575 N/mm
bd 1000 x 175
Tc = 0.36 N/mm2
12# @ 260mm
3500
300 Section 300
Bottom Plan
12# @ 260mmc/c
UNIT III LIMIT STATE DESIGN FOR BOND, ANCHORAGE SHEAR & TORSION
INTRODUCTION
Torsion when encountered in reinforced concrete members usually occurs in combination with flexure shear.
Torsion in its pure form (generally associated with metal shafts) is rarely encountered in reinforced concrete.
The interactive behavior of torsion with bending moment and flexural shear in reinforced concrete beams is
fairly complex, owing to the no homogeneous, nonlinear and composite nature of the material and the presence
of cracks. For convenience in design, codes prescribe highly simplified design procedures, which reflect a
judicious blend of theoretical considerations and experimental results.
These design procedures and their bases are described in this chapter, following a brief review of the general
behavior of reinforced concrete beams under torsion.
Torsion may be induced in a reinforced concrete member in various ways during the process of load transfer in
a structural system. In reinforced concrete design, the terms equilibrium torsion and compatibility torsion are
commonly used to refer to two different torsion inducing situations.
In equilibrium torsion, the torsion is induced by an eccentric loading, and equilibrium conditions alone suffice
in determining the twisting moments. In compatibility torsion, the torsion is induced by the application of an
angle of twist and the resulting twisting moment depends on the torsional stiffness of the member.
In some (relatively rare) situations, axial force (tension or compression) may also be involved.
It must be clearly understood that this is merely a matter of terminology, and that it does not imply for instance,
equilibrium conditions need not be satisfied in cases of compatibility torsion.
There are some situations (such as circular beams supported on multiple columns) where both equilibrium
torsion and compatibility torsion coexist.
EQUILIBRIUM TORSION
This is associated with twisting moments that are developed in a structural member is maintain static
equilibrium with the external loads, and are independent of the torsional stiffness of the member. Such torsion
must be necessarily considered design. The magnitude of the twisting moment does not depend on the torsional
stiffness of the member, and is entirely determinable from statics alone. The member has to be designed for the
full torsion, which is transmitted by the member to the supports. More ever, the end(s) of the member should be
suitably restrained to enable the member to resist effectively the torsion induced. Typically, equilibrium torsion
is induced in beams supporting lateral over hanging projections, and is caused by the eccentricity in the loading
(Figure). Such torsion is also induced in beams curved plan and subjected to gravity loads, and in beams where
the transverse loads are eccentric with respect to the shear centre of the cross section.
T/2
Total torque = T
T/2
T/2
(c) twisting moment
Diagram
Compatibility Torsion
T/2
This is the name given to the type of torsion induced in a structural member rotations (twists) applied at one
or more points along the length of the member. It twisting moments induced are directly dependent on the
torsional stiffness of the member. These moments are generally statically in determine and their analysis
necessarily involves (rotational) compatibility conditions; hence the name compatibility torsion. For example,
in the floor beam system has shown in figure, the flexure of the secondary beam BD results in a rotation B at
the end B. As the primary (Spandrel) beam ABC is monolithically connected with the secondary beam BD at
the joint B., compatibility at B implies an angle of twist, equal to B in the spandrel beam ABC, and a bending
moment will develop at the end b of beam BD. The bending moment will be equal to, and will act in a direction
opposite to the twisting moment, in order to satisfy static equilibrium. The magnitude of B and the twisting /
bending moment at b depends on the torsional stiffness of beam ABC and the flexural stiffness of beam BD.
The torsional stiffness of a reinforced concrete member is drastically reduced by torsional cracking. This results
in a very large increase in the angle of twist, and, in the case of compatibility torsion, a major reduction in the
induced twisting moment. For this reasons, the code (CL.40.1) permits the designer to neglect the torsional
stiffness of reinforced concrete members at the structural analysis stage itself, so that the need for detailed
design for torsion in such cases does not arise at the design stage. With reference to figure, this implies
assuming a fictitious hinge (i.e., no rotational restraint) at the end B of the beam BD, and assuming a continuous
support (spring, support, actually)at the joint D. Incidentally, this assumption helps in reducing the degree of
static indeterminacy of the structure (typically, a grid floor), thereby simplifying the problem of structural
analysis. Thus, the code states:
In general, where the torsional resistance or stiffness of members has not been taken into account in the analysis
of a structure no specific calculations for torsion will be necessary [CL40.1 of the code].
Of course, this simplification implies the acceptance of cracking and increased deformations in the torsional
member. It also means that during the first time loading, a twisting moment up to the cracking torque of the
plain concrete section develops in the member, prior to torsional cracking. In order to control the subsequent
cracking and to impart ductility to the member, it is desirable to provide a minimum torsional reinforcement,
equal to that required to resist the cracking torque. In fact one of the intentions of the minimum stirrup
reinforcement specified by the code (CL. 25.5.1.6) is to ensure some degree of control of torsional cracking of
beams due to compatibility torsion.
If, however, the designer chooses to consider compatibility torsion in analysis and design, then it is important
that a realistic estimate of torsional stiffness is made for the purpose of structural analysis, and the required
torsional reinforcement should be provided for the calculated twisting moment.
Observed behavior of reinforced concrete members under torsion (see also section 7.3) shows that the
torsional stiffness is little influenced by the amount of torsional reinforcement in the linear elastic phase, and
may be taken as that of the plain concrete section. However, once torsional cracking occurs, there is a drastic
reduction in the torsional stiffness. The post cracking torsional stiffness is only a small fraction (less than 10
percent) of the pre cracking stiffness, and depends on the amount of torsional reinforcement, provided in the
form of closed stirrups and longitudinal bars. Heavy torsional reinforcement can, doubt, increase the torsional
resistance (strength) to a large extent, but this can be realized only at very large angles of twist (accompanied by
very large cracks).
Hence, even with torsional reinforcement provided, in most practical situations, the maximum twisting moment
in a reinforced concrete member under compatibility torsion is the value corresponding to the torsional cracking
of the member. The cracking torque is very nearly the same as the failure strength obtained for an identical
plain concrete section.
In the usual linear elastic analysis of framed structures, the torsional stiffness kt (torque per unit twist T/ ) of a
beam of length l is expressed as
KT = GC / l
Where GC is the torsional rigidity, obtained as a product of the shear modulus G and the geometrical parameter
C of the section (Ref. 7.1). It is recommended in the Explanatory Handbook to the code (Ref.7.2) that G may be
taken as 0.4 times the c is a property of the section having the same relationship to the torsional stiffness of a
rectangular section as the polar moment of inertia has for a circular section
A column forms a very important component of structure. Columns support beams which a turn support walls
and slabs. It should be realized that the failure of a column results in the collapse of the structure. The design of
a column should therefore receive great importance.
A column is defined as a compression member, the effective length of which exceeds three times its lateral
dimension. Compression members whose lengths do not exceed three times their least dimension are classified
as pedestals.
RCC columns concrete has a high compressive strength and a low tensile strength. Hence theoretically concrete
should need no reinforcement when it is subjected to compression. Reinforcements are provided in order to
reduce the size of columns. Through a column is mainly a compression member, it is liable to some moment
due to eccentricity of loads or transverse loads or due to its slenderness. Such moments may occur in any
direction and so it is necessary to provide reinforcement near all faces of column. This reinforcement forms the
longitudinal steel. In order to maintain the position of the longitudinal reinforcement and also to prevent their
buckling which may cause splitting of concrete, it is necessary to provide transverse reinforcements in the form
of lateral ties or spirals at close pitch. The transverse reinforcement also assists in confining the concrete.
Classification of columns: A column may be classified on the basis of its shape, its slenderness ratio, the
manner of loading and the type of lateral reinforcement provided. A column may have a section which may be
square, rectangle, circular or a desired polygon.
Depending on the slenderness ratio, column may be short or a long column. The slenderness ratio of a column is
the ratio of the effective length of the column to its least lateral dimension. A column whose slenderness ratio
exceeds 12 is a long column. A column whose slenderness ratio does not exceed the above limit is a short
column.
Columns may also be classified based on the type of lateral reinforcement provided. On this basis, columns are
classified into
(i) Tied columns in which separate or individual ties are provided surrounding the longitudinal
reinforcement. The load on it. The object of stipulating a
(ii) Spirally reinforced columns in which helical bars are provided surrounding the longitudinal
reinforcement.
Longitudinal reinforcement (or main steel) is provided to resist compressive loads along with concrete. As per
I.S. 456 a reinforced concrete column shall have longitudinal steel reinforcement and the cross sectional area of
such reinforcement shall not be less than 0.8% nor more than 6% of the cross sectional area of the column
required to transmit all the loading. The object of stipulating a minimum percentage of steel is to make
provision to prevent buckling of the column due to any accidental eccentricity of a maximum percentage of
steel is to provide reinforcement within such a limit to avoid congestion of reinforcement which would make it
very difficult to place the concrete and consolidate it. This may be best realized from the following two
examples. Consider two columns 450mm x 450mm. Reinforcement required at 0.8% of gross area = 0.8 / 100 x
4502 = 1620mm2.
This may be provided by four bars of 25mm diameter with an area of 1963mm2 (Figure a)
= 6 x 4502 = 12150mm2
100
Even if the bigger diameter bars selected. Say 32mm. diameter bars;
We will require 16 bars of 32mm. diameter providing a total area of
804 x 16 = 12864mm2. (Figure b). The difficulty of placing concrete 4-25mm
between the 16 bars of 32mm. diameter with the overall size of (main bars
450mm x 450mm. may be quite apparent. Practically the
Maximum percentage of steel may be limited to 4 percent of the
gross area so as to ensure a good and sound concrete. (a) (b)
(a) The cross sectional area of longitudinal reinforcement shall be not less than 0.8 percent, of the gross
cross sectional area of the column.
(b) In any column that has a larger cross sectional area than that required to support the load, the minimum
percentage of steel shall be based upon the area of concrete required to resist the direct stress and not upon
the actual area.
(c) The minimum number of longitudinal bars provided in a column shall be four in rectangular columns and
six in circular columns.
(d) The bars shall not less than 12mm. in diameter.
(e) A reinforcement concrete column having helical reinforcement shall have at least six bars of longitudinal
reinforcement within the helical reinforcement.
(f) In a helically reinforced column, the longitudinal bars shall be in contact with the helical reinforcement and
equidistant around its inner circumference.
(g) Spacing of longitudinal bars measured along the periphery of the column shall not exceed 300mm.
(h) In case of pedestals in which the longitudinal reinforcement is not taken into account in strength
calculations, nominal longitudinal reinforcement not less than 0.15 percent of the cross sectional area
shall be provided.
Note: Pedestal is a compression member the effective length of which does not exceed three times the least
lateral dimension.
Sprial or
Helical
Reinforcement
Transverse
Reinforcement
(Links)
Figure R.C.Columns
TRANSVERSE REINFORCEMENT
The longitudinal reinforcement should be laterally tied by transverse links to provide a restraint against outward
buckling of each of the longitudinal bars. I.S. 456 code stipulates that the diameter of longitudinal bars shall not
be less than 12mm. and that the diameter of the transverse reinforcement shall not be less than one fourth of
the diameter of the main rods and in no case less than 5mm. in diameter. The ends of transverse links should be
properly anchored. Figure (a) & (b) show how transverse reinforcement are provided in R.C. Columns.
1. If the longitudinal bars are not spaced more than 75mm. on other side, transverse reinforcement only to
go round the corner and alternate bars for the purpose of providing effective lateral supports.
2. If the longitudinal bars spaced at a distance of not exceeding is times the diameter of the tie are
effectively tied in two directions, additional longitudinal bars in between these bars need to be tied in
one direction by open ties (see figure)
3. Where the longitudinal reinforcing bars in a compression member are placed in more than one row,
effective lateral support to the longitudinal bars in the inner rows may be assumed have been provided
if:
i) Transverse reinforcement is provided for the outer most rows.
ii) No bar of the inner row is closer to the nearest compression face than three times the diameter of the
largest bar in the inner row (figure).
4. Where the longitudinal bars in a compression member are grouped (not in contact) and each group
adequately tied with transverse reinforcement then the transverse reinforcement the compression
member as a whole may be provided on the assumption that each group is a single longitudinal bars for
the purpose of determining the pitch and the diameter of the transverse reinforcement. The diameter of
such transverse reinforcement need not, however, exceed
20mm (See the figure)
D D
D D
Ag = D2 Ag = D2
B B
D
D
D
D
Ag = D2 Ag = BD Ag = BD
Ag = 0.785D2 Ag = 0.865D2
Ag = 0.823D2
(a) (b)
Individual
Groups
Transverse
Reinforcement
>3 Diameter
(a)
(ii) 5mm
COVER:
The minimum cover to column reinforcement equals 40mm or diameter of bar whichever is greater.
The effective length of a column is not necessarily its actual length. It depends on the degree of fixity of the
ends of the columns. The table on page gives the effective length corresponding to the unsupported length l of
the column from floor to floor or between properly restrained supports.
A column will be considered as short when the ratio of the effective length to its least lateral dimension is less
than or equal to 12. When this ratio is exceeds the column will be considered as a long column.
The unsupported length between end restraints shall not exceed 60 times the latest lateral dimension of the
column.
If in any given plane, one end of a column is unstrained, its unsupported length I, shall not exceed (100b2
D)
MINIMUM ECCENTRICTY:
bi-axial bending is considered, it is sufficient to ensure that eccentricity exceeds the minimum about an axis.
Note: In case the minimum eccentricity requirements govern, bending about one axis alone at a time should be
considered. Bending simultaneously about both axes should not be considered, i.e. this should not be regarded
as a case of bi-axial bending.
The ultimate compressive load for an axially loaded short column is determined on the following assumptions.
For an absolutely axially loaded short column, at ultimate stage, the ultimate compressive load is resisted partly
by concrete and partly by steel. Thus, at ultimate stage,
AC = Area of concrete
This relation is applicable for the ideal condition of axial loading. In the practical conditions the loading is
never absolutely axial and there will always be some eccentricity which cannot be avoided. Hence we may
consider the possibility of a minimum eccentricity of 0.05 times the lateral dimension and assume a 11%
reduction in the ultimate strength of the column.
On this basis, the ultimate load for an axially loaded short column is taken as,
Ag = Ac + Asc
Problem 1: A short column R.C.C column 400mmx 400mm is provided with 8 bars of 16mm diameter. If
the effective length of the column is 2.25m, find the ultimate load for the column. Use M20 concrete and
Fe 415 steel.
Solution:
L = 2.25m
emin = 20mm
0.05b = 0.05 x 400 = 20mm
emin has not exceed 0.05b
Problem 2: A short column 450mm x 450mm is reinforced with 8 bars of 20mm diameter. The effective
length of the column is 2.75m. Find the ultimate load for the column. Use M20 concrete and Fe
250 steel.
Solution:
Size of the column; 450mm x 450mm, l = 2.75m
Minimum eccentricity is the greater of the following:
ii) 20mm
emin = 20.50mm
emin< 0.05b
Problem 3: A reinforced concrete short column 400mm x400mm has to carry an axial load of 1200kN.
Find the area of steel required. Use M20 concrete and Fe 415 steel.
Solution:
Gross Area of the column section = Ag = 400 x 400 = 160000mm2
Area of Steel = Asc
Asc = 1926mm2.
i) 5mm
ii) diameter of the larger size bar = (20) = 5mm
Problem 4: Find the area of steel required for a short reinforced concrete column 400mm x 425mm to
carry an axial load of 1195KkN.Use M20 concrete and Fe 415 steel.
Solution:
Solution:
Hence,
Asc = 2257mm2
Lateral ties
6mm tiles @
8-20mm
@280mm
Problem 6: A reinforced concrete column of 2.75m effective length carries an axial load of 1600kN.c/c
Design the column using M20 concrete and Fe 415 steel
Solution:
Assuming that the minimum eccentricity is less than 0.05 times the lateral dimension of the column,
Ultimate load = Pu = 0.40 fck Ac + 0.67 fy Asc
Ac = 0.98 Ag
Ag = 179091.11mm2
i) 20mm
emin = 20mm
0.05b = 0.05 x 425 = 21.25mm
Lateral ties
Diameter of lateral ties shall be not less than 300
i) 5mm
ii) x diameter of longitudinal bar = 16 x 25 = 400mm
iii) 48 x diameter of the = 48 x 8 = 384mm
iv) 300mm 300
v) Provide 8mm ties @300mm fe
425
CONTINUOUS COLUMNS
Often in multistoried structures, a column continues up through a floor from one storey to another. In such a
cases the main bars of the column must be first continued up either within or outside the reinforcement of the
floor beam which frames into the column. When the main bars continue up outside the reinforcement of the
beam, it is necessary that the width of the column should be at least 80mm more than the width of the beam.
Sometimes the column sizes in plan may be smaller above the floor than below it. In such cases the main bars of
the column will have to bent inwards at the floor level, or alternatively these main bars may be stopped just
below the floor level and separate lap bars may be provided for connecting the part of the column above and
below the floor.
SPIRALLY REINFORCED CIRCULAR COLUMNS:
These are circular columns, which are reinforced with closely and uniformly spaced spiral reinforcement
in additional to longitudinal steel. Columns of circular section are usually spirally reinforced. Sometimes
separate loops may also be provided in place of the spiral. The continuous spiral is adopted in preference to
separate loops. A column with helical reinforcement shall have at least six bars as longitudinal reinforcement.
The strength of a column with helical reinforcement satisfying the requirement given below shall be taken as
1.05 times the strength of similar member with lateral ties.
The ratio of the volume of helical reinforcement to the volume of the core shall not be less than 0.36
[Ag / Ak 1] fck / fy
Ak = area of the core of the helically reinforced column measured to the outside diameter of the helix.
Diameter of helical reinforcement: The diameter of the helical reinforcement shall not less than one fourth the
diameter of the largest longitudinal bar and in no case than 5mm.
Pitch
D k= Core diameter
D = Column diameter
Since the strength of a helically bound circular column has a strength equal to 1.05 times the strength of similar
column with lateral ties.
Ultimate strength of the column with helical reinforcement = Pu = 1.05(0.4 fck Ac + 0.67 fy Asc)
Note: The above equation is valid provided the following condition is satisfied,
Problem 7: Determine the safe axial load for a short column 400mm in diameter, reinforced with 6 bars
of 25mm diameter. It is provided with 8mm diameter helical reinforcement at a pitch of 45mm Use M20
concrete and Fe 415 steel.
Solution:
Diameter of the column corresponding to the centre of helical bars = dh = 336 8 = 328mm
Problem8: Determine the safe axial load for a short column 425mm in diameter, reinforced with 6 bars of
22mm diameter. It is provided with 8mm diameter helical reinforcement at a pitch of 40mm diameter.
Use M20 concrete and Fe 250 steel.
Solution:
Diameter of the column corresponding to the centre of helical bars = dh = 361 8 = 353mm
0.01
Hence, the provision of the helical reinforcement is satisfactory.
Problem9: Design a circular column to carry an axial load of 1500kN. The column has an effective length
of 2.50m. Use M20 concrete and Fe 415 steel.
Solution:
Providing 2 % steel
Asc = 0.02 Ag
Assuming the column to be short, and the minimum eccentricity does not exceed 0.05 D.
Ultimate load = Pu = 1.05 (0.4 fck Asc + 0.67 fy Asc) = 2250 x 103 N
Ag = 159902.78mm2
D2 / 4 = 159902.78
i) 20mm
emin = 20mm
But 0.05 D = 0.05 x 450 = 22.5mm
= 2250 x 103 N
Asc = 3223.5mm2
Provide 8 bars of 25mm diameter (3927.2mm2)
We know, Ag = 159043.13mm2
Ignore moment transmitted to column from slab. Use M20 concrete and Fe 415 steel.
Solution:
5m 5m
5m
3.50m 4000.15m
x 400
m Column
0.15m
3.50m
m
5m
0.15m
3.50m
m
0.15m
5m
3.50m
3.50m
Plinth Level
mm
0.5m
5m
Ground Level
1.25m
0.5m
i) 20mm
ii) leff + b = 2275 + 400 = 17.88mm.
500 30 500 30
emin = 20mm
Ultimate load Pu = 0.4 x 20 (160000 Asc) + 0.67 x 415 Asc = 2011.5 x 103N
Lateral ties
Diameter of lateral ties shall not be less than,
i) 5mm
ii) diameter of longitudinal bars = x 22 = 4.4mm
Providing 6mm diameter ties
Charts have been made by the Bureau of Indian standards (SP 16 : 1980) for designing columns in
accordance with the equation Pu = 0.4fck Ac + 0.67 fy Asc.
See charts 1, 2 and 3. In the chart, in the lower portion, Pu / Ag has been plotted against the percentage of
steel for various grades of concrete. Suppose the sectional area of the column is known, we can determine Pu
/ Ag and we can get from the chart the percentage of steel required. In the upper portion, Pu / Ag is plotted
against Pu for various values of Ag.By using the upper and the lower portions of the chart, calculations are
considerably minimized. These charts will be of great advantage in selecting sizes of columns in the
preliminary design stage of multistoried buildings.
Problem 11: Design an axially loaded short column to carry an axial load of 1650kN. Use M20 concrete
and Fe 415 steel.
Solution:
Solution:
EXERCISE
1. A short R.C.C. column 450mm X 450mm is provided with 8 bars of 18mm diameter. If the effective
length of the column is 2.50m, find the ultimate load for the column. Use M20 concrete and Fe 415
steel. (2168.7kN)
2. A short R.C.C. column 475mm x 475mm is reinforced with 8 bars of 25mm diameter. The effective
length of the column is 3m. Find the ultimate load for the column. Use M20 concrete and Fe 250 steel.
(2431.5kN)
3. A short reinforced concrete column 450mm x 450mm has to carry an axial load of 1400kn. Find the area
of steel required. Use M20 concrete and Fe 415 steel (1778mm2)
4. A reinforced concrete column has an effective length of 2.80m. It carries an axial load of 1800kN.
Design of column using M20 concrete and Fe 415 steel. (provide approximately 2% steel)
(450mm x 450mm Asc = 4000mm2)
5. Determine the safe axial load for a short circular column 450mm in diameter reinforced with 6 bars of
25mm diameter. It is provided with 8mm diameter helical reinforcement at a pitch of 45mm. Use M20
concrete and Fe415 steel. (1447.3kN)
6. Determine the safe axial load for a short circular column 450mm in diameter, reinforced with 6 bars of
20mm diameter. It is provided with 8mm diameter helical reinforcement at a pitch of 40mm. Use M20
concrete and Fe 250 steel. (1651.5Kn)
As mentioned earlier, a compression member shall be designed for a certain minimum eccentricity of the load.
It is always necessary to ensure that a column section is designed for a moment which is not less than the
moment due to the minimum specified eccentricity.
a) Plane section normal to the axis of the member remains plane after bending. This means that the strain at
any point of the cross section is directly proportional to the distance from the neutral axis.
b) The design stress strain relationship for concrete is taken as indicated earlier.
c) The tensile strength of concrete is ignored.
d) The design stresses in reinforcements are derived from the strains using the stress strain relationship
given earlier.
Let us consider the following two cases.
Case (I): When the neutral lies within the section.
Figure shows the column section subjected to load and moment which produce a stress diagram such
that the neutral axis lies within the section.
The compressive stress in concrete in uniform for a distance 3/7 xu from highly compressed edge. For
the remaining part of the compressive zone the stress varies parabolic ally.
This force Ccu acts at a distance of 0.42xu from the highly compressed edge. Compressive force on steel
Asc
Csu ASC (fsc fcc)
d N d
Ag
Ast
b
A
D
0.0035
esc
Stress Diagram
fcc = stress in compression concrete in the neighbor hood of Asc = 0.446 fck
Ultimate moment Mu can now be determined by taking moments about the centre line of the column.
By the geometry of the strain diagram we can find the strain esc and est
The stress in steel is proportional to the strain, till the stress reaches 0.80 x design yield stress i.e. 0.80 x 0.87 fy
Problem 1: A reinforced concrete column section 250mm x 500mm is provided with reinforcements as
shown in figure. Find Pu and Mu when xu = 335mm. Use M15 concrete and Fe 250 steel.
Problem 2: Figure shows the section of an RCC column 250mm x 500mm. Taking Asc = Ast = 804mm2
find Pu and Mu . Use M15 concrete and Fe 250. Take xu = 370mm.
Solution:
By the geometry of the strain diagramesc = 320 x 0.0035 = 0.003027
370
est = 80 x 0.0035 = 0.00075675
370
Since esc > 0.0010875
Ast = 804mm2 N Asc= 804mm2
fsc = 0.87 fy = 0.87 x 250
= 217.5 N/mm2
= 151.3 N/mm2
Ultimate moment
Solution:
By the geometry of the strain diagram
esc = 250 x 0.0035 = 0.002917
300
est = 150 x 0.0035 = 0.00175
300
Since esc and est have exceed 0.00144 the stresses fst must be
Ast = 1256mm2 N Asc= 1256mm2
calculated coressponding to the strains the table given below.
For esc = 0.002917, fsc = 353 N/mm2
For est = 0.00175, fst = 314 N/mm2
Since est < 0.0010875
= 486000 N = 486kN 50
300
esc
Csu = Asc (fsc fcc) 50 0.0035
=1256 (353 0.446 x 15)
= 394384 N = 394.384 Kn
Ultimate moment
Problem 4: An RCC column section is 450mm x 250mm and is provided with steel reinforcement as
shown in figure. Taking xu= 350mm find Pu and Mu . Use M15 concrete and Fe 415 steel.
Solution:
By the geometry of the strain diagram
esc =300 x 0.0035 = 0.003
350
est = 50 x 0.0035 = 0.0004
350
Since esc > 0.00144; fsc = 354 N/mm2
Ast = 1256mm2 N Asc= 1256mm2
Since esc < 0.00144; fst = Es , est
= 2 x105 x 0.0004 = 80 N/mm2
= 472500 N = 472.500kN 50
350
esc
Csu = Asc (fsc fcc) 50 0.0035
=1256 (354 0.446 x 15)
= 100480 N = 100.480 Kn
Pu = Ccu + Csu Tsu = 472.500 + 436.221 100.480 = 808.241 kN
Ultimate moment
Case (ii) when the neutral axis lies outside the section.
For this case the strain diagram for the section is drawn as follows. We know when the section is subjected to a
purely axial compressive load the strain in concrete at ultimate condition at ultimate condition is uniform and
equal to 0.002.
For the case when the neutral axis is along one edge then the maximum strain in concrete is 0.0035 at the highly
compressed edge to zero at the other edge.
The strain distribution lines for these two cases intersect at a distance 3D / 7 from the highly compressed edge.
This point is taken to act as a fulcrum for the strain distribution line when the neutral axes lies outside the
section. When the neutral axis is outside the section the strain at the highly compressed edge is 0.0035 minus
0.75 times the strain at the least compressed edge. Figure shows the stress diagram for concrete. It may be noted
in the stress diagram the stress is uniform at 0.446 fck for the distance 3D / 7 from the highly compressed edge,
since in this region the strain is more than 0.002. For the remaining region the stress diagram is parabolic.
N D/2 D/2
d d
Ast Asc
Xu = KD
Let xu = KD
Stress Diagram
Let g be the difference between the stress at the highly compressed edge and the stress at the least compressed
edge.
Area of the stress block = 0.446 fck D g / 3 (4/7 D) = 0.446 fCK D 4/21 gD
We can find the centroid of the stress block by taking moments about the highly compressed edge. Moment
about the highly compressed edge.
The position of the centroid can be determined by dividing the moment of the area of the stress block. The
position of the centroid of the stress block for different values of k are given in the table below.
Pu = Cs + Csu + Tsu
The ultimate moment Mu can now be determined by taking moments about the centre line of the column.
Problem 5: A reinforced concrete column section is 250mm x 250mm. It is provided with reinforcement as
shown if figure. Using M15 concrete and Fe250 steel find Pu and Mu for xu = 550mm.
Solution:
D = 500mm
Figure shows the strain diagram at ultimate condition. By the geometry of the strain diagram
500
esc = 500 x 0.002 = 0.003
335.7
Asc= 1964mm2
est = 100 x 0.002 = 0.0006 250
335.7 2
Ag = 1964mm
Since esc is greater than 0.0010875
50 50
fsc = 0.87fy = 0.87 x 250 = 217.5N/mm2
Xu = K = 550 = 1.1
D 500
Problem 6: A reinforced concrete column section is 250mm x 450mm. It is provided with reinforcement
as shown if figure. Using M15 concrete and Fe415 steel find Pu and Mu for xu = 550mm.
Solution:
Xu = 500mm
3 x D = 3 X 450 = 192.9mm
7 7
Figure shows the strain diagram at ultimate condition. By the geometry of the strain diagram
esc = 450 x 0.002 = 0.00252
500
357.1
Asc= 1256mm2
est = 150 x 0.002 = 0.00084
250
357.1 2
Ag = 1256mm
Since esc > 0.00144; fSC = 345.3 N/mm2
100
Area of the stress block
= K1 =0.401 fck D = 0.401 x 15x 450 = 2707
K2 = 0.460 D = 0.460 x 450 = 207 mm
fsc = 0.446 x 15 = 6.69N/mm2
For an RCC column of o given section and a given reinforcement the ultimate load Pu depends upon the
eccentricity of the load. A graph of Pu Vs e can be plotted. This plot is obtained by plotting the load against the
eccentricity corresponding to different values of xu (see figure)
OA = et = a given eccentricity
P1 B
AB = OP1 represents the ultimate load at the
Eccentricity e1
Load Pu
A curve giving a relation between corresponding values of
Pu and Mu will be more useful and such a curve is called A
an interaction diagram. O e1
Eccentricity e
R.C.C columns are generally designed for a minimum eccentricity of 20mm or 0.05D whichever is greater.
Hence we should always consider the moment due to eccentricity. For a given column, with a given amount of
steel, it is possible to get an idea about the column properties when subjected to load, moment and eccentricity.
We know the ultimate load Pu and the corresponding ultimate moment Mu depend on Xu. An interaction
diagram for a column of a given section and given reinforcement is prepared as follows.
Figure shows the plot. The diagram obtained is an interaction diagram. Such a diagram can be used to determine
various combinations of axial load and moment of the column section can sustain. For any value of the load and
moment if the point obtained is inside the diagram, the arrangements is safe. The interaction diagram also
provides information about compression failure, tension failure and balanced failure.
If E is any point on the interaction diagram and the line OE is at with the vertical than tan represents the
eccentricity for all the combinations of load and moment corresponding to points on the line OE. The load
corresponding to E represents the ultimate strength Pue for the eccentricity e = tan.
Construction of non dimensional interaction diagrams. Design charts for combined axial compression and
bending are given in the form of interaction diagrams. In these diagrams curves for Pu versus Mu are
plotted for different values of P
bd fck bd2 fck fck
where P is the Reinforcement percentage.
In the case of purely axially loaded compression member, the points shown on the Y axis of the charts are
obtained as follows.
We know for an axially loaded member, Pu = 0.446 fck bd + pbD / 100 (fsc 0.446 fck)
The quantity 0.446 fck is deduction for the concrete replaced by the reinforcement bars
We may generally ignore the term 0.446 fck since it is small compared with fsc.
However as an acceptable approximation a constant value corresponding
to the concrete grade M20 has been used in the production of the
interaction diagrams. In this way, the error is ignorable small E Comp.
over the range of the various grades of concrete. Pu Failure
fci = stress in concrete at the level of the ith row of reinforcement and
n = number of rows of reinforcement.
i=n
The above expansion may be rearranged as Pu = C1 + Pi (fsi fci)
fck bD i=l 100 fck
Where, C1D = distance of the centroid of the concrete stress block measured from the highly compressed edge
and
Yi = distance of the centroid of the section of the ith row of reinforcement positive towards the
highly compressed edge and negative towards the least compressed edge,
= i=n
Pi (fsi fci) (yi / D)
i=l fck 100
The stress block parameters in this case are simpler and they can be directly incorpated into the
expressions which are otherwise the same as for the earlier case.
i=n
Pu = 0.36 k + Pi (fsi fci)
i=l 100 fck
i=n
Mu = 0.36 k (0.5 0.416 K) Pi (fsi fci) (yi / D)
i=l fck 100
Use charts. Design of a column subjected to axial load and unaxial bending involves tedious calculations. Hence
to overcome the difficulties the Bureau of Indian standards has prepared interaction diagrams or charts.
Charts for rectangular sections have been given for reinforcement on two sides (charts 4 to 15) and for
reinforcements on four sides (charts 17 to 27). In the latter case the charts have been made for a section with 20
bars equally distributed on all sides. The charts have been made for three grades of steel and four values of d /
D for each case.
The dotted lines in these charts indicate the stress in the bars nearest to the tension face of the member. The line
for fst = 0 indicates that the neutral axis lies along the outermost row of reinforcement. For points lying above
this line on the chart, all the bars in the section will be in compression. The line for fst = fyd indicates that the
outermost tension reinforcement reaches the design yield strength. For points below this line, the outermost
tension reinforcement undergoes inelastic deformation while successive inner rows may reach a stress of fyd. It
should be noted that all these stress values are at the failure condition corresponding to limit state of collapse
and not at working loads.
Problem 7: Particulars of a reinforced concrete square column subjected to unaxial bending are given
below.
d = 40 + 12.5 = 52.5mm
d = 52.5 = 0.13
d 400
Problem 8: A reinforced square column 500mm x 500mm is subjected to a factored axial load 1800Kn
accompanied by a factored moment of 100kNm. Providing reinforcement on two sides determine the
reinforcement on two sides determine the reinforcement required for the column. Use M15 concrete and
Fe 250 steel.
d = 40 + 10 = 50mm
d = 50 = 0.10
d 500
Using the chart for d = 0.10
d
Pu = 1800 X 103 = 0.48
fckBd 15 x 500 x 500
Problem 9: Find the reinforced for an RCC column to the following particulars.
Reinforcement: Fe415
d = 40 + 12.5 = 52.5mm
d = 52.5 = 0.12
d 450
Problem 10: Find the reinforcement required for a 500mm x 500mm column subjected to a factored
load 1900kN accompanied by a factored moment of 115kNm. The reinforcement is provided on four
sides Use M15 concrete and Fe 250 steel.
d = 40 + 10 = 50mm
d = 50 = 0.10
d 500
Problem 11: Find the reinforcement required for a circular reinforced concrete column to the following
particulars.
Reinforcement : Fe415
Lateral reinforcement:
d = 40 + 12.5 = 52.5mm
d = 52.5 = 0.12
D 450
As per code, the strength of a compression member with helical reinforcement is 1.05 times the strength of a
similar member with hoop reinforcement. Hence the given factored load and the factored moment should be
divided by 1.05 before using chart.
Pu = 0.37 = 0.352
2
fckD 1.05
Mu = 0.06 = 0.057
Fck D3 1.05
Reinforcement : Fe415
d = 40 + 10 = 50mm
Referring to chart = 29
Corresponding to the above data:
P = 0.085
fck
P = 0.085 x 20 = 1.7 %
Since the strength of the column with helical reinforcement is 1.05 times the strength of the column with hoop
reinforcement,
Pu = 0.296 = 0.282
fckD2 1.05
Mu = 0.055 = 0.052
fck D3 1.05
Referring to chart 29
P = 0.07
fck
P = 0.07 x 20 = 1.4%
Columns are often subjected to axial load and biaxial bending. Biaxial bending is due to moments transmitted
by beams monolithically connected to a column in different directions. Corner columns and interior columns are
subjected to unbalanced moment transmission in perpendicular directions. The exact analysis of such columns
is very laborious and the I.S code has given the following approach.
As per I.S. code, The column can be designed by the following condition,
Where,
Mux = Ultimate moment about the x axis
Muy = Ultimate moment about the y axis
Mux1 = Uniaxial moment capacity about the x axis for the given ultimate load Pu
Muy1 = Ultimate moment capacity about the y axis for the given ultimate load Pu
For values of Pu / Puz = 0.20 to 0.80 the values of n vary uniformly from 1.00 to 2.00
Note: (1) For any given percentage p of steel the values of Puz can also be determined from chart 40.
(2) For different values Pu / Puz, taking the appropriate value of n curves for the equation
Problem 1: Design a short column subjected to biaxial bending to the following particulars:
Solution: We will design the column with reinforcement distributed equally on four sides.
P = 1 = 0.05
fck 20
And Pu = 1200 X 103 = 0.375
fck Bd 20 x 400 x 400
Referring to chart 22
Corresponding to P = 0.05
fck
Pu = 1200 = 0.624
Pz 1923.6 400
Corresponding to Pu = 0.624, the value of n = 1.707
Pz 8-16mm
Problem 2: A reinforced concrete is 340mm x 500mm in section and is reinforced with 10 bars of 20mm
diameter, consisting of 3 bars along each short edge and the remaining 4 bars equally distributed along
the long faces with 2 bars per as shown in figure.
The column is subjected to an ultimate load Pu whose eccentricities are 80mm about the x- x axis and 60mm
about the y-y axis . Find this ultimate load. Use M20 concrete and Fe 415 steel.
= 2479065 N = 2479.1 Kn
d = 50 = 0.10
D 500
Percentage of steel = P= 3140 x 100 = 1.85%
170000
P = 1.85 = 0.093
fck 20
Referring to chart 21
Corresponding to P = 0.093
fck
Corresponding to P = 0.093
fck
and Pu = 0.438
fck bd
Mu = 0.116
2
fck bD
= 134.1 kNm.
Pu = 1490 = 0.60
Pz 2479.1
Problem 3: A short rectangular R.C.C. column carries an axial load of 1170kN accompanied by moments
Mx = 120kNm and My = 30kNm about the major and the minor axes.
Solution: We will select the column sizes so that the column will be a short column
lex < 12
D
D > lex
12
D > 437.5mm
ley < 12 b > ley b > 4 x 103 = 333.3mm
b 12 12
Minimum eccentricity
ex min = l + D = 4750 + 500 = 26.17mm > 20mm
500 30 500 30
P = 2 = 0.10
fck 20
Mux1 = 0.116
Fck bD2
Referring to chart 6,
Muy1 = 0.10
2
Fck Db
n = 1.791
We know when the ratio of the effective length to the lateral dimension
12-20mm
Of the column section exceeds 12 the column is regarded as a long or
Slender column. Such a column is liable to buckle before it can reach the 500
Mx = Pu eux and My = Pu ey
The table below gives values of ex / D or ey / b for different values of the slenderness ratio.
12 0.072 25 0.313
13 0.085 30 0.450
14 0.098 35 0.613
15 0.113 40 0.800
16 0.128 45 1.013
17 0.145 50 1.250
18 0.162 55 1.513
19 0.181 60 1.800
20 0.200
The I.S. code has further specified that the moments given above may be reduced by a multiplication factor k
given by
K = Puz - Pu 1
Puz - Pb
Table Values of K1
Section d / D
0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20
Rectangular 0.219 0.207 0.196 0.184
Circular 0.172 0.160 0.149 0.138
Table Values of K2
Section fy N/mm2 d / D
0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20
Rectangular 250 0.045 0.045 -0.015 -0.045
Equal reinforcement 415 0.096 0.082 0.046 -0.022
On two opposite sides 500 0.213 0.173 0.104 -0.001
Rectangular 250 0.215 0146 0.061 -0.011
Equal reinforcement 415 0424 0328 0.203 0.028
On four sides 500 0545 0.425 0.256 0.040
Circular 250 0.193 0.148 0.077 -0.020
415 0.410 0.323 0.201 0.036
500 0.543 0.443 0.291 0.056
Notes:
1. A column may be considered braced at a given plane if lateral stability to the structure as a whole is
provided by walls or bracing or buttressing designed to resist all lateral forces in plane. It should
otherwise be considered as unbraced.
2. In the case of a braced column without any transverse loads occurring in its height, the additional
moment shall be added to an initial moment equal to the sum of 0.4 Mu1 and 0.6 Mu2 is the larger end
moment and Mu1 is the smaller end moment (assumed negative if the column is bent in double
curvature). In no case shall the initial moment be less than Mu2 nor the total moment including the initial
moment be less than Mu2. For unbraced columns, the additional moment shall be added to the end
moments.
3. Unbraced compression members, at any given level to storey, subject to lateral loads are usually
constrained to deflect equally. In such cases slenderness ratio for each column may be taken as the
average for all columns acting in the same direction.
M2 M2
Ma Mi Ma
Mi
Column bending in single curvature Column bending in single curvature
(M2 > M1) M2 > M1
Mi = 0.6 Mu2 + 0.4 Mu1 and not less than Mi = 0.6 Mu2 0.4 Mu1 and not less than 0.4
0.4 Mu2 Mu2
Total design moment Total design moment
Mt = Mi + M and not less than Mu2 Mt = Mi + M and not less than Mu2
Initial moments
Mix = 34kNm
Miy = 15kNm
Minimum moments
My = Pu b (lyeff / b)2 k
2000
Where, k = Puz - Pu
Puz - Pb
d = 50 = 0.167
b 300
Referring table
Mux = 40kNm
Thus the column should be designed for the following design loads and moments
Since d = 0.125 (between 0.10 and 0.15) we will refer to charts 21 and 22.
D
= 86.4 KNm
d = 50 = 0.167
D 300
Since d = is between 0.15 and 0.20 we will refer to charts 22 and 23.
b
Muy1 = 0.082 fck Db2 = 0.082 x 20 x 400 x 3002 = 59.04 x 106 Nmm
= 59.04 KNm
Pu = 1250 = 0.68
Puz 1839.282
Referring table
For Pu = 0.68,
Pz
n = 1.80
1. A short R.C.C. column 400 x 400mm is provided with 8 bars of 16mm diameter. If the effective length of
the column is 2.25m. Find the ultimate load for the column. Use M20 concrete and Fe 415 steel.
Solution:
i) L + b = 2250 + 400
500 30 500 30
= 4.5 + 13.33
= 17.83mm
ii) 20mm
emin = 20mm
Since emin has not exceed 0.05b, the ultimate load is given by
= 1714.24kN
2. A short column R.C.C. column 450 x 450mm is reinforced with 8 bars of 20mm diameter. The effective
length of the column is 2.75m. Find the ultimate load for the column. Use M20 concrete and Fe 250
Steel.
3. A reinforced concrete short column 400mm x 400mm has to carry an axial load of 1200kN. Find the
area of steel required. Use M20 concrete and Fe 415 steel.
4. A reinforced concrete column of 2.75m effective length carries an axial load of 1600kN. Design the
column using M20 concrete and Fe 415 steel.
Determine the safe axial load for a short circular column 400mm in diameter, reinforced with 6 bars
of 25mm diameter, it is provided with 8mm diameter helical reinforcement at a pitch of 45mm. Use
M20 concrete and Fe 415 steel.
D = 400mm
Asc = 6 x / 4 ( 25)2 = 2945.25mm2
= 1890.71kN
= (dh)2 + p2
= ( x 328)2 + 452
= 1031.43mm
= P ( 1- sin / 1 + sin )2
Find the area depth of foundation required for a column carrying an axial load of 1250kN. The safe
bearing capacity of the soil is 120 kN/m2. The soil at the sight weights 18kN/m3 and has an angle of repose
of 30.
= P ( 1- sin / 1 + sin )2
Plain concrete may be stresses to a bending stress equal to 1/30 for the 28 days cube strength . For M20
concrete the permissible bending stress.
F = 20 = 2 / 3 N/mm2
30
E / r = f/y = M /I
M = F.I / Y = Pa2
2
- f.I = Pa2
2
f BD3 . Pa2
6 2
D2 = 3Pa2
fB
D = 3Pa2
fB
P = 100 Kn/M2
0.10
= 100 X 1000 N
1000 X 1000 mm2
= 0./N/mm2
Plain concrete may be stresses to a bending stress equal to 1/30 of the 28 dayys cube strength
f= 20 = 2/3 N/mm2
30
1/6 f b D2 = pa2
2
D = 6 pa2
2 f b
D = 6 X 0.1 a2
2 x 2/3 x 1000
= 0.02 a
Plain concrete may be stresses to a bending stress equal to 1/30 of the 28 dayys cube strength
1/6 f b x D2 = pa2
2
D = 4.5 a p
= 4.5 a 0.1
= 2.121 a p
= 2.121 a 0.1
Design a unreinforced concrete wall footing for a wall 450mm thick carrying a load of 300kN/m run. The
safe bearing capacity of the soil is 200KN/m2. Use M20 concrete.
Solution:
Depth of footing
D = 3 X Pa2
fxB
= 3 x 0.18182 x 6002
20/30 x 1
= 541.37mm say 550mm
P = 181.82KN/m2
= 181.82 x 1000N
1000 X 1000
= 0.18182.
2. A square column 500 x 500mm carries an axial load of 1500kN. Design the column and a square
footing for the column. The safe bearing capacity of soil is 225kN/m2. Use M20 concrete and Fe 415
steel.
Solution:
Ac = 250000 Asc
Asc = 925.75mm2
Using 20mm #
Total = 1650kN
= 0.138 x 20 x 500 d2
d = 612.52mm
D = 613 + 78 = 691mm.
D = 900mm
d = 900 78 = 822mm.
Depth from punching shear consideration:
= 1450.42 Kn
D = 604.34mm
Ast =
= 165.28kN
303
Vu = 247.91kN
Tc = Vu
b1 d1
?
= 0.30 N/mm2 300 303 900
D2 = 680.80mm
d2 = 602.80mm
b1 = 1322
= 1153.31
Vu = 1.5 x 1153.31
= 1729.97 kN
Tv = 1729.97 x 103
5288 x 602.80
= 0.54 N/mm2
=1
SBC = 60KN/m2
= 15 kN/m3
A = 1.83m
P = 110 / 2 = 55kN/m
82.5kN/m.
d=M
0.148 fck b
= 33.41 x 106
0.148 x 15 x1000
= 109.73mm
d = 120mm
D = 300mm
d = 65
d = 235mm
Tv = V/bd
Shear strength Tc
30%
100%
30% 30%
0.111
Effective Span L1 0.15l1 0.15l2 Effective Span L2
Note: - Applicable to continuous beams with approximately equal spans (not differing more than 15 percent)
and subjected to predominantly U.D.L., and designed without compression steel.
Ld / 3
100% 50%
50%
0.08 L 0.08 L
Brick wall
In case partially restraint members 35 percent of the reinforcement shall also be provided for negative
moment at the support and fully anchored.
Not less than
Greater of 0.5 l
or Ld
Not less
than 0.5 Ast Ast 50
Ld
L
Ld / 3
8.6 Edge and spandrel Beam T beam or L beams are usually designed as internal and external beams
supporting a floor slab: where part of the slab form the horizontal portions of T or L beam
as thee flange of T or L beam is parallel to the beam, transverse reinforcement extending to the length
indicated in figure shall be provided. If the quantity of such transverse reinforcement is not specially determined
by calculations it shall not be less than 60 percent of main reinforcement in the centre of the span of slab
constituting the flange.
8.7 Corners and cracked Beams Recommendations for various methods of reinforcing corners are giving
herein based on reference 6. It is to be noted that closing corners present to the major.
< Greater of
0.5 L or Ld Bars to have the required
anchorage value on both
50
sides.
0.5Ast Ast
150
(Min
)
X X SECTION XX
Figure 8.18 Transverse
Reinforcement in Flange of T beam
Lx / 5 When Main Reinforcment of Slab is
parallel to Beam
Beam
As (T & B)
Lx / 5
As (T & B)
Lx / 5 Lx / 5
Lx / 5
9.4 B Corner with One Discontnuous Ends
1. An RCC footing 500mm x 500mm has to support an all inclusive load of 550kN and is also
subjected to a moment of 27.5kNm. Design a footing for the column. The safe bearing capacity of
the soil is 250kN per Sq.meter. Use M20 concrete and Fe 415 steel.
500
500
P = 550kN
M = 27.5kNm
SBC 250KN/m2
Pe = M
= 2.42 m2
The footing will be so provided so that centre of gravity of the column load will coincide with the centre of
gravity of the footing. The footing is placed symmetrical with respectively to the xx axis of the column.
45.45
800
800 x
500
Net upward pressure intensity
Depth of footing
D = 206.79mm
= 60.846 KNm
d = 257.20mm
D = 260 + 60 + 15 = 335mm
375
D = 450 60 10 5 = 375mm
500
250
375 375
450
220.05
200
SECTION
595
.50
Plan
b1 = 1250mm
d1 = 292.38 75
= 217.38mm
kN/m2 x m x m
= 75.80 kN
Vu = 113.69kN
v = Vu / bd = 0.42 N/mm2
c = 100 Ast / bd
d1 = 296.29mm
1600
d/2
PLAN
450
171.02 200
9
200
.50 408mm
8.50
D2 = 371.29
d2 = 296.29mm
Hence Safe
Nominal Shear Stress at the critical section due to factored shear force.
Very often a column may have to be provided near the edge of some property and it may not be possible to
extend the footing beyond a certain limit. In such a case the load on the footing will be eccentric, and will result
in uneven distribution of load to the supporting soil. Hence an alternative design would to be providing a
common footing to the edge column and to an interior column close to it. The column footing provided to the
two columns is called a combined footing. The shape of the combined footing in plan shall be such that the line
of action of the two column loads should pass through the centroid of the foundation plan. With such a
planning, the loads of the two columns will be evenly distributed to the soil.
Combined footings are either rectangular or trapezoidal. A rectangular combined footing is provided in the
following circumstances.
A trapezoidal combined footing is provided when the projections parallel to the length of the footing is
restricted on both the sides, i.e. the trapezoidal combined footing is provided when the length of the footing
itself is restricted.
Let A and B represent two columns carrying loads Wa and Wb respectively. Let the left column A be the
exterior column and let B be the interior column. Let the column be l apart between centers. Due to boundary
limitations, let the offset on the left side of the exterior column A be restricted to xa. Now the plan dimensions
of the footing can be fixed as follows.
b
Figure
Weight of the foundation (this may be taken equal to the 10% of W approximately).
= Wf
= (W) + Wf
=x = Wb x 1
(W)
Distance of C.G. of column loads from the left edge of the footing
= xa + x
In order the intensity of the soil reaction on the footing may be uniform, the condition to be satisfied is that the
C.G of the column loads (in plan) and the C.G. of the foundation plan must coincide.
After determining the length L of the footing the offset xb on the right side of the column B can be easily
determined.
Xb = L / 2 ( 1- X )
Since the area of the foundation is already calculated, we can determine the width b of the footing.
Thus, the plan dimensions of the footing and the exact positions of the columns on the footing are established.
Net upward pressure on the footing
Thickness of the footing: This is determined from punching shear and bending moment considerations.
= Wa p x area of column A
Equating the ultimate punching shear resistance to the factored punching load,
(Perimeter of column A ) x D x (design punching shear strength) = 1.5 [ Wa soil reaction on area of column
A]. We can find D
Punching shear consideration under the column B
As per previous case, we have the relation
(Perimeter of column B ) x D x (design punching shear strength) = 1.5 [ Wb soil reaction on area of column
A].
We can find D
Generally we find the depth of footing required will be greater.
B.M. consideration
Let Wus = 1.5 Wa and Wub = 1.5 Wb be the factored columns loads. Uniform upward pressure intensity.
A Wua Wub
Pu = Wua + Wub B
Af Xa l xb
= w = pu b
Where, X = Wua
This B.M will be generally the greatest B.M. for the footing. Mu lim
D = Mu max
0.138 fck
We can find the overall depth. The overall depth so determined may be increased bt 30% to 40% to limit the
shear stresses, and to reduce the steel area of economy consideration.
For the bending moment Mumax and Mua and Mub the reinforcement required are determined.
Shear Analysis. Now we should determine the shear force at all critical sections.
These shear forces are named as S1, S2, S3 and S4 in the order of their magnitudes.
Nominal shear stresses due to the above shear forces are given by
1 = S1 , 2 = S2 , 3 = S3 and 4 = S4 ,
bd bd bd bd
In the cantilevering parts, the critical section for shear should be considered at a distance of effective depth from
the face of the column.
In part of the footing between the two columns the critical section for shear is at a distance of effective depth
from the column face ar at the point of contra flexure whichever is closer to the column.
A Lesser of d or distance to B
Point of contra - flexure
C C C C
C C C C
Let c = permissible nominal shear stress. In the zones where the nominal shear stress is less than c nominal
eight legged stirrups will be provided at a nominal spacing of 300mm centers. Where the nominal shear
stresses are greater than c 10 or 12- legged stirrups may be provided. Sufficient longitudinal steel shall also be
provided to support the stirrups. To support eight legged stirrups at least five longitudinal bars are needed at
the top and at the bottom. See figure.
T o support 1 2- legged stirrups at least 7 longitudinal bars are needed at the top and the bottom. See figure.
Disposition of top and bottom longitudinal bars: The following points may be noted while deciding the
provision and disposition of the longitudinal reinforcement.
Disposition of top barsThe top bars which have been determined for the maximum hogging bending moment
may be provided between outer face of one column to outer face of the other column. Beyond this region as
much longitudinal steel as may be needed to support the stirrups may be provided.
(a)SECTION SHOWING 12 STIRRUPS
The bottom bars under the column A shall be extended into the interior of the footing to the greater of the
following distances:
i) 30 diameters from the outer face of column for M.S. bars and 47 diameters from the outer face of the
column for tor steel.
ii) Upto the point of contra flexural.
iii) 30 diameters from the outer face of column for M.S. bars and 47 diameters from the outer face of
the column for tor steel.
iv) Upto the point of contra flexural.
W ua W ub
A B
Xa l Xb
lc
lc
lc lc
Nominal 8 legged
Stirrups
Nominal 8
12 legged
Tor Steel
legged 12 legged
ottom bars under the column B
The bottom bars under the column B shall be extended into the interior of the footing for the greater of the
following distances:
i) 30 diameters from the outer face of the column for M.S. bars and 47 diameters from the outer face of
the column for tor steel.
ii) Upto the point of contra flexure.
A O1
M.S.bar
30 d or upto the
point of contr
flexure whichever is
greater
Transverse bending: The footing has also a tendency to bend in a transverse direction. However, such bending
is likely to occur for a certain region in the neighborhood of each column. For design purpose it may be
assumed that such transverse bending will occur for a distance equal to the effective depth measured from the
face of the column.
= M= Pu f2 / 2
Where Pu upward pressure intensity and = f = Maximum transverse projection. Now we can calculate the
transverse steel required for this bending moment. The transverse steel is placed over the bottom longitudinal
bars in the zone of transverse bending.
Transverse Bending
Aa
A
B
45 45
Transverse reinforcement
Design 1 : Design a reinforced concrete combined rectangular footing for two columns A and B located
3.60 metres apart. The sizes of the columns are 400mm x 400mm and 600mm x 600mm and the loads on
them are 1000kN and 1500kN respectively. The projection of the footing parallel to the length of the
footing beyond the axis of the column A is limited to 590mm. The safe bearing capacity of the soil is
280kN/m2. Use M20 concrete and Fe 415 steel.
Solutions:
0.4m 0.6m
1.8m A B
0.4m 0.6m
2.75m 2.75m
5.50m
Distance of the resultant column load from the left edge of the footing = 0.59 + 2.16 = 2.75m.
For the condition that the resultant of the column loads must pass through the centroid of the foundation plan,
length of the footing = L = 2 x 2.75 = 5.50m
Figure shows the position of the two columns on the foundation plan.
1500kN 2250kN
681.818kN/m
585.03kNm
118.67kNm
O1 O2
0.11m
2 765kNm
FIGURE
Reaction of soil on the footing per meter run = 1500 + 2250 / 5.50 = 681.818kN/m
The maximum hogging moment occurs at a section where the shear force is zero. Let this section be x metres
from the left end.
681.818x 1500 = 0
X = 2.20m
Or x2 4.42 x + 2.596 = 0
Shear analysis
Cantilevering Parts. The critical section for shear is taken at a distance equal to the effective depth from the face
of the column.
1500kN 2250kN
681.818kN/m 1356.82kN
402.27kN
1.61m +
+
- -
893.18kN
1097.73kN
FIGURE
Cantilever projection beyond the column face = 0.59 0.20 = 0.39m = 390mm
Cantilever projection beyond the column face = 1.31 0.30 = 1.01m = 1010mm
Critical section is taken at a distance of effective depth i.e. 582mm from the column face.
The critical section should be considered at the lesser of the following distances from the axis of
Column A
= 450468N
= 450.468kN
The critical section should be considered at the lesser of the following distances from the axis of
Column B
This is the same as the nominal shear stress at the other critical section on the right side of column A
= 450468N
= 450.468kN
Top bars. Twenty bars of 16mm have been provided for the maximum hogging moment. All these twenty bars
are provided between the outer face of the column A to the outer face of the column B. Beyond this, we will
provide as many longitudinal bars as may be necessary to support the stirrups.
Bottom bars under the column A. 7 bars of 16mm have been provided. These bars are extended into the
interior of the footing for the greater of the following distances.
552 6-16
7 16mm mm mm
5 18mm
Bottom bars under the column B. 15 bars of 16mm have been provided. These bars are extended into the
interior of the footing for the greater of the following distances.
6-16
5 16mm mm 490
5 16mm
Transverse reinforcement.1330
= 582 8 5 = 569mm
This reinforcement is provided for a distance of effective depth of the footing, i.e. 582mm beyond each face of
the columns.
K = n neutral axis depth factor
M = modular ratio
J = lever arm
M = 280 / 3 cbc
cbc
b
kd c
Kd =nd
(d kd / 3) - jd
st / m
D ( 1-k/3)= dj = jd
cbc = st
kd m/d kd
cbc = kd = k
st/m d kd 1-k
cbc = k
st/m 1-k
cbc (1 k) = st/m. k
= k (st/m + cbc)
K = cbc
st/m + cbc
= cbc / cbc
st/m 1/cbc + cbc/cbc
K= 1
1 + st/m. 1 / cbc
M = c ( d kd / 3)
= cbc . kd . b (d kd / 3)
= cbc kj bd2
M = Q bd2 Q = cbc k . j
d = M / Qb j = 1 k/3
M = Ast . st ( d- kd / 3) k= 1
1 + st / m + 1 / cbc
M = Ast st j.d
Ast = M
st j d
bxa2 = M.Ast (d x)
2 Xc = [ 1
1 + st / mcbc
Xa < Xc
Mr = st Ast ( d xa / 3)
Xa > Xc
Mr = cbc . xa . b (d xa / 3)
QUESTION BANK
PART-A
UNIT I
1. What are the advantages of limit state method over working stress and ultimate
load methods?
2. How do you find the moment of resistance of a beam section?
3. Discuss the merits of working stress method?
4. What is modular ratio? Determine the modular ratio at M20 grade concrete.
5. What do you understand by limit state of collapse?
6. Draw stress-strain curve for various grades of steel.
7. State the assumptions made in working stress method.
8. What is modular ratio? Determine the modular ratio at M25 grade concrete.
UNIT II
1. Distinguish between one way and two way slabs.
2. Explain the terms balanced, over reinforced and under reinforced
sections in bending
3. Discuss the different limit state to be considered in reinforced concrete
design?
4. Why is it necessary to provide transverse reinforcement in a one way slab?
5. What are the three basic methods using factor of safety to achieve safe
workable structures?
6. Explain maximum depth of neutral axis.
7. Find the depth of neutral axis in terms of d for a balanced section using Fe
415 steel, in limit state method.
8. What is the difference in the design of one way slab and two way slabs?
UNIT III
1. What are the types of reinforcements used to resist shear?
2. Explain the difference between primary and secondary torsion. Give two
examples each.
3. Under what circumstances are doubly reinforced beams used?
4. Reinforced concrete slab are generally safe in shear and do not require
shear reinforcement? Why?
5. What is modular ratio?
6. Mention the difference in design principles for L Beam and T Beam.
7. When shear reinforcement is necessary in a beam
8. What is bond stress? Write an expression for it.
UNIT IV
1 What is the minimum and maximum percentage of steel allowed in
R.C.Column? Explain why it is necessary to specify the minimum and
maximum percentage.
2 Give example of columns that are in practice subjected to unaxial and
biaxial bending.
3 Explain (a) Equilibrium torsion (b) Compatibility torsion
4 How do you classify a column as long?
5 What will be minimum and maximum area of tension reinforcement in a
beam?
6 How shear reinforcement improves the strength of beam?
7 How do you classify a column as short or long?
8 Write the procedure for the design of an axially loaded short column.
Unit V
UNIT III
1. A rectangular beam width b=350mm and d=550mm has a factored shear of
400kN at the critical section near the support. The steel at the tension side
of the section consists of four 32mm bars which are continued to support.
Assuming fck=25 and fy=415(N/mm2) design vertical stirrups for the
section.
2. A reinforced concrete rectangular beam has a breadth of 350mm and
effective depth of 800mm. It has a factored shear of 105kN at section XX.
Assuming that fck=25, fy=415(N/mm2) and percentage of tensile steel at that
section is 0.5percent, determine the torsional moment the section can resist
if no additional reinforcement for torsion is provided. Workout the problem
according to IS456 principles of design for torsion.
3. A simply supported beam is 5m in span and carries a characteristic load at
75kN/m. If 6Nos. of 20mm bras are continued into the supports. Check the
development length at the supports assuming grade M20 concrete and
Fe415steel.
4. A rectangular RCC beam is 400x900mm in size. Assuming the use of grade
M25 concrete and Fe415 steel, determine the maximum ultimate torsional
moment at the section can take it.
(i) No torsion reinforcement is provided and
(ii) Maximum torsion reinforcement is provided.
UNIT IV
4. Design a compound wall of height 1.8m to the top of 100mm thick coping.
Assume wind pressure is equal to 1kN/m2 and is UDL. The safe bearing
pressure of soil is 120kN/m2.
5. A solid footing has to transfer a dead load of 1000kn and an imposed load of
400kn from a square column 400mmx400mm. Assuming fck=20N/mm2 and
fy=415N/mm2 and safe bearing capacity to be 200KN/m2, Design the footing.
7. A solid footing has to transfer a dead load of 1000kN and an imposed load of
400kN from a square column 400x400mm (with 16mm bars.) Assuming
fy=415 and fck=20N/mm2 and safe bearing capacity to be 200kN/m2. Design
the footing.
8. Design a plain concrete footing for a 450mm wall carrying 300kN per meter
length. Assume grade 20 concrete and the bearing capacity of soil to be
200kN/m2.