Scribd
Upload
185 views1 page

Garcia grL20357 21s1056 25nov1967

This document summarizes a 1967 Supreme Court of the Philippines case regarding the probate of Gregorio Gatchalian's will. The court affirmed the lower court's decision to deny allowing the will, as the attesting witnesses did not acknowledge the will before a notary public as required by law. Philippine law requires that for a will to be valid, it must be acknowledged by the testator and witnesses before a notary public. As Gatchalian's will was only acknowledged by the testator, it did not comply with this mandatory legal requirement and could not be probated.

Uploaded by

Anonymous iOYkz0w
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
185 views1 page

Garcia grL20357 21s1056 25nov1967

This document summarizes a 1967 Supreme Court of the Philippines case regarding the probate of Gregorio Gatchalian's will. The court affirmed the lower court's decision to deny allowing the will, as the attesting witnesses did not acknowledge the will before a notary public as required by law. Philippine law requires that for a will to be valid, it must be acknowledged by the testator and witnesses before a notary public. As Gatchalian's will was only acknowledged by the testator, it did not comply with this mandatory legal requirement and could not be probated.

Uploaded by

Anonymous iOYkz0w
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

G.R. No.

L-20357 November 25, 1967 Every will must be acknowledged before a


notary public by the testator and the
IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION FOR THE
witnesses. The notary public shall not be
ALLOWANCE OF THE WILL OF GREGORIO
required to retain a copy of the will, or file
GATCHALIAN, deceased. PEDRO REYES GARCIA,
another with the office of the Clerk of Court.
petitioner-appellant,
vs. We have held heretofore that compliance with the
FELIPE GATCHALIAN, AURORA G. CAMINS, requirement contained in the above legal provision
ANGELES G. COSCA, FEDERICO G. TUBOG, VIRGINIA to the effect that a will must be acknowledged
G. TALANAY and ANGELES G. TALANAY, oppositors- before a notary public by the testator and also by
appellees. the witnesses is indispensable for its validity (In re:
Testate Estate of Alberto, G. R. No. L-11948, April 29,
E. Debuque for petitioner-appellant.
1959). As the document under consideration does
E. L. Segovia for oppositors-appellees.
not comply with this requirement, it is obvious that
DIZON, J.: the same may not be probated.
This is an appeal taken by Pedro Reyes Garcia from WHEREFORE, the decision appealed from is
the decision of the Court of First Instance of Rizal in affirmed, with costs.
Special Proceedings No. 2623 denying the allowance
Makalintal, Bengzon, J.P., Zaldivar, Sanchez, Castro,
of the will of the late Gregorio Gatchalian, on the
Angeles and Fernando, JJ., concur.
ground that the attesting witnesses did not
Concepcion, C.J., and Reyes, J.B.L., J., took no part.
acknowledge it before a notary public, as required
by law.
On March 15, 1967, Gregorio Gatchalian, a widower
of 71 years of age, died in the municipality of Pasig,
Province of Rizal, leaving no forced heirs. On April 2
of the same year, appellant filed a petition with the
above named court for the probate of said alleged
will (Exhibit "C") wherein he was instituted as sole
heir. Felipe Gatchalian, Aurora G. Camins, Angeles G.
Cosca, Federico G. Tubog, Virginia G. Talanay and
Angeles G. Talanay, appellees herein, opposed the
petition on the ground, among others, that the will
was procured by fraud; that the deceased did not
intend the instrument signed by him to be as his
will; and that the deceased was physically and
mentally incapable of making a will at the time of
the alleged execution of said will.
After due trial, the court rendered the appealed
decision finding the document Exhibit "C" to be the
authentic last will of the deceased but disallowing it
for failure to comply with the mandatory
requirement of Article 806 of the New Civil Code
that the will must be acknowledged before a notary
public by the testator and the witnesses.
An examination of the document (Exhibit "C")
shows that the same was acknowledged before a
notary public by the testator but not by the
instrumental witnesses.
Article 806 of the New Civil Code reads as follows:
Page 1 of 1

You might also like