SYLLABUS REMEDIAL LAW REVIEW YEAR 2017 REMEDIAL LAW REVIEW I (Covers Civil and Criminal Procedures) HENEDINO M. BRONDIAL, IVIL PI DURE I. JURISDICTION A. Meaning; Classes of Jurisdiction - jurisdiction according to its nature: original, appellate jurisdiction according to its object; corresponding principles over the subject matter over the persons of the parties ii. over the “res” iv. over the issues v. over the territory }. Elements of Jurisdiction '. Jurisdiction of Regular Courts 1. Supreme Court 2. Courts of Appeals 3. Regional Trial Court A. Intellectual Property Courts |. Family Courts Metropolitan Trial Courts ‘Municipal Trial Courts in cities Municipal Trial Courts and Municipal Circuit Courts 6. Sandiganbayan 7. Court of Tax-Appeals 8. Quasi-Courts “9. Sharia’h Courts: appellate, district, ci ow wa uit References: Judiciary Reorganization Act of 1980 BP. Big. 129 RA 7691 RA 8369 (Family Courts Act) SC-AO No. 113-95- Intellectual Property Courts RA 9282 (CTA) RA 7975; 8249; 10660 (Sandiganbayan) RA 9054 (Sharia’h courts) PNAVAYNECases: 1. Duero vs CA —373 SCRA 11 2. Donato vs, Court of Appeals — 417 SCRA 216 3. Gonzaga vs CA - 394 SCRA 472 4. Escobal vs Garchitorena— 422 SCRA 45 5. Agan, Jr. vs Phil Intemational Air Terminal, Co. ioe 420 8 SCRA 575 6. Liga Ng Mga Barangay National vs Atienza, Jr. 420 7. Manila ‘Daten Like eae Corp. vs. Ng Kok Wei — 418 SCRA 454 8. Office of the Court Administrator vs. Sardillo — 401 SCRA 583 14, Katon vs. Palanca — 437 SCRA 565 15. Figueroa vs. People, 558 SCRA 63 16. Hannah Serana vs. Sandiganbayan, 653 SCRA (7/6/11) 17. Pat-og Sr. vs. Civil Service Commission, 765 SCRA (June, 2013) 18. Boston Equity Resources, Inc. vs. CA, 699 SCRA 19. People vs. Henry T. Go, March 25, 2014 20. City of Manila vs. Judge Cuerdo, February 4, 2014 2015 Supreme Court Decisions: 21. St. Mary Crusade Foundation, Inc. vs. Riel, 745 SCRA 73 22. Duncano vs. Sandiganbayan, 762 SCRA 663 23. CE Casecnan Water and Energy Co. Inc. Vs. PROV. OF Nueva Ecija, 759 SCRA 180 24. Ferrer, Jr. vs. Bautista, 760 SCRA 652 25. Lomondot vs. Balindong, 762 SCRA 494 26. PCGG vs. Dumayas, 765 SCRA 524 27. Regulus Dev. Inc. vs, De la Cruz, 781 SCRA 607 (1/25/2016) Il. RULES | to 5 A. Actions: Commencement (Sections 3 and 5,R-1) 1, Alday vs. FGU Insurance, 350 SCRA 2. Korea Technologies vs. Lerma, 542 SCRA 3. Mercado vs. CA, 569 SCRA 4. Proton Pilipinas vs. Banque Nationale de Paris, 460 SCRA 5. Ruby Shelter Builders vs. Formaran, 578 SCRA 283 6. St. Louis University vs. Cobarrubias, 626 SCRA 649 7. Gipa vs. Southern Luzon Institute, 726 SCRA, 6/18/2014 8. Reyes vs. People, 763 SCRA 226 (2015) B. One suit for one action (Sec. 3, R-2) Splitting a single cause of action (Sec. 4, R-2) Joinder of Causes of action (S-5. R-2) 1. Dynamic Builders vs. Prisbitero, 755 SCRA 90 (2015) C. Parties to Civil Actions (S-1, R-3) Joinder of Parties (S-6, 7, R-3) Indispensable and Necessary Parties (S-7,8, R-3) Class Suit (S-12, R-3) Death or Separation of a Party (S-16,17,18, R-3)IH. Transfer of Interest (S-19, R-3) Contractual Money Claims (S. 20, R-3) Cases on Parties: 1. Relucio vs. Lopez - 373 SCRA 578 2. De Castro vs CA 386 SCRA 301 3. Orquiola vs CA - 389 SCRA 461 4. China Banking Corp., vs Oliver — 390 SCRA 263 5. Lotte Phils. Co. Inc. vs. De la Cruz — 464 SCRA 591 6. Carabeo vs. Dingco, 647 SCRA 200 7. De la Cruz vs, Joaquin — 464 SCRA 576 8. Navarro vs. Escobido, 606 SCRA 1 9. Land Bank vs. Cacayuran, 757 SCRA 160 (2015) 10. Divinagracia vs. Parilla, 753 SCRA 87 (2015) D. Venue of Actions: real actions, personal actions Distinction between Jurisdiction and Venue 1. Pacific Consultants International Asia vs. Schonfeld, 516 SCRA 2. Biaco vs. Countryside Rural Bank ~ 515 SCRA 106 3. BPI Savings Bank vs. Sps. Yujuico, 763 SCRA 486 E. Summary Procedure vs, Small Claims suit; their basic characteristics RULES 6-9 A. Kinds of Pleadings (R-6) Complaint and Answer (S-3,4, R-6) Defenses: Negative and Affirmative (S-5, R-6) Counterclaims: Compulsory and Permissive (S-6, R-6) Reply (S-10, R-6) aya oyn + Alba vs. Malapajo, 779 SCRA 534 (1/13/2016) . Lim Teck Chuan vs. Uy, 752 SCRA 268 Metrobank vs. CPR Promotions, 760 SCRA 59 Valdez vs. Dabon, 775 SCRA 1 Republic vs. Sandiganbayan, 406 SCRA 190 . Caneland Sugar Corp. vs. Alon, 533 SCRA 28 B. Parts ofa Pleading (R-7) Verification and Certification (S-4,5, R-7) 1. Alma Jose vs. Javellana, 664 SCRA 1 2. Medado vs. Heirs of Antonio Consuing, 665 SCRA 534 3. COA vs. Paler, 614 SCRA 4, Basan vs, Coca-Cola Bottlers Phils., 749 SCRA 541 5. Uy vs. CA, 770 SCRA 513 6. Bandillon vs. LFUC, 770 SCRA 624 7. People vs. Arojado, 774 SCRA 193DT a - ©. Allegations in Pleadings (R-8 Actionable documenta (S067, Ref) Specific denial ($-10, R-8) 1. Fernando Medical Enterprises Inc. vs. Wesleyan University, 778 SCRA 508, 1/20/2016 2. Go Tong Electrical Supply vs. BPI Family Savings Bank, 760 SCRA 486 3. Benquet Exploration Inc. vs CA- 351 SCRA 4.. Asian Const. & Dev. Corp. vs. CA — 458 SCRA D. Effect of Failure to Plead (R-9) Waiver of defenses and objections (S-1, R-9) Default (S-3, R-9) 1. Salvador vs, Rabaja, 749 SCRA 654 2. BDO vs. Tansipek, 593 SCRA 456 3. Bitte vs. Jonas, 777 SCRA 489 IV. RULES 10-13 A. Amended and Supplemental Pleadings (R-10) Kinds of Amendments (S-2,3,4,5, R-10) Supplemental Pleadings (S-6, R-10) B. Time/Period for Filing Responsive Pleadings (R-11) Answer (S-1,2,3,4,5, R-11) Reply (8-6, R-11) C. Bill of Particulars (R-12) D. Filing and Service of P and other papers (R-13) Distinction between Filing and Service (S-2, R-13) Filing: Manner, completeness, Proof (S-3,12, R-13) Service: Mode, Completeness, Proof (S-5,6,7,8,10,13, R-13) Priorites in Modes of Service (S-11, R-13) 1. Yujuico vs. United Resources Asset Mgt. Corp., 760 SCRA 2. Lisam Enterprises vs. Banco de Oro ~ 670 SCRA 310 3.. Tiu vs, Phil Bank of Communications, 596 SCRA 432 4, Remington Industrial Sales Corp. vs CA, 382 SCRA 499 -5, Palileo vs. Planters Dev. Bank, 738 SCRA 6. Heirs of Numeriano Miranda vs. Miranda, 700 SCRA "Vy, RULE 14 (Summons ) A. What is Summons (S-2,5) B. Who issues (S-1) C. Who serves (S-3,4) D. Kinds of Summons $n OTi coe in person (S-6) Substituted (S-7 ) ce E. ¢. Extraterritorial (S-15): personal, publication ~ On whom served a. On Corporations 1, public (S-13) 2. private (a) domestic (S-11) (b) foreign (S-12) b. On natural persons 1, prisoners (S-9) 2 prinors and incompetent (S-10) 3. unknown identity and eee 4, temporarily abroad (S~ : ©. Onentities ar rout judicial personality (S-8, R14) n, any mode yuts (S-14) F. Proofs of Service (S-18,19) _Valmonte vs CA- 252 SCRA ” Millenium Ind. & Com, Corp.. vs Tan 326 SCRA EL, Villarosa vs. Benito ~ 312 SCRA Mason vs. CA, 413 SCRA Jose vs. Boyon, Manotoc vs. CA — 499 SCRA 21 Dole Phil. Vs. Quilala— 557 SCRA 433 Santos vs. PNOC, 566 SCRA 272 pottune Life Insurance Co. vs. COA, 748 SCRA 286 9. Ong vs. Co, 752 SCRA42 (2/25/15) 16. Nation Petroleum Gas, Inc. Vs. RCBC, 766 SCRA 653 11, Green Star Express vs. Nissin Universal Robina Corp., 761 SCRA 528 12. Guy vs. Gacott, 779 SCRA 579 (Jan. 13, 2016) PRONAWE YEE G. Voluntary Appearance (S-20) 1, Sunrise Garden Corp. vs. CA—771 SCRA 616 VI. RULES 15-19 A. Motions (R-15) Definition (S-1,2,3) Requirements (S-4,5,6) ‘Omnibus Motion (S-8) B. Motion to Dismiss (R-16) Grounds (S-1) Distinctions: 1. Jurisdiction over the person from over the subj 2. Notice of Lis Pendens (S-14, R-13) from. a peace 3. Lack of cause of action from failure to state a cause of action4.Ba ie j ! : i A by prior judgment from conclusiveness of judgment Prescription from laches Bitect of Dismissal ($-5) ismissal of Actions (R-17) Dismissal Upon Notice (S-1) | Dismtecal Upon Motion (S-2) ‘ailure to Prosecute (S-3) D. Pre-Trial (R-18) August 16, 2004 : ive August 16, Wt NOx 03:09, Supretoe Cont Sec ae ae ren tinaka ot (Guidelines to be observed by trial courts judges and c* court in the conduct of pre-trial and use of deposition-discovery measures) + Failure to appear at the pre-trial (S-5) - Pre-Trial Brief (S-6) E. Intervention (R-19) Who may intervene (S-1) When to intervene (S-2) Cases: Acampado vs. Cosmilla, 771 SCRA 535 Laude vs. Gines-Jabalde, 775 SCRA 408 De Guzman Jr. vs. Ochoa, 648 SCRA 677 Office of the Ombudsman vs. Sison, 612 SCRA Anonuevo vs. Intestate Estate of Jalandoni, 636 SCRA. Fernandez vs. CA, 691 SCRA 167 Rodriguez vs. CA, 698 SCRA 352 . People vs. Perez, 397 SCRA . Ching vs. Cheng, 737 SCRA 10.Yao vs. Perello, 414 SCRA 11.Pinlac vs. CA, 410 SCRA 12.Chipongian vs. Benitez-Lirio, 768 SCRA 204 13.Navy Officers Village Association vs. Republic, 764 SCRA SEN AAARwYe VII. RULES 23 to 32 A. Modes of Discovery (R-23 to 29) 1:Depositions Pending Action (R-23) a. Use of depositions (S-4) b. Officers to take depositions (S-10, 11,12) ¢, Deposition upon written examination (S-15) d. Deposition upon written interrogatories (S-25) e. Effects of errors and irregularities (S-29) Depositions before Actions or Pending Appeal (R-24) . Interrogatories to Parties (R-25) a. Effect of failure to serve written interrogatories (S-6) . Admission by Adverse Party (R-26) a. Effect to failure to file and serve request for admission (S-25) Pas »- Physical ~ Refusal to Comply Mental Examination (R-28) " with Modes of Discovery (R.29) B. Trial (R-30) . \ Notice (§-1) djourments and Postponement (S-2,3,4) Gc Order of Trial ($-5) ae es * Consolidation or Severance (R-31) Consolidation (S-1) Severance (S-2) D. Trial By Commissioner (R-23) Distingui: rial wit Casear 'inguish from trial with Assessors 1. Dasmarinas Garment, Inc. vs. Reyes, 225 SCRA 622 (1993) 2. Go vs. People, 677 SCRA 213 3. Vda. De Manguerra vs. Risos, 563 SCRA 499 4. Allied Agri-Business Development Co. Inc. vs. CA, 299 SCRA 680 5. People vs. Webb, 312 SCRA 573 6. Afulugencia vs, Metro Bank, 715 SCRA 399, February 5, 2014 7. Disini vs. Sandiganbayan, 623 SCRA 8. People vs. Bustamante, 697 SCRA 411 | 9. Metrobank vs. Sandoval, 691 SCRA 92 : 10. Republic vs. Heirs of Enrique Oribello, 692 SCRA 645 11. Marano vs. Pryce Gases Inc., 755 SCRA 20 ; 12. Phil. Health Ins. Corp. vs.Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, 774 SCRA | VII. RULES 33-36 A. Demurrer to Evidence (R-33) = Distinguish between civil and criminal actions | 1. Republic vs. Gimenez, 778 SCRA 261, Jan. 11, 2016 | 2, Bemardo vs. CA, 278 SCRA 782 3. Radiowealth Finance Co. vs. Del Rosario, 335 SCRA 288 4. Cabador vs. People, 602 SCRA 760 5. Claudio vs. Saraza, 768 SCRA 356 \ . 6. Felipe vs. MGM Motor Trading Corporation, 771 SCRA 360 B. Judgment on the Pleadings (R-34) C. Summary Judgment (R-35) 1. Republic vs. Shell Petroleum Corp., 777 SCRA 393 2. Comglas Corp. vs. Santos Car Check Center, 754 SCRA 481 3.. Phil Bank of Communications vs, Go, 642 SCRA 4, Adolfo vs. Adolfo, 753 SCRA 580 D. Entry of Judgments and Final Orders (R-36) - Several judgments (S-4) - Separate judgments (S-5) - Judgments against entities without personality (S-6)THE REMEDIES AGAINST FINAL JUDGMENTS IX. RULE 37 - New Trial or Reconsideration (R-37) - Grounds for New Trial (S-1) Grounds for Reconsideration (S-1) - Effects of a Grant or Denial (S-6,7,8) 1. Mendezona vs Ozamis — 376 SCRA 482 2. Chua vs. People, 762 SCRA 523 3. Padilla-Rumbaua vs. Rumbaua, 596 SCRA 15 4. Senit vs. People, 778 SCRA 425 (1/11/2016) 5. People vs. Li Ka Kim, 429 SCRA 169 X. RULES 40 to 45 A. Appeal from MTC to RTC (R-40) Perfection of Appeal (S-4) Docket Fees (S-5) Appeals from order of dismissal (S-8) B. Appeal from RTC to CA (R-41) Modes of Appeal (S-2) Notice of Appeal vs Record on Appeal (S-5,6) Perfection of Appeal (S-9) C. Petition for Review from RTC to CA (R-42) How appeal taken (S-1) Failure to comply with requirements (S-3) Perfection of Appeal (S-8) D. Appeals from CTA & QUA to CA (R-43) Contents of Petition (S-6) Action on Petition (S-8) Effect of Appeal (S-12) E. Ordinary Appealed Cases to the CA (R-44) “Appellants Brief (S-7) Appellees Brief (S-8) F, Appeal by Certiorari (R-45) Contents of Petition (S-4) Requirements (S-7) Cases: Heirs of Arturo Garcia vs. Mun. of Iba, 763 SCRA 349 Estinozo vs. CA ~ 544 SCRA 422 Heirs of Sps. Reterta vs. Sps. Mores, 655 SCRA 580 Manaloto vs. Veloso III, 632 SCRA Latorre vs. Latorre, 617 SCRA yaeper6. Alfredo vs. Borras, 404 SCRA 145 7. People vs. Corpuz, 412 SCRA 479 8. PAL vs. CA, 417 SCRA 196 9. Augusto vs. Rios, 417 SCRA 408 10.Escueta vs. Lim — 512 SCRA 411 11.Springfield Dev. Corp. vs, RTC Judge of Mis. Occ. - 514 SCRA 326 12. Yuk Lik Ong vs. Co, 752 SCRA 42. 13.De Vera vs. Santiago, 759 SCRA 431 14.PNCC vs. Asiavest, 767 SCRA SCRA 458 15.Maravilla vs. Rios, 767 SCRA 522 ‘THE REMEDIES AGAINST EXECUTORY JUDGMENTS XI. RULE 38 ~ Petition for Relief from Judgment (S-1) - Petition for Relief from Denial of Appeal (S-2) - Time for filing Petition (S-3) - Preliminary Injunction (S-5) 1. The Prov. Govt of Aurora vs. Marco, 757 SCRA 222 2. Thomasites Center for International Studies vs. Rodriguez, 782 SCRA 391 (Jan. 27, 2016) XIL RULE 47 - Annulment of Judgment - Coverage. Grounds, Period (S-1,2,3) - Contents (S-4) - Effect (S-7) Cases: 1. Diona vs. Balanque, 688 SCRA 22 2. Santos vs. Santos, 737 SCRA 637 3. Lasala vs. National Food Authority, 767 SCRA 430 4. Manguba vs. Morga-Seva, 775 SCRA 312 5. Sibal vs. Buquel, 778 SCRAS17 (1/11/16) Xu. RULE 39 — EXECUTION AND SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENTS A. Kinds of Execution 1. Matter of right, ministerial (S-1) 2. Discretionary (S-2) ; ‘a. stay of discretionary execution (S-3) b. Judgments not stayed by appeal (S-4) B. Mode of Execution 1. By motion (S-6) 2. By independent action (S-6)C. Manner of Execution 2 when ay dead (5-7 3 ‘en judgment is for money (S-6) . when judgment is for specific. act 4 when gett i for specific act (S-10) D. Properties special judgment (S-11) 7 exempt from execution (S-13, E. Third P; i EXEAE) FL Ennd Party Claim ($-16) - Execution Sale (S- 4G, Redecaptie: (S-17 to 26) 1. The right of redemption vs equity of redemption 2. Who may redeem (S-27) 3. Effects of redemption (S-29) H. Other remedies to fully satisfy judgment 1, Examination of judgment obligor (S-36) 2. Examination of obligor of judgment-obligor (S-37) 3. Appointment of receiver (S-41) 4, Sale of ascertainable interest (S-42) 1. Judgment: principal vs surety (S-46) J. Effect of Judgment (S-47) 1. inrem 2. in personam 3. over judicata K. Effect of foreign judgment (S-48) Cases: Bajies vs Bafies — 374 SCRA 340 Fajardo vs. Quitalig, 400 SCRA 25 Santos vs. Commission on Elections, 399 SCRA 611 RCBC vs. Magwin Marketing Corp, 402 SCRA 592 City of Iligan vs. Principal Mngmt Gr., 407 SCRA 554 Villaruel vs. Fernando, 412 SCRA 54 Morta vs. Bagagnan, 415 SCRA 624 Serrano vs. CA, 417 SCRA 415 D*Armoured Sec. Agency vs. Orpia— 461 SCRA 312 10.Perez vs. CA — 464 SCRA 87 1LFEBTC vs. Tob Sr. — 404 SCRA 590 12.Panotes vs. Townhouse Dev. Corp. — 512 SCRA 269 13.Stronghold Insurance vs. Felix — 508 SCRA 357 14. Fujiki vs. Marinay, 700 SCRA 69 15. RCBC vs. Serra, 701 SCRA 124 16. Heirs of Magdaleno Ypon vs. Ricaforte, 700 SCRA 778 17. City of Cebu vs. Dedamo, 689 SCRA 547 PN AVaYPS ° XIV. RULES 48-56 Dismissal of Appeal (R-50) Grounds (S-1); “Material data” rule